scholarly journals Mental health day centres

2001 ◽  
Vol 25 (2) ◽  
pp. 61-66 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jocelyn Catty ◽  
Tom Burns

Aims and MethodMental health day centres have been little researched. We carried out a 1-week census at the four day centres run by a London borough.ResultsThe centres catered for a g roup with long-standing mental health problems, mostly under community mental health team care. A surprising number were suffering from physical ill health. They attended the centres primarily for social reasons or to participate in creative groups such as music and art.Very few were concurrently attending day hospitals.Clinical ImplicationsFurther work is essential to understand the distinction between NHS day hospitals and Social Services day centres in terms of utilisation and client group.This client group's needs, particularly for physical health care, require urgent attention.

2002 ◽  
Vol 26 (3) ◽  
pp. 91-92 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Stafford ◽  
R. Laugharne ◽  
K. Gannon

Aims and MethodPatient-held records have been introduced in mental health over the past 2 decades. This follow-up study aimed to evaluate one pilot project 5 years after the records were introduced. All patients initially interviewed 4 years previously were approached and asked about their use and opinion of the record.ResultsOf the 19 people interviewed, 12 were still using the record and had a positive opinion of its usefulness. Of all community mental health team contacts, 72% were recorded in the patient-held notes.Clinical ImplicationsPatient-held records are sustainable in a naturalistic clinical setting over the period of 5 years.


2006 ◽  
Vol 30 (7) ◽  
pp. 269-271 ◽  
Author(s):  
Polash Shajahan ◽  
Frances Forde ◽  
Mary McIntosh ◽  
Vicki Moffat ◽  
Pravin Munogee

Aims and MethodWe describe the redesign of a community mental health team in Lanarkshire (the focused intervention team for Bellshill). Their remit is to provide focused, time-limited therapeutic intervention for patients with mild-to-moderate mental health problems.ResultsThe redesign involved a closer working relationship with the psychiatrist, establishing a concurrent community psychiatric nurse/ psychiatric clinic, recategorisation of ‘soon’ and routine referrals to the team, opt-in letters and the introduction of new assessment formats.Clinical ImplicationsThese measures combined to provide a shorter waiting list, increased joint working and management plans for patients. Team functioning and morale improved.


1999 ◽  
Vol 23 (3) ◽  
pp. 161-164 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rebecca J. Tipper ◽  
Ian M. Pullen

Aims and methodAudio-recordings were made over a period of six months of liaison–consultation meetings between general practitioners and a community mental health team in the Scottish Borders to show general trends in length of discussion and information exchange.ResultsMeetings were predominantly supportive, with high levels of shared information, but little educational content. Some trends in discussion time are shown.Clinical implicationsAudio-recording could form the basis for reviewing the function of liaison-consultation meetings.


2010 ◽  
Vol 34 (3) ◽  
pp. 83-86 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elena Baker-Glenn ◽  
Mark Steels ◽  
Chris Evans

Aims and methodThis survey was conducted to ascertain the use of psychotropic medication in the treatment of patients with a primary diagnosis of personality disorder within a community mental health team. A sample of 113 patients were identified, their notes were reviewed, and details of current medications and diagnoses recorded.ResultsFour-fifths of patients were prescribed at least one psychotropic medication. The most commonly prescribed medication class was antidepressant, comprising almost half of prescriptions. The total annual cost across 107 patients was £37 000.Clinical implicationsMedication is commonly prescribed to people with personality disorder but more needs to be known about why prescriptions are started and stopped, what the benefits are, and how these are judged by patients and care teams.


1998 ◽  
Vol 61 (5) ◽  
pp. 203-206 ◽  
Author(s):  
Candida Rosier ◽  
Hilary Williams ◽  
Iain Ryrie

Just as the delivery of care to people with mental health problems has evolved, so too has the role an occupational therapist plays in the multidisciplinary mental health team. This paper highlights the valuable role of occupational therapists within a particular community mental health team by, first, acknowledging their specialist skills and then describing one component of their work: a 7-week closed group for anxiety management. Finally, it provides recommendations for others who may wish to set up a similar group, which have been drawn from the authors' own experiences.


2010 ◽  
Vol 34 (2) ◽  
pp. 44-46 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tongeji E. Tungaraza ◽  
Seema Gupta ◽  
Jane Jones ◽  
Rob Poole ◽  
Gary Slegg

Aims and methodTo determine the pattern of psychotropic prescribing in a group of people with psychosis who were living in the community under community mental health team (CMHT) care. Case-note entries over the previous 12 months were examined.ResultsOnly a third of individuals were on one psychotropic medication. Atypical antipsychotics were prescribed to 80.6%. Polypharmacy was common. A third of people were taking three or more psychotropic drugs and 13.7% were on high-dose regimes, mostly involving two atypical antipsychotics.Clinical implicationsThe use of atypicals has not eliminated polypharmacy or high-dose antipsychotic regimes. Clinicians need to be aware of this long-standing problem.


2014 ◽  
Vol 23 (4) ◽  
pp. 337-344 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. Burns

Mental health care in the second half of the 20th century in much of the developed world has been dominated by the move out from large asylums. Both in response to this move and to make it possible, a pattern of care has evolved which is most commonly referred to as ‘Community Psychiatry’. This narrative review describes this process, from local experimentation into the current era of evidence-based mental health care. It focuses on three main areas of this development: (i) the reprovision of care for those discharged during deinstitutionalisation; (ii) the evolution and evaluation of its characteristic feature the Community Mental Health Team; and (iii) the increasing sophistication of psychosocial interventions developed to support patients. It finishes with an overview of some current challenges.


2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. e000914
Author(s):  
Priyalakshmi Chowdhury ◽  
Amir Tari ◽  
Ola Hill ◽  
Amar Shah

This article describes the application of quality improvement (QI) to solve a long-standing, ongoing problem where service users or their carers felt they were not given enough information regarding diagnosis and medication during clinic assessments in a community mental health setting. Service users and carers had shared feedback that some of the information documented on clinic letters was not accurate and the service users were not given the opportunity to discuss these letters with the clinician. The aim of this QI project was to improve the communication between the community mental health team (CMHT) and service users and their carers. Wardown CMHT volunteered to take on this project. The stakeholders involved were the team manager and deputy manager, the team consultant, the team specialist registrar, team administrative manager, two carers and one service user. The project had access to QI learning and support through East London NHS Foundation Trust’s QI programme. The team organised weekly meetings to brainstorm ideas, plan tests of change to review progress and to agree on the next course of action. The outcome was an increase in service user satisfaction from 59.9% to 78% over a period of 6 months, and a reduction in complaints to zero.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document