scholarly journals Drug discontinuation before contrast procedures and the effect on acute kidney injury and other clinical outcomes: a systematic review protocol

2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Swapnil Hiremath ◽  
Jeanne Françoise Kayibanda ◽  
Benjamin J. W. Chow ◽  
Dean Fergusson ◽  
Greg A. Knoll ◽  
...  
2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Carol Wang ◽  
Swapnil Hiremath ◽  
Lindsey Sikora ◽  
Manish M. Sood ◽  
Jennifer Kong ◽  
...  

Nutrients ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (9) ◽  
pp. 2809
Author(s):  
Ban-Hock Khor ◽  
Hui-Ci Tiong ◽  
Shing Cheng Tan ◽  
Raha Abdul Rahman ◽  
Abdul Halim Abdul Gafor

Nutritional assessment is essential to identify patients with acute kidney injury (AKI) who are protein-energy wasting (PEW) and at risk of poor clinical outcomes. This systematic review aimed to investigate the relationship of nutritional assessments for PEW with clinical outcomes in patients with AKI. A systematic search was performed in PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane Library databases using search terms related to PEW, nutrition assessment, and AKI to identify prospective cohort studies that involved AKI adult patients with at least one nutritional assessment performed and reported relevant clinical outcomes, such as mortality, length of stay, and renal outcomes associated with the nutritional parameters. Seventeen studies reporting eight nutritional parameters for PEW assessment were identified and mortality was the main clinical outcome reported. A meta-analysis showed that PEW assessed using subjective global assessment (SGA) was associated with greater mortality risk (RR: 1.99, 95% CI: 1.36–2.91). Individual nutrition parameters, such as serum chemistry, body mass, muscle mass, and dietary intakes, were not consistently associated with mortality. In conclusion, SGA is a valid tool for PEW assessment in patients with AKI, while other nutrition parameters in isolation had limited validity for PEW assessment.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Irina Oltean ◽  
Nicole Travis ◽  
Lamia Hayawi ◽  
Anne Tsampalieros ◽  
Ahmed Nasr

In patients who don’t respond to medical treatment, surgical procedures including colectomy and ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA), also known as J-pouch, are often indicated; however, pouchitis can develop in 80% of patients after the surgery and it may significantly impair quality of life. Recent studies have shown that IPAA without temporary ileal diversion has a relatively low complication rate, a low rate of small bowel obstruction, and provides excellent fecal control. A precise method for evaluating the clinical benefits associated with each procedure is lacking. The aim of this systematic review protocol is to outline how we will compare the clinical advantages or disadvantages of colectomy and J-pouch without ileostomy as opposed to with ileostomy. Our systematic review will identify retrospective and prospective cohort studies, case-control studies, and randomized-control trials where clinical outcomes such as postoperative complications and recurrence of colectomy and J-pouch with and without ileostomy are described. Secondary research (e.g., editorials, letters to the editor), case studies, and articles not written in English or French will be excluded. The following databases were searched on November 11th 2019: CINAHL (1982 onwards), CENTRAL, EMBASE (1980 onwards), and MEDLINE (1996 onwards). The following information will be obtained: citation details (title of the article and the year of publication); study details including study design; location of the study and its sample size; disease status, comorbidities, average or median follow-up, surgical details including the procedure implemented, and clinical outcomes such as frequency of small bowel obstruction, pouchitis, and recurrence. Observational studies will be assessed using the MINORS 2015 checklist. Statistical heterogeneity of the included studies will be assessed using the I-squared test with 95% confidence intervals, and publication bias will be determined using a funnel plot and Egger’s test when possible (>10 included studies). If a meta-analysis will be undertaken, the strength of the body of evidence will be assessed using GRADE. Examining the postoperative complications and clinical outcomes in children who undergo a J-pouch with ileostomy versus without ileostomy will aid clinical practitioners, particularly surgeons, in addressing the optimal surgery type for managing children with inflammatory diseases to minimize their post-operative discomfort and recurrence.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhenjian Xu ◽  
Ying Tang ◽  
Qiuyan Huang ◽  
Sha Fu ◽  
Xiaomei Li ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Acute kidney injury (AKI) occurs among patients with COVID-19, it is also proved to be associated with in-hospital mortality. Remdesivir, an RNA polymerase inhibitor, has shown its antiviral activity in vitro and animal models. The adverse effect of Remdesivir especially AKI is the most common cause which lead to drug discontinuation. Whether Remdesivir increases the risk of AKI in patients with COVID-19 is not clear. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the incidence rate of AKI in hospitalized COVID-19 patients and whether Remdesivir increases the risk of AKI. Methods: A thorough search was carried out to find relevant studies in PubMed, medRxiv, and Web of Science from 1 Jan 2020 till 1 June 2020. 15135 COVID-19 patients and 981 COVID-19 patients using Remdesivir were included in our meta-analysis. Results: The pooled estimated incidence of AKI in all hospitalized COVID-19 patients was 12.0% (95% CI:9.0%-15.0%). According to our subgroup study, the incidence of AKI was associated with the age, disease severity and race of patients. The incidence of AKI in hospitalized COVID-19 patients using Remdesivir was 6% (95% CI: 3%-13%) with a total of 5 studies. Comparing with COVID-19 patients without Remdesivir treatment, Remdesivir treatment do not increase the risk of AKI in COVID-19 patients showing OR 0.80(95%CI: 0.44-1.46, P>0.05). Conclusions: We found out that AKI was not rare in hospitalized COVID-19 patients. The incidence of AKI was associated with age, disease severity and race. Remdesivir treatment did not increase the risk of AKI in hospitalized COVID-19 patients. Our meta-analysis may provide an evidence for future study that AKI is associated with the natural cause of COVID-19, not the adverse event after the usage of Remdesivir.


