scholarly journals Phase I Escalation and Expansion Study of Bemarituzumab (FPA144) in Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors and FGFR2b-Selected Gastroesophageal Adenocarcinoma

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (21) ◽  
pp. 2418-2426 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel V.T. Catenacci ◽  
Drew Rasco ◽  
Jeeyun Lee ◽  
Sun Young Rha ◽  
Keun-Wook Lee ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Gastroesophageal Junction ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Pharmacokinetic Parameters ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Advanced Stage ◽  
Line Therapy

PURPOSE To evaluate the safety, pharmacokinetics, and preliminary activity of bemarituzumab in patients with FGFR2b-overexpressing gastric and gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (GEA). PATIENTS AND METHODS FPA144-001 was a phase I, open-label, multicenter trial consisting of the following 3 parts: part 1a involved dose escalation in patients with recurrent solid tumors at doses ranging from 0.3 to 15 mg/kg; part 1b involved dose escalation in patients with advanced-stage GEA; and part 2 involved dose expansion in patients with advanced-stage GEA that overexpressed FGFR2b at various levels (4 cohorts; high, medium, low, and no FGFR2b overexpression) and 1 cohort of patients with FGFR2b-overexpressing advanced-stage bladder cancer. RESULTS Seventy-nine patients were enrolled; 19 were enrolled in part 1a, 8 in part 1b, and 52 in part 2. No dose-limiting toxicities were reported, and the recommended dose was identified as 15 mg/kg every 2 weeks based on safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetic parameters, and clinical activity. The most frequent treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were fatigue (17.7%), nausea (11.4%), and dry eye (10.1%). Grade 3 TRAEs included nausea (2 patients) and anemia, neutropenia, increased AST, increased alkaline phosphatase, vomiting, and an infusion reaction (1 patient each). Three (10.7%) of 28 patients assigned to a cohort receiving a dose of ≥ 10 mg/kg every 2 weeks for ≥ 70 days reported reversible grade 2 corneal TRAEs. No TRAEs of grade ≥ 4 were reported. Five (17.9%; 95% CI, 6.1% to 36.9%) of 28 patients with high FGFR2b-overexpressing GEA had a confirmed partial response. CONCLUSION Overall, bemarituzumab seems to be well tolerated and demonstrated single-agent activity as late-line therapy in patients with advanced-stage GEA. Bemarituzumab is currently being evaluated in combination with chemotherapy in a phase III trial as front-line therapy for patients with high FGFR2b-overexpressing advanced-stage GEA.

Pooled analysis of phase I dose-escalation and dose cohort expansion studies of IMP4297, a novel PARP inhibitor, in Chinese and Australian patients with advanced solid tumors.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3059-3059 ◽  
Author(s):  
Junning Cao ◽  
Pin Zhang ◽  
Paul L. de Souza ◽  
Bo Gao ◽  
Mark Voskoboynik ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Dose Level ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Response To Treatment ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Dose Cohort ◽  
Phase Ii Studies ◽  
Grade 3

3059 Background: Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) enzymes play critical roles in DNA damage detection and repair. IMP4297 is a novel, potent PARP1/2 inhibitor (IC50 6.27nM/1.57nM) and has demonstrated to be 20-fold more potent than Olaparib in anticancer animal models. Two phase I studies were performed to evaluate and characterize the tolerability and safety, pharmacokinetics, and antitumor activity of single agent IMP4297 in Chinese and Australian patients with advanced ovarian, breast, prostate and other solid tumors. Methods: Dose escalation used a 3+3 design with a modified Fibonacci escalation. Dose cohort expansion was planned after efficacy was observed at the lowest dose level. Patients received IMP4297 monotherapy orally once a day until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Results: As of Jan 12, 2019, 56 patients, including 23 BRCA mutation carriers (BRCA+), had been enrolled at 2-100 mg dose level. No DLT was observed. In these two studies, the most frequent treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were leukopenia (20%), followed by anemia (18%), nausea (18%) and thrombocytopenia (14%). The majority of TRAEs were grade 1 or 2. Grade 3 TRAEs occurred in five patients (anemia, n=2; vomiting, n=1; thrombocytopenia, n=1; elevated AST, n=1). Only one patient had a dose reduction due to grade 3 thrombocytopenia. No serious TRAEs were observed. In 15 BRCA+ patients who had measurable lesions, the ORR was 33% and the DCR was 80%. There were 4 BRCA+, platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer patients with an ORR of 75% and a DCR of 100%. One patient with somatic BRCA mutated urothelial carcinoma showed a 76% decrease in tumor size. Conclusions: IMP4297 has been well-tolerated with significant anti-tumor activity. The 100 mg daily dose was selected as the RP2D based on safety, pharmacokinetics and clinical activity, and will be further characterized in dose expansion and phase II studies. Tumor response to treatment (RECIST 1.1) in patients with measurable lesions. Clinical trial information: NCT03508011 and NCT03507543. [Table: see text]

