Alternating Hepatic Arterial Infusion and Systemic Chemotherapy for Liver Metastases From Colorectal Cancer: A Phase II Trial Using Intermittent Percutaneous Hepatic Arterial Access

2001 ◽  
Vol 19 (9) ◽  
pp. 2404-2412 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Sitki Copur ◽  
Mary Capadano ◽  
James Lynch ◽  
Timothy Goertzen ◽  
Timothy McCowan ◽  
...  

PURPOSE: To evaluate the objective response to a short course of hepatic arterial infusion (HAI) using temporary, percutaneously placed catheters alternating with systemic prolonged continuous infusion fluorouracil (ci 5-FU) and daily oral leucovorin (L). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eligible patients were previously untreated (except for adjuvant therapy) adults with liver-predominant metastases, with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 to 2. Treatment regimen included HAI with fluorodeoxyuridine (FUDR) 60 mg/m2/d and L 15 mg/m2/d continuously infused daily for 4 days. After a 1-week rest, ci 5-FU was administered through a central venous access device using a dose of 180 mg/m2/d with a fixed dose of oral L at 5 mg/m2/d for 21 out of 28 days. Cycles were repeated every 6 weeks. After four cycles of therapy, patients were maintained on ci 5-FU and daily oral L until evidence of progression. RESULTS: Forty-three patients were enrolled onto this trial. One patient was ineligible. The objective response rate for all patients (17 partial, zero complete) was 41% (95% confidence interval [CI], 26% to 56%). Five patients were not able to receive at least one complete cycle of HAI. Among patients who received at least one complete cycle of HAI, the response rate was 46% (95% CI, 30% to 62%). Five patients underwent a liver resection after enrolling onto the protocol. At the time of analysis, estimated median time to progression was 6 months, and estimated median overall survival was 13 months. CONCLUSION: The objective response rate was comparable to that achieved with more prolonged and more frequent HAI using FUDR. This approach should be studied as an acceptable alternative to surgically placed hepatic arterial catheters/pumps and may have a role as neoadjuvant therapy for liver metastases that are unresectable, as well as an adjuvant role for patients with resected hepatic metastatic colorectal cancer.

2005 ◽  
Vol 23 (22) ◽  
pp. 4888-4896 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nancy Kemeny ◽  
William Jarnagin ◽  
Philip Paty ◽  
Mithat Gönen ◽  
Lawrence Schwartz ◽  
...  

Purpose To determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) of concurrent systemic oxaliplatin (Oxal) combinations plus hepatic arterial infusion (HAI) in patients with unresectable hepatic metastases from colorectal cancer. Patients and Methods Thirty-six patients (89% previously treated) with unresectable liver metastases were treated with concurrent HAI and systemic Oxal plus irinotecan (CPT-11; group A) or Oxal, fluorouracil (FU), and leucovorin (LV; group B). Systemic chemotherapy was administered every 2 weeks concurrent with 2 weeks of HAI floxuridine (FUDR) and dexamethasone (Dex) every 28 days. Results The MTD for patients in group A was Oxal 100 mg/m2, CPT-11 150 mg/m2, and FUDR 0.12 mg/kg × 30 mL divided by pump flow rate. The MTD for group B was Oxal 100 mg/m2, LV 400 mg/m2, and FU 1,400 mg/m2 by continuous infusion over 48 hours, with the same FUDR dose as in group A. Grade 3 or 4 toxicities in groups A and B included diarrhea (24% and 20%), neutropenia (10% and 7%), neurotoxicity (24% and 20%), and bilirubin more than 3 mg/mL (5% and 7%, respectively). The complete and partial response rate totaled 90% for group A and 87% for group B. Median survival time was 36 and 22 months for groups A and B, respectively. Seven patients in group A were ultimately able to undergo liver resection. Conclusion Combination therapy with HAI FUDR and Dex plus systemic Oxal combinations may be safely administered to patients with colorectal cancer. The high response rate (88%) and the possibility of conversion to resectability, despite disease progression on prior systemic regimens, suggest that these combinations should be evaluated in larger studies as first- or second-line therapy in patients with hepatic metastases from colorectal cancer.


2011 ◽  
Vol 47 (18) ◽  
pp. 2681-2690 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Bouchahda ◽  
F. Lévi ◽  
R. Adam ◽  
P. Rougier

1997 ◽  
Vol 15 (4) ◽  
pp. 1432-1438 ◽  
Author(s):  
Y Z Patt ◽  
A Hoque ◽  
R Lozano ◽  
R Pozdur ◽  
J Chase ◽  
...  

