Phase I study of erlotinib (E) for solid tumors in patients with hepatic or renal dysfunction (HD or RD): CALGB 60101

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3026-3026
Author(s):  
A. A. Miller ◽  
D. J. Murry ◽  
D. R. Hollis ◽  
K. Owzar ◽  
L. D. Lewis ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Progressive Disease ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Direct Bilirubin ◽  
Hematologic Toxicity ◽  
Renal Obstruction ◽  
Reduced Dose ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Tolerable Dose ◽  
Dose Limiting Toxicity

3026 Background: We sought to determine a tolerable dose and characterize the pharmacokinetics (PK) of E in patients with HD or RD. Methods: Patients with biopsy-proven solid tumors that commonly express EGFR, refractory to or without available standard therapy, performance status 0–2, and without biliary or renal obstruction were assigned to one of 3 cohorts (C): C1, AST ≥ 3 × ULN but no RD; C2, direct bilirubin 1–7 mg/dl but no RD; C3, creatinine 1.6–5.0 mg/dl but no HD. After slow accrual of 3 patients, an amended C1 for albumin < 2.5 g/dl accrued 3 additional patients. E was administered po daily in groups of at least 3 evaluable patients in escalating doses of 50, 75, 100, 150 mg starting with 50 mg in HD and 75 mg in RD. Patients had to take E for at least 4 weeks to be considered evaluable for toxicity unless dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) occurred sooner. DLT was defined as: grade 4 neutrophils or platelets; bilirubin ≥ 1.5 × baseline in C1/2 and ≥ 2.5 × ULN in C3; creatinine ≥ 2 × ULN in C1/2 and ≥ 2.5 × baseline in C3; grade ≥ 3 nausea,vomiting,diarrhea despite optimal supportive care; or any other grade ≥ 3 non-hematologic toxicity. Blood samples were obtained before and 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 24 hrs after the first dose. Plasma E concentrations were measured by HPLC. A 2-compartment PK model was used to estimate total clearance of E. Results: Between 12/01 and 5/05, 55 patients were accrued but 1 never started therapy: male/female, 34/20; white/black, 46/8; median age 56 (range, 39–78); PS 0/1/2, 12/25/17. The distribution of treated/evaluable patients was: 6/5 in C1, 30/16 (attrition due to progressive disease) in C2, and 18/18 in C3. DLT consisted of both total and direct bilirubin ≥ 1.5 × baseline in 3 patients: C1, 1 of 5 at 50 mg; C2, 2 of 6 at 100 mg. In C2, 1 of 7 patients had grade 4 diarrhea/dehydration and grade 3 hypotension at 75 mg. No DLT was encountered in C3 with 12 patients at 150 mg. Clearance (mean ± SD) was cohort-dependent: 1.51 ± 0.64 (C1), 2.36 ± 1.17 (C2), 4.34 ± 2.53 (C3) l/hr; 2-sided exact Kruskal-Wallis p < 0.0006. Conclusions: Patients with RD tolerate 150 mg and appear to have normal clearance of E. Patients with HD should be treated at a reduced dose (i.e. 75 mg) consistent with their reduced clearance. [Table: see text]

Pharmacokinetic (PK) and phase I study of sorafenib (S) for solid tumors and hematologic malignancies in patients with hepatic or renal dysfunction (HD or RD): CALGB 60301

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3538-3538 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. A. Miller ◽  
D. J. Murry ◽  
K. Owzar ◽  
D. R. Hollis ◽  
G. K. Abou-Alfa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Test Dose ◽  
Compartment Model ◽  
Hematologic Malignancies ◽  
Hematologic Toxicity ◽  
Hand Foot Syndrome ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Tolerable Dose ◽  
Dose Limiting Toxicity