2020 ◽  
Vol 35 (Supplement_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Blanca Tarragon ◽  
Nan Ye ◽  
Martin Gallagher ◽  
Shaundeep Sen ◽  
Jose' M Portoles ◽  
...  

Abstract Background and Aims The incidence of multiple myeloma (MM) is increasing. Abnormal secretion of serum free light chains (sFLC) can lead to cast nephropathy and severe acute kidney injury (AKI) requiring haemodialysis (HD), which is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. High cut-off (HCO) HD membranes demonstrate better sFLC clearance. However, their role in all-cause mortality and renal recovery remains uncertain. Method A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed examining all randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies assessing the effect of high cut-off HD compared to conventional HD on clinical outcomes of patients with MM complicated by cast nephropathy induced-severe AKI. Medline, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched until September 2019. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality at the end of the study. The secondary outcomes included all-cause mortality at 12 months, haemodialysis independence at 3, 6 and 12 months, biopsy-proven haematologic responses at 90 days and sFLC (kappa and lambda) reduction. Random effect models were used to pool relative risks (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for individual studies. Results The search identified 5 studies including 276 patients with a mean follow-up of 18.7 months. There were 2 RCTs and 3 retrospective cohort studies. Compared with patients treated with conventional HD, patients on HCO dialysis did not show survival benefits at 12 months (4 studies, 186 patients, RR 0.79; 95% CI 0.46-1.36), or at the end of the study (5 studies, 276 patients, RR 0.86; 95% CI 0.60-1.25). Although survival benefits at the end of study (3 studies, 88 patients, RR 0.64; 95% CI 0.45-0.90) were seen in observational studies, no differences in all-cause mortality was seen in RCTs (2 studies, 188 patients, RR 1.31; 95% CI 0.50-3.46). Likewise, although the pooled data from the observational studies demonstrated significantly higher rates of HD independence at 90 days (2 trials, 78 patients, RR 2.23; 95% CI 1.09-4.55), this difference disappeared when the data from RCTs were included to the analysis (4 studies, 266 patients, RR 1.28; 95% CI 0.95-1.73).  There was no difference in HD Independence at 6 months (2 studies, 188 patients, RR 1.19; 95% CI 0.68-2.06), and 12 months (2 studies, 188 patients, RR 1.14; 95% CI 0.58-2.26) between these two therapies. Patients receiving HCO dialysis, however, had significantly better biopsy-proven haematologic response at 90 days by 40% (3 studies, 176 patients, RR 1,40; 95% CI 1.13-1.74) and a significantly higher kappa light chain reduction (2 studies, 188 patients, standardized mean difference (SMD) 2.37; 95% CI 1.99-2.75; I2 = 0%). Overall, the majority of the studies were of suboptimal quality and underpowered. Conclusion Current evidence from RCTs and observational studies suggest HCO dialysis provides haematological benefits but makes no significant improvement in all-cause mortality and renal outcomes, compared to conventional HD for patients with multiple myeloma associated cast nephropathy. However, there is a trend towards better renal outcomes, therefore further large-scale RCTs are needed to assess the effect of HCO dialysis on clinical outcomes in patients with multiple myeloma complicated by cast-nephropathy.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sean Carruthers ◽  
Gemma Brunetti ◽  
Susan Rossell

Schizophrenia spectrum disorders are chronic and debilitating mental illnesses characterised by both cognitive impairments and sleep deficits. In this systematic review protocol, we outline an approach to examine the available literature investigating the relationship between sleep and cognition in individuals with schizophrenia spectrum disorder.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document