Phase I dose-finding study of oral ERK1/2 inhibitor LTT462 in patients (pts) with advanced solid tumors harboring MAPK pathway alterations.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3640-3640
Author(s):  
Filip Janku ◽  
Elena Elez ◽  
Gopa Iyer ◽  
Noboru Yamamoto ◽  
Daniel Shao-Weng Tan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Drug Exposure ◽  
Mapk Pathway ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Human Study ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Grade 3

3640 Background: LTT462 is an investigational small molecule inhibitor of ERK1/2, which has demonstrated preclinical activity in multiple MAPK activated cancer cells and xenograft models. This first-in-human study was designed to evaluate the safety and tolerability of LTT462 in advanced solid tumors harboring MAPK pathway alterations (NCT02711345). Methods: The dose-escalation part of this Phase I, open-label study, enrolled adult and adolescent pts with advanced solid tumors harboring ≥1 documented MAPK pathway alteration with progressive disease (PD) despite standard therapy, or for whom there is no effective standard treatment. Oral LTT462 was given once daily (QD) at 45–600 mg or twice daily (BID) at 150 mg or 200 mg. Objectives were to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) using a Bayesian hierarchical logistic regression model guided by escalation with overdose control, and characterize safety, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and preliminary efficacy of LTT462. Results: Sixty-five pts (median age 60 years) including 1 pt aged 15 were enrolled in the dose-escalation; most pts (22%) had 3 prior therapies. Most common primary sites for cancer were in the colon (n = 21; 32%), ovary (n = 9; 14%), and pancreas (n = 7; 11%). All pts discontinued, the majority due to PD (n = 44; 68%). Eleven pts experienced DLTs; 6 pts experienced Grade 3 eye disorder DLTs (4 pts retinopathy, 2 pts chorioretinopathy). Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were reported for 89% of pts, most commonly ( > 30%) diarrhea (n = 25; 38%) and nausea (n = 22; 34%). Grade 3/4 TRAEs were reported in 29% of pts; most common was retinopathy (n = 4; 6%). MTD of LTT462 was 400 mg QD and 150 mg BID. Overall, 8 pts (12%) had stable disease (SD) and 35 pts (54%) had PD. An unconfirmed partial response was reported in a pt with cholangiocarcinoma with BRAF mutation; best change in sum of target lesions per RECIST 1.1 was -33.9%. LTT462 increased plasma peak drug concentration and drug exposure at increasing doses between 45–450 mg QD. Exposure at LTT462 600 mg QD was lower than anticipated, indicating potential saturation of absorption at this dose. LTT462 inhibited ERK1/2 and reduced DUSP6 expression relative to baseline in most pts evaluated. Conclusions: LTT462 is well tolerated. Limited clinical activity was reported with single agent LTT462; best overall response was SD. An ongoing study is investigating LTT462 in combination with the RAF inhibitor, LXH254, in NSCLC and melanoma. Clinical trial information: NCT02711345 .