3538 Background: We sought to characterize the PK and determine a tolerable dose of S in patients with HD or RD. Methods: Patients with performance status 0–2 and pathologically proven solid tumors, multiple myeloma, or non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma, for whom standard therapy was exhausted, were assigned to one of 9 cohorts: [1] Bilirubin (B) =ULN and SGOT =ULN and creatinine clearance (CC) =60 ml/min; [2] B > ULN but = 1.5 x ULN and/or SGOT > ULN; [3] CC between 40 and 59 mL/min; [4] B > 1.5 x ULN to = 3 x ULN (any SGOT); [5] CC between 20 and 39 mL/min; [6] B > 3 x ULN to 10 x ULN (any SGOT); [7] CC < 20 mL/min; [8] albumin < 2.5 mg/dL (any B/ SGOT); and [9] hemodialysis. S was administered po as a 400 mg test dose on day 1 with blood sampled before and 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 24, and 168 hrs afterwards for PK. Total S concentrations were fit to a 2-compartment model and population parameters from previous studies were utilized. On day 8, continuous daily po S started with dose escalation in groups of at least 3 evaluable patients. Dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) by day 29 was defined as: grade 4 neutrophils or platelets; B = 1.5 x baseline in HD and = 2.5 x ULN in RD; CC reduction by > 20 mL/min in RD and >10 mL/min in HD; grade = 3 nausea/vomiting/diarrhea despite optimal supportive care; or any other grade = 3 non-hematologic toxicity. Results: Between 1/05 and 12/06, 146 patients (target 150) were registered but 12 never started therapy. With the exception of cohorts 6 and 7, at least 12 patients per cohort were evaluable. The dose level in each cohort with DLT in less than one third of patients was: [1] 400 mg bid; [2] 400 mg bid; [3] 400 mg bid; [4] 200 mg bid; [5] 200 mg bid; [6] not even 200 mg every third day tolerable; [7] n/a; [8] 200 mg qd; and [9] 200 mg qd. All DLT was non-hematologic: 9 of 12 events in patients with HD were increase in B; other DLT included abdominal pain, rash, fatigue, nausea/vomiting, hand-foot syndrome, congestive heart failure, diarrhea, hemorrhage, and hypertension. PK data are available for 51 patients. Apparent S clearance was: highly variable, median 5.69 (range 1.27 - 19.98) L/hr; not related to age, body weight, or sex; and not different among cohorts. Conclusions: Apparent S clearance does not depend on cohort. We propose the above empiric starting doses by cohort. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

A phase I trial of TAS-102 administered on a three times a day schedule in patients with solid tumors

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 2053-2053 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. A. Wolff ◽  
P. M. Hoff ◽  
A. Mita ◽  
M. Fukushima ◽  
J. C. Blais ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Phase I Trial ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Tumor Xenograft ◽  
Unknown Primary ◽  
Hematologic Toxicity ◽  
Prior Therapy ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
And Performance

2053 Background: TAS-102 consists of trifluorothymidine (FTD) and an inhibitor of thymidine phosphorylase (TP). FTD, like 5-fluorouracil, is an inhibitor of thymidylate synthase. However, when orally administered, FTD is rapidly degraded to an inactive form, primarily by TP. Co-administration of FTD with an inhibitor of TP elevates FTD concentrations. Since tumor xenograft models demonstrated greater anti-tumor activity with divided daily dosing of TAS-102, and a phase I trial of once-daily TAS-102 showed a short FTD half-life, this trial was designed to explore a three times a day dosing schedule. Methods: Patients with advanced solid tumors having received prior therapy, with adequate organ function, and performance status Zubrod 0–2, were eligible. TAS-102 was administered orally three times a day for 5 days a week for two weeks, followed by two weeks off. Courses were repeated every 4 weeks. Results: A total of 15 patients (8 female, age 37–72 years) were enrolled into the study; three at 60 mg/m2/day, 6 each at 70 mg/m2/day and 80 mg/m2/day. Nine patients had colorectal cancer, 2 carcinoma of unknown primary, 2 pancreatic cancer, one each medullary thyroid cancer and cholangiocarcinoma. Toxicity was assessed throughout all courses of therapy. Grade 3 and 4 hematological toxicities were the most common, including 3 episodes of grade 3 neutropenia at 60 mg/m2/day, 5 at 70 mg/m2/day, 5 at 80 mg/m2/day with only 1 instance of grade 3 thrombocytopenia at 80 mg/m2/day. Non-hematological grade 3 toxicities included nausea/vomiting (1 at 70 mg/m2/day), colitis, gout, and hematuria (1 each at 70 mg/m2/day), and fatigue (1 at 70 mg/m2/day and 2 at 80 mg/m2/day) Two episodes of dose-limiting toxicity were observed at 80 mg/m2/day: grade 3 fatigue and grade 4 neutropenia. Although there were no objective responses, nine patients (60%) maintained stable disease with a median duration of disease stabilization of 4.3 months (range, 1.9 to 8.6 months). Conclusions: TAS-102 is well tolerated with manageable hematologic toxicity and few non-hematological toxicities. The most common grade 3 or 4 toxicity was neutropenia. The suggested phase II dose of TAS-102 is 70 mg/m2/day when administered orally three times a day for 5 days a week for two weeks followed by two weeks off every 4 weeks. [Table: see text]

MK-0457, a Novel Multikinase Inhibitor, Has Activity in Refractory AML, Including Transformed JAK2 Positive Myeloproliferative Disease (MPD), and in Philadelphia-Positive ALL.

