scholarly journals End of life care in a secure hospital setting

BJPsych Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (S1) ◽  
pp. S96-S96
Author(s):  
Owen Obasohan ◽  
Deepak Tokas ◽  
Mamta Kumari
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Palliative Care ◽  
End Of Life ◽  
End Of Life Care ◽  
Hospital Setting ◽  
Care Plan ◽  
Psychiatric Ward ◽  
Life Care ◽  
Individualised Care ◽  
Care Of The Dying

AimsTo measure the standard of care provided to patients who had a natural and expected death whilst in secure care at Roseberry Park Hospital, Middlesbrough.Mallard ward is a low secure psychiatric ward for older aged men suffering from cognitive difficulties and significant physical comorbidity in addition to a severe and enduring mental illness. The patient population is such that it will remain the most appropriate placement for some patients until their death. It is vital that staff members on Mallard ward and indeed all parts of the Trust are aware of the priorities for care of the dying person and ensure that care is provided in accordance with these priorities.The Leadership Alliance for the Care of Dying People (LACDP), a coalition of 21 national organisations, published One Chance to get it Right – Improving people's experience of care in the last few days and hours of life in June 2014. This document laid out five priorities for care of the dying person focussing on sensitive communication, involvement of the person and relevant others in decisions and compassionately delivering an individualised care plan.MethodThe data collection tool was adapted from End of Life Care Audit: Dying in Hospital, a national clinical audit commissioned by Healthcare Quality Improvement Partnership (HQIP) and run by the Royal College of Physicians. Data were collected from both electronic and paper records. There were three natural and expected deaths in the last two years.ResultFor all three patients, there was documented evidence that they were likely to die in the coming hours or days.End of life care discussion was held with the nominated persons and not with the patients due to their lack of mental capacity.The needs of the patients and their nominated persons were explored in all three cases.All patients had an individualised care plan which was followed.The palliative care team supported the staff with the care of these patients.The care provided was largely consistent with the priorities listed.ConclusionThe national audit compares performance of only acute NHS Trusts with no data to reflect the performance of mental health hospitals. It is imperative that mental health services work in collaboration with physical health and palliative care services so they are able to continue providing a high level of care to this patient group. Clinicians and staff involved in the care of dying patients also need to be adequately trained.

Impact of mortality reviews on supportive care utilization, end-of-life care, and inpatient mortality.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (31_suppl) ◽  
pp. 45-45
Author(s):  
Yasmin Karimi ◽  
Vasu Divi ◽  
Sandy Srinivas ◽  
Andrea Segura Smith ◽  
Jennifer Hansen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Care ◽  
Supportive Care ◽  
End Of Life ◽  
End Of Life Care ◽  
Health Workers ◽  
Hospital Setting ◽  
Care Plan ◽  
Care Utilization ◽  
Life Care ◽  
Chi Square Analysis

45 Background: 22% of US patients with cancer die in a hospital setting. As part of an effort to reduce unexpected inpatient (inpt) mortality, we reviewed records of all inpt cancer deaths at Stanford Hospital and reported findings to the treatment teams. Methods: Deaths with a cancer related ICD 9/10 code between 5/2017 and 6/2019 were reviewed by a multidisciplinary team. Findings and potential opportunities for improvement were communicated to the pt’s primary outpt oncologist, inpt oncologists and other involved providers. Observed to expected (O:E) mortality for the year prior to the intervention (5/2016–4/2017), Year 1 (5/2017–4/2018) and Year 2 (5/2018–4/2019) of the intervention were compared with two sided t test, α=0.05 (Vizient Inc, Irving TX). Changes in supportive care utilization and end of life care between cases reviewed in Year 1 and Year 2 were compared with chi square analysis. Results: There were 236 inpatient deaths reviewed. The median age was 64 years; 76% had solid tumors; 68% had metastatic disease; 33% had a previous inpt admission; 34% received chemotherapy in the last 2 weeks of life. Median length of stay was 7 days and 37% were admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU). The O:E mortality ratio significantly decreased between the year prior to intervention and Year 2 (0.95 vs. 0.69; p = .019), and Years 1 and 2 (0.90 vs. 0.69; p = .003). There was no noted difference in number of palliative care consults or resuscitation status at the time of death between Years 1 and 2. There was an increased frequency of advance care plan documentation on admission in Year 2 (p = .007). Conclusions: Cancer pts who die in the hospital have high rates of recent hospitalizations, chemotherapy/radiation use in the last 2 weeks of life and ICU admissions. Decrease in O:E is likely multifactorial. Potential factors are improved documentation of comorbidities, increased access to palliative care services, and facilitation of hospice referrals which were partially driven by results of our reviews and resulting awareness around end of life care. Work is ongoing to standardize documentation of goals of care conversations in the electronic medical record and employ lay health workers for earlier end of life discussions.