A five-arm, open-label, phase I/lb study to assess safety and tolerability of the oral MEK1/MEK2 inhibitor trametinib (GSK1120212) in combination with chemotherapy or erlotinib in patients with advanced solid tumors.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3023-3023 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carlos Becerra ◽  
Jeffrey R. Infante ◽  
Lawrence E. Garbo ◽  
Michael S. Gordon ◽  
David A. Smith ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Growth Factors ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Post Dose

3023 Background: Trametinib, an oral MEK1/MEK2 inhibitor, has demonstrated single-agent clinical activity. In vitro studies of trametinib plus docetaxel (doc), pemetrexed (pem) and erlotinib (erl) showed enhanced growth inhibition of lung cancer cell lines with and without RAS/RAF mutations. Trametinib+doc significantly increased apoptosis compared with either agent alone. Methods: This is a two-part, five-arm, phase I/Ib, open-label study to evaluate the safety and tolerability of trametinib plus doc, erl, pem, pem+carboplatin (pem+carbo), or nab-paclitaxel (nab-pac) (NCT01192165). Part I is dose escalation in patients (pts) with advanced solid tumors; part II is dose expansion in pts with lung and pancreatic cancers. A 3+3 dose-escalation design was used to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and the recommended phase II regimen (RP2R) for each combination. Dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) were determined during the first treatment cycle (21 days). Trametinib was started at 0.5 mg/day; chemotherapy was given at full recommended doses. Erl was escalated from 50 mg/day. Pharmacokinetic (PK) samples were collected pre-, and 1, 2, 3 and 6 hours post-dose. Results: As of January 2012, 80 pts have been enrolled across all arms except trametinib+nab-pac. Preliminary exposure results of trametinib+doc, erl, or pem suggest no PK drug-drug interaction. The predominant DLT for trametinib+doc without growth factors (MTD = 0.5 mg+60 mg/m2) was neutropenia. When administered with growth factors, trametinib+doc has been given up to 1.5 mg+75 mg/m2 with no DLTs. The predominant DLTs for trametinib+erl (MTD = 1 mg+100 mg) were diarrhea and mucositis and for trametinib+pem (MTD = 1.5 mg+500 mg/m2) were mucositis and febrile neutropenia. The MTD for trametinib+pem+carbo has not yet been determined. To date there are 5 PRs in the trametinib+doc group and 2 PRs in the trametinib+pem group. An NSCLC expansion cohort for trametinib+pem is enrolling. Conclusions: Trametinib+doc and trametinib+pem have shown acceptable tolerability and initial evidence of clinical activity.

Phase I dose escalation and expansion trial to assess the safety and efficacy of ADP-A2M4 SPEAR T cells in advanced solid tumors.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 102-102 ◽  
Author(s):  
David S. Hong ◽  
Brian A. Van Tine ◽  
Anthony J. Olszanski ◽  
Melissa Lynne Johnson ◽  
David A. Liebner ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
T Cells ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Lentiviral Vector ◽  
Dose Range ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Eligibility Criteria ◽  
Safety And Efficacy

