Concurrent Hyperfractionated Radiotherapy and Low-Dose Daily Carboplatin/Paclitaxel in Patients With Early-Stage (I/II) Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer: Long-Term Results of a Phase II Study

2005 ◽  
Vol 23 (28) ◽  
pp. 6873-6880 ◽  
Author(s):  
Branislav Jeremić ◽  
Biljana Milicić ◽  
Ljubisa Acimović ◽  
Slobodan Milisavljević
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Small Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Low Dose ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Stage I ◽  
Small Cell Lung ◽  
Local Progression

PurposeFeasibility and activity of concurrent hyperfractionated radiotherapy (Hfx RT) and low-dose, daily carboplatin and paclitaxel were investigated in patients with early-stage (I/II) non–small-cell lung cancer in a phase II study.Patients and MethodsFifty-six patients started their treatment on day 1 with 30 mg/m2of paclitaxel. Hfx RT using 1.3 Gy bid to a total dose of 67.6 Gy and concurrent low-dose daily carboplatin 25 mg/m2and paclitaxel 10 mg/m2, both given Mondays through Fridays during the RT course, started from the second day.ResultsThere were 29 complete responses (52%) and 15 partial responses (27%), and 12 patients (21%), experienced stable disease. The median survival time was 35 months, and 3- and 5-year survival rates were 50% and 36%, respectively. The median time to local progression has not been achieved, but 3- and 5-year local progression-free survival rates were 56% and 54%, respectively. The median time to distant metastasis has not been achieved, but 3- and 5- year distant metastasis-free survival rates were 61% and 61%, respectively. The median and 5-year cause-specific survivals were 39 months and 43%, respectively. Acute high-grade (> 3) toxicity was hematologic (22%), esophageal (7%), or bronchopulmonary (7%). No grade 5 toxicity was observed. Late high-grade toxicity was rarely observed (total, 10%).ConclusionHfx RT and concurrent low-dose daily carboplatin/paclitaxel was feasible with low toxicity and effective in patients with stage I/II non–small-cell lung cancer. It should continue to be investigated for this disease.

scholarly journals Surgery in Small-Cell Lung Cancer

Cancers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. 390
Author(s):  
Nicola Martucci ◽  
Alessandro Morabito ◽  
Antonello La Rocca ◽  
Giuseppe De Luca ◽  
Rossella De Cecio ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Small Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Stage I ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Small Cell Lung ◽  
Early Stage Disease ◽  
Stage Disease

Small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) is one of the most aggressive tumors, with a rapid growth and early metastases. Approximately 5% of SCLC patients present with early-stage disease (T1,2 N0M0): these patients have a better prognosis, with a 5-year survival up to 50%. Two randomized phase III studies conducted in the 1960s and the 1980s reported negative results with surgery in SCLC patients with early-stage disease and, thereafter, surgery has been largely discouraged. Instead, several subsequent prospective studies have demonstrated the feasibility of a multimodality approach including surgery before or after chemotherapy and followed in most studies by thoracic radiotherapy, with a 5-year survival probability of 36–63% for patients with completely resected stage I SCLC. These results were substantially confirmed by retrospective studies and by large, population-based studies, conducted in the last 40 years, showing the benefit of surgery, particularly lobectomy, in selected patients with early-stage SCLC. On these bases, the International Guidelines recommend a surgical approach in selected stage I SCLC patients, after adequate staging: in these cases, lobectomy with mediastinal lymphadenectomy is considered the standard approach. In all cases, surgery can be offered only as part of a multimodal treatment, which includes chemotherapy with or without radiotherapy and after a proper multidisciplinary evaluation.

scholarly journals The Diagnostic Role of Sputum miRNA in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zaoxiu Hu ◽  
Yonghe Zhao ◽  
Yanlong Yang ◽  
Zhenghai Shen ◽  
Yunchao Huang
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Diagnostic Accuracy ◽  
Small Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Stage I ◽  
Small Cell Lung ◽  
Diagnostic Role