Hospital end-of-life care: families’ free-text notes

2020 ◽  
pp. bmjspcare-2020-00239
Author(s):  
Sandra Kurkowski ◽  
Johannes Radon ◽  
Annika R Vogt ◽  
Martin Weber ◽  
Stephanie Stiel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Care ◽  
Quality Of Care ◽  
End Of Life ◽  
End Of Life Care ◽  
Qualitative Content Analysis ◽  
Free Text ◽  
Life Care ◽  
Quality Aspects ◽  
Care Of The Dying

BackgroundPalliative care strives to improve quality of life for patients with incurable diseases. This approach includes adequate support of the patients’ loved ones. Consequently, loved ones have personal experiences of providing end-of-life care for their next. This is a resource for information and may help to investigate the loved ones’ perspectives on need for improvements.AimTo identify further quality aspects considered important by loved ones to improve the quality of care at the end of life as an addition to quantitative results from the Care of the Dying Evaluation for the German-speaking area (CODE-GER) questionnaire.DesignWithin the validation study of the questionnaire ‘Care of the Dying Evaluation’ (CODETM) GER, loved ones were asked to comment (free text) in parallel on each item of the CODE-GER. These free-text notes were analysed with the qualitative content analysis method by Philipp Mayring.Setting/participantsLoved ones of patients (n=237), who had died an expected death in two university hospitals (palliative and non-palliative care units) during the period from April 2016 to March 2017.Results993 relevant paragraphs were extracted out of 1261 free-text notes. For loved ones, important aspects of quality of care are information/communication, respect of the patient’s and/or loved one’s will, involvement in decision-making at the end of life (patient’s volition) and having the possibility to say goodbye.ConclusionsIt is important for loved ones to be taken seriously in their sorrows, to be informed, that the caregivers respect the patients’ will and to be emotionally supported.Trial registration numberThis study was registered at the German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS00013916).

scholarly journals Development and evaluation of an LGBT+ education programme for palliative care interdisciplinary teams

2021 ◽  
Vol 15 ◽  
pp. 263235242110513
Author(s):  
Claude Chidiac ◽  
Kate Grayson ◽  
Kathryn Almack
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Palliative Care ◽  
End Of Life ◽  
Cultural Change ◽  
End Of Life Care ◽  
Healthcare Access ◽  
Interdisciplinary Teams ◽  
Life Care ◽  
Educational Work ◽  
Health And Social Care

Background: Despite national policy recommendations to enhance healthcare access for LGBT+ (lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and those who do not identify as cisgender heterosexual) people, education on LGBT+ issues and needs is still lacking in health and social care curricula. Most of the available resources are focused on primary care, mental health, and sexual health, with little consideration to broader LGBT+ health issues and needs. The limited available educational programmes pertaining to LGBT+ individuals outside the context of sexual or mental health have mainly focused on cancer care or older adults. Aim: To support palliative care interdisciplinary teams to provide LGBT+ affirmative care for people receiving and needing palliative and end-of-life care. Methods: A 1½-h workshop was developed and evaluated using Kotter’s eight-step process for leading change. Across four hospices, 145 health and social professionals participated in the training. A quasi-experimental non-equivalent groups pre–post-test design was used to measure self-reported levels of knowledge, confidence, and comfort with issues, and needs and terminology related to LGBT+ and palliative care. Results: There was a significant increase in the reported levels of knowledge, confidence, and comfort with issues, needs, and terminology related to LGBT+ and palliative care after attending the training. Most participants reported that they would be interested in further training, that the training is useful for their practice, and that they would recommend it to colleagues. Conclusion: The project illustrates the importance of such programmes and recommends that such educational work is situated alongside wider cultural change to embed LGBT+-inclusive approaches within palliative and end-of-life care services.