102 Background: MAGE-A4 is a cancer/testis antigen with expression in many solid tumors promoting cell growth by preventing cell cycle arrest and apoptosis. This study (NCT03132922) evaluated safety and efficacy of SPEAR T-cells directed against the MAGE-A4 peptide expressed in 9 tumor types. Methods: This Phase I dose-escalation, expansion trial evaluated patients (pt) who were HLA-A*02 positive with advanced cancers that expressed the MAGE-A4 protein. Autologous T-cells from eligible patients were isolated, transduced with a lentiviral vector containing the MAGE-A4c1032 TCR, and expanded. Prior to ADP-A2M4 infusion, pts received a lymphodepletion regimen of cyclophosphamide and fludarabine. Cohorts 1, 2, 3, and expansion were to receive transduced cell doses of up to: 0.12 × 109, 1.2 × 109, 6 × 109, and 10 x 109, respectively. Results: As of 23 October 2019, 9 pts were treated in dose escalation with no DLTs; 25 pts were treated in expansion. Median age was 56.5 yr (range: 31-78). All pts received prior chemotherapy. Most common ( > 30%) AEs ≥Grade 3 were lymphopenia, leukopenia, neutropenia, anemia, thrombocytopenia, and febrile neutropenia. Two pts had trial-related deaths (aplastic anemia and CVA) leading to modification of the lymphodepletion regimen and eligibility criteria. In Cohort 3/expansion (28 pts), Best Overall Response was PR (7), SD (11), PD (5), non-evaluable (5). All PRs, at the time of data cut-off, were in patients with synovial sarcoma. Transduced T-cells were detectable in all patients. Tumor infiltration of SPEAR T-cells was detectable in several cohort 3/expansion pts. Conclusions: The Phase I single agent ADP-A2M4 trial will complete enrollment shortly and updated data will be presented. ADP-A2M4 shows promising efficacy and a manageable safety profile at a dose range of 1.2 – 10 × 109. Clinical activity in various tumors has led to a separate on-going low dose radiation sub-study of this trial, a Phase II trial in sarcoma (SPEARHEAD-1, NCT04044768), and a Phase I trial (SURPASS, NCT04044859) with ADP-A2M4CD8, a next-generation SPEAR T-cell targeting MAGE-A4. Clinical trial information: NCT03132922.

ABT-888 Plus Bendamustine Is Safe and Has Shown Preliminary Efficacy In Patients With Lymphoma

Blood ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 122 (21) ◽  
pp. 4366-4366
Author(s):  
John F. Gerecitano ◽  
Gary K Schwartz ◽  
Richard Carvajal ◽  
Matthew Fury ◽  
Jason Konner ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Alkylating Agents ◽  
Parp Inhibitor ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Pharmacokinetic Analysis ◽  
Pharmacokinetic Parameters ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Background PARP is overexpressed in many malignancies, and can protect tumor cells from genetic damage. The PARP inhibitor ABT-888 (A) enhances the cytotoxicity of several alkylating agents. Since bendamustine (B) is an alkylator with promising clinical activity in a variety of lymphoid malignancies and some solid tumors, we have executed a phase 1b trial combining ABT-888 with bendamustine in patients with solid tumors, lymphomas and multiple myeloma. The primary aim of this study is to determine the safety and MTD of ABT-888 in combination with bendamustine, with secondary aims of establishing response rates and pharmacokinetic parameters of ABT-888 in this combination. We report here the results of the dose escalation portion of this study. Methods Patients with relapsed solid tumors, lymphoma and multiple myeloma with no standard curative options were eligible for enrollment to the dose escalation portion of this trial. Patients were treated with escalating doses of bendamustine (70 to 90mg/m2 IV days 1 and 2) and ABT-888 (30 to 400 mg PO bid x7) over 7 days each 28 day cycle. Planned treatment duration was 6 cycles, with the option of additional cycles in cases of clinical benefit. Results 29 patients are evaluable for study endpoints to date, including 21 with solid tumors and 8 with lymphoma. 4 DLTs were seen: one grade 4 anemia (at A=100/B=90), one grade 3 nausea (at A=300/B=90), one grade 3 hypertension and one grade 3 hyperhidrosis. The latter 2 DLTs were seen at the Maximum Administered Dose (MAD : A=400/B=90), and the Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) was therefore A=300mg/B=90mg/m2. Grade 3/4 toxicities to date that have occurred in more than one patient and are possibly related to treatment include anemia (n=3), thrombocytopenia (n=3), neutropenia (n=2), hematuria (n=2), nausea (n=2), abdominal pain (n=2), hypertension (n=2), pneumonia (n=2) and sepsis (n=2). There was one death due to sepsis on trial that was deemed possibly related to treatment due to its development during a possible neutropenic period after cycle 4 of treatment. There were no objective responses seen in patients with solid tumors. Of the 8 patients with relapsed/refractory lymphoma, best responses were: 3 HL (1CR, 2PR), 1 DLBCL (PD), 1 transformed FL (SD), 2 FL (1 CR, 1 pending), 1 MCL (CR). The one patient with multiple myeloma studied on trial achieved a PR. Pharmacokinetic analysis has shown no significant affect of bendamustine on Cmax, Tmax, AUC or volume of distribution of ABT-888 compared with historical single-agent analyses. Data will be updated in the final presentation, as the last patients enrolled have not yet completed their full safety and efficacy assessments. Conclusions ABT-888 plus bendamustine is tolerable in patients with solid tumors, myeloma and lymphoma, with an MTD of ABT-888 300mg bid days 1-7 plus bendamustine 90mg/m2 days 1 and 2 of each 28-day cycle. This regimen has shown efficacy in lymphoma and myeloma, although it is unclear if ABT-888 adds benefit to bendamustine alone. A cohort expansion is planned to assess the safety and preliminary efficacy of this regimen at the MTD in combination with rituximab in patients with B-cell non-Hodgkin Lymphomas. Disclosures: Off Label Use: novel drug combination.

