Prospective Pilot Study of Sildenafil for Treatment of Postradiotherapy Erectile Dysfunction in Patients With Prostate Cancer

1999 ◽  
Vol 17 (11) ◽  
pp. 3444-3449 ◽  
Author(s):  
Damien C. Weber ◽  
Sabine Bieri ◽  
John M. Kurtz ◽  
Raymond Miralbell

PURPOSE: Erectile dysfunction is a common late complication patients may experience after external-beam radiotherapy for prostate cancer. The efficacy and safety of oral sildenafil to correct sexual dysfunction caused by external-beam radiotherapy was studied in patients participating in our prospective trial. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-five assessable patients participated in this prospective pilot study. Using a 25-point scale based on the International Index of Sexual Function, erectile dysfunction was assessed weekly, during which time patients received sildenafil 100 mg orally once a week for 6 consecutive weeks. Response was defined as a score of 18 or more, corresponding to at least one successful attempt at sexual intercourse per week. RESULTS: Thirty patients (86%) completed the 6-week study. Seventy-seven percent of these patients had significantly improved erectile function, allowing recovery of full capacity for sexual intercourse. Of 27 patients not receiving concomitant hormone treatment, failure to respond was observed in only four patients (15%) compared with four (50%) of eight patients receiving hormonal treatment during the study. The time course of response was gradual, with 40%, 57%, 66%, 69%, and 74% responding at weeks 1 through 5, respectively. Therapy was generally well tolerated. The most frequently reported side effects in patients were flushing (37%), transient headache (17%), and dyspepsia (9%). No patient reported priapism, and no cardiovascular event or death was observed. After response, 12 patients (34%) reported the ability to achieve and maintain an erection sufficient for intercourse in the absence of sildenafil (ie, 24 hours to 6 days after taking the medication). CONCLUSION: This study suggests that oral sildenafil is well tolerated and can reverse erectile dysfunction after radiotherapy in a substantial proportion of prostate cancer patients.

2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (2_suppl) ◽  
pp. 87-87
Author(s):  
Stephen A. Mihalcik ◽  
Jonathan Chipman ◽  
Martin G. Sanda ◽  
Irving D. Kaplan ◽  
Catrina Crociani ◽  
...  

87 Background: EPIC-CP (Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite for Clinical Practice) is a one page, 16-item questionnaire designed and validated to measure patient-reported health related quality of life in prostate cancer (PC) patients at the point of care in the clinical setting. We previously developed and externally validated models predictive of intact sexual function (i.e. achieving an erection firm enough for intercourse) at two years following external beam radiation (EBRT) or brachytherapy (BT) using EPIC-26, the parent tool from which EPIC-CP was derived. We aimed to enable the use of these models in clinical practice by recalibrating them for use with EPIC-CP. Methods: Using a previously described multicenter longitudinal cohort (PROST-QA), we identified 217 men treated with EBRT and 230 with BT with complete sexual domain and model covariate information. We used the established covariates predictive of functional erections in the EPIC-26-based models (baseline sexual score, neoadjuvant hormonal therapy, and baseline PSA for EBRT, and baseline sexual score, age, race, and BMI for BT) to recalibrate the multivariable logistic regression models for use with EPIC-CP. We examined Pearson residuals to determine goodness of fit and compared the individual predictions based on the revised models with those generated by the EPIC-26-based models. Results: The recalibrated EPIC-CP-based models demonstrated excellent discrimination (AUC 0.81 for EBRT, AUC 0.87 for BT). Odds ratio estimates for the EPIC-CP models changed by no more than 0.2 from their EPIC-26 counterparts, and remained statistically significant. EPIC-CP and EPIC-26-based predictions had good concordance: the mean ± SD difference in predicted probability between EPIC-26 and EPIC-CP models was 0.0 ± 0.08 in each treatment group. Predicted probabilities were within 15.4% and 15.8% for 95% of the subjects treated with EBRT and BT, respectively. Conclusions: EPIC-CP-based nomograms predicting erectile function two years after EBRT or BT are in good agreement with established EPIC-26-based tools and offer an easily applied and accurate prediction regarding a common and impactful side effect of PC treatment.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document