Blood ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 108 (11) ◽  
pp. 1967-1967 ◽  
Author(s):  
Francis Giles ◽  
Steven J. Freedman ◽  
Alan Xiao ◽  
Gautam Borthakur ◽  
Guillermo Garcia-Manero ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Dose Level ◽  
Phase I Study ◽  
Standard Dose ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Resistance Mutation ◽  
Hematologic Toxicity ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Dose Limiting Toxicity ◽  
Refractory Aml

Abstract Background. MK-0457 (VX-680) is a small-molecule inhibitor of aurora kinases A, B, and C, FLT3, BCR-ABL, and JAK2. MK-0457 exhibits nanomolar level broad-spectrum preclinical anti-tumor activity. Specifically, MK-0457 inhibits proliferation of patient-derived AML cells in vitro, and improves survival of a Ba/F3 FLT3 ITD murine model of systemic AML. A Phase I study of MK-0457 is being conducted in patients with a broad range of hematological malignancies, including acute myeloid and lymphoid leukemias. Methods. After IRB approval, 15 consenting patients with relapsed/refractory AML and ALL, ECOG performance status ≤ 2, and adequate organ function were enrolled using a standard dose escalation scheme with 3 patients/dose level until dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), followed by 6 patients/level. MK-0457 was administered by continuous 5-day intravenous infusion every 2 to 3 weeks. DLT was defined as grade 3 or higher non-hematologic toxicity during cycle 1. Pharmacokinetics (PKs) were collected pre-dose through 168 h and analyzed for MK-0457 by HPLC/mass spec. Results. Thirteen patients with AML and 2 patients with ALL were enrolled at 8, 12, 20, 24, and 28 mg/m2/hr. Among AML patients, two had a diploid karyotype and the remainder had complex unfavorable cytogenetic abnormalities. Two AML patients had a prior JAK2-positive MPD, transformed to AML, and then received MK-0457 as their 1st AML treatment. One AML patient received MK-0457 as first salvage, three as second salvage, and the remainder as salvage attempt three or higher. Both ALL patients failed prior multiagent chemotherapy; one of these patients had Philadelphia (Ph)-positive ALL and progressed after prior BCR-ABL inhibitor therapy, including dasatinib. The latter patient carried the BCR-ABL inhibitor resistance mutation, T315I. Four of 5 AML patients without baseline grade 3/4 myelosuppression in one cell line developed grade 4 neutropenia, including both JAK2-positive AML patients. Normalization of the platelet count during cycle one occurred in one MPD patient with thrombocytosis at baseline (~800 x 103/mL); Grade 3 thrombocytopenia occurred during cycle one in the other MPD patient with a normal baseline. The Ph+-ALL patient had eradication of peripheral blood blasts at the end of 2 cycles of therapy. No MK-0457 attributable extramedullary grade 2 or above adverse events were seen. Mild hair thinning was seen in some patients at dose levels 20 mg/m2/hr and above. Preliminary PK analysis showed dose-dependent linearity at steady state, with a biexponential decay at the end of infusion characterized by a rapid a decay followed by a slower b decay (t1/2 10–20 hrs). Conclusions. MK-0457 at well tolerated doses achieves myelosuppression in refractory AML and ALL patients. Its activity in JAK2+ transformed AML patients may be partially attributable to JAK2 inhibitory activity. The role of aurora kinase inhibition in the above responses is not yet established. As neither maximum tolerated dose nor dose limiting toxicity has been defined to date, dose finding on this Phase I study of MK-0457 is on-going in the acute leukemia population with 36 mg/m2/hr as the current dose level under investigation.

