Interferon Alfa Consolidation After Intensive Chemotherapy Does Not Prolong the Progression-Free Survival of Patients With Low-Grade Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma: Results of the Southwest Oncology Group Randomized Phase III Study 8809

2000 ◽  
Vol 18 (10) ◽  
pp. 2010-2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard I. Fisher ◽  
Bruce W. Dana ◽  
Michael LeBlanc ◽  
Carl Kjeldsberg ◽  
Jeffrey D. Forman ◽  
...  

PURPOSE: S8809 is a randomized phase III trial determining whether intensive cytoreductive treatment, followed by interferon consolidation at the time of minimal residual disease, prolongs the progression-free survival (PFS) or overall survival (OS) of indolent lymphoma patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Five hundred seventy-one patients with previously untreated stage III or IV low-grade non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma were registered. Patients received six to eight cycles of prednisone, methotrexate, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, and etoposide/mechlorethamine, vincristine, procarbazine, and prednisone (ProMACE[day 1]-MOPP[day 8]) chemotherapy or chemotherapy plus radiotherapy. Responding patients were randomized to observation alone or to interferon consolidation. Interferon alfa-2b 2 mU/m2 was given subcutaneously three times weekly for 2 years. RESULTS: Two hundred sixty-eight eligible patients were randomized to interferon alfa consolidation (n = 144) or observation alone (n = 124). With a median follow-up time from randomization among patients still alive of 6.2 years, the median PFS time was 4.1 years for patients who received interferon consolidation therapy and 3.2 years for patients who were observed after ProMACE-MOPP induction (P = .25). The adjusted hazard ratio for relapse for observation to interferon was 0.83 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.61 to 1.13). The median OS has not been reached in either group. At 5 years, OS is 78% for the interferon group and 77% for the observation group (P = .65). The adjusted hazard ratio for survival for observation to interferon is 1.11 (95% CI, 0.69 to 1.79). CONCLUSION: Interferon alfa consolidation therapy after intensive treatment with anthracycline-containing combination chemotherapy and involved-field radiation therapy does not prolong the PFS or OS of patients with low-grade non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma.

Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (21) ◽  
pp. 268-268 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gilles Andre Salles ◽  
Franck Morschhauser ◽  
Catherine Thieblemont ◽  
Philippe Solal-Celigny ◽  
Thierry Lamy ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 268 Obinutuzumab (GA101) is the only type II glycoengineered, humanized anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody in clinical development for the treatment of lymphoma and chronic lymphocytic leukemia. The efficacy of GA101 monotherapy in patients with relapsed/refractory indolent non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (iNHL) is under investigation, and here we report response and long-term results from a Phase I/II study (BO20999). Phase I was a non-randomized dose-escalating study (3 + 3 design; n = 21) with GA101 monotherapy (50–2,000 mg) on Days 1 and 8 of Cycle 1, and Day 1 of Cycles 2–8 (21-day cycles). The primary objective was to determine the safety and pharmacokinetics of GA101 in patients with NHL. In Phase II patients with iNHL were randomized to receive GA101 at one of two doses: 1,600 mg on Days 1 and 8 of Cycle 1 and then 800 mg on Day 1 of Cycles 2–8 (1,600/800 mg; n = 22), or 400 mg on Days 1 and 8 of Cycle 1 and on Day 1 of Cycles 2–8 (400/400 mg; n = 18). The primary efficacy endpoint was end of treatment response, assessed 4 weeks after the last infusion. Secondary endpoints included safety, pharmacokinetics, best overall response (BOR), and progression-free survival (PFS). In indolent patients that entered Phase I (n = 16), response was observed in 9 (56%) patients, with a complete response (CR) in 5 (31%) patients and a partial response (PR) in 4 (25%) patients. No clear dose-response relationship was observed. In Phase II, baseline patient characteristics were similar for each cohort (Table 1) with most patients having follicular lymphoma (FL). In the subpopulation of patients with FL, BOR was observed in 5/14 (35.7%) patients (CR unconfirmed: 1 [7.1%]; PR: 4 [28.6%]) in the 400/400 mg cohort; for the 1,600/800 mg cohort, 12/20 (60%) patients with FL responded (CR: 3 [15%]; CR unconfirmed: 1 [5.0%]; PR: 8 [40%]). After a median observation time of 23.1 months, median PFS for patients with FL was 11.8 months (range: 1.8–22.8 months) for the 1,600/800 mg cohort and 6.0 months (range: 1.0–30.0 months) for the 400/400 mg cohort (HR: 0.77 [95% CI 0.34–1.77) (Figure 1). In the 400/400 mg cohort, 2 patients with FL are in continued responses at 16.9+ and 19.3+ months; 2 others experienced a delayed lasting response (time to response: 13.8 and 12.1 months; duration of response: 7.0 and 10.8 months). Of the 12 responders with FL in the 1,600/800 mg cohort, 3 patients have ongoing response for ≥ 19 months (19.8, 19.9 and 20.4 months). One patient with lymphocytic lymphoma also experienced a response duration of 20.3 months. Efficacy results in the overall population are in line with the FL subpopulation. In patients refractory to rituximab treatment (n = 22), response was observed during the study in 3/12 patients (25%) and in 6/10 patients (60%) in the 400/400 mg cohort and the 1600/800 mg cohort respectively. In Phase II, GA101 was well tolerated in both iNHL cohorts. Infusion-related reactions (IRRs) were the most common adverse event (AE) (400/400 mg: 72%; 1,600/800 mg: 73%). Grade 3/4 AEs occurring in >5% of all patients (both cohorts) included infections and infestations (14%; Herpes zoster, haemophilus, lung infection, one patient each), neutropenia (14%) and IRRs (9%) in the 1,600/800 mg cohort, with none in the 400/400 mg cohort. Re-treatment with GA101 on relapse was permitted as per protocol. To date, 3 patients from Phase II and 2 from Phase I have been re-treated with GA101, with 3 of these 5 patients responding again to GA101.Table 1.Patient baseline characteristics (Phase II)Characteristic400/400 mg (n = 18)1,600/800 mg (n = 22)All (n = 40)Histology, nFollicular142034Other426Clinical stage at diagnosis (Ann Arbor)I–II033III–IV171835Unknown112Median age, years (range)51.0 (42–79)61.5 (44–76)60.5 (42–79)Median number of prior treatments (range)3 (1–8)3 (1–11)3 (1–11)Prior stem cell transplant, n6814Previous rituximab, n172138Rituximab refractory*, n121022*Rituximab refractory: those patients who have had no response or a response of <6 months to a rituximab-containing regimen (rituximab monotherapy or in combination with chemotherapy) at any point during their treatment history.Figure 1Progression-free survival (Phase II, follicular non-Hodgkin's lymphoma)Figure 1. Progression-free survival (Phase II, follicular non-Hodgkin's lymphoma) In conclusion, GA101 monotherapy shows encouraging efficacy with a higher response observed at a higher dose (1,600/800 mg vs 400/400 mg). Phase III trials are ongoing in GA101 in combination with chemotherapy for first-line treatment of patients with advanced iNHL. Disclosures: Salles: Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria. Morschhauser:Roche: Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria. Wenger:Hoffmann La Roche: Employment. Wassner-Fritsch:Roche: Employment. Asikanius:Roche: Employment. Cartron:Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria; GSK: Honoraria.


