scholarly journals Forecasting potential yields under uncertainty using fuzzy cognitive maps

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohammed A. Al-Gunaid ◽  
Irina I. Salygina ◽  
Maxim V. Shcherbakov ◽  
Vladislav N. Trubitsin ◽  
Peter P. Groumpos

Abstract Background The aim of the study is identification of factors influencing the reduction of the potential maximum yield of winter wheat in weather conditions of dry farming in European part of Russia, Volgograd region. The novelty of the work is forecasting potential yields under uncertainty that allows to assess the risks and potential threats that can influence and maximize the potential yield. To solve this problem, the tool for formalization, analysis and modeling of semi-structured systems and processes Fuzzy Cognitive Maps (FCM) is used. Results Based on disparate and heterogeneous information about the multitude of external influences on crop formation during plant photosynthesis, a model for analyzing the level of influencing factors on the target factor is constructed and an effective control impact scenario is developed. This model is used to identify the factors, where each one of them iteratively passes from the initial value to the stable one according to the chosen formula, based on which, the influence of the factors on each other are determined. Conclusions The conclusions obtained as a result of the work confirm the concept of precision farming: the quantity and quality of innovation in agriculture depends on the ability to apply it effectively in the field. Developed method of predicting potential yield levels can be used not only to model future agricultural performance, but also to estimate harvested yields.

2020 ◽  
pp. 58-61
Author(s):  
O. V. Bukin ◽  
D. V. Bochkarev ◽  
A. N. Nikolsky ◽  
N. V. Smolin

Relevance and methods. The studies were carried out in 2017–2019. on podzolized chernozem in the forest-steppe zone of the European part of Russia on the territory of the Republic of Mordovia. Weather conditions during the years of research varied from humid to extremely arid. Intensive methods of tillage helped to reduce soil moisture before sowing peas.Results. Compared to direct sowing, humidity decreased by 11–39% in the upper soil layer, by 5–12% in the arable horizon. Productive moisture reserves were lower for plowing and discing than for direct sowing: 21–33% before sowing, and 27–34% in the budding phase. The maximum differences in the reserves of productive moisture between the methods of tillage were noted in 2018 during the phase of pea budding. In the cases with plowing and discing, the moisture content decreased in the horizon of 0–30 cm to critical values of 0–10 mm/ha. Significant differences in pea productivity between options with tillage were revealed only in 2019. The maximum yield was observed on plowing – 5.54 t/ha, the minimum on the option with direct sowing — 5.54 t/ha. Under drought conditions, maximum yields were observed in the variant with direct sowing of pea seeds.


Author(s):  
Márcio Mendonça ◽  
Guilherme Bender Sartori ◽  
Lucas Botoni de Souza ◽  
Giovanni Bruno Marquini Ribeiro

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document