PURPOSE To determine the toxicity, response rate, and survival in patients treated with hepatic arterial infusion (HAI) of fluorouracil (5-FU) plus recombinant human interferon alfa-2b (rIFN-alpha 2b) (Intron-A; Schering-Plough, Inc, Kenilworth, NJ) for colorectal carcinoma (CRC) liver metastases refractory to systemic 5-FU plus leucovorin (LCV). PATIENTS AND METHODS Forty-eight patients were given a 6-hour HAI of rIFN-alpha 2b 5 MU/m2 followed by an 18-hour HAI of 5-FU, 1,500 mg/m2 daily for 5 days. Twenty-nine patients were treated through percutaneously placed catheters and 19 through implantable infusion pumps (Shiley Infusaid Inc, Noorwood, MA). Treatment cycles were repeated every 28 to 35 days. RESULTS There were three (6.6%) complete remissions (CRs) and 12 (26.6%) partial remissions (PRs), for a CR plus PR rate of 33.3% among 45 assessable patients (95% confidence interval [CI], 20% to 49%). The median response duration was 7 months, while median survival duration was 15 months. Grade 3 to 4 treatment-related toxic effects included mucositis (40%), neutropenia (42%), and thrombocytopenia (12%). No hepatobiliary toxicity was encountered in any of the patients. Treatment was discontinued because of progressive liver disease in 23 patients and extrahepatic progression in 16, while six patients continue treatment through an infusaid pump. CONCLUSION HAI of 5-FU plus rIFN-alpha 2b is well tolerated, devoid of hepatobiliary toxicity, and can produce a response rate of 33.3% among patients refractory to bolus intravenous (IV) 5-FU plus LCV. The lack of hepatobiliary toxicity may permit salvage HAI with floxuridine (FUDR) in patients whose liver tumors fail to respond to HAI of 5-FU plus rIFN-alpha 2b. Because diarrhea was not a common side effect of HAI of 5-FU plus rIFN-alpha 2b, it would be of interest to investigate whether alternating HAI of 5-FU and rIFN-alpha 2b with systemic irinotecan (CPT-11) will decrease the incidence of both hepatic and extrahepatic disease progression.


2004 ◽  
Vol 22 (14_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3714-3714 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. J. Vogl ◽  
K. Eichler ◽  
M. G. Mack ◽  
J. O. Balzer ◽  
C. Herzog ◽  
...  

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3584-3584
Author(s):  
B. F. El-Rayes ◽  
A. F. Shields ◽  
U. Vaishampayan ◽  
L. K. Heilbrun ◽  
M. M. Zalupski ◽  
...  

3584 Background: The cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) enzyme is overexpressed in the majority of colorectal cancers. Inhibition of the COX-2 enzyme can sensitize colorectal cancer cells to the apoptotic effects of chemotherapeutic agents and block angiogenesis. This phase II study was undertaken to determine the effects of adding celecoxib to a dose attenuated irinotecan and capecitabine regimen. Methods: The primary objective was to estimate the objective response rate of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer treated with irinotecan, capecitabine, and celecoxib. Previously untreated patients, except for adjuvant therapy, with metastatic colorectal adenocarcinoma were eligible for this study. Patients received irinotecan 70 mg/m2 (over 30 minutes) on days 1 and 8, and capecitabine 2,000 mg/m2/day from day 1 to 14 of a 21-day cycle. Celecoxib was administered at a dose of 400 mg twice-daily starting on day -7 until termination from study. Results: A total of 51 patients (median age 58 years) have been enrolled on the study. The results presented are for the first 48 patients registered to the study. Median performance status was 1. A median number of 5.5 cycles (range 0- 18) were administered. In an intention to treat analysis, objective response rate was 50%. The median progression free survival was 6.9 months (90%CI; 4.7–8.2). Median survival is ≥19.4 months. No treatment related deaths were observed. The only grade 4 toxicity was diarrhea in 2 (4%) patients. Grade 3 toxicities were diarrhea (33%), hand-foot syndrome (8%), nausea (13%), vomiting (8%) and neutropenia (12%). Conclusion: Lowering the dose intensity of irinotecan in this study did not appear to compromise the treatment outcome and markedly improved the therapeutic index of this combination. Celecoxib can be safely administered in combination with irinotecan and capecitabine. Based on the observed progression free survival and response rate, the regimen has promising activity. No significant financial relationships to disclose.


