scholarly journals Venetoclax Combined With Low-Dose Cytarabine for Previously Untreated Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia: Results From a Phase Ib/II Study

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15) ◽  
pp. 1277-1284 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew H. Wei ◽  
Stephen A. Strickland ◽  
Jing-Zhou Hou ◽  
Walter Fiedler ◽  
Tara L. Lin ◽  
...  

PURPOSE Effective treatment options are limited for patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) who cannot tolerate intensive chemotherapy. An international phase Ib/II study evaluated the safety and preliminary efficacy of venetoclax, a selective B-cell leukemia/lymphoma-2 inhibitor, together with low-dose cytarabine (LDAC) in older adults with AML. PATIENTS AND METHODS Adults 60 years or older with previously untreated AML ineligible for intensive chemotherapy were enrolled. Prior treatment of myelodysplastic syndrome, including hypomethylating agents (HMA), was permitted. Eighty-two patients were treated at the recommended phase II dose: venetoclax 600 mg per day orally in 28-day cycles, with LDAC (20 mg/m2 per day) administered subcutaneously on days 1 to 10. Key end points were tolerability, safety, response rates, duration of response (DOR), and overall survival (OS). RESULTS Median age was 74 years (range, 63 to 90 years), 49% had secondary AML, 29% had prior HMA treatment, and 32% had poor-risk cytogenetic features. Common grade 3 or greater adverse events were febrile neutropenia (42%), thrombocytopenia (38%), and WBC count decreased (34%). Early (30-day) mortality was 6%. Fifty-four percent achieved complete remission (CR)/CR with incomplete blood count recovery (median time to first response, 1.4 months). The median OS was 10.1 months (95% CI, 5.7 to 14.2), and median DOR was 8.1 months (95% CI, 5.3 to 14.9 months). Among patients without prior HMA exposure, CR/CR with incomplete blood count recovery was achieved in 62%, median DOR was 14.8 months (95% CI, 5.5 months to not reached), and median OS was 13.5 months (95% CI, 7.0 to 18.4 months). CONCLUSION Venetoclax plus LDAC has a manageable safety profile, producing rapid and durable remissions in older adults with AML ineligible for intensive chemotherapy. High remission rate and low early mortality combined with rapid and durable remission make venetoclax and LDAC an attractive and novel treatment for older adults not suitable for intensive chemotherapy.

2019 ◽  
Vol 143 (1) ◽  
pp. 65-68 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shai Shimony ◽  
Hilla Reiss Mintz ◽  
Yulia Shvartser Beryozkin ◽  
Avivit Shoham ◽  
Pia Raanani ◽  
...  

Midostaurin is a tyrosine multikinase inhibitor approved for the treatment of patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML) with mutated Fms-like tyrosine kinase-3. We describe a case report of a 49-year-old AML patient treated with an intensive chemotherapy regimen followed by midostaurin. After achieving complete remission with blood count recovery, he suffered from a serious, rare complication of necrotizing hemorrhagic gastritis with no evidence of infection or malignant infiltration, possibly associated with midostaurin therapy.


2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 7511-7511 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew H. Wei ◽  
Pau Montesinos ◽  
Vladimir Ivanov ◽  
Courtney Denton Dinardo ◽  
Jan Novak ◽  
...  

