Rituximab and yttrium-90 ibritumomab tiuxetan radioimmunotherapy as treatment options in patients with indolent lymphoma of the orbit
15532 Objective: To report a cohort of patients with lymphoid tumors of the orbit whose disease responded to immunotherapy with rituximab alone or rituximab followed by Zevalin (yttrium-90 ibritumomab tiuxetan). Methods: Between October 2002 and June 2005, 9 patients with indolent non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma and 1 with orbital benign lymphoid hyperplasia were treated with monoclonal antibodies against CD20. 6 patients with orbital lymphoma (3 follicular B-cell, 2 MALT, and 1 mantle cell lymphoma) received rituximab followed by Zevalin. 2 patients with indolent orbital lymphoma (one with follicular B cell and the other with small lymphocytic lymphoma) and 1 patient with benign lymphoid hyperplasia received rituximab alone. 3 out of the 6 patients who received Zevalin were part of a prospective trial evaluating the efficacy of Zevalin for indolent B-cell lymphoma of the orbit; the rest were treated in other trials at M. D. Anderson. Clinical records and imaging studies were reviewed to document response. Results: 4 men and 5 women were between23 and 83 years old (median age, 63 years). Of the 8 patients with orbital lymphoma, 4 had stage IE, 4 had stage IV, and 6 had previously untreated disease. All 9 patients experienced resolution of the orbital tumor in response to monoclonal antibodies against CD20. Follow-up time ranged from 6 to 32 months (mean, 12 months) after completion of immunotherapy. There were no serious systemic or ocular side effects during the study period. The most common side effect was mild fatigue. All 6 patients treated with Zevalin had transient pancytopenia which normalized within 3 months. Conclusions: Rituximab and Zevalin may be considered as alternative treatment modalities to radiotherapy for indolent B-cell lymphoma or MALT of the orbit. Systemic targeted immunotherapy may potentially have the advantage of lower rate of distant (out-of-field) relapse and less ocular toxicity compared with radiotherapy; these potential advantages would have to be verified in long-term studies and in larger number of patients. [Table: see text]