Effects of Fling Step and Forward Directivity on Seismic Response of Buildings

2006 ◽  
Vol 22 (2) ◽  
pp. 367-390 ◽  
Author(s):  
Erol Kalkan ◽  
Sashi K. Kunnath
Keyword(s):  
Seismic Response ◽  
Ground Motions ◽  
High Amplitude ◽  
Moment Frames ◽  
Steel Moment Frames ◽  
Damage Potential ◽  
Near Fault ◽  
Forward Directivity ◽  
Fling Step ◽  
Far Fault

This paper investigates the consequences of well-known characteristics of near-fault ground motions on the seismic response of steel moment frames. Additionally, idealized pulses are utilized in a separate study to gain further insight into the effects of high-amplitude pulses on structural demands. Simple input pulses were also synthesized to simulate artificial fling-step effects in ground motions originally having forward directivity. Findings from the study reveal that median maximum demands and the dispersion in the peak values were higher for near-fault records than far-fault motions. The arrival of the velocity pulse in a near-fault record causes the structure to dissipate considerable input energy in relatively few plastic cycles, whereas cumulative effects from increased cyclic demands are more pronounced in far-fault records. For pulse-type input, the maximum demand is a function of the ratio of the pulse period to the fundamental period of the structure. Records with fling effects were found to excite systems primarily in their fundamental mode while waveforms with forward directivity in the absence of fling caused higher modes to be activated. It is concluded that the acceleration and velocity spectra, when examined collectively, can be utilized to reasonably assess the damage potential of near-fault records.

scholarly journals Seismic Response of a Historical Masonry Bridge under Near and Far-fault Ground Motions

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alper Özmen ◽  
Erkut Sayın
Keyword(s):  
Finite Element ◽  
Natural Disasters ◽  
Seismic Response ◽  
Ground Motions ◽  
Masonry Arch ◽  
Finite Element Software ◽  
Near Fault ◽  
Historical Masonry ◽  
Arch Bridges ◽  
Far Fault

Historical masonry arch bridges which might be vulnerable to natural disasters are important part of the cultural heritage. Natural disasters, especially earthquakes can inflict damage to these structural systems. This paper aims to investigate a comparison of the effects of near and far-fault ground motions on the seismic response of masonry arch bridges under different earthquakes. Kalender masonry arch bridge which is located in Ergani, Turkey is selected as a numerical model. For this purpose, three-dimensional finite element model of the bridge is generated with ANSYS finite element software with macro modelling approach. Seismic response of the bridge is assessed by means of time-history analyses. The near-fault and far-fault ground motions, which have approximately equal peak ground accelerations, of 1979 Imperial Valley, 1999 Chi-Chi, 1999 Kocaeli and 2010 Darfield earthquakes are considered for the analyses. Comparisons between maximum displacements, maximum and minimum stress, which were acquired from the dynamic analyses of the masonry bridge subjected to each fault effect, are obtained. The study demonstrates that far-fault ground motions are as important as near-fault ground motions and it can be used together with near-fault ground motion for further evaluation of such historical masonry bridges.

scholarly journals Dynamic Response Evaluation of Bridges Considering Aspect Ratio of Pier in Near-Fault and Far-Fault Ground Motions

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (17) ◽  
pp. 6098
Author(s):  
Hyojoon An ◽  
Jong-Han Lee ◽  
Soobong Shin
Keyword(s):  
Aspect Ratio ◽  
Seismic Response ◽  
Ground Motion ◽  
Ground Motions ◽  
Nonlinear Static Analysis ◽  
Structural System ◽  
Seismic Capacity ◽  
Near Fault ◽  
Aspect Ratios ◽  
Far Fault

The recent increase in earthquake activities has highlighted the importance of predicting the seismic response of structures. Damage to civil infrastructure, particularly bridges, can cause considerable human and property losses. The seismic performance of a structure should be evaluated based on the characteristics of structures and earthquakes. For this, this study defined the two main factors of ground motion and structural system that affect the seismic response of a structure. Ground motions, which are mainly dependent on the distance from the epicenter, were defined as near-fault and far-fault ground motions. Near-fault ground motion includes the characteristics of forward directivity and fling step. In addition to ground motion, the aspect ratio of the pier, as a representative factor of a structural system, influences the seismic behavior of bridges. Thus, this study assessed the seismic response of bridges with various aspect ratios under the near-fault and far-fault ground motion conditions. Nonlinear static analysis was first performed to evaluate the seismic capacity of the pier. Then modal and dynamic analyses were carried out to examine the effects of the aspect ratio and ground motion on the displacement and force response and the change in the natural frequency of the bridge.

Influence of floor system on seismic behavior of RC buildings to forward directivity and fling-step in the near-fault region

Structures ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 30 ◽  
pp. 803-817
Author(s):  
Sayed Mahmoud ◽  
Ali Alqarni ◽  
Joseph Saliba ◽  
Amal H. Ibrahim ◽  
Magdy genidy ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Seismic Behavior ◽  
Rc Buildings ◽  
Near Fault ◽  
Forward Directivity ◽  
Fling Step ◽  
Floor System ◽  
Fault Region

scholarly journals Inelastic displacement ratios for non-structural components in steel framed structures under forward-directivity near-fault strong-ground motion

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. A. Bravo-Haro ◽  
J. R. Virreira ◽  
A. Y. Elghazouli
Keyword(s):  
Strong Ground Motion ◽  
Ground Motions ◽  
Structural Elements ◽  
Structural Components ◽  
Framed Structures ◽  
Inelastic Displacement ◽  
Near Fault ◽  
Forward Directivity ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Strong Ground

AbstractThis paper describes a detailed numerical investigation into the inelastic displacement ratios of non-structural components mounted within multi-storey steel framed buildings and subjected to ground motions with forward-directivity features which are typical of near-fault events. The study is carried out using detailed multi-degree-of-freedom models of 54 primary steel buildings with different structural characteristics. In conjunction with this, 80 secondary non-structural elements are modelled as single-degree-of-freedom systems and placed at every floor within the primary framed structures, then subsequently analysed through extensive dynamic analysis. The influence of ground motions with forward-directivity effects on the mean response of the inelastic displacement ratios of non-structural components are compared to the results obtained from a reference set of strong-ground motion records representing far-field events. It is shown that the mean demand under near-fault records can be over twice as large as that due to far-fault counterparts, particularly for non-structural components with periods of vibration lower than the fundamental period of the primary building. Based on the results, a prediction model for estimating the inelastic displacement ratios of non-structural components is calibrated for far-field records and near-fault records with directivity features. The model is valid for a wide range of secondary non-structural periods and primary building fundamental periods, as well as for various levels of inelasticity induced within the secondary non-structural elements.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document