scholarly journals Bone strain index in the prediction of vertebral fragility refracture

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Fabio Massimo Ulivieri ◽  
Luca Petruccio Piodi ◽  
Luca Rinaudo ◽  
Paolo Scanagatta ◽  
Bruno Mario Cesana
Keyword(s):  
2021 ◽  
Vol 7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fabio Massimo Ulivieri ◽  
Luca Rinaudo

For a proper assessment of osteoporotic fragility fracture prediction, all aspects regarding bone mineral density, bone texture, geometry and information about strength are necessary, particularly in endocrinological and rheumatological diseases, where bone quality impairment is relevant. Data regarding bone quantity (density) and, partially, bone quality (structure and geometry) are obtained by the gold standard method of dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). Data about bone strength are not yet readily available. To evaluate bone resistance to strain, a new DXA-derived index based on the Finite Element Analysis (FEA) of a greyscale of density distribution measured on spine and femoral scan, namely Bone Strain Index (BSI), has recently been developed. Bone Strain Index includes local information on density distribution, bone geometry and loadings and it differs from bone mineral density (BMD) and other variables of bone quality like trabecular bone score (TBS), which are all based on the quantification of bone mass and distribution averaged over the scanned region. This state of the art review illustrates the methodology of BSI calculation, the findings of its in reproducibility and the preliminary data about its capability to predict fragility fracture and to monitor the follow up of the pharmacological treatment for osteoporosis.


Bone Reports ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 14 ◽  
pp. 100788
Author(s):  
Gaia Tabacco ◽  
Anda Mihaela Naciu ◽  
Carmelo Messina ◽  
Luca Rinaudo ◽  
Roberto Cesareo ◽  
...  

PLoS ONE ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. e0245967
Author(s):  
Fabio Massimo Ulivieri ◽  
Luca Rinaudo ◽  
Luca Petruccio Piodi ◽  
Carmelo Messina ◽  
Luca Maria Sconfienza ◽  
...  

Background Osteoporosis is an asymptomatic disease of high prevalence and incidence, leading to bone fractures burdened by high mortality and disability, mainly when several subsequent fractures occur. A fragility fracture predictive model, Artificial Intelligence-based, to identify dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) variables able to characterise those patients who are prone to further fractures called Bone Strain Index, was evaluated in this study. Methods In a prospective, longitudinal, multicentric study 172 female outpatients with at least one vertebral fracture at the first observation were enrolled. They performed a spine X-ray to calculate spine deformity index (SDI) and a lumbar and femoral DXA scan to assess bone mineral density (BMD) and bone strain index (BSI) at baseline and after a follow-up period of 3 years in average. At the end of the follow-up, 93 women developed a further vertebral fracture. The further vertebral fracture was considered as one unit increase of SDI. We assessed the predictive capacity of supervised Artificial Neural Networks (ANNs) to distinguish women who developed a further fracture from those without it, and to detect those variables providing the maximal amount of relevant information to discriminate the two groups. ANNs choose appropriate input data automatically (TWIST-system, Training With Input Selection and Testing). Moreover, we built a semantic connectivity map usingthe Auto Contractive Map to provide further insights about the convoluted connections between the osteoporotic variables under consideration and the two scenarios (further fracture vs no further fracture). Results TWIST system selected 5 out of 13 available variables: age, menopause age, BMI, FTot BMC, FTot BSI. With training testing procedure, ANNs reached predictive accuracy of 79.36%, with a sensitivity of 75% and a specificity of 83.72%. The semantic connectivity map highlighted the role of BSI in predicting the risk of a further fracture. Conclusions Artificial Intelligence is a useful method to analyse a complex system like that regarding osteoporosis, able to identify patients prone to a further fragility fracture. BSI appears to be a useful DXA index in identifying those patients who are at risk of further vertebral fractures.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Messina ◽  
A. Naciu ◽  
L. Rinaudo ◽  
J. P. Bilezikian ◽  
A. Palermo ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 125 (3) ◽  
pp. 313-318 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carmelo Messina ◽  
Luca Petruccio Piodi ◽  
Luca Rinaudo ◽  
Ciriaco Buonomenna ◽  
Luca Maria Sconfienza ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 32 (1) ◽  
pp. 85-91
Author(s):  
C. Messina ◽  
L. Rinaudo ◽  
B. M. Cesana ◽  
D. Maresca ◽  
L. P. Piodi ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Gaia Tabacco ◽  
Anda M Naciu ◽  
Carmelo Messina ◽  
Gianfranco Sanson ◽  
Luca Rinaudo ◽  
...  

