Retrieving Love wave dispersion curves from 3C ambient noise data using spatial autocorrelation (SPAC) method

Author(s):  
Koichi Hayashi ◽  
Recep Cakir
Geophysics ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 84 (5) ◽  
pp. R693-R705 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jing Li ◽  
Sherif Hanafy ◽  
Zhaolun Liu ◽  
Gerard T. Schuster

We present a theory for wave-equation inversion of Love-wave dispersion curves, in which the misfit function is the sum of the squared differences between the wavenumbers along the predicted and observed dispersion curves. Similar to inversion of Rayleigh-wave dispersion curves, the complicated Love-wave arrivals in traces are skeletonized as simpler data, namely, the picked dispersion curves in the [Formula: see text] domain. Numerical solutions to the SH-wave equation and an iterative optimization method are then used to invert these dispersion curves for the S-wave velocity model. This procedure, denoted as wave-equation dispersion inversion of Love waves (LWD), does not require the assumption of a layered model or smooth velocity variations, and it is less prone to the cycle-skipping problems of full-waveform inversion. We demonstrate with synthetic and field data examples that LWD can accurately reconstruct the S-wave velocity distribution in a laterally heterogeneous medium. Compared with Rayleigh waves, inversion of the Love-wave dispersion curves empirically exhibits better convergence properties because they are completely insensitive to the P-velocity variations. In addition, Love-wave dispersion curves for our examples are simpler than those for Rayleigh waves, and they are easier to pick in our field data with a low signal-to-noise ratio.


2020 ◽  
Vol 222 (3) ◽  
pp. 2147-2161
Author(s):  
Bin Luo ◽  
Whitney Trainor-Guitton ◽  
Ebru Bozdağ ◽  
Lisa LaFlame ◽  
Steve Cole ◽  
...  

SUMMARY A 2-D orthogonal distributed acoustic sensing (DAS) array designed for seismic experiments was buried horizontally beneath the Kafadar Commons Geophysical Laboratory on the Colorado School of Mines campus at Golden, Colorado. The DAS system using straight fibre-optic cables is a cost-efficient technology that enables dense seismic array deployment for long-term seismic monitoring, favouring both earthquake-based and ambient-noise-based surface wave analysis for subsurface characterization. In our study, the horizontally orthogonal DAS array records ambient noise data for a period of about two months from November 2018 to January 2019. During this time, the array also detected seismic signals from an ML3.6 earthquake at Glenwood Springs, Colorado, which exhibit opposite signal polarities in the orthogonal DAS section recordings. We derive the transformation matrix for DAS strain measurements in horizontally orthogonal cables to retrieve both Rayleigh and Love wave dispersion information from the single-component DAS signals using the 2-D multichannel analysis of surface waves method. In addition, ambient noise interferometry is applied to long-term DAS noise recordings. Our theoretical derivation demonstrates that Rayleigh and Love wave Green's functions are coupled in the noise cross-correlation functions (NCFs) of DAS receiver pairs. Stacking NCFs over the horizontally orthogonal DAS array can constructively recover the radial Rayleigh wave component but destructively suppress the Love wave component. The multimodal Monte Carlo inversion of the earthquake-based Rayleigh wave and Love wave dispersion measurements and the noise-based Rayleigh wave measurement reveals a 1-D layered structure that agrees qualitatively with geological surveys of the site. Our study demonstrates that although straight fibre-optic cables lack broadside sensitivity, using appropriate DAS array configuration and seismic array methods can extend the seismic acquisition ability of DAS and enable its application to a broad range of scenarios.


2020 ◽  
Vol 176 ◽  
pp. 103939
Author(s):  
Xiaofei Yin ◽  
Hongrui Xu ◽  
Binbin Mi ◽  
Xiaohan Hao ◽  
Peng Wang ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 91 (4) ◽  
pp. 2234-2246
Author(s):  
Hang Li ◽  
Jianqiao Xu ◽  
Xiaodong Chen ◽  
Heping Sun ◽  
Miaomiao Zhang ◽  
...  

Abstract Inversion of internal structure of the Earth using surface waves and free oscillations is a hot topic in seismological research nowadays. With the ambient noise data on seismically quiet days sourced from the gravity tidal observations of seven global distributed superconducting gravimeters (SGs) and the seismic observations for validation from three collocated STS-1 seismometers, long-period surface waves and background free oscillations are successfully extracted by the phase autocorrelation (PAC) method, respectively. Group-velocity dispersion curves at the frequency band of 2–7.5 mHz are extracted and compared with the theoretical values calculated with the preliminary reference Earth model. The comparison shows that the best observed values differ about ±2% from the corresponding theoretical results, and the extracted group velocities of the best SG are consistent with the result of the collocated STS-1 seismometer. The results indicate that reliable group-velocity dispersion curves can be measured with the ambient noise data from SGs. Furthermore, the fundamental frequency spherical free oscillations of 2–7 mHz are also clearly extracted using the same ambient noise data. The results in this study show that the SG, besides the seismometer, is proved to be another kind of instrument that can be used to observe long-period surface waves and free oscillations on seismically quiet days with a high degree of precision using the PAC method. It is worth mentioning that the PAC method is first and successfully introduced to analyze SG observations in our study.


1954 ◽  
Vol 44 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-5
Author(s):  
Jack Foord Evernden

abstract By use of the Love-Wave dispersion data for the earthquake of 29 September 1946 (Lat. 5° S, Long. 154° E), a three-layer model of Pacific Basin structure has been derived. The periods of the Love Waves observed varied continuously from 45 seconds to 7 seconds. The model consists of: (a) 2.5 km. with VS equal to 2.31 km/sec.; (b) 11 km. with VS equal to 3.87 km/sec.; (c) bottom with VS equal to 4.52 km/sec. The differences between this model and that found by Raitt using refraction measurements are discussed.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document