Safety of Treatment of Metastatic Breast Cancer With Trastuzumab Beyond Disease Progression

2004 ◽  
Vol 22 (6) ◽  
pp. 1063-1070 ◽  
Author(s):  
Debu Tripathy ◽  
Dennis J. Slamon ◽  
Melody Cobleigh ◽  
Andrew Arnold ◽  
Mansoor Saleh ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Breast Cancer ◽  
Disease Progression ◽  
Cardiac Dysfunction ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Extension Study ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
Group 1

Purpose In a pivotal phase III trial, the addition of trastuzumab to chemotherapy significantly improved response rate, time to disease progression, and overall survival in women with HER2 overexpressing metastatic breast cancer. We conducted an extension study to this trial to obtain additional safety information and to provide trastuzumab following disease progression. Patients and Methods A total of 247 patients with documented disease progression received weekly intravenous trastuzumab in the extension study. Concurrent therapies were administered at the discretion of the treating physician. Patient groups were based on initial study treatment: chemotherapy alone (group 1, n = 154) or chemotherapy plus trastuzumab (group 2, n = 93). Results Sixty-eight percent of group 1 and 76% of group 2 received chemotherapy plus trastuzumab in the extension trial; the remainder received trastuzumab alone or combined with palliative radiotherapy or hormonal therapy. Seventy-six percent of group 1 and 55% of group 2 experienced at least one adverse event, similar to effects observed in the pivotal trial. Symptomatic or asymptomatic cardiac dysfunction occurred in 9% of group 1 and 2% of group 2 patients. Overall objective response rates were 14% in group 1 and 11% in group 2; median durations of response exceeded 6 months in both groups. Conclusion Our results suggest that prolonged use of trastuzumab therapy is safe and well tolerated. Longer durations of therapy did not appear to increase the risk of cardiac dysfunction. Patients progressing on trastuzumab-containing therapy demonstrate some response to a second trastuzumab-containing regimen. The independent contribution of trastuzumab in this setting merits further study.

scholarly journals Neratinib Plus Capecitabine Versus Lapatinib Plus Capecitabine in HER2-Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer Previously Treated With ≥ 2 HER2-Directed Regimens: Phase III NALA Trial

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (27) ◽  
pp. 3138-3149 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cristina Saura ◽  
Mafalda Oliveira ◽  
Yin-Hsun Feng ◽  
Ming-Shen Dai ◽  
Shang-Wen Chen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Breast Cancer ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Her2 Positive ◽  
End Points ◽  
Cns Disease

PURPOSE NALA (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01808573 ) is a randomized, active-controlled, phase III trial comparing neratinib, an irreversible pan-HER tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), plus capecitabine (N+C) against lapatinib, a reversible dual TKI, plus capecitabine (L+C) in patients with centrally confirmed HER2-positive, metastatic breast cancer (MBC) with ≥ 2 previous HER2-directed MBC regimens. METHODS Patients, including those with stable, asymptomatic CNS disease, were randomly assigned 1:1 to neratinib (240 mg once every day) plus capecitabine (750 mg/m2 twice a day 14 d/21 d) with loperamide prophylaxis, or to lapatinib (1,250 mg once every day) plus capecitabine (1,000 mg/m2 twice a day 14 d/21 d). Coprimary end points were centrally confirmed progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). NALA was considered positive if either primary end point was met (α split between end points). Secondary end points were time to CNS disease intervention, investigator-assessed PFS, objective response rate (ORR), duration of response (DoR), clinical benefit rate, safety, and health-related quality of life (HRQoL). RESULTS A total of 621 patients from 28 countries were randomly assigned (N+C, n = 307; L+C, n = 314). Centrally reviewed PFS was improved with N+C (hazard ratio [HR], 0.76; 95% CI, 0.63 to 0.93; stratified log-rank P = .0059). The OS HR was 0.88 (95% CI, 0.72 to 1.07; P = .2098). Fewer interventions for CNS disease occurred with N+C versus L+C (cumulative incidence, 22.8% v 29.2%; P = .043). ORRs were N+C 32.8% (95% CI, 27.1 to 38.9) and L+C 26.7% (95% CI, 21.5 to 32.4; P = .1201); median DoR was 8.5 versus 5.6 months, respectively (HR, 0.50; 95% CI, 0.33 to 0.74; P = .0004). The most common all-grade adverse events were diarrhea (N+C 83% v L+C 66%) and nausea (53% v 42%). Discontinuation rates and HRQoL were similar between groups. CONCLUSION N+C significantly improved PFS and time to intervention for CNS disease versus L+C. No new N+C safety signals were observed.