Transitioning end-of-life care from hospital to the community: case report

2021 ◽  
Vol 30 (17) ◽  
pp. 1010-1014
Author(s):  
Pedro Lino ◽  
Mary Williams
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Care ◽  
End Of Life ◽  
End Of Life Care ◽  
Hospital Setting ◽  
Community Setting ◽  
Life Care ◽  
Cultural Aspects ◽  
Advance Care ◽  
Increasing Demand ◽  
The Impact

Palliative/end-of-life care is an integral part of the district nursing service. There is increasing demand for palliative care to be delivered in the community setting. Therefore, there is a need for excellent collaboration between staff in primary and secondary care settings to achieve optimum care for patients. This article critically analyses the care delivered for a palliative patient in the hospital setting and his subsequent transition to the community setting. The importance of effective communication, holistic assessment in palliative care, advance care planning, organisational structures and the socio-cultural aspects of caring for patients at the end of life are discussed. Additionally, the article highlights the impact of substandard assessment and communication and the consequent effect on patients and families.

scholarly journals Ethico-legal issues in relation to end-of-life care and institutional mental health

2006 ◽  
Vol 30 (3) ◽  
pp. 286 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pam D McGrath ◽  
Kim Forrester
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Mental Illness ◽  
Palliative Care ◽  
End Of Life ◽  
Serious Mental Illness ◽  
End Of Life Care ◽  
Legal Issues ◽  
Life Care ◽  
Health Institution ◽  
Mental Health Institution

Objectives: In view of the fact that there is a higher mortality rate for individuals with serious mental illness and that people with mental illness suffer excess mortality due to physical illness, the lack of attention to end-of-life care for patients with a serious mental illness needs addressing. This article seeks to put these issues on the agenda by beginning to explore important ethico-legal issues at the interface of palliative care and institutional mental health. Methods: Data were collected from eight qualitative interviews conducted with mental health professionals at The Park, Centre for Mental Health, Queensland. The interviews were recorded verbatim, coded and thematically analysed. Results: The findings highlight the inherent tension at the interface of compassionate, patientcentred end-of-life care and the participants? perception of the legal restraints imposed by virtue of being in a mental health institution. This article examines the participants? perceptions of the legal restraints curtailing the provision of palliative care in a mental health institution and considers these findings within an understanding of the limitations imposed by law. Our hope and expectation in undertaking this exploration is to clarify the legal limitations that operate to restrict the type of end-of-life care that can be offered to mental health patients, in order to provide an informed basis for practice.

scholarly journals Hospital-Based Palliative and End-of-Life Care in the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Scoping Review

2021 ◽  
pp. 104990912110570
Author(s):  
Michael Connolly ◽  
Mary Bell ◽  
Fiona Lawler ◽  
Fiona Timmins ◽  
Mary Ryder
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Care ◽  
End Of Life ◽  
Scoping Review ◽  
End Of Life Care ◽  
Hospital Setting ◽  
Palliative Care Service ◽  
Rapid Progression ◽  
Life Care ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Palliative Care Teams

Aim: To identify the nature of the evidence reporting hospital-based palliative and end-of-life care during the COVID-19 pandemic. Background: The COVID-19 pandemic has seen an increase in the numbers of seriously ill people being cared for across all health services worldwide. Due to the rapid progression of severe symptoms, the majority of staff working in hospitals and other healthcare centres were providing end-of-life care. Little is known about the level of hospital-based palliative care service provided during the COVID-19 pandemic, particularly during surges in admission rates with an increased number of deaths accruing. Methods: A scoping review was conducted to search and select potential studies. The scoping review was guided by the framework of Arskey and O’Malley and advanced by the use of the methodology of the Joanna Briggs Institute. Results: Eighteen studies published between March 2020 and July 2021 were identified. Three broad categories included overall management strategy and logistics, symptom prevalence and management of patients with COVID-19 and end-of-life care needs within the current pandemic. Conclusions: This review highlights increased awareness and knowledge of palliative and end-of-life care provided in hospitals. The review also highlights the response of hospital-based palliative care teams to an evolving crisis, within the context of developed health systems under sustained and overwhelming pressure. Implications: Newly established clinical links and referral pathways developed during the initial COVID-19 surge between hospital-based palliative care and other healthcare teams, be continued and further enhanced. Understanding of the role of specialist palliative care providers in supporting palliative and end-of-life care within the hospital setting needs further investigation.

scholarly journals Documenting plans for care: advance care directives and the 7-step pathway in the acute care context

