Significance of normal serum prostate-specific antigen in the follow-up period after definitive radiation therapy for prostatic cancer.

1995 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 459-463 ◽  
Author(s):  
M J Zelefsky ◽  
S A Leibel ◽  
K E Wallner ◽  
W F Whitmore ◽  
Z Fuks
Keyword(s):  
Multivariate Analysis ◽  
Prostate Specific Antigen ◽  
Prostatic Cancer ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
Normal Serum ◽  
Relapse Free Survival ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Serum Prostate Specific Antigen ◽  
Psa Relapse

PURPOSE To determine the prognostic significance of a normal serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level in patients with prostatic cancer with long-term follow-up evaluation after radiotherapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS PSA information was available in 403 patients (38%) who were treated with pelvic lymph node dissection and retropubic radioactive iodine-125 implantation. One hundred eighty-two patients had a normal serum PSA level (< or = 4.0 ng/mL) the first time this test was conducted during the follow-up period, designated PSA-1. RESULTS Among patients with PSA-1 values < or = 1.0 ng/mL, the 5-year PSA relapse-free survival rate was 85% compared with 27%, respectively, among those with PSA values in the higher range of normal (P < .00001). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that only a PSA-1 value greater than 1.0 to < or 4.0 (P < .00001) and grade II/III histology (P = .009) had a negative impact on continued PSA relapse-free survival. The only independent variable identified by a multivariate analysis to affect local relapse-free survival (LRFS) was a PSA-1 value greater than 1.0 to < or = 4.0 ng/mL (P < .004), while high-grade histology (P < .0001) and local failure (P < .001) were the only significant variables to affect distant metastases-free survival (DMFS). CONCLUSION Patients with PSA values < or = 1.0 ng/mL are significantly less likely to have a subsequent relapse after therapy than those with levels greater than 1.0 to < or = 4.0 ng/mL. Continuously maintained PSA levels of < or = 1.0 ng/mL after treatment may serve as an end point for early evaluation of the efficacy of experimental radiotherapy protocols in prostate cancer.

scholarly journals Event-Free Survival, a Prostate-Specific Antigen–Based Composite End Point, Is Not a Surrogate for Overall Survival in Men With Localized Prostate Cancer Treated With Radiation

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (26) ◽  
pp. 3032-3041 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wanling Xie ◽  
Meredith M. Regan ◽  
Marc Buyse ◽  
Susan Halabi ◽  
Philip W. Kantoff ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Radiation Therapy ◽  
Prostate Specific Antigen ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
Event Free Survival ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Patient Level ◽  
End Point

PURPOSE Recently, we have shown that metastasis-free survival is a strong surrogate for overall survival (OS) in men with intermediate- and high-risk localized prostate cancer and can accelerate the evaluation of new (neo)adjuvant therapies. Event-free survival (EFS), an earlier prostate-specific antigen (PSA)–based composite end point, may further expedite trial completion. METHODS EFS was defined as the time from random assignment to the date of first evidence of disease recurrence, including biochemical failure, local or regional recurrence, distant metastasis, or death from any cause, or was censored at the date of last PSA assessment. Individual patient data from trials within the Intermediate Clinical Endpoints in Cancer of the Prostate–ICECaP–database with evaluable PSA and disease follow-up data were analyzed. We evaluated the surrogacy of EFS for OS using a 2-stage meta-analytic validation model by determining the correlation of EFS with OS (patient level) and the correlation of treatment effects (hazard ratios [HRs]) on both EFS and OS (trial level). A clinically relevant surrogacy was defined a priori as an R2 ≥ 0.7. RESULTS Data for 10,350 patients were analyzed from 15 radiation therapy–based trials enrolled from 1987 to 2011 with a median follow-up of 10 years. At the patient level, the correlation of EFS with OS was 0.43 (95% CI, 0.42 to 0.44) as measured by Kendall’s tau from a copula model. At the trial level, the R2 was 0.35 (95% CI, 0.01 to 0.60) from the weighted linear regression of log(HR)-OS on log(HR)-EFS. CONCLUSION EFS is a weak surrogate for OS and is not suitable for use as an intermediate clinical end point to substitute for OS to accelerate phase III (neo)adjuvant trials of prostate cancer therapies for primary radiation therapy–based trials.

scholarly journals Growth hormone replacement does not increase serum prostate-specific antigen in hypopituitary men over 50 years

2002 ◽  
pp. 59-63 ◽  
Author(s):  
CW le Roux ◽  
PJ Jenkins ◽  
SL Chew ◽  
C Camacho-Hubner ◽  
AB Grossman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Specific Antigen ◽  
Gh Deficiency ◽  
Hormone Replacement ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
Prospective Longitudinal Study ◽  
Serum Prostate Specific Antigen ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Igf I ◽  
Prospective Longitudinal

OBJECTIVE: Epidemiological studies have shown an increased risk for prostate carcinoma in men with serum IGF-I in the upper part of the age-related reference range. Recombinant human GH (rhGH) is widely used in patients with GH deficiency, usually raising the serum IGF-I levels into the normal range: safety surveillance is therefore mandatory, with particular regard to neoplasia. The aim was to examine whether rhGH replacement in hypopituitary adults is associated with changes in serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) as a surrogate marker of changes in prostatic growth. DESIGN AND METHODS: A prospective longitudinal study was used with a median follow-up of 22 (range 2.5-32) months, in which 41 men aged over 50 years with adult onset hypopituitarism and GH deficiency during rhGH replacement were examined. Serum PSA and IGF-I were measured at baseline and at latest follow-up. RESULTS: Mean serum PSA remained unchanged during rhGH replacement, with a median follow-up of 2 years. No correlation was found between the individual changes in serum IGF-I and changes in serum PSA. CONCLUSIONS: These data are reassuring thus far regarding the safety of GH replacement in relation to the prostate in this patient group.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document