scholarly journals GADD34-mediated dephosphorylation of eIF2α facilitates pseudorabies virus replication by maintaining de novo protein synthesis

2021 ◽  
Vol 52 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ting Zhu ◽  
Xueli Jiang ◽  
Hangkuo Xin ◽  
Xiaohui Zheng ◽  
Xiaonuan Xue ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Protein Synthesis ◽  
Protein Kinase ◽  
Pseudorabies Virus ◽  
De Novo ◽  
Initiation Factor ◽  
Protein Kinase R ◽  
Eif2α Phosphorylation ◽  
Phosphorylation Level ◽  
Global Protein Synthesis ◽  
De Novo Protein Synthesis

AbstractViruses have evolved multiple strategies to manipulate their host’s translational machinery for the synthesis of viral proteins. A common viral target is the alpha subunit of eukaryotic initiation factor 2 (eIF2α). In this study, we show that global protein synthesis was increased but the eIF2α phosphorylation level was markedly decreased in porcine kidney 15 (PK15) cells infected with pseudorabies virus (PRV), a swine herpesvirus. An increase in the eIF2α phosphorylation level by salubrinal treatment or transfection of constructs expressing wild-type eIF2α or an eIF2α phosphomimetic [eIF2α(S51D)] attenuated global protein synthesis and suppressed PRV replication. To explore the mechanism involved in the inhibition of eIF2α phosphorylation during PRV infection, we examined the phosphorylation status of protein kinase R-like endoplasmic reticulum kinase (PERK) and double-stranded RNA-dependent protein kinase R (PKR), two kinases that regulate eIF2α phosphorylation during infection with numerous viruses. We found that the level of neither phosphorylated (p)-PERK nor p-PKR was altered in PRV-infected cells or the lungs of infected mice. However, the expression of growth arrest and DNA damage-inducible protein 34 (GADD34), which promotes eIF2α dephosphorylation by recruiting protein phosphatase 1 (PP1), was significantly induced both in vivo and in vitro. Knockdown of GADD34 and inhibition of PP1 activity by okadaic acid treatment led to increased eIF2α phosphorylation but significantly suppressed global protein synthesis and inhibited PRV replication. Collectively, these results demonstrated that PRV induces GADD34 expression to promote eIF2α dephosphorylation, thereby maintaining de novo protein synthesis and facilitating viral replication.

scholarly journals Inhibition of Protein Kinase R Activation and Upregulation of GADD34 Expression Play a Synergistic Role in Facilitating Coronavirus Replication by Maintaining De Novo Protein Synthesis in Virus-Infected Cells

2009 ◽  
Vol 83 (23) ◽  
pp. 12462-12472 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiaoxing Wang ◽  
Ying Liao ◽  
Pei Ling Yap ◽  
Kim J. Png ◽  
James P. Tam ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Protein Synthesis ◽  
Protein Kinase ◽  
Viral Replication ◽  
De Novo ◽  
Initiation Factor ◽  
Animal Cells ◽  
Protein Kinase R ◽  
Α Subunit ◽  
Infected Cells ◽  
De Novo Protein Synthesis

ABSTRACT A diversity of strategies is evolved by RNA viruses to manipulate the host translation machinery in order to create an optimal environment for viral replication and progeny production. One of the common viral targets is the α subunit of eukaryotic initiation factor 2 (eIF-2α). In this report, we show that phosphorylation of eIF-2α was severely suppressed in human and animal cells infected with the coronavirus infectious bronchitis virus (IBV). To understand whether this suppression is through inhibition of protein kinase R (PKR), the double-stranded-RNA-dependent kinase that is one of the main kinases responsible for phosphorylation of eIF-2α, cells infected with IBV were analyzed by Western blotting. The results showed that the level of phosphorylated PKR was greatly reduced in IBV-infected cells. Overexpression of IBV structural and nonstructural proteins (nsp) demonstrated that nsp2 is a weak PKR antagonist. Furthermore, GADD34, a component of the protein phosphatase 1 (PP1) complex, which dephosphorylates eIF-2α, was significantly induced in IBV-infected cells. Inhibition of the PP1 activity by okadaic acid and overexpression of GADD34, eIF-2α, and PKR, as well as their mutant constructs in virus-infected cells, showed that these viral regulatory strategies played a synergistic role in facilitating coronavirus replication. Taken together, these results confirm that IBV has developed a combination of two mechanisms, i.e., blocking PKR activation and inducing GADD34 expression, to maintain de novo protein synthesis in IBV-infected cells and, meanwhile, to enhance viral replication.