Single-agent docetaxel (TXT) as first-line treatment in metastatic breast cancer (MBC)

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 11515-11515
Author(s):  
D. Guarneri ◽  
R. Ratti ◽  
A. Venturino ◽  
G. Addamo ◽  
Z. Coccorullo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Breast Cancer ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
First Line ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
Agent Treatment ◽  
First Line Treatment ◽  
Group 1

11515 Background: Historically anthracyclines have been considered the most active agents in metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Docetaxel (TXT) has challenged this belief. Aims: Evaluate response rates, toxicity and time to progression in patients with MBC receiving single agent TXT as first line treatment. Methods: MBC patients received first line single agent treatment according to one of the following schedules: TXT 35 mg/m2 iv weekly for 6 wks q 8 wks (Group 1) or TXT 100 mg/m2 iv day 1 q 3 weeks (Group 2). Adjuvant chemotherapy was FAC (600,50,600) day 1 q 21 days for 6 courses in all cases so treated. Results: Conclusions: It appears that results with single agent TXT obtained in clinical practice are comparable to those reported in Phase II-III trials (Group 1 and Group 2, respectively ) using the same regimens. [Table: see text] No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Incorporation of a Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA) into a randomized phase III trial for metastatic breast cancer: The PELICAN Study

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 9551-9551 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. de Wit ◽  
N. Harbeck ◽  
M. Scholz ◽  
W. Lerbs ◽  
U. Wedding ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Breast Cancer ◽  
Activities Of Daily Living ◽  
Daily Living ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Wilcoxon Test ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Phase Iii Trial ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
Dose Reductions

9551 Background: The PELICAN trial is a randomized phase III trial evaluating efficacy and safety of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) versus capecitabine as first-line therapy in patients (pts) with metastatic breast cancer who are not considered candidates for combination chemotherapy. Randomisation was stratified according to age (cut-off 65 years) and anthracycline pretreatment. CGA results and adverse events (AEs), dose reductions, and number of applied cycles were evaluated. Methods: CGA comprised data on activities of daily living (ADL), instrumental activities of daily living (IADL), ECOG and Karnofsky performance score, comorbidity (CIRS-G), and number of comedication. According to CGA, pts were classified into groups 1–3 (Balducci 2000). Associations of CGA groups and single CGA items with outcome measures were assessed using Fisher's exact test, Wilcoxon test, and logistic regression. Results: Results of 210 pts, mean age 61 years (SD 11; range 22–85) were analysed. According to CGA, 102 pts were considered fit (group 1, 72%), 21 compromised (group 2, 15%), and 19 frail (group 3, 13%). Age was associated neither with overall AEs, nor with dose reductions or number of applied cycles. However, the following significant associations were observed: any AE and number of comedication (p=0.026); less hand foot syndrome (HFS) and CGA group 2/3 (p=0.032); and more constitutional symptomes and age >=65 as well as CGA group 2/3 (p=0.002 and 0.015, respectively). Comedication was the variable most frequently associated with single AEs (dermatology other than HFS, p=0.038; gastrointestinal, p=0.035; constitutional symptomes, p=0.002; pain, p=0.001; pulmonary, p<0.0001; fatigue, p=0.01). Whereas no association between any item and dose reduction was found, CIRS-G grade 3–4 was associated with a reduced number of applied cycles (p=0.049). Conclusions: Incorporation of CGA into a phase III trial is feasible and yields information that would otherwise have been missed. Results of CGA should be validated prospectively in treatment algorithms for this population. [Table: see text]

MERiDiAN: A phase III, randomized, double-blind study of the efficacy, safety, and associated biomarkers of bevacizumab plus paclitaxel compared with paclitaxel plus placebo, as first-line treatment of patients with HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS1142-TPS1142 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Miles ◽  
Leonardo Faoro ◽  
Yan V. Wang ◽  
Joyce O'Shaughnessy
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Metastatic Breast Cancer ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Double Blind Study ◽  
Clinical Trial Registry ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Treatment Benefit