2000 ◽  
Vol 18 (17) ◽  
pp. 3135-3143 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas A. Davis ◽  
Antonio J. Grillo-López ◽  
Christine A. White ◽  
Peter McLaughlin ◽  
Myron S. Czuczman ◽  
...  

PURPOSE: This phase II trial investigated the safety and efficacy of re-treatment with rituximab, a chimeric anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody, in patients with low-grade or follicular non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma who relapsed after a response to rituximab therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fifty-eight patients were enrolled onto this study, and two were re-treated within the study. Patients received an intravenous infusion of 375 mg/m2 of rituximab weekly for 4 weeks. All patients had at least two prior therapies and had received at least one prior course of rituximab, with a median interval of 14.5 months between rituximab courses. RESULTS: Most adverse experiences (AEs) were transient grade 1 or 2 events occurring during the treatment period. Clinically significant myelosuppression was not observed; hematologic toxicity was generally mild and reversible. No patient developed human antichimeric antibodies after treatment. The type, frequency, and severity of AEs in this study were not apparently different from those reported in the phase III trial of rituximab. The overall response rate in 57 assessable patients was 40% (11% complete response and 30% partial responses). Median time to progression (TTP) in responders and median duration of response (DR) have not been reached, but Kaplan-Meier estimated medians are 17.8 months (range, 5.4+ to 26.6 months) and 16.3 months (range, 3.7+ to 25.1 months), respectively. These estimated medians are longer than the medians achieved in the patients’ prior course of rituximab (TTP and DR of 12.4 and 9.8 months, respectively, P > .1) and in a previously reported phase III trial (TTP in responders and DR of 13.2 and 11.6 months, respectively). Responses are ongoing in seven of 23 responders. CONCLUSION: In this re-treatment population, safety and efficacy were not apparently different from those after initial rituximab exposure.


1992 ◽  
Vol 10 (11) ◽  
pp. 1690-1695 ◽  
Author(s):  
R Chopra ◽  
A H Goldstone ◽  
R Pearce ◽  
T Philip ◽  
F Petersen ◽  
...  

