Adjuvant chemotherapy with doxorubicin plus cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil in the treatment of resectable breast cancer with more than three positive axillary nodes.

1991 ◽  
Vol 9 (12) ◽  
pp. 2134-2140 ◽  
Author(s):  
R Buzzoni ◽  
G Bonadonna ◽  
P Valagussa ◽  
M Zambetti
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Left Breast ◽  
Axillary Lymph Nodes ◽  
Axillary Lymph ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Postoperative Irradiation ◽  
High Risk Breast Cancer ◽  
High Risk Breast ◽  
Risk Breast Cancer

To improve current adjuvant results in high-risk breast cancer, in February 1982 we activated a prospective randomized trial using both intravenous cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil (CMF) and Adriamycin (doxorubicin; Farmitalia-Carlo Erba, Milan, Italy) involving patients with resectable mammary carcinoma and more than three positive axillary lymph nodes. The objective of the study was to assess the effectiveness of four courses of Adriamycin followed by eight courses of CMF versus two courses of CMF alternated with one course of Adriamycin for a total of 12 courses. All drug courses were recycled every 3 weeks. Rather than temporarily reducing doses in the event of myelosuppression on the planned day of treatment, drug administration was delayed for 1 to 2 weeks. At a median follow-up of 59 months, treatment outcome was significantly superior for patients who received Adriamycin followed by CMF (Adriamycin----CMF) than for those given alternating regimens (CMF/Adriamycin). The 5-year relapse-free survival was superior post-Adriamycin----CMF (61%) compared with post-CMF/Adriamycin administration (38%; P = .001). The corresponding figures for the 5-year total survival were 78% and 62%, respectively (P = .005). The benefit of Adriamycin----CMF was observed in all patient subsets. Treatment was fairly well tolerated, and we documented only one case of fatal congestive heart failure in a patient who received postoperative irradiation to the left breast in addition to Adriamycin. Present findings indicate that in women with extensive nodal involvement, Adriamycin----CMF yielded superior results compared with CMF/Adriamycin.

Predicting reattendance at a high-risk breast cancer clinic

2015 ◽  
Vol 13 (5) ◽  
pp. 1441-1448 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarah R. Ormseth ◽  
David K. Wellisch ◽  
Adam E. Aréchiga ◽  
Taylor L. Draper
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Perceived Risk ◽  
Depressive Symptomatology ◽  
High Risk Breast Cancer ◽  
High Risk Breast ◽  
Risk Breast Cancer ◽  
Cancer Clinic ◽  
High Risk Clinic

AbstractObjective:The research about follow-up patterns of women attending high-risk breast-cancer clinics is sparse. This study sought to profile daughters of breast-cancer patients who are likely to return versus those unlikely to return for follow-up care in a high-risk clinic.Method:Our investigation included 131 patients attending the UCLA Revlon Breast Center High Risk Clinic. Predictor variables included age, computed breast-cancer risk, participants' perceived personal risk, clinically significant depressive symptomatology (CES–D score ≥ 16), current level of anxiety (State–Trait Anxiety Inventory), and survival status of participants' mothers (survived or passed away from breast cancer).Results:A greater likelihood of reattendance was associated with older age (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 1.07, p = 0.004), computed breast-cancer risk (AOR = 1.10, p = 0.017), absence of depressive symptomatology (AOR = 0.25, p = 0.009), past psychiatric diagnosis (AOR = 3.14, p = 0.029), and maternal loss to breast cancer (AOR = 2.59, p = 0.034). Also, an interaction was found between mother's survival and perceived risk (p = 0.019), such that reattendance was associated with higher perceived risk among participants whose mothers survived (AOR = 1.04, p = 0.002), but not those whose mothers died (AOR = 0.99, p = 0.685). Furthermore, a nonlinear inverted “U” relationship was observed between state anxiety and reattendance (p = 0.037); participants with moderate anxiety were more likely to reattend than those with low or high anxiety levels.Significance of Results:Demographic, medical, and psychosocial factors were found to be independently associated with reattendance to a high-risk breast-cancer clinic. Explication of the profiles of women who may or may not reattend may serve to inform the development and implementation of interventions to increase the likelihood of follow-up care.