scholarly journals Human Cytomegalovirus pTRS1 and pIRS1 Antagonize Protein Kinase R To Facilitate Virus Replication

2016 ◽  
Vol 90 (8) ◽  
pp. 3839-3848 ◽  
Author(s):  
Benjamin Ziehr ◽  
Heather A. Vincent ◽  
Nathaniel J. Moorman
Keyword(s):  
Protein Synthesis ◽  
Protein Kinase ◽  
Viral Protein ◽  
Hcmv Infection ◽  
Initiation Factor ◽  
Host Defenses ◽  
Protein Kinase R ◽  
Viral Protein Synthesis ◽  
Eif2α Phosphorylation ◽  
Hcmv Replication

ABSTRACTHuman cytomegalovirus (HCMV) counteracts host defenses that otherwise act to limit viral protein synthesis. One such defense is the antiviral kinase protein kinase R (PKR), which inactivates the eukaryotic initiation factor 2 (eIF2) translation initiation factor upon binding to viral double-stranded RNAs. Previously, the viral TRS1 and IRS1 proteins were found to antagonize the antiviral kinase PKR outside the context of HCMV infection, and the expression of either pTRS1 or pIRS1 was shown to be necessary for HCMV replication. In this study, we found that expression of either pTRS1 or pIRS1 is necessary to prevent PKR activation during HCMV infection and that antagonism of PKR is critical for efficient viral replication. Consistent with a previous study, we observed decreased overall levels of protein synthesis, reduced viral protein expression, and diminished virus replication in the absence of both pTRS1 and pIRS1. In addition, both PKR and eIF2α were phosphorylated during infection when pTRS1 and pIRS1 were absent. We also found that expression of pTRS1 was both necessary and sufficient to prevent stress granule formation in response to eIF2α phosphorylation. Depletion of PKR prevented eIF2α phosphorylation, rescued HCMV replication and protein synthesis, and reversed the accumulation of stress granules in infected cells. Infection with an HCMV mutant lacking the pTRS1 PKR binding domain resulted in PKR activation, suggesting that pTRS1 inhibits PKR through a direct interaction. Together our results show that antagonism of PKR by HCMV pTRS1 and pIRS1 is critical for viral protein expression and efficient HCMV replication.IMPORTANCETo successfully replicate, viruses must counteract host defenses that limit viral protein synthesis. We have identified inhibition of the antiviral kinase PKR by the viral proteins TRS1 and IRS1 and shown that this is a critical step in HCMV replication. Our results suggest that inhibiting pTRS1 and pIRS1 function or restoring PKR activity during infection may be a successful strategy to limit HCMV disease.

scholarly journals Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus Triggers Apoptosis via Protein Kinase R but Is Resistant to Its Antiviral Activity

2008 ◽  
Vol 83 (5) ◽  
pp. 2298-2309 ◽  
Author(s):  
Verena Krähling ◽  
David A. Stein ◽  
Martin Spiegel ◽  
Friedemann Weber ◽  
Elke Mühlberger
Keyword(s):  
Protein Kinase ◽  
Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome ◽  
Chromatin Condensation ◽  
Mrna Translation ◽  
Translation Initiation Factor ◽  
Initiation Factor ◽  
Protein Kinase R ◽  
Beta Interferon ◽  
Reverse Transcription Pcr ◽  
Eif2α Phosphorylation