PURPOSE A case-controlled study of patients who reported to the European Bone Marrow Transplant Group (EBMTG) was performed to investigate the relative roles and efficacy of allogeneic (alloBMT) and autologous bone marrow transplantation (ABMT) in non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS Of 1,060 patients who reported to the lymphoma registry, 938 patients underwent ABMT and 122 patients underwent alloBMT. A case-controlled study was performed by matching 101 alloBMT patients with 101 ABMT patients. The case matching was performed after the selection of the main prognostic factors for progression-free survival by a multivariate analysis. RESULTS The progression-free survival was similar in both types of transplants (49% alloBMT v 46% ABMT). The overall relapse and progression rate for the alloBMT patients was 23% compared with 38% in the ABMT patients. This difference was not significant statistically. In the lymphoblastic lymphoma subgroup, alloBMT was associated with a lower relapse rate than ABMT (24% alloBMT v 48% ABMT; P = .035). The progression-free survival, however, was not significantly different because patients with lymphoblastic lymphoma who underwent alloBMT had a higher procedure-related mortality (24% alloBMT v 10% ABMT; P = .06). A significantly lower relapse/progression rate was also observed in patients with chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD) compared with those patients without (0% cGVHD v 35% no cGVHD; P = .02). Fourteen of 18 patients who had cGVHD also had lymphoblastic lymphoma. CONCLUSION This study suggests that ABMT and alloBMT for non-Hodgkin's lymphoma are comparable, with the exception of lymphoblastic lymphoma in which a graft-versus-lymphoma effect may account for the lower relapse rate for patients who underwent alloBMT.


2009 ◽  
Vol 14 (S2) ◽  
pp. 17-29 ◽  
Author(s):  
Franck Morschhauser ◽  
Martin Dreyling ◽  
Ama Rohatiner ◽  
Fredrick Hagemeister ◽  
Angelika Bischof Delaloye

1998 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 41-47 ◽  
Author(s):  
A Hagenbeek ◽  
P Carde ◽  
J H Meerwaldt ◽  
R Somers ◽  
J Thomas ◽  
...  

PURPOSE Interferon alfa has shown significant activity in patients with low-grade malignant non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL). In 1985, we initiated a prospective randomized study in which the potential benefit of interferon alfa given as maintenance treatment was investigated after tumor load reduction was achieved with chemoradiotherapy in patients with advanced low-grade malignant non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS The study involved 347 patients with stage III or IV disease, 315 satisfying the eligibility criteria. All were treated with a regimen of cyclophosphamide, vincristine, and prednisone (CVP) given every 3 weeks for eight cycles. Thereafter, patients were eligible for iceberg irradiation. Finally, all patients were completely restaged, and responding and stable-disease patients were then randomized, 122 to interferon alfa-2a maintenance, 3 million U three times weekly for 1 year; and 120 to no further treatment. RESULTS Seventy-nine percent of the patients response to CVP, ie, 45% complete remissions (CR) and 34% partial remissions (PR). In the group of randomized patients, the response rate after CVP plus or minus radiotherapy was 90%. As compared with control patients, patients in the interferon (IFN) maintenance group had a tendency toward a prolonged time to progression (TTP) (median, 132 v 87 weeks; P = .054, adjusted for response to CVP). However, overall survival was similar in both groups. Interferon was well tolerated. The median dose of IFN actually received corresponded to 90% of the planned cumulative dose. The treatment had to be stopped because of toxicity in 16 patients (15% of the patients in whom IFN was started). CONCLUSION Interferon maintenance treatment in the phase of minimal residual disease of patients with advanced low-grade malignant NHL increased TTP at the borderline of statistical significance, without remarkable toxicity. However, overall survival was not influenced.


2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (10) ◽  
pp. 1590-1596 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anton Hagenbeek ◽  
Houchingue Eghbali ◽  
Silvio Monfardini ◽  
Umberto Vitolo ◽  
Peter J. Hoskin ◽  
...  

Purpose To compare the efficacy and safety of fludarabine phosphate with cyclophosphamide, vincristine, and prednisone (CVP) in 381 previously untreated, advanced-stage, low-grade (lg) non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) patients in a phase III, multicenter study. Patients and Methods Between 1993 and 1997, patients were randomly assigned to treatment with either fludarabine (25 mg/m2 intravenously [IV] daily for 5 days every 4 weeks) or CVP (cyclophosphamide 750 mg/m2 IV on day 1; vincristine, 1.4 mg/m2 IV on day 1; and prednisone, 40 mg/m2 orally on days 1 through 5 every 4 weeks). Results Overall response (OR) rates were significantly improved in the fludarabine arm versus the CVP arm, both for the intent-to-treat (ITT) population and assessable patients (P < .001). Complete response (CR) rates in the ITT population were also higher after fludarabine treatment. The CR rate was 38.6% for fludarabine compared with 15.0% for CVP. There were no statistically significant differences in time to progression (TTP), time to treatment failure (TTF), and overall survival (OS) between treatment groups. WHO grades 3 and 4 hematologic adverse events were more common in the fludarabine arm. However, concerning the higher incidence of granulocytopenia, this did not translate to more infections in fludarabine-treated patients. Conclusion Newly diagnosed lgNHL patients who received fludarabine achieved higher OR and CR rates compared with CVP-treated patients. No differences in TTP, TTF, and OS were noted. Fludarabine is a highly active single agent in lgNHL. Combination therapies incorporating fludarabine are now being further evaluated as first-line therapy in follicular NHL.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document