Comparison of induced polarization and controlled‐source audio‐magnetotellurics methods for massive chalcopyrite exploration in a volcanic area

Geophysics ◽  
1997 ◽  
Vol 62 (4) ◽  
pp. 1087-1096 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. T. Basokur ◽  
T. M. Rasmussen ◽  
C. Kaya ◽  
Y. Altun ◽  
K. Aktas

In this paper, we compare and contrast the results of field experiments with the dipole‐dipole‐induced polarization (IP) and controlled‐source audio‐magnetotellurics (CSAMT) methods, along the same survey profiles, at a test area that was subject to extensive drilling and detailed geological investigation. The ore bodies are interbedded between two series of dacitic tuff. The depth and thickness of the massive chalcopyrite‐pyrite‐sphalerite body vary between 25 and 100 m and 0.5 and 16 m, respectively. Resistivity and IP phase measurements on the core samples collected from the test area provide some idea of the relative differences between the background rock units and the target. The resistivity of the chalcopyrite samples varies between 0.6 to 2 ohm-m and provides sufficient resistivity contrast with surrounding volcanic rock units for target detection. The results of dipole‐dipole IP profiling with a 50-m dipole length conducted along two profiles are presented in the form of apparent resistivity and phase pseudosections. CSAMT measurements were made at 13 frequencies from 2 Hz to 8192 Hz along three profiles. The receiver dipole length was 25 m. The CSAMT data are presented in the form of pseudosections using conventional and new definitions of apparent resistivity. The elliptical contours of low apparent resistivity generated by the transition‐field notch can be misleading with respect to the real anomaly of the ore body. These artificial anomaly patterns are suppressed by making use of an alternative apparent resistivity definition derived from the frequency‐normalized impedance. The qualitative interpretation based on the IP and CSAMT pseudosections shows that the location and the extension of the ore body are indicated better in the CSAMT apparent resistivity data computed from the alternative definition. The qualitative interpretation of the IP data is difficult because of the 3-D effect arising from the neighboring thicker parts of the ore body and pyrite particles within the basement. At the final stage, the far‐field range of the CSAMT apparent resistivity and phase data is identified by the visual inspection of the individual sounding diagrams. The models derived from the 2-D Occam inversion carried out on the far‐field data are compared with the drill‐hole information and are found to describe the actual geological situation.

Geophysics ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 1-35
Author(s):  
Siming He ◽  
Jian Guan ◽  
Yi Wang ◽  
Xiu Ji ◽  
Hui Wang

In electrical exploration techniques, an effective suppression method for Gaussian and impulsive random noise in spread spectrum induced polarization (SSIP) continues to be challenging for conventional denoising methods. Remnant noise influences the complex resistivity spectrum and damages the subsequent interpretation of geophysical surveys. We present a hybrid method based on a correlation function and complex resistivity, which introduces the correlation analyses between the transmitting source, the measured potential, and the injected current signal. According to the analyses, reliable results for complex resistivity spectra can be calculated, which can be further used for noise suppression. We apply the hybrid method to both numerical and field experiments to process measured SSIP data. Simulation tests show that the hybrid method not only suppresses the two types of noise but also improves the relative error of the complex resistivity spectrum. Field data processing shows that the hybrid method can minimize the standard deviation of the data and possess a greater ability to distinguish adjacent objects, which can improve the reliability of the data in subsequent processing and interpretation.


Geophysics ◽  
1971 ◽  
Vol 36 (6) ◽  
pp. 1232-1249 ◽  
Author(s):  
Philip G. Hallof ◽  
Emil Winniski

The Lakeshore ore body is in Pinal County, Arizona about 30 miles south of Casa Grande. In February, 1969 when the latest figures were published, the ore reserves were reported at 241 million tons of disseminated sulfide ore (0.7 percent copper) and 24 million tons of concentrated metallic ore (1.69 percent copper). Sulfide copper ore was first intersected in July, 1967 in Hole P‐3. The magnetite‐pyrite‐chalco‐pyrite mineralization occurred in a banded tactite at a depth of 1147 ft. Hole P‐3 was the fourth of several holes that were drilled to determine the source of an induced polarization anomaly that had been outlined, at depth, to the west of the old Lakeshore pit. The successful conclusion of this exploration program by El Paso Natural Gas Company is an excellent example of an integrated exploration approach. The application of regional geological planning, geophysical methods, and detailed geological reasoning resulted in the discovery of a major copper ore body. Due to the depth of the ore zone and the disseminated character of most of the ore, the only geophysical technique that was useful in the direct detection of the ore mineralization was the induced polarization method. Field measurements were made sporadically between August, 1966 and July, 1968. Variable‐frequency induced‐polarization measurements, made using the dipole‐dipole electrode configuration and electrode intervals from 300 ft to 1000 ft, successfully indicated the presence of the metallic mineralization at depth and gave some indication of its extent. Comparisons of the induced polarization data and the appropriate geological sections give information concerning the usefulness of the method.


