scholarly journals Airborne gravimetry: An investigation of filtering

Geophysics ◽  
1999 ◽  
Vol 64 (1) ◽  
pp. 61-69 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vicki A. Childers ◽  
Robin E. Bell ◽  
John M. Brozena

Low‐pass filtering in airborne gravimetry data processing plays a fundamental role in determining the spectral content and amplitude of the free‐air anomaly. Traditional filters used in airborne gravimetry, the 6 × 20-s resistor‐capacitor (RC) filter and the 300-s Gaussian filter, heavily attenuate the waveband of the gravity signal. As we strive to reduce the overall error budget to the sub-mGal level, an important step is to evaluate the choice and design of the low‐pass filter employed in airborne gravimetry to optimize gravity anomaly recovery and noise attenuation. This study evaluates low‐pass filtering options and presents a survey‐specific frequency domain filter that employs the fast Fourier transform (FFT) for airborne gravity data. This study recommends a new approach to low‐pass filtering airborne data. For a given survey, the filter is designed to maximize the target gravity signal based upon survey parameters and the character of measurement noise. This survey‐specific low‐pass filter approach is applied to two aerogravimetry surveys: one conducted in West Antarctica and the other in the eastern Pacific off the California coast. A reflight comparison with the West Antarctic survey shows that anomaly amplitudes are increased while slightly improving the rms fit between the reflown survey lines when an appropriately designed FFT filter is employed instead of the traditionally used filters. A comparison of the East Pacific survey with high‐resolution shipboard gravity data indicates anomaly amplitude improvements of up to 20 mGal and a 49% improvement of the rms fit from 3.99 mGal to 2.04 mGal with the appropriately designed FFT filter. These results demonstrate that substantial improvement in anomaly amplitude and wavelength can be attained by tailoring the filter to the survey.

Geophysics ◽  
1985 ◽  
Vol 50 (1) ◽  
pp. 170-170
Author(s):  
M. J. Hall

Hammer’s replies to Steenland’s, Herring’s and Pearson’s discussions of his paper, “Airborne gravity is here!,” are nothing short of incredulous. Both his paper and his replies would suggest that he did not expect those with experience in dynamic gravity to read them. Hammer accuses his critics of ignoring “…the low‐pass filter which was applied for realistic comparison with the airborne data.” I shall call this “Hammer’s Rule:” you filter the very standard against which you will compare any new method without concern for the truth. Hammer’s Rule frees us from annoyingly difficult rigor. If the airborne filter eliminates the anomaly, then so must the ground truth anomaly be eliminated. Fair is fair, and Hammer’s Rule gives a “realistic comparison” between something which is wrong and something which is wrong.


2014 ◽  
Vol 548-549 ◽  
pp. 1192-1195
Author(s):  
Wei Zheng ◽  
Gui Bin Zhang ◽  
Rui Li

Due to the interference of noise, filtering technology is applied to achieve gravity anomaly for airborne gravimetry. Kalman filtering and smoothing are discussed and implemented for data processing of airborne gravimetry in this paper. Firstly, the algorithms of Kalman filtering and smoothing are introduced. Then, the system model for solving the gravity anomaly is established which is based on the dynamic equation and the hardware design equations. Finally, the result of Kalman filtering and smoothing would be compared with digital FIR low pass filter, and it is proved that Kalman filter and smoother could obtain more accurate result than FIR low pass filter as that the solving error of Kalman filter and smoother is improved within 1 mGal compared with the theory standard obtained by GT-1A software.


2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (4) ◽  
pp. 147-169
Author(s):  
Ahmad Ghonchi ◽  
Yazdan Amerian ◽  
Mohammad Shakibay Senobari ◽  
◽  
◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol E100.C (10) ◽  
pp. 858-865 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yohei MORISHITA ◽  
Koichi MIZUNO ◽  
Junji SATO ◽  
Koji TAKINAMI ◽  
Kazuaki TAKAHASHI

2016 ◽  
Vol 15 (12) ◽  
pp. 2579-2586
Author(s):  
Adina Racasan ◽  
Calin Munteanu ◽  
Vasile Topa ◽  
Claudia Pacurar ◽  
Claudia Hebedean

Author(s):  
Nanan Chomnak ◽  
Siradanai Srisamranrungrueang ◽  
Natapong Wongprommoon
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document