2021 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Gregory Brian Crawford ◽  
Katherine Hodgetts ◽  
Teresa Burgess ◽  
Jaklin Eliott
Keyword(s):  
End Of Life ◽  
Acute Care ◽  
Advance Care Planning ◽  
End Of Life Care ◽  
Hospital Setting ◽  
South Australia ◽  
Care Plan ◽  
Care Planning ◽  
Life Care ◽  
Advance Care

Abstract Background Advance care planning involves the discussion and documentation of an individual’s values and preferences to guide their future healthcare should they lose capacity to make or communicate treatment decisions. Advance care planning can involve the individual’s completion of an Advance Care Directive (ACD), a legislated and common-law instrument which may include appointment of a substitute decision-maker and binding refusals of treatment. In South Australia, ACDs intersect in the acute-care context with the Resuscitation Plan 7-Step Pathway (7-SP), an integrated care plan written for and by clinicians, designed to organise and improve patients’ end-of-life care through the use of structured documentation. Here, we examine the perspectives of healthcare professionals (HCPs) within a hospital setting on the practical integration of ACDs and the 7-SP, exploring the perceived role, function, and value of each as they intersect to guide end-of-life care in an Australian hospital setting. Methods Qualitative data were collected via eight focus groups with a total of 74 HCPs (acute care, and oncology specialists; medical intern; general and emergency nurses; social workers) across two hospitals. Audio recordings were transcribed and thematically analysed. Results HCPs viewed ACDs as a potentially valuable means of promoting patient autonomy, but as rarely completed and poorly integrated into hospital systems. Conversely, the process and documentation of the 7-SP was perceived as providing clarity about clinicians’ responsibilities, and as a well-understood, integrated resource. Participants sometimes exhibited uncertainty around which document takes precedence if both were present. Sometimes, the routinisation of the 7-SP meant it was understood as the ‘only way’ to determine patient wishes and provide optimal end-of-life care. When this occurs, the perceived authority of ACDs, or of patients’ choice not to participate in end-of-life discussions, may be undermined. Conclusions The intersection of ACDs and the 7-SP appears problematic within acute care. Clinicians’ uncertainty as to whether an ACD or 7-SP takes precedence, and when it should do so, suggests a need for further clarity and training on the roles of these documents in guiding clinical practice, the legislative context within which specific documentation is embedded, and the dynamics associated with collaborative decision-making in end-of-life care.

End-of-life care planning in patients with recurrent gynecologic cancers.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e20648-e20648
Author(s):  
Nathan L Jones ◽  
Shelley L Galvin ◽  
Timothy J Vanderkwaak ◽  
David J. Hetzel ◽  
Cameron Blair Harkness ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Palliative Care ◽  
End Of Life ◽  
Median Duration ◽  
End Of Life Care ◽  
Gynecologic Oncology ◽  
Care Plan ◽  
Life Care ◽  
Do Not Resuscitate ◽  
Gynecologic Cancers

e20648 Background: Gynecologic oncologists and associates must provide appropriate, acceptable, and patient-centered end-of-life care. Most women with terminal gynecologic cancers do not have do-not-resuscitate (DNR) orders upon hospital admission and many do not receive effective palliative care. Our objective was to assess quality care indicators involving end-of-life care among gynecologic oncology patients treated at our institution. Methods: An IRB-approved retrospective chart review was performed on all patients with recurrent gynecologic cancers and terminal diagnoses who died from January 2009 through October 2012. Data included intervals to death from: diagnoses, DNR status, Hospice/Palliative Care Medicine (HPCM) involvement, and other factors related to end-of-life care. Chi-squared and discriminate analyses were utilized. Results: Complete data were available for 130 of 345 (37.7%) patients. Disease sites included cervix 28 (21.5%), uterine 37 (28.5%), ovarian 51(39.2%), and vaginal/vulvar 14 (10.8%). Median age at diagnosis and death was 63 and 65 years. Relative to death, diagnoses occurred at a median of 1.65 (0.05-32) years prior. 83 (63.8%) patients were DNR at their last hospitalization, 84(64.6%) had HPCM involvement, and 18(13.8%) had an advance care plan. When HPCM was involved, 83.3% were DNR as compared to 28.3% without involvement (p=0.0001). Patients were also significantly more likely to have DNR status with diagnosis of ovarian cancer and as the duration of time between diagnosis and death increased (p=0.0001). The provider obtaining DNR was most often faculty over residents or HPCM (60.2%, 27.7%, 12%). DNR status was declared by 57 (68.7%) patients and 26 (31.3%) power of attorneys. Median duration from DNR to death was 14 days (0-308) and median duration from HPCM involvement to death was 22 days (0-391). Conclusions: DNR status is associated with ovarian cancer, HPCM involvement, and increasing time from diagnosis to death. Earlier intervention from providers or HPCM could allow for greater patient autonomy and fewer interventions at end-of-life.