7511 Background: VIALE-C was designed to compare the safety and efficacy of the BCL-2 inhibitor venetoclax (VEN) or placebo (PBO) plus low-dose cytarabine (LDAC) in previously untreated patient (pts) with acute myeloid leukemia (AML; ≥75 yr or ≥18 yr with comorbidities precluding intensive chemotherapy). The primary overall survival (OS) analysis showed a clinically meaningful improvement with VEN+LDAC, although the primary endpoint was not met. Herein, we present a 6-mo update after primary analysis, with a focus on OS. Methods: This double-blind, PBO-controlled phase 3 study (NCT03069352) randomized pts 2:1 to VEN (600 mg orally QD, days [d]1–28) with 4-d ramp-up in first cycle or PBO in 28-d cycles, plus LDAC (20 mg/m2 subcutaneously QD, d1–10). The primary endpoint was OS; secondary endpoints included response, transfusion independence (TI; red blood cells [RBC] or platelets), and event-free survival (EFS). OS and EFS were analyzed by the Kaplan-Meier method and compared between arms using the log-rank test stratified by AML status (de novo vs secondary) and age (18 to < 74 vs ≥75). The planned sample size was 210 pts (n = 140, VEN; n = 70, PBO) to detect a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.545 in OS with 2-sided alpha of 5% and power of 90%. Results: As of 15 Aug 2019, 211 pts were randomized (n = 143, VEN; n = 68, PBO); median age: 76 yr in both arms (range: 36–93); secondary AML: 38% (88% post-MDS/CMML); prior hypomethylating agent: 20%. With a median follow-up of 17.5 mo (range: 0.1–23.5), median OS was 8.4 mo vs 4.1 mo in the VEN+LDAC and PBO+LDAC arms (HR 0.70; 95% CI 0.50–0.99; P= .04), representing a 30% reduction in the risk of death. Complete remission (CR)/CRi and CR/CRh (CR with partial hematologic recovery) rates were both 48% for the VEN+LDAC arm, and 13% and 15%, respectively, for PBO+LDAC. RBC/platelets TI rates were 43%/49% vs 19%/32% for VEN+LDAC and PBO+LDAC. Median EFS was 4.9 mo vs 2.1 mo in the VEN+LDAC and PBO+LDAC arms (HR 0.61; 95% CI 0.44–0.84; P= .003). Grade ≥3 adverse events (AEs [ > 30%]; VEN+LDAC/PBO+LDAC) included neutropenia (49%/18%), thrombocytopenia (45%/38%), and febrile neutropenia (32%/29%); serious AEs ( > 10%) were febrile neutropenia (17%/18%) and pneumonia (14%/10%); tumor lysis syndrome occurred in 5.6%/0%. Conclusions: VEN+LDAC demonstrates a clinically meaningful improvement in OS compared with PBO+LDAC, with a tolerable and manageable safety profile. These data support VEN+LDAC as a frontline treatment option for older pts with AML, as well as those considered unfit for intensive chemotherapy. Clinical trial information: NCT03069352 .


2016 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
pp. 2016009 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maël Heiblig ◽  
Mohamed Elhamri ◽  
Isabelle Tigaud ◽  
Adriana Plesa ◽  
Fiorenza Barraco ◽  
...  

Objectives: Low-dose cytarabine (LD-AraC) is still regarded as the standard of care in elderly patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) ‘unfit’ for intensive chemotherapy. In this study, we compared the efficacy of LD-AraC, in patients ≥ 70 years old, with that of intensive chemotherapy, best supportive care (BSC), or hypomethylating agents in a single institution experience.Methods: Between 2000 and 2014, 60 patients received LD-AraC at 20 mg once or twice daily by subcutaneous injection for 10 consecutive days every 4-6 weeks. 85 patients were treated by intensive chemotherapy, 34 patients by hypomethylating agents, and 43 patients only by BSC.Results: Complete remission rate with LD-AraC was 7% versus 56% with intensive chemotherapy and 21% with hypomethylating agents. Median overall survival (OS) of patients treated with LD-AraC was 9.6 months with 3-year OS of 12%. Survival with LD-AraC was better than with BSC only (P = 0.001). Although not statistically significant, intensive chemotherapy and hypomethylating agents tended to be better than LD-AraC in terms of OS (median: 12.4 months and 16.1 months, respectively). There was no clear evidence that a beneficial effect of LD-AraC was restricted to any particular subtype of patients, except for cytogenetics.Conclusions: Despite a trend in favor of intensive chemotherapy and hypomethylating agents over LD-AraC, no real significant advantage could be demonstrated, while LD-AraC showed a significant advantage comparatively to BSC. This tends to confirm that LD-AraC can still represent a baseline against which new promising agents may be compared either alone or in combination.


Oncotarget ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 9 (5) ◽  
pp. 5823-5833
Author(s):  
Seung-Hwan Shin ◽  
Byung-Sik Cho ◽  
Sung-Soo Park ◽  
Sung-Yeon Cho ◽  
Young-Woo Jeon ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document