scholarly journals Estimating Cost-effectiveness of a Multimodal Ovarian Cancer Screening Program in the United States

JAMA Oncology ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 190 ◽  
Author(s):  
Haley A. Moss ◽  
Andrew Berchuck ◽  
Megan L. Neely ◽  
Evan R. Myers ◽  
Laura J. Havrilesky
Author(s):  
Marian J. Mourits ◽  
G. H. de Bock

The history of screening and prevention of ovarian cancer among high-risk women in the United States and Europe is one of mutual inspiration, with researchers learning from each others’ findings and insights and collaborating with investigators from both sides of the Atlantic ocean. Examples of simultaneous and joint development of knowledge and scientific points of view include the paradigm shift from ovarian to fallopian tube high-grade serous cancer and the cessation of simultaneous adoption of ovarian cancer screening by clinicians in both the United States and Europe. Examples of joint efforts with fruitful results include international collaboration in large population-based, genome-wide association studies and in epidemiologic database studies. Research in the field of hereditary ovarian cancer is a great example of mutual inspiration and joint efforts for the purpose of improving knowledge and health care for women with hereditary ovarian cancer.


2007 ◽  
Vol 104 (3) ◽  
pp. 695-701 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael A. Andrykowski ◽  
Mei Zhang ◽  
Edward J. Pavlik ◽  
Richard J. Kryscio

2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e13059-e13059 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kisha T Hope ◽  
Anna Everett Strohl ◽  
Patricia Smyrniotis ◽  
Jeffrey Dungan ◽  
Shohreh Shahabi ◽  
...  

Diagnostics ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 67
Author(s):  
Justin W. Gorski ◽  
McKell Quattrone ◽  
John R. van Nagell ◽  
Edward J. Pavlik

The primary objective of this study is to provide an updated analysis of the cost of screening for ovarian cancer in the United States. Here, we use updated information from the University of Kentucky Ovarian Cancer Screening Trial in conjunction with new modifying factors such as U.S. national estimates of the cost of care (Truven Health MarketScan Database), recently published estimates of earnings lost due to ovarian cancer death and estimates of federal income taxes paid on those earnings. In total, 326,998 screens were performed during the Kentucky trial from 1987 to 2019. At a cost of $56 per screen, we estimate that the total base cost to operate the program over the last 32 years is $18,311,888. When accounting for the surgical cost of 381 false-positive cases, the total cost of the screening program increases by $3,030,474. However, these costs are offset by the benefit of treating more early-stage ovarian cancer in the screened population, with a total cost advantage of $4,016,475 at our institution (Kentucky) or $1,525,050 ($725,700–$3,312,650) (U.S.) nationally. Additionally, program costs are offset by approximately $3,549,000 due to the potential earnings gained by the 26 women whose lives have been saved with screening. Furthermore, the cost of the program is offset by the federal tax dollars paid on the recovered earnings and amounts to $383,292. Ultimately, the net adjusted total cost of the Kentucky screening program is an estimated $13,393,595 at our institution or $15,885,020 ($13,978,068–$16,799,083) nationally. Thus, the adjusted cost per screen is an estimated $40.96 in Kentucky or $48.58 ($42.75–$51.37) nationally.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document