Systematic Review for the Quality of End-of-Life Care for Patients With Dementia in the Hospital Setting

2018 ◽  
Vol 35 (12) ◽  
pp. 1572-1583 ◽  
Author(s):  
Felicity Moon ◽  
Fiona McDermott ◽  
David Kissane
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Care ◽  
End Of Life ◽  
Health Care Professionals ◽  
End Of Life Care ◽  
Hospital Setting ◽  
Psychosocial Care ◽  
Life Care ◽  
Hospital Patients ◽  
To Receive

Background: Patients with dementia may receive suboptimal end-of-life care in hospital settings reflecting broader debate around the palliative status of dementia syndromes. Objectives: To synthesize literature describing the quality of end-of-life care for patients with dementia dying in hospital. Methods: An integrative review assessed the quality of 26 articles concerning medical, nursing, and psychosocial care of patients with dementia dying in hospital settings. Results: Literature reflects a growing awareness of the need to consider a palliative approach to end-of-life care for patients with dementia in hospital. Patients with dementia are less likely to receive aggressive care at the end of life, but provision of palliative care interventions is inconsistent. Health-care professionals highlighted the need for greater education around identification and management of problematic symptoms at the end of life. Engagement of family caregivers is essential in optimizing end-of-life care, and further research is required to ascertain their experiences around decision-making. Conclusion: Although patients with dementia appear to receive less aggressive treatment at the end of life, the provision of palliative care and symptom management may be inadequate.

scholarly journals Documenting Plans for Care: Advance Care Directives and the 7-Step Pathway in the Acute Care Context

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gregory Brian Crawford ◽  
Katherine Susan Hodgetts ◽  
Teresa Burgess ◽  
Jaklin Ardath Eliott
Keyword(s):  
End Of Life ◽  
Acute Care ◽  
End Of Life Care ◽  
Hospital Setting ◽  
South Australia ◽  
Care Plan ◽  
Life Care ◽  
Emergency Nurses ◽  
Substitute Decision Maker ◽  
Advance Care

Abstract Background Advance care planning (ACP) involves the discussion and documentation of an individual’s values and preferences to guide their future healthcare should they lose capacity to make or communicate treatment decisions. ACP can involve the individual’s completion of an Advance Care Directive (ACD), a legislated and common-law instrument which may include appointment of a substitute decision-maker and binding refusals of treatment. In South Australia, ACDs intersect in the acute-care context with the Resuscitation Plan 7-Step Pathway (7-SP), an integrated care plan written for and by clinicians, designed to organise and improve patients’ end-of-life care through the use of structured documentation. Here, we examine the perspectives of healthcare professionals (HPs) within a hospital setting on the practical integration of ACDs and the 7-SP, exploring the perceived role, function, and value of each as they intersect to guide end-of-life care in an Australian hospital setting. Methods Qualitative data were collected via eight focus groups with a total of 74 HPs (palliative care, acute care, and oncology specialists; medical intern; general and emergency nurses; social workers) across two hospitals. Audio recordings were transcribed and thematically analysed. Results HPs viewed ACDs as a potentially valuable means of promoting patient autonomy, but as rarely completed and poorly integrated into hospital systems. Conversely, the process and documentation of the 7-SP was perceived as providing clarity about clinicians’ responsibilities, and as a well-understood, integrated resource. Participants sometimes exhibited uncertainty around which document takes precedence if both were present. Sometimes, the routinisation of the 7-SP meant it was understood as the ‘only way’ to determine patient wishes and provide optimal end-of-life care. When this occurs, the perceived authority of ACDs, or of patients’ choice not to participate in end-of-life discussions, may be undermined. Conclusions The intersection of ACDs and the 7-SP appears problematic within acute care. Clinicians’ uncertainty as to whether an ACD or 7-SP takes precedence, and when it should do so, suggests a need for further clarity and training on the roles of these documents in guiding clinical practice, the legislative context within which specific documentation is embedded, and the dynamics associated with collaborative decision-making in end-of-life care.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document