Phase I trial of daily lenalidomide and docetaxel given every three weeks in patients with advanced solid tumors

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3570-3570 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. L. Sanborn ◽  
M. Cooney ◽  
J. Gibbons ◽  
J. Brell ◽  
P. Savvides ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Phase I Trial ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Unknown Primary ◽  
Hematologic Toxicity ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Ecog Performance Status ◽  
Combination Methods ◽  
Grade 3

3570 Background: Lenalidomide is a potent anti-angiogenic and immune modulating agent. This phase I trial of docetaxel and lenalidomide was undertaken to evaluate the maximal tolerated dose (MTD), dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), and secondarily, any tumor response for this novel combination. Methods: Patients with advanced solid tumors with adequate organ function were eligible. Lenalidomide was given orally days 1–14, and docetaxel was administered intravenously on day 1 of each 21-day cycle. DLT was defined as grade 3 or higher non-hematologic toxicity, grade 4 neutropenia with fever, and grade 4 anemia or thrombocytopenia. Results: Nineteen patients, 14 male and 5 female, with tumor types including prostate (7), sarcoma (3), head and neck (2), pancreatic, colon, melanoma, adenocarcinoma of unknown primary, gastric, bladder, and GIST have been enrolled. ECOG performance status was zero (10 patients) or one (9 patients). The median age was 59 years (range 35 to 86). Fourteen patients had zero or one prior treatment regimens (range 0 to 6). A total of 64 cycles have been administered (range 1 to 12). In the first nine evaluable patients, eight (89%) had grade 3 or 4 neutropenia. Docetaxel 75 mg/m2 given every 3 weeks with lenalidomide 5 mg on days 1–14 exceeded the MTD due to one grade 3 nausea/vomiting and one grade 4 neutropenia with fever. After the addition of pegfilgrastim on day 2, there has not been any neutropenia in the subsequent seven evaluable patients. Other grade 3 and 4 toxicities included leukopenia (31%), lymphopenia (19%), as well as nausea, vomiting, fatigue, anemia, infection, hyponatremia, and hypokalemia (6% each). Seven patients (44%) have had stable disease (range 3 to 12 cycles). One prostate cancer patient experienced a >95% reduction of PSA. Enrollment is ongoing and the current dose level is docetaxel 75 mg/m2, lenalidomide 10 mg days 1–14, and pegfilgrastim on day 2. Conclusions: The toxicity evaluation is ongoing. This trial will provide the MTD of docetaxel 75 mg/m2 given every 3 weeks with lenalidomide on days 1–14 in combination with pegfilgrastim support to avoid neutropenia. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Phase I and Pharmacokinetic Study of Docetaxel and Irinotecan in Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors

2000 ◽  
Vol 18 (20) ◽  
pp. 3545-3552 ◽  
Author(s):  
Corinne Couteau ◽  
Marie-Laure Risse ◽  
Michel Ducreux ◽  
Florence Lefresne-Soulas ◽  
Alessandro Riva ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Febrile Neutropenia ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Pharmacokinetic Study ◽  
Topoisomerase I ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Hematologic Toxicity ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Phase Ii Studies ◽  
Grade 3

PURPOSE: We conducted a phase I and pharmacokinetic study of docetaxel in combination with irinotecan to determine the dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD), and the dose at which at least 50% of the patients experienced a DLT during the first cycle, and to evaluate the safety and pharmacokinetic profiles in patients with advanced solid tumors. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with only one prior chemotherapy treatment (without taxanes or topoisomerase I inhibitors) for advanced disease were included in the study. Docetaxel was administered as a 1-hour IV infusion after premedication with corticosteroids followed immediately by irinotecan as a 90-minute IV infusion, every 3 weeks. No hematologic growth factors were allowed. RESULTS: Forty patients were entered through the following seven dose levels (docetaxel/irinotecan): 40/140 mg/m2, 50/175 mg/m2, 60/210 mg/m2, 60/250 mg/m2, 60/275 mg/m2, 60/300 mg/m2, and 70/250 mg/m2. Two hundred cycles were administered. Two MTDs were determined, 70/250 mg/m2 and 60/300 mg/m2; the DLTs were febrile neutropenia and diarrhea. Neutropenia was the main hematologic toxicity, with 85% of patients experiencing grade 4 neutropenia. Grade 3/4 nonhematologic toxicities in patients included late diarrhea (7.5%), asthenia (15.0%), febrile neutropenia (22.5%), infection (7.5%), and nausea (5.0%). Pharmacokinetics of both docetaxel and irinotecan were not modified with the administration schedule of this study. CONCLUSION: The recommended dose of docetaxel in combination with irinotecan is 60/275 mg/m2, respectively. At this dose level, the safety profile is manageable. The activity of this combination should be evaluated in phase II studies in different tumor types.