Abstract Context Primary hyperparathyroidism (PHPT) is associated with impaired bone quality and increased fracture risk. Reliable tools for the evaluation of bone quality parameters are not yet clinically available. Bone Strain Index (BSI) is a new metric for bone strength based on Finite Element Analysis from lumbar spine and femoral neck dual X-ray absorptiometry images. Objective To assess the lumbar spine (LS), femoral neck (FN), and total hip (TH) BSI in PHPT compared to controls and to investigate the association of BSI with vertebral fractures (VFs) in PHPT. Design case-control study Setting Outpatient clinic Patients 50 PHPT and 100 age- and sex-matched control subjects. Main Outcome Measures LS-BSI, FN-BSI, TH-BSI. Results FN bone mineral density (BMD) and 1/3 distal radius BMD were lower in the PHPT group than in controls (FN 0.633 ± 0.112 vs 0.666 ± 0.081 p= 0.042; radius 0.566 ± 0.07 vs 0.625 ± 0.06 p<0.001). PHPT group has significant lower TBS score compared to controls (1.24 ± 0.09 vs 1.30 ± 0.10 p <0.001).BSI was significantly higher at LS (2.28±0.59 vs 2.02±0.43, p=0.009), FN (1.72±0.41 vs 1.49±0.35, p=0.001) and TH (1.51±0.33 vs 1.36±0.25, p=0.002) in PHPT. LS-BSI showed moderate accuracy for discriminating VFs (AUC 0.667; 95% CI 0.513-0.820). LS-BSI ≥ 2.2 and was a statistically significant independent predictor of VFs, with an adjusted OR ranging from 5.7 to 15.1. Conclusion BSI, a DXA-derived bone quality index, is impaired in PHPT and may help to identify PHPT subjects at high risk of fractures.


2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Fabio Massimo Ulivieri ◽  
Luca Rinaudo ◽  
Carmelo Messina ◽  
Luca Petruccio Piodi ◽  
Davide Capra ◽  
...  

Abstract Background We applied an artificial intelligence-based model to predict fragility fractures in postmenopausal women, using different dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) parameters. Methods One hundred seventy-four postmenopausal women without vertebral fractures (VFs) at baseline (mean age 66.3 ± 9.8) were retrospectively evaluated. Data has been collected from September 2010 to August 2018. All subjects performed a spine x-ray to assess VFs, together with lumbar and femoral DXA for bone mineral density (BMD) and the bone strain index (BSI) evaluation. Follow-up exams were performed after 3.34 ± 1.91 years. Considering the occurrence of new VFs at follow-up, two groups were created: fractured versus not-fractured. We applied an artificial neural network (ANN) analysis with a predictive tool (TWIST system) to select relevant input data from a list of 13 variables including BMD and BSI. A semantic connectivity map was built to analyse the connections among variables within the groups. For group comparisons, an independent-samples t-test was used; variables were expressed as mean ± standard deviation. Results For each patient, we evaluated a total of n = 6 exams. At follow-up, n = 69 (39.6%) women developed a VF. ANNs reached a predictive accuracy of 79.56% within the training testing procedure, with a sensitivity of 80.93% and a specificity of 78.18%. The semantic connectivity map showed that a low BSI at the total femur is connected to the absence of VFs. Conclusion We found a high performance of ANN analysis in predicting the occurrence of VFs. Femoral BSI appears as a useful DXA index to identify patients at lower risk for lumbar VFs.


Author(s):  
Gaia Tabacco ◽  
Anda Mihaela Naciu ◽  
Carmelo Messina ◽  
Luca Rinaudo ◽  
Roberto Cesareo ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document