scholarly journals Fluoxetine therapy in depersonalisation disorder: Randomised controlled trial

2004 ◽  
Vol 185 (1) ◽  
pp. 31-36 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daphne Simeon ◽  
Orna Guralnik ◽  
James Schmeidler ◽  
Margaret Knutelska
Keyword(s):  
Serotonin Reuptake ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Intention To Treat ◽  
Dissociative Experiences ◽  
Efficacious Treatment ◽  
Randomised Controlled ◽  
Treat Analysis ◽  
Clinical Global Impression Improvement

BackgroundDespite anecdotal reports that serotonin reuptake inhibitors may improve depersonalisation, there is no proven efficacious treatment for depersonalisation disorder.AimsTo investigate the efficacy of fluoxetine in the treatment of depersonalisation disorder.MethodFifty-four people who met DSM-IV criteria for depersonalisation disorder were recruited through newspaper advertisements, and 50 were randomised to a 10-week, double-blind trial of fluoxetine 10–60 mg/day or placebo. Primary outcome measures were the Dissociative Experiences Scale-epersonalisation Factor, the Depersonalization Severity Scale and the Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-1) scale.ResultsIntention-to-treat analysis revealed that fluoxetine (mean dosage 48 mg/day) was not superior to placebo except for a clinically minimal but statistically significantly greater improvement in CGI-I score in the fluoxetine group prior to covarying for anxiety and depression (2.9 v. 3.6). Depersonalisation was significantly more likely to improve if comorbid anxiety disorder improved.ConclusionsFluoxetine was not efficacious in treating depersonalisation disorder, despite the commonly reported clinical use of serotonin reuptake inhibitors for this condition.

scholarly journals Effectiveness of a Fortified Drink in Improving B Vitamin Biomarkers in Older Adults: A Controlled Intervention Trial

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria Heffernan ◽  
Leanne C Doherty ◽  
Roberta Hack Mendes ◽  
Michelle Clarke ◽  
Stephanie Hodge ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Older Adults ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Intervention Strategy ◽  
B Vitamins ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Intention To Treat ◽  
Vitamin Status ◽  
Randomised Controlled ◽  
B Vitamin ◽  
To Receive

Abstract BackgroundOlder adults are reported to have sub-optimal B vitamin status; targeted food-based solutions may help to address this. The objectives of the OptiAge food intervention study were to develop and investigate the effectiveness of a B vitamin-fortified drink in improving B vitamin biomarkers in older Irish adults with a primary outcome of change in B vitamin biomarker concentrations.MethodsA multicentre double-blind randomised controlled trial was performed in University College Dublin and Ulster University. Participants aged > 50 years were recruited following screening for exclusion criteria i.e. taking medications known to interfere with B vitamin metabolism, supplements containing B vitamins, consuming >4 portions of B-vitamin fortified foods per week or diagnosed with gastrointestinal, liver or pulmonary disease. Recruited participants were randomised with gender and centre as factors in the randomisation to receive either B vitamin-fortified or placebo drinks (developed by Smartfish, Norway) daily for 16 weeks.ResultsA total of 95 participants were randomised, of which 81 commenced the trial. Of these, 70 completed - 37 in the active and 33 in the placebo groups. Intention to treat (ITT) analysis of the B vitamins demonstrated a significant improvement in all B vitamins biomarkers in the active compared to placebo groups (p<0.01 for Folate, Vitamin B12, Vitamin B6, and Riboflavin). A significant lowering of plasma homocysteine from 11.9 (10.3-15.1) µmol/L to 10.6 (9.4-13.0) µmol/L (functional marker of B vitamin status) was also observed in response to the active treatment (P<0.001). Similar results were seen in a per-protocol analysis.ConclusionsThe results demonstrate that a B vitamin-fortified drink was effective in optimising B vitamin status, making this a useful intervention strategy to improve B vitamin status in older adults. Trial registration: ISRCTN, ISRCTN61709781. - Retrospectively registered, https://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN61709781

scholarly journals Efficacy of high-volume injections with and without corticosteroid compared with sham for Achilles tendinopathy: a protocol for a randomised controlled trial

2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (4) ◽  
pp. e001136
Author(s):  
Peter Malliaras ◽  
David Connell ◽  
Anders Ploug Boesen ◽  
Rebecca S Kearney ◽  
Hylton B Menz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Randomised Controlled Trial ◽  
Exercise Intervention ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
High Volume ◽  
Primary Outcome Measure ◽  
Achilles Tendinopathy ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Sham Injection ◽  
Intention To Treat ◽  
Randomised Controlled