TPS1142^ Background: Bevacizumab (BV), a humanized monoclonal antibody targeting the angiogenic VEGF, has demonstrated activity in patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Plasma VEGF-A levels ([VEGF-A]p) appear to positively correlate with the effect of BV on progression-free survival (PFS) in MBC, metastatic pancreatic, and advanced gastric cancers. The MERiDiAN study will prospectively investigate (1) whether baseline [VEGF-A]ppredict treatment benefit with BV, (2) efficacy of BV with weekly paclitaxel (P), based on previously observed differences in the magnitude of benefit compared with BV + non-P chemotherapies. Methods: MERiDiAN is a global, randomized, double-blind, phase III study enrolling patients with HER2-negative MBC (first patient was enrolled in August 2012). The co-primary endpoints are PFS by investigator assessment in the intent-to-treat (ITT) population, and PFS in the subgroup with high baseline [VEGF-A]p. Secondary endpoints are overall survival (OS), 1-year survival, objective response rate and duration, and safety. Exploratory objectives include assessing the predictive or prognostic potential of blood, DNA and tumor tissue markers, and genetic variants involved in angiogenesis and tumorigenesis, with regard to BV efficacy and safety.Patients will be randomized 1:1 to either P 90 mg/m2 IV weekly (qw) for 3 weeks followed by a 1-week rest and BV 10 mg/kg every 2 weeks (q2w) until disease progression (PD); or P 90 mg/m2IV qw for 3 weeks followed by a 1-week rest and placebo 10 mg/kg q2w until PD. An interim analysis of OS will be performed at the time of the primary PFS analysis. Clinical Trial Registry Number NCT01663727. Clinical trial information: NCT01663727.

Neratinib + capecitabine versus lapatinib + capecitabine in patients with HER2+ metastatic breast cancer previously treated with ≥ 2 HER2-directed regimens: Findings from the multinational, randomized, phase III NALA trial.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1002-1002 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cristina Saura ◽  
Mafalda Oliveira ◽  
Yin-Hsun Feng ◽  
Ming-Shen Dai ◽  
Sara A. Hurvitz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Breast Cancer ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Stage Iv ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Cns Disease ◽  
Patient Reported

1002 Background: NALA (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01808573) is a multinational, randomized, open-label, phase III trial of neratinib (an irreversible pan-HER tyrosine kinase inhibitor [TKI]) + capecitabine (N+C) vs lapatinib (a reversible dual TKI) + capecitabine (L+C) in patients with stage IV HER2+ metastatic breast cancer (MBC) who had received ≥2 prior HER2-directed regimens for MBC. Methods: Patients were randomized 1:1 to N (240 mg qd po) + C (750 mg/m2 bid po) or L (1250 mg qd po) + C (1000 mg/m2 bid po). Co-primary endpoints were centrally assessed progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Secondary endpoints were investigator-assessed PFS; objective response rate (ORR); duration of response (DoR); clinical benefit rate (CBR); time to intervention for symptomatic metastatic central nervous system (CNS) disease; safety; and patient-reported health outcomes. Results: 621 patients were randomized (307 to N+C; 314 to L+C). The risk of disease progression or death was reduced by 24% with N+C vs L+C (HR = 0.76; 95% CI 0.63–0.93; p = 0.006); 6- and 12-month PFS rates were 47.2% vs 37.8% and 28.8% vs 14.8% for N+C vs L+C, respectively. OS rates at 6 and 12 months were 90.2% vs 87.5% and 72.5% vs 66.7% for N+C vs L+C, respectively (HR = 0.88; 95% CI 0.72–1.07; p = 0.2086). ORR in patients with measurable disease at screening was improved with N+C vs L+C (32.8% vs 26.7%; p = 0.1201), as was CBR (44.5% vs 35.6%; p = 0.0328) and DoR (HR = 0.50; 95% CI 0.33–0.74; p = 0.0004). Time to intervention for symptomatic CNS disease (overall cumulative incidence 22.8% vs 29.2%; p = 0.043) was delayed with N+C vs L+C. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were similar between arms, but there was a higher rate of grade 3 diarrhea with N+C vs L+C (24.4% vs 12.5%). TEAEs leading to neratinib/lapatinib discontinuation were lower with neratinib (10.9%) than with lapatinib (14.5%). Conclusions: N+C significantly improved PFS with a trend towards improved OS vs L+C. N+C also resulted in a delayed time to intervention for symptomatic CNS disease. Tolerability was similar between the two arms, with no new safety signals observed. Clinical trial information: NCT01808573.