Phase I study of temozolomide in children and adolescents with recurrent solid tumors: a report from the Children's Cancer Group.

1998 ◽  
Vol 16 (9) ◽  
pp. 3037-3043 ◽  
Author(s):  
H S Nicholson ◽  
M Krailo ◽  
M M Ames ◽  
N L Seibel ◽  
J M Reid ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Children And Adolescents ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Hematologic Toxicity ◽  
Cancer Group ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Dose Levels ◽  
Dose Limiting Toxicity

PURPOSE The Children's Cancer Group conducted a phase I trial of temozolomide stratified by prior craniospinal irradiation (CSI). PATIENTS AND METHODS Children and adolescents with recurrent or progressive cancer were enrolled. Temozolomide was administered orally daily for 5 days, with subsequent courses administered every 21 to 28 days after full hematologic recovery. Dose levels tested included 100, 150, 180, 215, 245, and 260 mg/m2 daily. RESULTS Twenty-seven patients on the non-CSI stratum were assessable for hematologic toxicity. During the first three dose levels (100, 150, and 180 mg/m2 daily), only grades 1 and 2 hematologic toxicity occurred. One patient at 215 mg/m2 daily had grade 3 hematologic toxicity. Three of eight patients (38%) treated at 245 to 260 mg/m2 daily had dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), which included both neutropenia and thrombocytopenia. Twenty-two patients on the CSI stratum were assessable for hematologic toxicity. Hematologic DLT occurred in one of six patients (17%) at 100 mg/m2 daily and in two of four patients (50%) at 215 mg/m2 daily. No nonhematologic DLT occurred; nausea and vomiting occurred in more than half of the patients. After two courses of temozolomide, 10 patients had stable disease (SD), and three patients had a partial response (PR), one of whom subsequently had a complete response (CR) that persists through 24 months of follow-up. CONCLUSION The maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) of temozolomide for children and adolescents without prior CSI is 215 mg/m2 daily and for those with prior CSI is 180 mg/m2 daily for 5 days, with subsequent courses that begin on day 28. Temozolomide is well tolerated and should undergo phase II testing in children and adolescents.

Gemcitabine as a Single Agent in the Treatment of Relapsed or Refractory Aggressive Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma

1999 ◽  
Vol 17 (12) ◽  
pp. 3786-3792 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Fosså ◽  
A. Santoro ◽  
W. Hiddemann ◽  
L. Truemper ◽  
N. Niederle ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Partial Response ◽  
Confidence Interval ◽  
Karnofsky Performance Status ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
World Health ◽  
Hematologic Toxicity ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Health Organization ◽  
Hodgkin's Lymphomas

PURPOSE: A multicenter phase II trial was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of gemcitabine in patients with relapsed or refractory aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphomas (NHL). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-one patients with B-cell intermediate or high-grade NHL (Working Formulation) were enrolled onto the study. The median age was 61 years, with a Karnofsky performance status of ≤ 80% in 65% of patients. Forty-eight percent had stage III or IV (Ann Arbor Classification) at study entry. Pretreatment consisted of one, two, or three chemotherapeutic regimens in nine, 11, and 11 patients, respectively. Gemcitabine 1,250 mg/m2 was administered intravenously over 30 minutes on days 1, 8, and 15 of a 28-day schedule. RESULTS: Thirty patients were assessable for efficacy, and 31 were assessable for toxicity. No complete responses were observed, but six patients showed a partial response, 11 stable disease, and 13 progressive disease. The overall response rate was 20% (95% confidence interval, 8% to 39%) for assessable patients and 19% (95% confidence interval, 8% to 34%) for the intent-to-treat analysis. The median duration of partial response was 6 months (range, 3.7 to 15+ months). Nonhematologic World Health Organization grade 3 toxicity included hepatic toxicity in four patients and infection in two. Hematologic toxicity was observed as grade 3 anemia in three patients, grade 3 leukopenia in two patients, grade 3/4 neutropenia in two patients, and grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia in six patients. CONCLUSION: The present schedule of gemcitabine displays modest efficacy and mild toxicity in pretreated aggressive NHL.