Anthracycline-based sequential adjuvant chemotherapy in operable breast cancer: Five-year results of a randomized study by the Michelangelo Foundation

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 535-535 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Moliterni ◽  
M. Mansutti ◽  
D. Aldrighetti ◽  
L. Merlini ◽  
L. Zuccarino ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Systemic Treatment ◽  
Randomized Study ◽  
Operable Breast Cancer ◽  
Sequential Chemotherapy ◽  
High Risk Breast Cancer ◽  
High Risk Breast ◽  
Risk Breast Cancer

535 Background: Anthracycline-based sequential chemotherapy significantly improves efficacy outcomes compared to CMF alone. Methods: 806 eligible patients with operable breast cancer were enrolled into a randomized study (ratio 1:1:1:1) of sequential chemotherapy. In a 2×2-type design patients were allocated to first receive 4 cycles of AT (doxorubicin, A 60 mg/m2 iv + paclitaxel, T 200 mg/m2 as 3 h inf q 3wks) or EV (epirubicin, E 75 mg/m2 iv + vinorelbine, V 25 mg/m2 iv D1,8 q3wks) followed either by 4 monthly cycles of iv CMF or 6 cycles of q3w T alone (100 mg/m2 as 1h inf D1,8). Tamoxifen was recommended for 5 yr after chemotherapy in patients with HR+ tumors. Patients with tumors > 2 cm in diameter were allowed to start primary chemotherapy with 4 cycles of either AT or EV followed by surgery and postoperative systemic treatment as detailed above. Aim of the study was to test the role of T vs V when combined with an anthracycline during the first 4 cycles of the regimen as well as the role of CMF vs T during the last 4 cycles. Results: At a median follow-up of approximately 48 months, the 5 year freedom from progression (FFP) and overall survival (OS) for the main endpoints were as in the Table : The four treatment sequences were fairly well tolerated, with only 1 treatment-related death after EV. Type and severity of hematological toxicities were similar in all treatment arms. The incidence of reversible G2–3 neurotoxicity was 21.9% after AT, 5.3% after EV and 29.1% after sequential T. Chemical phlebitis was more frequent after EV (6.5%) then after AT (0.3). Conclusions: The results indicate that vinorelbine-epirubicin and classical CMF when appropriately used in a sequential modality for high-risk breast cancer are as valid and less neurotoxic an option of adjuvant therapy than the more widely used taxane-containing adjuvant regimens. Supported in part by Bristol-Myers Squibb, Pierre Fabre and Pharmacia. [Table: see text] [Table: see text]

scholarly journals Is adjuvant chemotherapy necessary in older patients with breast cancer?

Breast Cancer ◽  
2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Midori Morita ◽  
Akihiko Shimomura ◽  
Emi Tokuda ◽  
Yoshiya Horimoto ◽  
Yukino Kawamura ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Adjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Older Patients ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Breast Cancer Surgery ◽  
Axillary Lymph Nodes ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Axillary Lymph ◽  
Free Survival

Abstract Background Due to the lack of clinical trials on the efficacy of chemotherapy in older patients, an optimal treatment strategy has not been developed. We investigated whether adjuvant chemotherapy could improve the survival of older patients with breast cancer in Japan. Methods We retrospectively analyzed data of patients with breast cancer aged ≥ 70 years who underwent breast cancer surgery in eight hospitals between 2008 and 2013. Clinical treatment and follow-up data were obtained from the patients’ medical electric records. Results A total of 1095 patients were enrolled, of which 905 were included in the initial non-matched analysis. The median age and follow-up period were 75 (range 70–93) and 6.3 years, respectively. Of these patients, 127 (14%) received adjuvant chemotherapy (Chemo group) while the remaining 778 (86%) did not (Control group). The Chemo group was younger (mean age in years 73 vs 76; P < 0.0001), had a larger pathological tumor size (mean mm 25.9 vs 19.9; P < 0.0001), and more metastatic axillary lymph nodes (mean numbers 2.7 vs 0.7; P < 0.0001) than the Control group. The disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) did not differ significantly between the two groups (P = 0.783 and P = 0.558). After matched analyses, DFS was found to be significantly prolonged with adjuvant chemotherapy (P = 0.037); however, OS difference in the matched cohort was not statistically significant (P = 0.333). Conclusion The results showed that adjuvant chemotherapy was associated with a reduced risk of recurrence, but survival benefits were limited.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document