RIBBON-1: Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Phase III Trial of Chemotherapy With or Without Bevacizumab for First-Line Treatment of Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2–Negative, Locally Recurrent or Metastatic Breast Cancer

2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (10) ◽  
pp. 1252-1260 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicholas J. Robert ◽  
Véronique Diéras ◽  
John Glaspy ◽  
Adam M. Brufsky ◽  
Igor Bondarenko ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Breast Cancer ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Growth Factor Receptor ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
First Line ◽  
Epidermal Growth ◽  
First Line Treatment

Purpose This phase III study compared the efficacy and safety of bevacizumab (BV) when combined with several standard chemotherapy regimens versus those regimens alone for first-line treatment of patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2–negative metastatic breast cancer. Patients and Methods Patients were randomly assigned in 2:1 ratio to chemotherapy plus BV or chemotherapy plus placebo. Before random assignment, investigators chose capecitabine (Cape; 2,000 mg/m2 for 14 days), taxane (Tax) -based (nab-paclitaxel 260 mg/m2, docetaxel 75 or 100 mg/m2), or anthracycline (Anthra) -based (doxorubicin or epirubicin combinations [doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide, epirubicin/cyclophosphamide, fluorouracil/epirubicin/cyclophosphamide, or fluorouracil/doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide]) chemotherapy administered every 3 weeks. BV or placebo was administered at 15 mg/kg every 3 weeks. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary end points included overall survival (OS), 1-year survival rate, objective response rate, duration of objective response, and safety. Two independently powered cohorts defined by the choice of chemotherapy (Cape patients or pooled Tax/Anthra patients) were analyzed in parallel. Results RIBBON-1 (Regimens in Bevacizumab for Breast Oncology) enrolled 1,237 patients (Cape cohort, n = 615; Tax/Anthra cohort, n = 622). Median PFS was longer for each BV combination (Cape cohort: increased from 5.7 months to 8.6 months; hazard ratio [HR], 0.69; 95% CI, 0.56 to 0.84; log-rank P < .001; and Tax/Anthra cohort: increased from 8.0 months to 9.2 months; HR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.52 to 0.80; log-rank P < .001). No statistically significant differences in OS between the placebo- and BV-containing arms were observed. Safety was consistent with results of prior BV trials. Conclusion The combination of BV with Cape, Tax, or Anthra improves clinical benefit in terms of increased PFS in first-line treatment of metastatic breast cancer, with a safety profile comparable to prior phase III studies.

RIBBON-2: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Phase III Trial Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Bevacizumab in Combination With Chemotherapy for Second-Line Treatment of Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2–Negative Metastatic Breast Cancer

2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (32) ◽  
pp. 4286-4293 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adam M. Brufsky ◽  
Sara Hurvitz ◽  
Edith Perez ◽  
Raji Swamy ◽  
Vicente Valero ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Breast Cancer ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Growth Factor Receptor ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
Second Line ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Epidermal Growth

Purpose This phase III study compared the efficacy and safety of bevacizumab combined with standard chemotherapy regimens versus chemotherapy alone as second-line treatment of patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) –negative metastatic breast cancer. Patients and Methods Patients were randomly assigned 2:1 to chemotherapy + bevacizumab or to chemotherapy + placebo. Before random assignment, investigators chose capecitabine, a taxane (paclitaxel, nab-paclitaxel, or docetaxel), gemcitabine, or vinorelbine. Dosing for bevacizumab or placebo was 15 mg/kg every 3 weeks or 10 mg/kg every 2 weeks, depending on chemotherapy regimen. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary end points included overall survival, PFS by chemotherapy cohort, objective response rate (ORR), duration of objective response, 1-year survival rate, and safety. Results RIBBON-2 enrolled 684 patients (225, chemotherapy + placebo; 459, chemotherapy + bevacizumab). The combination of bevacizumab with chemotherapy demonstrated a statistically significant benefit. Median PFS increased from 5.1 to 7.2 months (stratified hazard ratio for PFS, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.64 to 0.93; P = .0072). The 10% improvement in ORR between the placebo- and bevacizumab-containing arms (39.5% v 29.6%; P = .0193), although not statistically significant, was consistent with previous trials. There was no statistically significant difference in overall survival. The most common grade ≥ 3 adverse events (AEs) related to bevacizumab treatment were hypertension (9.0%) and proteinuria (3.1%). There was an increased number of AEs leading to study discontinuation in the chemotherapy + bevacizumab arm compared with the chemotherapy + placebo arm (13.3% v 7.2%). Conclusion The combination of bevacizumab with commonly used chemotherapies improved PFS in the second-line treatment of patients with HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer, with a safety profile comparable with that in prior phase III studies.