A first-in-human phase I study of CZ48, a lactone ring protected oral camptothecin, in patients with advanced solid tumors.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 2578-2578
Author(s):  
Devalingam Mahalingam ◽  
Montaser F. Shaheen ◽  
John Sarantopoulos ◽  
Steven Weitman ◽  
Beppino C. Giovanella ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Phase I Study ◽  
Topoisomerase I ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Poor Correlation ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Open Label

2578 Background: CZ48, the 20-O-propionate ester of camptothecin (CPT), is a prodrug of CPT first described by Cao et al. in 1998. The side-chain is enzymatically cleaved in tissues. This gives rise to CPT, a potent inhibitor of topoisomerase I. Methods: An open-label, single-arm, dose-escalation Phase I study was performed to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of CZ48 in patients with advanced solid tumors. Initial dosing started qd po 80mg/m2, advancing to 2560mg/m2 for 21 consecutive days, followed by 7 days rest. Dosing was restarted in cohorts of 3 patients tid po at 18mg/m2 and escalated to 1g/m2on a 5 days on, 2 days off schedule for 28 days. Patients were prescreened by measuring CPT levels in plasma following a single pilot dose of CZ48. Dose was doubled until occurrence of at least Grade 2 adverse event, at which time 3+3 patient cohorts with a dose escalation of 33%-100% were implemented. DLT in 2/6 patients defined the MTD as the preceding DLT dose. PK parameters were measured prior to dosing, days 1-5, and day 28 of Cycle 1. Results: Poor absorption led to initial qd dosing reaching 2560mg/m2 with no signs of DLT. Subsequent tid dosing showed improved plasma levels and arrival at DLT. 34 patients were treated across 8 dose levels from 18 to 1000 mg/m2. The most frequent study-related adverse effects were cystitis, vomiting, diarrhea and fatigue. Grade IV toxicities observed were febrile neutropenia, anemia, and thrombocytopenia. Preliminary PK data in the qd dosing showed poor correlation between dose and Cmax or AUC, while PK in tid patients showed slightly improved correlation between dose and both CZ48 AUC (Pearson's correlation coefficient ϱ=0.476, p<0.01) and CZ48 Cmax(ϱ =0.51, p<0.01). Evidence of clinical activity with stable disease ≥ 6 months was observed in 2 heavily pre-treated colon and one breast cancer patient. Conclusions: The MTD of tid po CZ48 administered 5 days on, 2 days off of 28-day cycle is between 750 mg/m2 and 576 mg/m2. Overall toxicity is relatively mild, with DLT being cystitis and myelosuppression. Even with tid dosing, PK values correlate poorly to dose. A new formulation with 3-5 fold higher preclinical absorption values is being considered for introduction into the trial. Clinical trial information: NCT00947739.