ABSTRACT In this study, infection of 293/ACE2 cells with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV) activated several apoptosis-associated events, namely, cleavage of caspase-3, caspase-8, and poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase 1 (PARP), and chromatin condensation and the phosphorylation and hence inactivation of the eukaryotic translation initiation factor 2α (eIF2α). In addition, two of the three cellular eIF2α kinases known to be virus induced, protein kinase R (PKR) and PKR-like endoplasmic reticulum kinase (PERK), were activated by SARS-CoV. The third kinase, general control nonderepressible-2 kinase (GCN2), was not activated, but late in infection the level of GCN2 protein was significantly reduced. Reverse transcription-PCR analyses revealed that the reduction of GCN2 protein was not due to decreased transcription or stability of GCN2 mRNA. The specific reduction of PKR protein expression by antisense peptide-conjugated phosphorodiamidate morpholino oligomers strongly reduced cleavage of PARP in infected cells. Surprisingly, the knockdown of PKR neither enhanced SARS-CoV replication nor abrogated SARS-CoV-induced eIF2α phosphorylation. Pretreatment of cells with beta interferon prior to SARS-CoV infection led to a significant decrease in PERK activation, eIF2α phosphorylation, and SARS-CoV replication. The various effects of beta interferon treatment were found to function independently on the expression of PKR. Our results show that SARS-CoV infection activates PKR and PERK, leading to sustained eIF2α phosphorylation. However, virus replication was not impaired by these events, suggesting that SARS-CoV possesses a mechanism to overcome the inhibitory effects of phosphorylated eIF2α on viral mRNA translation. Furthermore, our data suggest that viral activation of PKR can lead to apoptosis via a pathway that is independent of eIF2α phosphorylation.

scholarly journals The role of host eIF2α in viral infection

2020 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuanzhi Liu ◽  
Mingshu Wang ◽  
Anchun Cheng ◽  
Qiao Yang ◽  
Ying Wu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Protein Synthesis ◽  
Protein Kinase ◽  
Viral Infection ◽  
Infection Process ◽  
Host Protein ◽  
Main Body ◽  
Protein Kinase R ◽  
Viral Protein Synthesis ◽  
Eif2α Phosphorylation

Abstract Background eIF2α is a regulatory node that controls protein synthesis initiation by its phosphorylation or dephosphorylation. General control nonderepressible-2 (GCN2), protein kinase R-like endoplasmic reticulum kinase (PERK), double-stranded RNA (dsRNA)-dependent protein kinase (PKR) and heme-regulated inhibitor (HRI) are four kinases that regulate eIF2α phosphorylation. Main body In the viral infection process, dsRNA or viral proteins produced by viral proliferation activate different eIF2α kinases, resulting in eIF2α phosphorylation, which hinders ternary tRNAMet-GTP-eIF2 complex formation and inhibits host or viral protein synthesis. The stalled messenger ribonucleoprotein (mRNP) complex aggregates under viral infection stress to form stress granules (SGs), which encapsulate viral RNA and transcription- and translation-related proteins, thereby limiting virus proliferation. However, many viruses have evolved a corresponding escape mechanism to synthesize their own proteins in the event of host protein synthesis shutdown and SG formation caused by eIF2α phosphorylation, and viruses can block the cell replication cycle through the PERK-eIF2α pathway, providing a favorable environment for their own replication. Subsequently, viruses can induce host cell autophagy or apoptosis through the eIF2α-ATF4-CHOP pathway. Conclusions This review summarizes the role of eIF2α in viral infection to provide a reference for studying the interactions between viruses and hosts.

scholarly journals De novo protein synthesis in distinct centrolateral amygdala interneurons is required for associative emotional memories

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Prerana Shrestha ◽  
Zhe Shan ◽  
Maggie Marmarcz ◽  
Karen San Agustin Ruiz ◽  
Adam Taye Zerihoun ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Protein Synthesis ◽  
Basolateral Amygdala ◽  
De Novo ◽  
Brain Area ◽  
Dynamic Environment ◽  
Initiation Factor ◽  
Eukaryotic Initiation Factor ◽  
Defensive Responses ◽  
De Novo Protein Synthesis