scholarly journals Determination and clinical significance of bone pseudoprogression in hormone receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer

2021 ◽  
Vol 13 ◽  
pp. 175883592110228
Author(s):  
Mingxi Lin ◽  
Yizi Jin ◽  
Ziyi Yang ◽  
Xichun Hu ◽  
Jian Zhang
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Breast Cancer ◽  
Disease Progression ◽  
Endocrine Therapy ◽  
Clinical Significance ◽  
Hormone Receptor ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Bone Lesions ◽  
Hormone Receptor Positive

Background: 99mTechnetium labeled methylene diphosphonate bone scans (BSs) are commonly used to monitor disease progression in bone for patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC). However, new BS lesions may represent osteoblastic bone healing, which we now define as bone pseudoprogression. In this study, we aimed to assess the clinical significance and determination methods of bone pseudoprogression. Methods: This retrospective analysis was conducted among 48 patients with hormone receptor-positive MBC treated with first-line endocrine therapy. Four months after initiating therapy, all the participants did not show extraosseous disease progression. Participants were divided into two groups according to the presence of new BS lesions. All the patients continued on treatment until explicit disease progression (extraosseous disease progression or progressive lysis on bone lesions). Explicit progression-free survival (PFS) and extraosseous objective response rate were analyzed between the two groups. Results: New BS lesions were observed in 11 of 48 (22.9%) patients. All the new BS lesions appeared as osteoblastic bone lesions on computed tomography. For patients with new BS lesions, the median PFS was 26.57 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 15.46–37.68], which was similar to that (29.57 months; 95% CI 19.24–39.90) in patients without new BS lesions [hazard ratio: 1.098 (95% CI 0.482–2.503), p = 0.818]. Notably, 82.9% of patients without new BS lesions showed an extraosseous objective response, whereas 85.7% of patients with new BS lesions demonstrated an extraosseous objective response [odds ratio: 0.806 (95% CI 0.061–5.682), p = 0.999]. The median interval between bone pseudoprogression and true disease progression was 21.26 months (95% CI 10.11–32.42). Conclusions: Osteoblastic new BS lesions detected on follow-up BSs may represent bone pseudoprogression. Clinicians should raise awareness of bone pseudoprogression, thereby avoiding premature discontinuation of therapy and maximizing the opportunity to benefit from endocrine therapy. Due to the small sample size and retrospective nature of the study, large prospective clinical trials are needed to confirm our findings.

scholarly journals Prospective Randomized Trial of Docetaxel Versus Doxorubicin in Patients With Metastatic Breast Cancer

1999 ◽  
Vol 17 (8) ◽  
pp. 2341-2341 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephen Chan ◽  
Kay Friedrichs ◽  
Daniel Noel ◽  
Tamàs Pintér ◽  
Simon Van Belle ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Breast Cancer ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Severe Infection ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Therapy Choice ◽  
Visceral Metastases ◽  
Doxorubicin Group ◽  
To Receive