An open label, multicenter, phase I/II study of RP1 as a single agent and in combination with PD1 blockade in patients with solid tumors.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS2671-TPS2671
Author(s):  
Mark R. Middleton ◽  
Joseph J. Sacco ◽  
Jaime R. Merchan ◽  
Brendan D. Curti ◽  
Ari M. Vanderwalde ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
Biomarker Analysis ◽  
Tumor Types

TPS2671 Background: RP1 is an attenuated oncolytic HSV-1 that expresses a fusogenic glycoprotein from gibbon ape leukemia virus (GALV-GP R-) and GM-CSF. RP1 induces potent GALV-GP R- enhanced immunogenic cell death and host anti-tumor immunity in murine tumor models and increases PD-L1 expression. This clinical trial (NCT03767348) was designed to test the hypotheses that RP1 is safe when given alone and together with nivolumab (phase 1) and has efficacy together with nivolumab in four tumor types (phase 2). Methods: The primary goals of this clinical trial in a total of ~150 patients are to define the safety profile of RP1 alone and together with nivolumab, determine the recommended phase 2 dose (phase 1), and then in four phase 2 cohorts, to determine objective response rate in patients with melanoma, non-melanoma skin cancer, urothelial carcinoma and MSI-H solid tumors. Secondary objectives include duration of response, CR rate, PFS, viral shedding, and immune biomarker analysis. Patients with advanced cancer who failed prior therapy were eligible for the phase I component. In Phase 2 patients with histologic diagnoses of the four tumor types (N=30 for each) and who meet safety criteria for nivolumab treatment are eligible. Prior treatment with checkpoint blockade is not allowed except for the melanoma cohort. In the phase 1 portion patients are treated by intra-patient dose escalation of virus (range, 104 - 108 PFU) by intratumoral injection every two weeks for 5 total doses followed by 12 patients dosed 8 times at the RP2D in combination with nivolumab. Phase 1 patients were divided into two groups based on presence of clinically accessible lesions amenable to direct injection or those with visceral/deep lesions requiring image guidance for injection. In the phase 2 portion patients will receive the RP2D for eight injections and nivolumab will be given starting with the second RP1 injection. For the phase 1 portion, a modified 3+3 dose escalation design is used to assess safety and in the phase 2 portion, statistical analysis will be performed using a two-stage three-outcome optimum design with objective responses determined by RECIST criteria. As of February 11, 2019, 27 patients have been enrolled. Clinical trial information: NCT03767348.

Phase I trial of cabazitaxel plus cisplatin in patients with advanced solid tumors.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (5_suppl) ◽  
pp. 162-162 ◽  
Author(s):  
Albert C. Lockhart ◽  
Shankar Sundaram ◽  
John Sarantopoulos ◽  
Monica M. Mita ◽  
Alex R. Lane ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Febrile Neutropenia ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Dose Level ◽  
Combined Treatment ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Primary Tumors ◽  
Grade 3

162 Background: Cabazitaxel (Cbz) is a novel taxane with broad in vivo efficacy in taxane-sensitive and -resistant tumors. Clinical activity of Cbz was confirmed in the Phase III TROPIC trial ( NCT00417079 ); Cbz significantly improved overall survival compared with mitoxantrone in patients (pts) with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer whose disease had progressed during or after a prior docetaxel-containing regimen. Therapeutic synergism of Cbz/cisplatin (Cis) has been demonstrated in tumor-bearing mice. Methods: The primary objective in part 1 of this Phase I study ( NCT00925743 ) was to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) of Cbz/Cis. Secondary objectives were safety, pharmacokinetics (PK) and efficacy. The primary objective of part 2 was to determine the antitumor activity at the MTD. Eligible pts were ≥ 18 yrs, ECOG PS ≤ 1, with confirmed metastatic or unresectable solid tumors for which Cis therapy was considered appropriate. A 3 + 3 dose escalation with a starting dose (level 0) of 20/75 mg/m2 (Cbz/Cis), administered IV Q3W, was used. The MTD was the highest dose at which 0/3 or ≤ 1/6 pts experienced a DLT in Cycle 1. Results: Pts (N = 25; 10 in part 1; 15 in part 2) with a median age of 56 yrs were enrolled. The most frequent primary tumors were lung (n = 4), prostate, ovary and pancreas (each n = 2). 2 of 6 evaluable pts experienced a DLT at dose level 0 (Grade 3 acute renal failure; febrile neutropenia). The MTD was 15/75 mg/m2 as no DLTs were observed. Eighteen pts were treated at the MTD and 60 cycles were administered (median = 3; range 1–8). The most frequent non-hematologic treatment-related adverse events (all Grade/Grade 3–4) were nausea (78%/22%), vomiting (72%/11%), fatigue (61%/17%), anorexia (67%/11%) and diarrhea (44%/0%). Incidence of Grade 3–4 neutropenia was 78% and 1 pt had febrile neutropenia. No PK interactions between Cbz and Cis were observed. Stable disease was seen in 11 pts. No objective responses were reported. Conclusions: The MTD of Cbz/Cis was 15/75 mg/m2. The combination had a manageable safety profile consistent with that of a platinum/taxane combination. No PK interactions were seen. Further investigations into the combined treatment combination are planned.

