Resection of non resectable liver metastases after chemotherapy: Prognostic factors and long term results

Aim. To evaluate short- and long-term results of surgical treatment of the liver metastases from kidney cancer, to identify prognostic factors.Materials and methods. The retrospective study included 67 patients who underwent surgical treatment for liver metastases from kidney cancer from 1990 to 2019. A total of 71 operations on the liver were performed (53 economical resections, 15 extensive resections, 3 radiofrequency thermoablation). Four of them were repeated for the development of metastases in the liver remant.Results. Postoperative morbidity was 30%. There was one (1,5%) intraoperative death. Within 90 days after surgery, all patients were alive. The 5-year overall survival was 64%, median was 73 months. Univariate analysis revealed factors that significantly worsened overall survival: stage III and IV kidney cancer at the time of nephrectomy; nonclear cell histological type of metastases; synchronous liver metastases; intraoperative blood loss more than 2000 ml. Gender, age (≥ 65 years) at the time of surgery, number of metastases, maximum diameter of the metastases, presence of extrahepatic disease and major liver resection did not have a statistically significant impact on overall survival.Conclusions. Surgical treatment allows to achieve long-term overall survival of patients with liver metastases from kidney cancer. Higher indicators of overall survival were noted in the clear-cell variant of kidney cancer, stage I–II, and the metachronic nature of hepatic metastases. Patients with large (≥4 cm) and multiple resectable liver metastases, having solitary and single metastases in other organs, provided that they are radically removed, can also be considered as candidates for surgical treatment.

Download Full-text

Efficacy of Surgery for the Treatment of Gastric Cancer Liver Metastases: A Systematic Review of the Literature and Meta-Analysis of Prognostic Factors

Journal of Clinical Medicine ◽

10.3390/jcm10051141 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 10 (5) ◽

pp. 1141

Author(s):

Gianpaolo Marte ◽

Andrea Tufo ◽

Francesca Steccanella ◽

Ester Marra ◽

Piera Federico ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Gastric Cancer ◽

Systematic Review ◽

Prognostic Factors ◽

Liver Metastases ◽

Meta Analysis ◽

Multidisciplinary Treatment ◽

Review Of The Literature ◽

Term Survival ◽

The Impact

Background: In the last 10 years, the management of patients with gastric cancer liver metastases (GCLM) has changed from chemotherapy alone, towards a multidisciplinary treatment with liver surgery playing a leading role. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to assess the efficacy of hepatectomy for GCLM and to analyze the impact of related prognostic factors on long-term outcomes. Methods: The databases PubMed (Medline), EMBASE, and Google Scholar were searched for relevant articles from January 2010 to September 2020. We included prospective and retrospective studies that reported the outcomes after hepatectomy for GCLM. A systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis of prognostic factors was performed. Results: We included 40 studies, including 1573 participants who underwent hepatic resection for GCLM. Post-operative morbidity and 30-day mortality rates were 24.7% and 1.6%, respectively. One-year, 3-years, and 5-years overall survival (OS) were 72%, 37%, and 26%, respectively. The 1-year, 3-years, and 5-years disease-free survival (DFS) were 44%, 24%, and 22%, respectively. Well-moderately differentiated tumors, pT1–2 and pN0–1 adenocarcinoma, R0 resection, the presence of solitary metastasis, unilobar metastases, metachronous metastasis, and chemotherapy were all strongly positively associated to better OS and DFS. Conclusion: In the present study, we demonstrated that hepatectomy for GCLM is feasible and provides benefits in terms of long-term survival. Identification of patient subgroups that could benefit from surgical treatment is mandatory in a multidisciplinary setting.

Download Full-text