PURPOSE: This phase III study compared docetaxel and doxorubicin in patients with metastatic breast cancer who had received previous alkylating agent–containing chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were randomized to receive an intravenous infusion of docetaxel 100 mg/m2 or doxorubicin 75 mg/m2 every 3 weeks for a maximum of seven treatment cycles. RESULTS: A total of 326 patients were randomized, 165 to receive doxorubicin and 161 to receive docetaxel. Overall, docetaxel produced a significantly higher rate of objective response than did doxorubicin (47.8% v 33.3%; P = .008). Docetaxel was also significantly more active than doxorubicin in patients with negative prognostic factors, such as visceral metastases (objective response, 46% v 29%) and resistance to prior chemotherapy (47% v 25%). Median time to progression was longer in the docetaxel group (26 weeks v 21 weeks; difference not significant). Median overall survival was similar in the two groups (docetaxel, 15 months; doxorubicin, 14 months). There was one death due to infection in each group, and an additional four deaths due to cardiotoxicity in the doxorubicin group. Although neutropenia was similar in both groups, febrile neutropenia and severe infection occurred more frequently in the doxorubicin group. For severe nonhematologic toxicity, the incidences of cardiac toxicity, nausea, vomiting, and stomatitis were higher among patients receiving doxorubicin, whereas diarrhea, neuropathy, fluid retention, and skin and nail changes were higher among patients receiving docetaxel. CONCLUSION: The observed differences in activity and toxicity profiles provide a basis for therapy choice and confirms the rationale for combination studies in early breast cancer.

Phase II multicenter study of talazoparib for somatic BRCA1/2 mutant metastatic breast cancer.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS1110-TPS1110
Author(s):  
Neelima Vidula ◽  
Erica Blouch ◽  
Nora K. Horick ◽  
Erin Basile ◽  
Senthil Damodaran ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Metastatic Breast Cancer ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Parp Inhibitor ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Parp Inhibitors ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Patient Reported

TPS1110 Background: PARP inhibitors are approved for the treatment of HER2 negative metastatic breast cancer (MBC) with germline BRCA1/2 mutations, based on phase III studies demonstrating an improvement in progression-free survival (PFS) compared to chemotherapy in this population and better patient reported outcomes (Robson, NEJM, 2017; Litton, NEJM, 2018). However, germline BRCA1/2 mutations account for only 5-10% of breast cancer, limiting the current clinical applicability of PARP inhibitors. Somatic BRCA1/2 mutations are detectable in circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA) in ̃13.5% of patients with MBC; in pre-clinical models, pathogenic somatic BRCA1/2 mutations have been shown to respond to PARP inhibition (Vidula, CCR, 2020). The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of talazoparib, a PARP inhibitor, in patients with MBC who have somatic BRCA1/2 mutations detectable in cfDNA, in the absence of a germline BRCA1/2 mutation, which we hypothesize will be effective in this setting. This study may help expand the population of patients with MBC who benefit from PARP inhibitors. Methods: This is an investigator initiated multicenter, single arm, phase II clinical trial studying the efficacy of talazoparib in 30 patients with MBC who have pathogenic somatic BRCA1/2 mutations detected in cfDNA. Patients with MBC who are found to have pathogenic somatic BRCA1/2 mutations detected in cfDNA in the absence of a germline BRCA1/2 mutation are eligible. Patients may have triple negative (with ≥ 1 prior chemotherapy), or hormone receptor positive/HER2 negative breast cancer (with ≥ 1 prior hormone therapy). Patients may have received any number of prior lines of chemotherapy, including a prior platinum (in the absence of progression). They must have adequate organ function and ECOG performance status ≤2, and should not have previously received a PARP inhibitor. Patients are treated with talazoparib 1 mg daily until disease progression or intolerability, with serial imaging using CT chest/abdomen/pelvis and bone scan performed at baseline and every 12 weeks, and cfDNA collection every 4 weeks. Primary endpoint is PFS by RECIST 1.1. Patients are being enrolled in a two-stage design with 80% power to demonstrate that the treatment is associated with “success” (PFS > 12 weeks) in ≥53% patients (4% alpha). Secondary endpoints include objective response rate and safety (NCI CTCAE v 5.0). Exploratory analyses include studying serial changes in cfDNA BRCA1/2 mutant allelic frequency and comparing pre-and post-treatment cfDNA for the emergence of BRCA1/2 reversion and resistance mutations. This study is activated and open at Massachusetts General Hospital, where 2 patients are completing screening. It is also opening soon at 6 other academic centers (NCT03990896). Grant support includes a Pfizer ASPIRE award and 2020 Conquer Cancer Foundation of ASCO – Breast Cancer Research Foundation – Career Development Award. Clinical trial information: NCT03990896 .

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document