Geophysics ◽  
1988 ◽  
Vol 53 (5) ◽  
pp. 726-727 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lásaló Szarka

A growing number of papers being published on the CSAMT-MT curve transformation, which — as the authors state — allows a simpler magnetotelluric interpretation of the corrected CSAMT curves. The concept of near‐field corrections is based on electromagnetic relations over a homogeneous earth, and the effects of subsurface layers or lateral inhomogeneities are usually neglected. Bartel and Jacobson (1987) especially suppress the bounds of the near‐field correction: After presenting several near‐field correction curves over a homogeneous earth in their Figure 2 (which includes an idealistic demarcation line instead of a gradual change between near‐field and far‐field regions), they simply add that “…for a layered earth a similar demarcation occurs between the far‐ and near‐field regimes.” Further, the problem of lateral inhomogeneities is not mentioned in the paper. Such a description might lead to an oversimplification. I should like here to underline both limitations.


Geophysics ◽  
1996 ◽  
Vol 61 (3) ◽  
pp. 919-919
Author(s):  
Umesh C. Das

I thank Pierre Valla for his interest in my paper (Das, 1995a). Transformation of controlled source electromagnetic (CSEM) measurements into apparent resistivities is carried out as an intermediate step in order to enhance interpretation. Duroux (1967; and hence Valla, 1984) derives, using asymptotic expressions (higher order terms are dropped out), apparent resistivities from CSEM measurements. Valla mentions, ‘those apparent resistivities do not have the nice asymptotic behavior’, and they can not be used as an intermediate step to estimate the layer resistivities and thicknesses in the subsurface. My aim in the paper has been not to work a ‘miracle’ but to derive a function to reflect the subsurface resistivity distributions of the layered earth structures directly. The calculations on a few models indicate that such a function can be derived which yields an unambiguous apparent resistivity. The apparent resistivity curves are similarly useful in interpretation as the direct current and magnetotelluric apparent resistivity curves. Inclusion of Duroux’s work would have given the readers a chance to appreciate my definition.


Geophysics ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 71 (4) ◽  
pp. G179-G189 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sofia Davydycheva ◽  
Nikolai Rykhlinski ◽  
Peter Legeido

We propose a method of surface and marine electrical prospecting using controlled-source excitation. The method is designed to detect hydrocarbon deposits at depths of a few kilometers and to map their boundaries. The technique is based on imaging the induced-polarization (IP) parameters of the geologic formation. We use the fact that, because of the imaginary part of the electric conductivity, polarized media support wave propagation processes whose nature is similar to displacement currents induced by the dielectric permittivity. However, unlike displacement currents, these processes reveal themselves at much lower frequencies and, therefore, at greater depths. It is established that the ratio of the second and the first differences of the electric potential does not decay after the current turn-off in polarized media, whereas it decays quickly if the IP effect is absent. Thus, the IP response can be observed directly and separated from the electromagnetic (EM) response. We use a vertical focusing of the electric current to decrease the effect of laterally adjacent formations to apply a 1D layered model in a 3D environment. This method obtained promising results in several regions of Russia.


Geophysics ◽  
1977 ◽  
Vol 42 (5) ◽  
pp. 1006-1019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeffrey J. Daniels

The three‐dimensional induced‐polarization and resistivity‐modeling problem for buried source and receiver electrodes is solved by using a modified form of Barnett’s surface‐integral technique originally developed for surface‐electrode configurations. Six different buried electrode configurations are considered in this study: three types of hole‐to‐hole configurations, hole‐to‐surface and surface‐to‐hole configurations, and the single hole (bipole‐bipole) configuration. Results show there is no “best” method for all situations encountered in the field. The choice of method depends upon depth of the body, spacing of drill holes, and electrical properties of the body. In hole‐to‐hole measurements, the geometric factor (necessary for the computation of the apparent resistivity) becomes infinitely large or infinitely small whenever the receiving bipole is placed at a depth so that it lies on a zero equipotential surface. This leads to the formation of apparent resistivity anomalies that are extremely sensitive to the presence of the body but that are also complicated and not easily correlated with the position of the body. It is shown that diagnostic and easily interpretable anomalies are obtained by selecting the proper source‐receiver configurations.


Geophysics ◽  
1999 ◽  
Vol 64 (6) ◽  
pp. 1689-1697 ◽  
Author(s):  
Partha S. Routh ◽  
Douglas W. Oldenburg

We present a technique for inverting controlled source audio‐frequency magnetotelluric (CSAMT) data to recover a 1-D conductivity structure. The earth is modeled as a set of horizontal layers with constant conductivity, and the data are apparent resistivities and phases computed from orthogonal electric and magnetic fields due to a finite dipole source. The earth model has many layers compared to the number of data points, and therefore the solution is nonunique. Among the possible solutions, we seek a model with desired character by minimizing a particular model objective function. Traditionally, CSAMT data are inverted either by using the far‐field data where magnetotelluric (MT) equations are valid or by correcting the near‐field data to an equivalent plane‐wave approximation. Here, we invert both apparent resistivity and phase data from the near‐field transition zone and the far‐field regions in the full CSAMT inversion without any correction. Our inversion is compared with that obtained by inverting near‐field corrected data using an MT algorithm. Both synthetic and field data examples indicate that a full CSAMT inversion provides improved information about subsurface conductivity.


2006 ◽  
Vol 244 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 709-724 ◽  
Author(s):  
Florence Nicollin ◽  
Dominique Gibert ◽  
François Beauducel ◽  
Georges Boudon ◽  
Jean-Christophe Komorowski

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document