To survive in a dynamic environment, animals need to identify and appropriately respond to stimuli that signal danger1,2. At the same time, animal survival also depends on suppressing the threat response during a stimulus that predicts absence of threat, i.e. safety3-5. Understanding the biological substrates of differential threat memories in which animals learn to flexibly switch between expressing and suppressing defensive responses to a threat-predictive cue and a safety cue, respectively, is critical for developing treatments for memory disorders such as PTSD6. A key brain area for processing and storing threat memories is the centrolateral amygdala (CeL), which receives convergent sensory inputs from the parabrachial nucleus and the basolateral amygdala and connects directly to the output nucleus of amygdala, the centromedial nucleus, to mediate defensive responses7-9. Despite a plethora of studies on the importance of neuronal activity in specific CeL neuronal populations during memory acquisition and retrieval10-12, little is known about regulation of their protein synthesis machinery. Consolidation of long-term, but not short-term, threat memories requires de novo protein synthesis, which suggests that the translation machinery in CeL interneurons is tightly regulated in order to stabilize associative memories. Herein, we have applied intersectional chemogenetic strategies in CeL interneurons to block cell type-specific translation initiation programs that are sensitive to depletion of eukaryotic initiation factor 4E (eIF4E) and phosphorylation of eukaryotic initiation factor 2α (p-eIF2α), respectively. We show that in a differential threat conditioning paradigm, de novo translation in somatostatin-expressing (SOM) interneurons in the CeL is necessary for long-term storage of conditioned threat response whereas de novo translation in protein kinase Cδ-expressing (PKCδ) interneurons in the CeL is essential for storing conditioned response inhibition to a safety cue. Further, we show that oxytocinergic neuromodulation of PKCδ interneurons during differential threat learning is important for long-lasting cued threat discrimination. Our results indicate that the molecular elements of a differential threat memory trace are compartmentalized in distinct CeL interneuron populations and provide new mechanistic insight into the role of de novo protein synthesis in consolidation of long-term memories.

scholarly journals Murine Cytomegalovirus m142 and m143 Are both Required To Block Protein Kinase R-Mediated Shutdown of Protein Synthesis

2006 ◽  
Vol 80 (20) ◽  
pp. 10181-10190 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ralitsa S. Valchanova ◽  
Marcus Picard-Maureau ◽  
Matthias Budt ◽  
Wolfram Brune
Keyword(s):  
Protein Synthesis ◽  
Protein Kinase ◽  
Rna Binding ◽  
Translation Initiation Factor ◽  
Initiation Factor ◽  
Murine Cytomegalovirus ◽  
Deletion Mutants ◽  
Sequence Motifs ◽  
Protein Kinase R ◽  
Double Stranded Rna

ABSTRACT Cytomegaloviruses carry the US22 family of genes, which have common sequence motifs but diverse functions. Only two of the 12 US22 family genes of murine cytomegalovirus (MCMV) are essential for virus replication, but their functions have remained unknown. In the present study, we deleted the essential US22 family genes, m142 and m143, from the MCMV genome and propagated the mutant viruses on complementing cells. The m142 and the m143 deletion mutants were both unable to replicate in noncomplementing cells at low and high multiplicities of infection. In cells infected with the deletion mutants, viral immediate-early and early proteins were expressed, but viral DNA replication and synthesis of the late-gene product glycoprotein B were inhibited, even though mRNAs of late genes were present. Global protein synthesis was impaired in these cells, which correlated with phosphorylation of the double-stranded RNA-dependent protein kinase R (PKR) and its target protein, the eukaryotic translation initiation factor 2α, suggesting that m142 and m143 are necessary to block the PKR-mediated shutdown of protein synthesis. Replication of the m142 and m143 knockout mutants was partially restored by expression of the human cytomegalovirus TRS1 gene, a known double-stranded-RNA-binding protein that inhibits PKR activation. These results indicate that m142 and m143 are both required for inhibition of the PKR-mediated host antiviral response.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document