scholarly journals Patient Safety in Medical Imaging: a joint paper of the European Society of Radiology (ESR) and the European Federation of Radiographer Societies (EFRS)

2019 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter Hiles ◽  
Patrick Gilligan ◽  
John Damilakis ◽  
Eric Briers ◽  
Cristian Candela-Juan ◽  
...  

AbstractPatient contact shielding has been in use for many years in radiology departments in order to reduce the effects and risks of ionising radiation on certain organs. New technologies in projection imaging and CT scanning such as digital receptors and automatic exposure control systems have reduced doses and improved image consistency. These changes and a greater understanding of both the benefits and the risks from the use of shielding have led to a review of shielding use in radiology. A number of professional bodies have already issued guidance in this regard. This paper represents the current consensus view of the main bodies involved in radiation safety and imaging in Europe: European Federation of Organisations for Medical Physics, European Federation of Radiographer Societies, European Society of Radiology, European Society of Paediatric Radiology, EuroSafe Imaging, European Radiation Dosimetry Group (EURADOS), and European Academy of DentoMaxilloFacial Radiology (EADMFR). It is based on the expert recommendations of the Gonad and Patient Shielding (GAPS) Group formed with the purpose of developing consensus in this area. The recommendations are intended to be clear and easy to use. They are intended as guidance, and they are developed using a multidisciplinary team approach. It is recognised that regulations, custom and practice vary widely on the use of patient shielding in Europe and it is hoped that these recommendations will inform a change management program that will benefit patients and staff.


2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Chris Kalinka ◽  
Jeanette Dickson ◽  
Richard Evans ◽  
Edward Morris ◽  
Pamela Parker ◽  
...  

AbstractThis letter to the editor is in response to the consensus statement from the Ultrasound Subcommittee of the European Society of Radiology, the European Union of Medical Specialists (UEMS) Section of Radiology, and the European Federation of Societies for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology. It highlights the role of the non-medical sonographer in the UK and the evidence underpinning this safe and effective practice.


2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  

Abstract This document summarises best practice recommendations for medical imaging use of ultrasound in Europe, representing the agreed consensus of experts from the Ultrasound Subcommittee of the European Society of Radiology (ESR), the European Union of Medical Specialists (UEMS) Section of Radiology, and the European Federation of Societies for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology. Recommendations are given for education and training, equipment and its maintenance, documentation, hygiene and infection prevention, and medico-legal issues.


2019 ◽  
pp. 216847901987214
Author(s):  
Sashka Hristoskova ◽  
James Milligan ◽  
Jan De Wit ◽  
Jukka Pesonen ◽  
Robyn Rennick

The approach used by medical information services in answering unsolicited safety-related questions from health care professionals regarding prescription medicines varies widely across the pharmaceutical industry. A significant amount of information is available in the public domain, but this can be difficult to filter and determine what is most appropriate for a given situation. A team representing the medical information group MILE (Medical Information Leaders Europe) and European Federation of Pharmaceutical Industries and Associations Pharmacovigilance Expert Group have partnered to develop principles and considerations on how to answer unsolicited safety questions. Essentially two key principles are important in ensuring success: (1) Effective collaboration between medical information and patient safety teams is important for an optimal outcome providing accurate, useful, and timely information. This article discusses considerations for an effective, efficient collaboration between medical information and patient safety and suggests a way of working. (2) Collaborating teams will need to evaluate and select the most appropriate sources of information to answer the question. Sources of information that may or may not be in the public domain are discussed. Adoption of principles and considerations discussed in this article may be expected to improve current safety information–sharing practices that tend to be conservative and risk averse. In addition, this presents the opportunity to initiate discussions with regulatory authorities to realize the benefits that will come through greater transparency and communication to support safe and effective use of medicines.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document