Fludarabine and Mitoxantrone for the Refractory Relapse Treatment of B-Cell Low-Grade Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma (NHL): LACOHG First Interim Report (Latin American Cooperative Oncology Hematology Group).

Blood ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 108 (11) ◽  
pp. 4665-4665
Author(s):  
Severiano Baltazar-Arellano ◽  
Patricia Pimentel ◽  
Luis Vera ◽  
Fernando Bezares ◽  
Jose Málaga ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
B Cell ◽  
Latin American ◽  
Progressive Disease ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Previous Treatment ◽  
Low Grade ◽  
Ecog Performance Status ◽  
Ann Arbor ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Background: fludarabine (F) is licensed for the management of indolent non Hodgkin’s lymphoma in countries such as Canada and Switzerland. Clinical evidence suggests that fludarabine monotherapy is as least as effective, than conventional therapies such as cyclophosphamide, vincristine, prednisone (CVP) for the first and second line treatment of B-cell low grade NHL achieving objective response rates. Better response rates can be achieved combining F with Mitoxantrone (M) in low grade NHL even in refractory relapsed (RR) patients (pts). The Latin American Cooperative Oncology Hematology Group (LACOHG) proposed a multicenter study in Latin American countries in 2002 to use FM in RR B-cell low grade NHL. Aims: to assess the response rate, safety, disease free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) of FM in RR B-cell low grade NHL during (2003–2006). Methods: Forty-eight patients in the period of January 2003 to February 2006 were evaluated. Forty-four pts. had follicular lymphoma and 4 small lymphocytic lymphoma. Median age 63.5 years old (range: 24–83). Gender: female 56% and male 44%. Inclusion criteria for low grade NHL-LG was: any previous treatment excluding autologous transplantation, Ann Arbor stage II to IV, age &gt; 18 years old, ECOG performance status 0–2 and written informed consent. ECOG performance status 0: 2%, 1: 71% and 2: 27%. Ann Arbor staging: II: 2%, III: 29% and IV: 69%. International Prognostic Index (IPI): 0–1: 19%, 2–3: 71% and 4–5: 10%. Median previous treatment was 1 (range: 1–3). FM treatment consisted of F 25 mg/m2 i.v. (day 1–3) and M 10 mg/m m2 i.v. (day 1) each 28 days for 6–8 cycles. Results: on this low grade NHL cohort the overall response rate (ORR was 81%; progressive disease and non-response 19%. With a median follow up of 17 months, OS at 24 months was 86% (DE 5.2%) and DFS at 24 months 57.1% (DE 11.3%). LDH in serum was not an adverse prognostic factor for DFS and OS. Safety: on the 286 cycles in 48 pts, the toxicity was: 18 episodes of grade 3-4 neutropenias, 15 episodes of grade 3-4 thrombocytopenia, 7 episodes of grade 1–2 nausea/vomiting, grade 1–2 diarrhea in 4 pts, 8 pts were admitted to the clinic, 11 fever episodes, 2 allopecia, 4 pts developed grade 1–2 peripheral neuropathy and infections 7%: one case herpes zoster. Mortality rate: 12,5% (6/48 patients), 5 of them because progressive disease. No cardiac toxicity was reported. Conclusions: FM is an effective and safe treatment for RR low grade NHL. A longer follow up and a larger trial, might be needed to confirm these results in a multicenter, randomized study. DFS with FM in RR low grade NHL : LACOHG DFS with FM in RR low grade NHL : LACOHG

Evaluation of the Regimen Brentuximab Vedotin Plus ESHAP (BRESHAP) in Refractory or Relapsed Hodgkin Lymphoma Patients: Preliminary Results of a Phase I-II Trial from the Spanish Group of Lymphoma and Bone Marrow Transplantation (GELTAMO)

Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 582-582 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ramon Garcia-Sanz ◽  
Anna Sureda ◽  
Sara Alonso-Alvarez ◽  
Ana Pilar Gonzalez ◽  
Antonia Rodriguez ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cell ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Hodgkin Lymphoma ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Brentuximab Vedotin ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Hematologic Toxicity ◽  
Pet Ct ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Dose Limiting Toxicity

