A prospective comparison of Karnofsky (KPS) with ECOG performance status in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): A COMET group study investigating sensitivity and specificity issues important in clinical decision making

2005 ◽  
Vol 23 (16_suppl) ◽  
pp. 8134-8134 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. J. Hollen ◽  
R. J. Gralla ◽  
J. A. Stewart ◽  
C. Chin ◽  
G. A. Bizette ◽  
...  
BMC Cancer ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Mokhles ◽  
J. J. M. E. Nuyttens ◽  
M. de Mol ◽  
J. G. J. V. Aerts ◽  
A. P. W. M. Maat ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
pp. 570-578
Author(s):  
Christine M. Cramer-van der Welle ◽  
Elisabeth A. Kastelijn ◽  
Bram C. Plouvier ◽  
Cornelia F. van Uden-Kraan ◽  
Franz M. N. H. Schramel ◽  
...  

PURPOSE To develop and evaluate a tool for patients with stage IV non–small-cell lung cancer and their thoracic oncologists (TOs) that provides insight into real-world effectiveness of systemic treatments to support informed clinical decision making in the palliative setting. METHODS A participatory design approach was used to acquire insights from patients and TOs into preferences regarding the content and design of the web-based tool. Implementation was investigated by means of an adoption and usage rate. The appreciation of the tool was evaluated through a telephone survey with patients and a questionnaire for TOs. RESULTS From clinical data of 2,989 patients with stage IV non–small-cell lung cancer diagnosed in one of the Santeon hospitals, an interface was developed to show treatments plus both real-world outcomes and clinical trial results after selecting patient characteristics (patients like me). This prototype of the tool was finalized after discussion in a focus group with four TOs and semi-structured interviews with six patients. The tool was implemented and used by TOs in three of six Santeon hospitals (50% adoption rate). The tool was used in 48 patients (29% usage rate), of which 17 participated in the telephone survey. Ten TOs responded to the questionnaire. The responses varied from positive reactions on the clear overview of treatment outcomes to statements that the tool rarely changed treatment decisions. Overall, the majority of patients and TOs scored the tool as of added value (71% and 83%, respectively). CONCLUSION Our real-world data tool in metastatic lung cancer was appreciated in clinical practice by both patients and TOs. However, the efficacy of the implementation can be improved.


Lung Cancer ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 90 (3) ◽  
pp. 465-471 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maximilian von Laffert ◽  
Albrecht Stenzinger ◽  
Michael Hummel ◽  
Wilko Weichert ◽  
Dido Lenze ◽  
...  

1996 ◽  
Vol 82 (1) ◽  
pp. 57-60 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luciano Frontini ◽  
Paola Candido ◽  
Maria Teresa Cattaneo ◽  
Sabrina Zonato ◽  
Ernesto Piatto ◽  
...  

Aim The North Milan Group presents the results of a phase II study on a cisplatin-vinorelbine combination schedule in the treatment of locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer to evaluate its activity and tolerability. Methods Seventy-six consecutive patients entered the study. Patients’ characteristics were the following: males/females 69/7; median age, 61.4 years (range, 40-73); ECOG performance status, 0-1; 17 stage IIIa and 59 stage IIIb. There were 49 squamous cell carcinomas, 20 adenocarcinomas, and 7 large cell carcinomas. All patients had not been previously treated and showed measurable disease. Treatment consisted of vinorelbine, 25 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8, plus cisplatin, 80 mg/m2 on day 1, administered intravenously every 21 days for three standard courses. Results Seventy-four patients were evaluable for response. Objective responses were documented in 42/74 patients with an overall response rate (CR+PR) of 56.7%; 18/74 patients (24.3%) showed stable disease and the remaining 14/74 (18.9%) went into progression. Twelve patients (16.2%) were suitable for a subsequent surgery. The median duration of response was 13.3 months. Survival time ranged from 4 to 36 months: it was 14.6 months for PR patients, 8.6 months for NC and 5 months for PD. Mean survival time is presently 12.85 months (SE, 1.2 months). Toxicity evaluated on 222 cycles administered was acceptable, and it was necessary to use G-CSF or delay the treatment because of severe leukopenia in only a few cases. Conclusions The regimen is active and safe: the slight survival increase is likely due to the small amenability to surgery achieved (16.2%). However, our results are fully comparable to others obtained with vinorelbine in two/three drug combination chemotherapy regimens.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document