Response of Circulating Tumor Cells to Systemic Therapy in Patients With Metastatic Breast Cancer: Comparison of Quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction and Immunocytochemical Techniques

2000 ◽  
Vol 18 (7) ◽  
pp. 1432-1439 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brendan M. Smith ◽  
Martin J. Slade ◽  
Jacqueline English ◽  
Helen Graham ◽  
Margreet Lüchtenborg ◽  
...  

PURPOSE: We previously developed a quantitative system for the detection of cytokeratin 19 (CK-19) transcripts using reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (PCR) to detect breast carcinoma cells in blood and bone marrow. The aim of this study was to determine the value of this system in monitoring patients with metastatic disease and to compare it with an established immunocytochemical method. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with progressive, locally advanced, and metastatic breast cancer (all stage IV) who were due to start systemic treatment were recruited. Blood samples were analyzed for CK-19 transcripts using quantitative PCR (QPCR) and immunocytochemistry (ICC) throughout their course of treatment. RESULTS: One hundred forty-five blood samples were obtained from 22 patients over 13 months. Seventy-two (49.6%) of these samples were positive by QPCR, and 56 (42%) of 133 were positive by ICC. Of the 133 specimens analyzed by both techniques, 95 (71.4%) had the same results for each, and of the 71 samples that were positive, 40 (56%) were positive by both methods. The relationship between the number of cells detected and the QPCR values was statistically significant (P < .0001). Of the 25 courses of assessable treatment, 17 (68%) of 25 treatment outcomes (either response or disease progression) were reflected by QPCR measurements, and 12 (57%) of 21 were reflected by ICC. During the course of the study, five patients showed a response, and of these, ICC was in agreement in four cases (80%) and QPCR in three cases (60%). Eighteen courses of treatment resulted in progression of the disease; however, only 15 of these were assessable by ICC. ICC was in agreement in eight (53%) of 15 of these cases, and QPCR in 15 (83%) of 18 cases. CONCLUSION: Circulating carcinoma cells are frequently found in patients with metastatic breast cancer. In the majority of patients, cancer cell numbers as evaluated by QPCR or ICC reflected the outcome of systemic treatment.

1999 ◽  
Vol 17 (3) ◽  
pp. 870-870 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martin J. Slade ◽  
Brendan M. Smith ◽  
H. Dudley Sinnett ◽  
Nicholas C.P. Cross ◽  
R. Charles Coombes

PURPOSE: Previous reports have indicated that reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) for cytokeratin 19 (CK-19) may be useful in the management of patients with breast cancer. However, the specificity of this technique is low, principally because of a high rate of false-positive results. To improve the specificity of this assay, we developed a quantitative RT-PCR methodology that enables an estimate to be made of the number of CK-19 transcripts in blood and bone marrow samples. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We examined 45 peripheral-blood samples and 30 bone marrow samples from patients with a variety of nonneoplastic conditions using nested RT-PCR for CK-19. We also examined bone marrow and peripheral-blood samples from 23 patients with primary breast cancer and peripheral-blood samples from 37 patients with metastatic breast cancer. The number of CK-19 transcripts was estimated in positive specimens by competitive PCR and normalized to the number of ABL transcripts as an internal control for the quality and quantity of cDNA. RT-PCR results were compared with the numbers of CK-19–positive cells detected by immunocytochemistry. RESULTS: Analysis of samples from patients without cancer enabled us to define an upper limit for the background ratio of CK-19 to ABL transcripts (1:1,000 for blood samples and 1:1,600 for bone marrow samples). Using these figures as cut-off points, elevated CK-19: ABL ratios were detected in peripheral-blood samples of 20 of 37 (54%) patients with metastatic breast cancer and in bone marrow samples of 14 of 23 (61%) patients with primary breast cancer. Only three of 23 (13%) primary breast cancer peripheral-blood samples and none of the control samples were positive by these criteria. Only two of 23 patients (9%) with primary breast cancer showed immunocytochemically detectable cells in the blood; 10 of 23 (43%) showed immunocytochemically detectable cells in the bone marrow. Of 36 patients with metastatic breast cancer, eight (22%) showed positive events. CONCLUSION: Quantitative RT-PCR for CK-19 detects a percentage of patients with breast cancer and may enable the progression or regression of the disease to be monitored.


Author(s):  
Dave S.B. Hoon ◽  
Terry Sarantou ◽  
Fukashi Doi ◽  
Dorcas D.J. Chi ◽  
Christine Kuo ◽  
...  

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 21066-21066
Author(s):  
A. Altimari ◽  
S. Quercia ◽  
E. Benedettini ◽  
M. Rosati ◽  
E. Capizzi ◽  
...  

21066 Background: metastatic breast cancer is an incurable disease. Molecular tumor staging methods are required for a better therapeutic approach. Patients and Methods: eight mL blood samples were drawn from 20 patients (pts) (mean age 61.9±9) with metastatic breast cancer at the time of the beginning of a new chemo- or hormonal treatment line. Median follow-up was 7±4.5 months. Twenty- five female healthy blood donor volunteers were used as controls. Blood samples were screened for the presence of circulating tumor cells (CTC) with a quantitative PCR method using molecular probes for human mammaglobin (hMAM) and cytokeratin 19 (CK19). Relative quantification of hMAM and CK19 RNA was obtained using a blood sample infected with known concentrations of MDA-MB453 cells as calibrator. Results: none of the healthy controls was hMAM positive while the cut-off for CK19 was calculated as the mean value of the controls plus two standard deviations. Nine of 20 (45%) pts were hMAM positive, 15/20 (75%) CK19 positive, while 18/20 (90%) pts were positive for at least one marker (CTC positive). Among the 14 (70%) pts who had a disease progression 7 died. Seven of 9 hMAM positive (78%) and 11/15 (73%) CK19 positive pts had disease progression. All the 14 pts who had disease progression were CTC positive while the only 2 CTC negative pts were free from progression at the time of last follow-up. Conclusions: (1) Multiple (hMAM, CK19) rather than single marker detection should be preferred for CTC blood screening in breast cancer. (2) Combined hMAM and CK19 evaluation might identify pts at higher risk of tumor progression and might be useful for stratification and decision making in metastatic breast cancer pts. No significant financial relationships to disclose.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document