2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 14549-14549
Author(s):  
T. Yamaguchi ◽  
H. Matsumoto ◽  
K. Takahashi ◽  
M. Yasutome ◽  
T. Mori

14549 Background: To determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) and to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of combination chemotherapy of irinotecan (CPT-11), UFT and leucovorin (LV) with hepatic arterial infusion (HAI) in colorectal cancer patients with unresectable liver metastases. Methods: Patients who had unresectable liver metastases from colorectal cancer were treated concurrently with intravenous CPT-11 on day1 of each 14-day treatment cycle with dose escalation, with orally UFT and LV on day 1–7 of each cycle, and with HAI of 5-FU on day 8–14 of each cycle. The primary objective of this phase I study was to determine the MTD of biweekly intravenous CPT-11 and UFT/LV with HAI of 5-FU. In the phase II study, the primary endpoint was to determine the response rate. Results: In the phase I study, the recommended dose of CPT-11 for phase II study was 140 mg/m2 combined with UFT 300 mg/m2/day, LV 75 mg/body/day and 5-FU 2,000 mg/body/week. Sixteen patients were enrolled onto the phase II study. The six patients treated at the recommended dose during the phase I study also included in the phase II analysis (n = 22). Median number of liver metastases was 12 (range, 3 to 35). Median size of maximum diameter was 6.3 cm (range, 2.0 to 12.0 cm). The most common adverse event was neutropenia. The complete and partial response rate totaled 81.8%. Median survival time has not been reached yet. Eleven patients (50.0%) were ultimately able to undergo liver resection. Conclusions: The combination chemotherapy of CPT-11 and UFT/LV with HAI was safe, well tolerate and effective in current population of the patients with unresectable liver metastases from colorectal cancer. Updated toxicity and response data will be available in the spring of 2007. No significant financial relationships to disclose.


2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 591-591
Author(s):  
S. Sadahiro ◽  
T. Suzuki ◽  
Y. Maeda ◽  
A. Tanaka ◽  
K. Okada ◽  
...  

591 Background: FOLFOX+bevacizumab (BEV) is the standard systemic chemotherapy for metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC). We investigated the combination of FOLFOX4 and hepatic arterial infusion (HAI) in patients who had isolated liver metastasis from CRC. We also compared efficacy and safety between this combination therapy and its concomitant use with BEV. Methods: Twenty-five patients entered a phase I/II trial of HAI (5-FU 250 mg/d, leucovorin 25 mg/d; d1-7, q2w) combined with FOLFOX4. Fourteen other patients with a similar background received HAI + FOLFOX4 combined with BEV and the two regimens were compared. Results: In the phase I/II study, the recommended doses for FOLFOX were as follows: L-OHP, 85 mg/m2; l-LV, 100 mg/m2; 5-FU (bolus), 400 mg/m2; and 5-FU (infusion), 600 mg/m2. Sixteen patients who received this regimen showed a response rate of 93.8% (2 CR and 13 PR), a median progression-free survival of 323 days, and a one-year survival rate of 93.7%. In the subsequent phase II trial of HAI + FOLFOX4 with BEV, 14 patients were enrolled and the response rate was 78.6% (2 CR and 9 PR). The outcome was inferior when BEV was used concomitantly. The median numbers of doses were 10 (range: 1-27) for FOLFOX4 and 9 (1-27) for HAI without BEV, whereas the corresponding numbers with BEV were 8 (1-12) and 2 (0-9), respectively. There was a marked decrease in the number of HAI procedures when BEV was used. Thrombosis occurred in 8 patients who received concomitant BEV, which was the most common reason for cessation of HAI. Other adverse events (≥Grade 3) were neutropenia (n=7; 43.8%) and thrombocytopenia (n=2; 12.5%) without BEV or neutropenia (n=7; 43.8%) and diarrhea (n=1; 7.1%) with BEV, and no marked difference was seen between the two regimens. Both regimens were well tolerated. Severe neuropathy was only observed in 1 patient (6.3%; Grade 3) who received concomitant BEV. Conclusions: In the present study, HAI + FOLFOX combined with BEV caused thrombosis and disturbance of wound healing, thereby increasing the incidence of complications and making it difficult to continue treatment. These findings suggest that BEV should not be administered with HAI therapy. No significant financial relationships to disclose.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document