Long-Term Follow-Up for Locally Advanced and Inflammatory Breast Cancer Patients Treated With Multimodality Therapy

2004 ◽  
Vol 22 (20) ◽  
pp. 4067-4074 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer A. Low ◽  
Arlene W. Berman ◽  
Seth M. Steinberg ◽  
David N. Danforth ◽  
Marc E. Lippman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Inflammatory Breast Cancer ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Stage Iii ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
Stage Iiia ◽  
Stage Iii Breast Cancer

Purpose To determine long-term event-free (EFS) and overall survival (OS) for patients with stage III breast cancer treated with combined-modality therapy. Patients and Methods Between 1980 and 1988, 107 patients with stage III breast cancer were prospectively enrolled for study at the National Cancer Institute and stratified by whether or not they had features of inflammatory breast cancer (IBC). Patients were treated to best response with cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, methotrexate, fluorouracil, leucovorin, and hormonal synchronization with conjugated estrogens and tamoxifen. Patients with pathologic complete response received definitive radiotherapy to the breast and axilla, whereas patients with residual disease underwent mastectomy, lymph node dissection, and radiotherapy. All patients underwent six additional cycles of adjuvant chemotherapy. Results OS and EFS were obtained with a median live patient follow-up time of 16.8 years. The 46 IBC patients had a median OS of 3.8 years and EFS of 2.3 years, compared with 12.2 and 9.0 years, respectively, in stage IIIA breast cancer patients. Fifteen-year OS survival was 20% for IBC versus 50% for stage IIIA patients and 23% for stage IIIB non-IBC. Pathologic response was not associated with improved survival for stage IIIA or IBC patients. Presence of dermal lymphatic invasion did not change the probability of survival in clinical IBC patients. Conclusion Fifteen-year follow-up of stage IIIA and inflammatory breast cancer is rarely reported; IBC patients have a poor long-term outlook.

Breast-conserving surgery after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for stage III breast cancer patients.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e11532-e11532
Author(s):  
Hee-Chul Shin ◽  
Wonshik Han ◽  
Hyeong-Gon Moon ◽  
Woo Kyung Moon ◽  
Seock-Ah Im ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Clinical Stage ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Stage Iii ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Stage Iii Breast Cancer

e11532 Background: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NCT) is a reasonable option for operable breast cancer in terms of downsizing large tumor and increasing the rate of breast-conserving surgery (BCS). However, BCS in patients with large breast tumors down-staged by NCT remains still controversial because of the possibility of residual tumor and resistance to NCT. Aims of this study were to evaluate the long-term survival results of patients who received NCT and BCS compared to patients who received BCS first and to compare recurrence and survival rates between patients who received preplanned BCS and those who received down-staged BCS among patients who underwent NCT. Methods: Between 2000 and 2007, 70 patients with clinical stage III breast cancer who received BCS after NCT (NCT group) and 72 patients with clinical stage III breast cancer who underwent BCS first (Surgery group) were retrospectively reviewed. Among 70 patients received NCT, 45 patients (64.3%) received preplanned BCS (preplanned BCS group) and 25 patients (35.7%) received down-staged BCS (down-staged BCS group). The long-term results including ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR), locoregional recurrence (LRR), disease recurrence and survival rates were compared with groups. Results: There was no significant difference in IBTR-free survival, LRR-free survival rates, disease-free survival and overall survival rates between the NCT and the Surgery group (p=0.971, p=0.294, p=0.863 and p=0.933, respectively). Among patients who received NCT, IBTR-free survival, LRR-free survival, disease-free survival and overall survival rates was not also different between the preplanned BCS group and the down-staged BCS group (p=0.278, p=0.501, p=0.776 and p=0.412, respectively). Conclusions: Our study demonstrated that patients who received BCS after NCT showed similar long-term resutls compared to patients who received BCS first in clinical stage III breast cancer patients. Also, down-staged BCS shows is oncologically as safe as preplanned BCS in clinical stage III breast cancer patients in terms of recurrence and survival.

Long-term Follow-up for Inflammatory Breast Cancer Patients: Institute Curie Experience

2010 ◽  
Vol 78 (3) ◽  
pp. S158-S159
Author(s):  
S. Abrous-Anane ◽  
A. Savignoni ◽  
C. Daveau ◽  
J. Pierga ◽  
F. Reyal ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Inflammatory Breast Cancer ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
Long Term Follow Up

scholarly journals Post-surgical depressive symptoms and long-term survival in non-metastatic breast cancer patients at 11-year follow-up

2017 ◽  
Vol 44 ◽  
pp. 16-21 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael H. Antoni ◽  
Jamie M. Jacobs ◽  
Laura C. Bouchard ◽  
Suzanne C. Lechner ◽  
Devika R. Jutagir ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Breast Cancer ◽  
Depressive Symptoms ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
Long Term Survival

Impact of physical activity on recurrence dynamics in early breast cancer patients

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elia Mario Biganzoli ◽  
Christine Desmedt ◽  
Romano Demicheli
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Physical Activity ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Rural Women ◽  
Randomized Clinical Trials ◽  
Urban Women ◽  
Additive Models ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients

Abstract Background Several studies have suggested that pre and/or postdiagnosis physical activity can reduce the risk of recurrence in breast cancer patients, however its effect according to follow-up time has not yet been investigated. Methods We analyzed recurrence and mortality dynamics in randomized clinical trials (RCTs) from Australia and Canada. The combined Australian RCTs evaluated, at median follow-up of 8.3 years, an 8-month pragmatic exercise intervention in 337 women with newly diagnosed breast cancer, while the Canadian RCT evaluated, at median follow-up of 7.4 years, supervised aerobic or resistance exercise during chemotherapy in 242 patients. For each RCT, the control arm consisted of patients undergoing usual care. We estimated the event dynamics by the discrete hazard function, through flexible regression of yearly conditional event probabilities with generalized additive models. Results In the considered RCTs, the recurrence and mortality risk of patients enrolled in the physical activity arm was stably reduced at medium/long term after five year of follow-up. In the Australian RCTs where patients were recruited by urban versus rural area, the latter group did not display benefit from physical activity. Estimated Odds Ratios (95% Confidence Intervals) for Disease Free Survival (DFS) in urban women were 0.63 (0.22-1.85); 0.27 (0.079-0.90); 0.11 (0.013-0.96) at the 3rd, 5th and 7th year of follow-up, respectively. For rural women, DFS patterns were overlapping with ORs approximating 1 at the different years of follow-up. Although not reaching statistical evidence, the estimates in the Canadian trial were in line with the results from the Australian urban women with ORs (95% CI) forDFS of 0.70 (0.33-1.50); 0.47 (0.19-1.18); 0.32 (0.077-1.29) at 3rd, 5th, 7th follow-up year, respectively. Conclusions While we acknowledge that the analyzed RCTs were not designed for investigating disease recurrence over time, these results support the evidence that physical activity reduces the risk of developing medium/long-term metastases. Additional translational research is needed to clarify the mechanisms underlying these observations.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document