Abstract Objective: Recent studies indicated sputum miRNAs may provide a promising approach for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) diagnosis. But some results were still inconsistent. So, we performed meta-analysis to evaluate the diagnostic role of sputum miRNAs for the detection of NSCLC.Methods: Eligible studies that estimated the diagnostic accuracy of sputum miRNAs in NSCLC were searched in Pubmed, Embase and Web of Science and Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI). Data from the eligible studies were collected and pooled; sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative likelihood ratios, diagnostic odds ratios, weighted symmetric summary ROC curve and the area under the curve (AUC) were calculated by bi-variate random effects model. The between-study heterogeneity was evaluated by Q test and I2 statistics.Results: 30 studies from 16 articles were included for analysis. The overall analysis yielded the sensitivity of 0.77 (95% CI: 0.73–0.81) and specificity of 0.87 (95% CI: 0.83–0.90), with an area under the SROC curve (AUC) of 0.89 (95% CI: 0.86–0.91). Subgroup analysis revealed the diagnostic accuracy in multiple miRNAs studies was higher than single miRNA (the sensitivity, specifcity and an AUC of multiple miRNAs were 0.76, 0.88 and 0.90; and for single miRNA, it was 0.74, 0.74, and 0.80). The diagnostic performance in early stage NSCLC was also very high (the sensitivity, specifcity and an AUC of stage I/II was 0.76, 0.88 and 0.91; and for stage I, it was 0.79, 0.85, and 0.87). We also found miR-210, miR-21, miR-31 and miR-126-3p might serve as potential biomarkers for lung cancer.Conclusion: Sputum miRNAs was useful noninvasive biomarkers for NSCLC diagnosis.

scholarly journals Segmentectomy or lobectomy for early-stage non-small-cell lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2020 ◽  
Vol 57 (6) ◽  
pp. 1051-1060 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas Winckelmans ◽  
Herbert Decaluwé ◽  
Paul De Leyn ◽  
Dirk Van Raemdonck
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Small Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Stage I ◽  
Small Cell Lung ◽  
Oncological Outcomes ◽  
Stage Ia

Abstract OBJECTIVES The role of segmentectomy in early-stage non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains a matter of debate. We performed a meta-analysis to evaluate the oncological outcomes following segmentectomy versus lobectomy for stage I, stage IA only and stage IA <2 cm only. METHODS We systematically searched the literature for articles reporting on overall survival (OS), cancer-specific survival (CSS) or recurrence-free survival (RFS). The hazard ratios (HRs) were retrieved and pooled using an inverse variance-weighted approach. RESULTS Twenty-eight studies were included in the analysis. In stage I, segmentectomy was found to be inferior to lobectomy for all 3 outcomes with HR: 1.25 (P = 0.01) for OS, 1.59 (P = 0.02) for CSS and 1.40 (P < 0.001) for RFS. In stage IA, the differences were significant for OS and CSS, though not for RFS with HR: 1.31 (P = 0.04), 1.56 (P = 0.02) and 1.22 (P = 0.11), respectively. In stage IA <2 cm, no significant differences were found between segmentectomy and lobectomy with HR: 1.13 (P = 0.37) for OS, 1.02 (P = 0.95) for CSS and 1.24 (P = 0.11) for RFS. CONCLUSIONS For stages I and IA, lobectomy showed superior results whereas for tumours <2 cm, our study did not find significant differences in oncological outcomes between both groups. These results suggest that segmentectomy might be a valuable alternative to lobectomy for NSCLC in tumours <2 cm.

CT findings of early-stage small cell lung cancer in a low-dose CT screening programme

Lung Cancer ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 56 (2) ◽  
pp. 207-215 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shusuke Sone ◽  
Tomio Nakayama ◽  
Takayuki Honda ◽  
Kenji Tsushima ◽  
Feng Li ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Small Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Low Dose ◽  
Screening Programme ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Small Cell Lung ◽  
Ct Screening ◽  
Low Dose Ct

Concurrent Hyperfractionated Radiotherapy and Low-Dose Daily Carboplatin and Paclitaxel in Patients With Stage III Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer: Long-Term Results of a Phase II Study

