European/U.S. Comparison and Contrasts in Ovarian Cancer Screening and Prevention in a High-Risk Population

2017 ◽  
pp. 124-127
Author(s):  
Marian J. Mourits ◽  
G. H. de Bock
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Cancer Screening ◽  
High Risk ◽  
The United States ◽  
High Risk Population ◽  
Genome Wide Association Studies ◽  
Hereditary Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Ovarian Cancer Screening ◽  
Screening And Prevention

The history of screening and prevention of ovarian cancer among high-risk women in the United States and Europe is one of mutual inspiration, with researchers learning from each others’ findings and insights and collaborating with investigators from both sides of the Atlantic ocean. Examples of simultaneous and joint development of knowledge and scientific points of view include the paradigm shift from ovarian to fallopian tube high-grade serous cancer and the cessation of simultaneous adoption of ovarian cancer screening by clinicians in both the United States and Europe. Examples of joint efforts with fruitful results include international collaboration in large population-based, genome-wide association studies and in epidemiologic database studies. Research in the field of hereditary ovarian cancer is a great example of mutual inspiration and joint efforts for the purpose of improving knowledge and health care for women with hereditary ovarian cancer.

scholarly journals Estimating Cost-effectiveness of a Multimodal Ovarian Cancer Screening Program in the United States

JAMA Oncology ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 190 ◽  
Author(s):  
Haley A. Moss ◽  
Andrew Berchuck ◽  
Megan L. Neely ◽  
Evan R. Myers ◽  
Laura J. Havrilesky
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Cost Effectiveness ◽  
Cancer Screening ◽  
Screening Program ◽  
The United States ◽  
Ovarian Cancer Screening ◽  
Cancer Screening Program

Ovarian cancer screening in high risk menopausal females

2015 ◽  
Vol 137 ◽  
pp. 209
Author(s):  
T. Lai ◽  
H.J. Ahn ◽  
J. Elia ◽  
K.Y. Terada
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Cancer Screening ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Ovarian Cancer Screening

Risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy and prophylactic mastectomy among BRCA mutation “previvors.”

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1518-1518
Author(s):  
Laura L. Holman ◽  
Molly S Daniels ◽  
Amanda C. Brandt ◽  
Banu Arun ◽  
Elizabeth Keeler ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Cancer Screening ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Prophylactic Mastectomy ◽  
Brca Mutation ◽  
Premenopausal Women ◽  
Prophylactic Surgery ◽  
Ovarian Cancer Screening ◽  
Brca Mutation Carriers ◽  
Risk Reducing

1518 Background: We prospectively evaluated the timing and uptake of risk-reducing surgery in a cohort of female BRCA mutation carriers that have no personal cancer history (“previvors”). Methods: Patients at high risk of breast and ovarian cancer were enrolled between 2007 and 2011 and followed in a high-risk ovarian cancer screening clinic. Women were offered risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO) and/or prophylactic mastectomy (PM) per guidelines. Their clinical data were recorded and analyzed using descriptive statistics. Results: Of 260 BRCA mutation carriers enrolled, 73 have no personal history of cancer and are “previvors.” Patients have been followed for a median of 26.5 months (1-50 months). The median age is 38 years, 81.1% are white, 16.2% are Ashkenazi Jewish, and 79.7% are premenopausal. BRCA1 carriers account for 43.2% of participants and 55.4% have a BRCA2 mutation. The majority of patients (77.6%) presented for ovarian cancer screening <1 year after their BRCA testing. In all, 60.8% of women underwent prophylactic surgery: 28.4% chose RRSO, 18.9% chose PM, and 13.5% chose both procedures. Postmenopausal women were more likely to choose RRSO, while uptake for both procedures was common for premenopausal women (Table, p=0.04). RRSO was also more likely in parous than nulliparous premenopausal women (35.2% vs 9% p=0.001). PM was not associated with parity (p=0.79). Of women that had both surgeries, 20% had them concurrently and 20% had PM first. Of the 60% that underwent RRSO first, all had their second surgery within 14 months. Conclusions: BRCA mutation “previvors” have a high overall uptake of prophylactic surgery. Premenopausal women are more likely to choose PM than postmenopausal women; reasons for this are unclear. “Previvors” that choose RRSO and PM typically have both surgeries within a fairly short timeframe. With the growing population of “previvors” in the US, further study of patient preferences regarding preventative surgery and long-term consequences is needed. [Table: see text]

Is There a Role for Ovarian Cancer Screening in High-Risk Women?

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (13) ◽  
pp. 1384-1386 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew Berchuck ◽  
Laura J. Havrilesky ◽  
Noah D. Kauff
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Cancer Screening ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Ovarian Cancer Screening ◽  
High Risk Women

scholarly journals P1.11-29 Relationship Between Lung Cancer Screening Centers in the United States and High-Risk Individuals

2019 ◽  
Vol 14 (10) ◽  
pp. S527-S528
Author(s):  
C. Wilshire ◽  
C. Henson ◽  
S. Chiu ◽  
C. Gilbert ◽  
E. Vallieres ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Cancer Screening ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Lung Cancer Screening ◽  
The United States
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document