Phase I study of AG-120, an IDH1 mutant enzyme inhibitor: Results from the cholangiocarcinoma dose escalation and expansion cohorts.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4015-4015 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maeve Aine Lowery ◽  
Ghassan K. Abou-Alfa ◽  
Howard A. Burris ◽  
Filip Janku ◽  
Rachna T. Shroff ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Stable Disease ◽  
Phase I Study ◽  
Enzyme Inhibitor ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Metabolic Enzyme ◽  
Expansion Cohort

4015 Background: Mutations in the metabolic enzyme isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 (mIDH1) occur in patients (pts) with cholangiocarcinoma (CC) and are detected in up to 25% of intrahepatic CC. mIDH1 produce the oncometabolite, D-2-hydroxyglutarate (2-HG), resulting in epigenetic and genetic dysregulation and oncogenesis. AG-120 is a first-in-class, potent, oral inhibitor of mIDH1 tested in this phase I study in mIDH1 solid tumors, including CC. Methods: AG-120 was escalated in a 3+3 design from 100 mg twice daily to 1200 mg once daily (QD) in 28-day cycles (N = 60, mIDH1 advanced solid tumors). Key eligibility for CC: recurrence of progressive mIDH1 CC following standard therapy (dose escalation) or at least a prior gemcitabine-based regimen (expansion cohort). Response (RECIST 1.1) was assessed every 8 weeks. Plasma and tumor tissue were collected for exploratory analyses. Results: Based on the safety, pharmacokinetic, and pharmacodynamic data from dose escalation, the 500 mg QD dose was selected for expansion in mIDH1 CC and other mIDH1 solid tumors. As of Dec 16, 2016, 73 pts with mIDH1 CC had been dosed in the dose escalation (n = 24) and expansion (n = 49) cohorts. Demographics: M/F = 24/49, median number of prior therapies = 2 (range 1–5), ECOG 0–1 = 26/47. There were no dose-limiting toxicities. Treatment-related adverse events (AEs) in ≥5% pts: fatigue (21%), nausea (18%), vomiting (12%), diarrhea (10%), decreased appetite (8%), dysgeusia (5%), QT prolongation (5%). Two (3%) pts experienced related grade 3 AEs: fatigue and low phosphorus. There were no AG-120-related AEs leading to discontinuation. Among the 72 efficacy evaluable (≥1 post baseline response assessment or discontinued prematurely) mIDH1 CC pts (24 in escalation and 48 in expansion cohort), 6% (n = 4) had a confirmed partial response and 56% (n = 40) experienced stable disease. The progression-free survival rate at 6 months was 40%, and 8 pts have been treated with AG-120 for ≥1 year. Conclusions: In this pretreated mIDH1 CC population, AG-120 was associated with a favorable safety profile and prolonged stable disease. A global, phase III, randomized, placebo-controlled study of AG-120 in mIDH1 CC has been initiated (ClarIDHy). Clinical trial information: NCT02073994.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document