IntroductionAchilles tendinopathy (AT) is a common and disabling musculoskeletal condition. First-line management involving Achilles tendon loading exercise with, or without, other modalities may not resolve the problem in up to 44% of cases. Many people receive injections. Yet there are no injection treatments with demonstrated long-term efficacy. The aim of the trial is to examine the 12-month efficacy of high-volume injection (HVI) with corticosteroid and HVI without corticosteroid versus sham injection among individuals with AT.Methods and analysisThe trial is a three-arm, parallel group, double-blind, superiority randomised controlled trial that will assess the efficacy of HVI with and without corticosteroid versus sham up to 12 months. We will block-randomise 192 participants to one of the three groups with a 1:1:1 ratio, and both participants and outcome assessors will be blinded to treatment allocation. All participants will receive an identical evidence-based education and exercise intervention. The primary outcome measure will be the Victorian Institute of Sport Assessment – Achilles (VISA-A) at 12 months post-randomisation, a validated, reliable and disease-specific measure of pain and function. Choice of secondary outcomes was informed by core outcome domains for tendinopathy. Data will be analysed using the intention-to-treat principle.Ethics and disseminationEthics approval was obtained via the Monash University Human Ethics Committee (no: 13138). The study is expected to be completed in 2024 and disseminated via peer review publication and conference presentations.Trial registration numberAustralia and New Zealand Clinical trials registry (ACTRN12619001455156)

Presenting a randomised controlled trial

2013 ◽  
Author(s):  
Janet L. Peacock ◽  
Sally M. Kerry
Keyword(s):  
Randomised Controlled Trial ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Consort Statement ◽  
Intention To Treat ◽  
The Consort Statement ◽  
Randomised Controlled ◽  
Treat Analysis

Chapter 12 covers presenting a randomised controlled trial, including the CONSORT statement and checklist, intention to treat analysis, and presenting trials with other designs.

scholarly journals 117. Adjunctive Daptomycin in the Treatment of staphylococcus Aureus Bacteremia

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S187-S187
Author(s):  
Matthew P Cheng ◽  
Alexander Lawandi ◽  
Guillaume Butler-Laporte ◽  
Samuel De L’Etoile-Morel ◽  
Katryn Paquette ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Staphylococcus Aureus ◽  
Median Duration ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Absolute Difference ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Intention To Treat ◽  
Care Treatment ◽  
Standard Of Care Treatment ◽  
Treat Analysis

Abstract Background Bloodstream infections (BSI) caused by methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) are associated with significant morbidity and mortality. The objective of our study was to determine whether daptomycin given in combination with an anti-staphylococcal beta-lactam improved outcomes in MSSA BSI. Methods A randomized, double blind, placebo-controlled trial was performed at two academic hospitals in Montreal, Canada. Patients ≥ 18 years of age with MSSA BSI receiving either cefazolin or cloxacillin monotherapy were considered for inclusion. In addition to the standard of care treatment, participants received a 5-day course of adjunctive daptomycin or placebo. The primary outcome was the duration of MSSA BSI in days. Results Of 318 participants screened, 115 were enrolled and 104 were included in the intention to treat analysis (median age 67 years; 34.5% female). The median duration of bacteremia was 2.04 days among patients who received daptomycin versus 1.65 days in those who received placebo (absolute difference 0.39 days, p=0.40). A modified intention to treat analysis involving participants who remained bacteremic at the time of enrollment found a median duration of bacteremia of 3.06 days among patients who received daptomycin versus 3.0 days in those who received placebo (absolute difference 0.06 days, p=0.77). Ninety-day mortality in the daptomycin arm was 18.9% vs. 17.7% in the placebo arm (p=1.0). There were no significant differences in the proportion of patients who developed renal failure, hepatotoxicity, or rhabdomyolysis between groups. Conclusion Among patients with MSSA BSI, the administration of adjunctive daptomycin therapy to standard of care treatment did not shorten the duration of bacteremia. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

scholarly journals Controlled Trial of 3-Day Quinine-Clindamycin Treatment versus 7-Day Quinine Treatment for Adult Travelers with Uncomplicated Falciparum Malaria Imported from the Tropics

2001 ◽  
Vol 45 (3) ◽  
pp. 932-935 ◽  
Author(s):  
Phillippe Parola ◽  
Stephane Ranque ◽  
Sekene Badiaga ◽  
Mohamadou Niang ◽  
Olivier Blin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Reactions ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Cure Rate ◽  
Short Term ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Intention To Treat ◽  
The Tropics ◽  
Severe Adverse Reactions ◽  
Cessation Of Treatment ◽  
Treat Analysis

ABSTRACT We conducted a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial to compare a 3-day quinine-clindamycin regimen (group QC) with a 7-day quinine regimen (group Q) for the treatment of uncomplicatedPlasmodium falciparum malaria in travelers returning from the tropics. A total of 55 and 53 patients in groups Q and QC were analyzed, respectively. Adverse effects were similar in both groups, although two patients in group Q had severe adverse reactions, leading to the cessation of treatment. The 28-day cure rate for the evaluated patients (per-protocol analysis) was 100% for group QC, whereas it was 96.3% for group Q (P = 0.5). The 28-day cure rate in the intention-to-treat analysis was 96.2% for group QC, whereas it was 94.6% for group Q (P = 1). There were no significant differences between the two regimens with regard to parasite and fever clearance times. Our study shows that the 3-day quinine-clindamycin regimen is well tolerated and compares favorably with a 7-day quinine treatment. This short-term regimen had previously been evaluated only in areas of endemicity. According to our results, the 3-day quinine-clindamycin regimen may be an alternative for the treatment of imported uncomplicated P. falciparum malaria in travelers returning from the tropics.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document