2005 ◽  
Vol 23 (6) ◽  
pp. 1144-1151 ◽  
Author(s):  
Branislav Jeremic ◽  
Biljana Milicic ◽  
Ljubisa Acimovic ◽  
Slobodan Milisavljevic
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Small Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Distant Metastasis ◽  
Low Dose ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
High Grade ◽  
Small Cell Lung ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Local Progression

PurposeTo investigate the feasibility and activity of hyperfractionated radiation therapy (Hfx RT) and concurrent chemotherapy (CT) consisting of low-dose, daily carboplatin and paclitaxel in patients with stage III non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).Patients and MethodsSixty-four patients started their treatment on day 1 with 30 mg/m2of paclitaxel administered by 1-hour infusion. Hfx RT began on day 2 using 1.3 Gy bid to a total dose of 67.6 Gy and concurrent low-dose daily CT consisting of 25 mg/m2of carboplatin and 10 mg/m2of paclitaxel, both given Mondays to Fridays during RT course.ResultsObjective response rate was 83% and included complete response in 27 patients (42%) and partial response in 26 patients (41%). Ten patients (16%) had stable disease, whereas only one patient (2%) had progressive disease. The median survival time was 28 months, and 3- and 5-year survival rates were 37% and 26%, respectively. The median time to local progression was 26 months, and 3- and 5-year local progression-free survival rates were 37% and 33%, respectively. The median time to distant metastasis was 25 months, and 3- and 5- year distant metastasis-free survival rates were 37% and 31%, respectively. Acute high-grade (≥ grade 3) toxicity was hematologic (25%), esophageal (17%), bronchopulmonary (13%), and skin (9%). Late high-grade toxicity was infrequent.ConclusionThis combined Hfx RT/TC regimen produced results that are among the best ever reported and warrants further study in a prospective randomized fashion.

Effect of lobectomy on survival in early-stage small cell lung cancer: A retrospective analysis

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 7585-7585
Author(s):  
J. M. Varlotto ◽  
A. Recht ◽  
J. C. Flickinger ◽  
A. Dyer ◽  
L. Medford-Davis ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Small Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Adjuvant Radiotherapy ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Stage I ◽  
Small Cell Lung ◽  
Radiotherapy Alone ◽  
Resected Stage

7585 Background: Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) rarely presents as I/II Disease. In order to assess the incidence, treatment and prognosis of this early-stage SCLC, we used the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results database. Furthermore, since some investigators are irradiating growing and/or PET Scan positive nodules without biopsy, presenting characteristics of surgically-resected Stage I SCLC were compared to those of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Methods: The SEER 17 Database from 1988–2003 was accessed for all patients with early-stage SCLC. Presenting characteristics of surgically-resected Stage I SCLC were compared to those of resected Stage I NSCLC using chi-square and Wilcoxon Rank Sum tests. The logrank test was used to compare the differences in Survival(S) resulting from the various treatments options for early-stage SCLC. Results: 1,615 patients were identified with early-stage SCLC with greater than 3 months of follow-up. The median S was 20 months for the entire group. Over the time period of our study, the incidence of early stage SCLC as a percentage of all SCLCs and all lung cancers (SCLCs and NSCLCs) remained stable and ranged from 3.00–4.96% and 0.09–0.16% respectively. Surgically-resected Stage I SCLC did not differ from NSCLC in regards to patient characteristics (age, sex, race) or tumor location, but SCLC was found to have significantly smaller tumor size (p< 0.0001). Lobectomy or greater resections without radiotherapy were associated with a greater median S than those treated with segmental/wedge resections and those treated with radiotherapy alone (44 vs 29 months, p=0.03 and 20 months, p <0.0001). Furthermore, when lobectomy or greater resection was performed, adjuvant radiotherapy was associated with a shorter, but not significantly different median S (32 vs 44 months, p = 0.17). Segmental/wedge resections without radiotherapy were associated with significantly better S than patients who received radiotherapy alone, but no difference in S was found with the use of adjuvant radiotherapy (29 vs 20 months, p =0.003, and 35 months, p=0.31). Conclusions: The incidence of stage I/II small cell lung cancer was stable over the years of our study. Anatomic lobectomy without adjuvant radiotherapy appears to be the optimal therapy for patients without mediastinal nodal metastases. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document