Abstract Introduction: Around 30% of Hodgkin Lymphoma (HL) patients are refractory or relapse (RR) after first line therapy. Salvage chemotherapy followed by high-dose chemotherapy and with Autologous Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplantation (APBSCT) can cure many patients, but those who are transplanted with active disease detectable by PET-CT have a very poor prognosis. Therefore, the current challenge in HL is to improve the results of the pre-transplant chemotherapy. Phase 2 single agent trials with Brentuximab Vedotin (BV) in highly RRHL patients have demonstrated overall and complete response rates of 75% and 34%, respectively (Younes, JCO 2012; 30:2183); as 2nd line, BV has provided very promising results in combination with chemotherapy (LaCasce, Blood 2014; 124(21):3099) Objectives: We conducted a phase I/II trial to determine the dose limiting toxicity (DLT), maximum tolerated dose (MTD), and response rate with combined Brentuximab vedotin with ESHAP chemotherapy [BRESHAP] as 2nd line therapy for RRHL prior to APBSCT (ClinicalTrials.gov #NCT02243436). Methods: The primary efficacy endpoint was the proportion of complete responses (CR) pre-APBSCT. It is a phase I-II trial with dose escalation followed by expansion. Treatment consisted of Etoposide (40 mg/m2/day IV, D1-4), Solumedrol (250 mg/day IV, D1-4), High dose AraC (2 g/m2 IV, D5) and cisPlatin (25 mg/m2/day IV, D1-4). BV was administered at three dose levels: 0.9, 1.2 or 1.8 mg/kg IV on day 1 to each cohort of patients, following the scheme of cohorts of 3 patients each, to assess the maximum tolerable dose (MTD). The dose limiting toxicity (DLT) was defined as Grade 4 hematologic toxicity extended over 3 weeks or non-hematologic toxicity grade ≥3 during the first treatment cycle. Patients were evaluated weekly. Results: Patients with relapsed or refractory classical HL (cHL) after one prior line of therapy were eligible. To date, 27 patients have been included in the trial. The first 9 have completed the three courses as scheduled, without TLD doses. Fifteen patients have received the first full cycle, presenting 4 episodes of severe adverse reactions: non-neutropenic fever due to IV AraC and to complicated catheter insertion; one pneumothorax after catheter insertion; and one febrile neutropenia recovered with antibiotic treatment. Grade 4 hematologic toxicity presented in three of these nine patients: 2 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia 1. All nine patients underwent stem cell mobilization after the 1st or the 2nd treatment cycle with subcutaneous G-CSF 5 mcg/Kg days +7 to +14, collecting >2·10e6/Kg peripheral blood CD34+ cells in all cases, with no grade 3-4 toxicity. The number of harvesting procedures was one & two in seven & two patients, respectively. The transplant has been done in 6 patients, with a median of 9 days and 10 days for neutrophil and platelet recovery, respectively. All nine patients had no evidence of disease before the transplant by PET-CT, although one patient had residual FGD uptaking areas without underlying anatomical lesions on CT (metabolic complete response: 89%). Six patients have been evaluated after the APBSCT and they are all in metabolic CR. The phase II of the trial was open on April the 12th 2015, with BV at the recommended dose of 1.8 mg/kg per course. At the submission of this report, there were 28 patients recruited, and 17 evaluated pre-transplant, achieving 16 CR. The complete results will be presented during the meeting; the projected recruitment by the meeting is 45 (65% of the total planned recruitment). Conclusions: BRESHAP is a tolerable treatment scheme as remission induction prior to transplant in patients with refractory or relapsed Hodgkin lymphoma, and it offers very promising results. Disclosures Off Label Use: Brentuximab Vedotin in Resistant or Relapsed Hodgkin Lymphoma patients who are candidates to Autologous Stem Cell Transplant. Sureda:Seattle Genetics Inc.: Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Caballero:Takeda: Honoraria, Research Funding.

Final results from a phase I trial of ixabepilone in patients with advanced malignancies and lymphoma

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 2039-2039
Author(s):  
C. Aghajanian ◽  
O. O’Connor ◽  
M. Cohen ◽  
R. Peck ◽  
H. Burris
Keyword(s):  
Febrile Neutropenia ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Phase I Trial ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Hematologic Toxicity ◽  
Phase Ii Studies ◽  
Grade 3

2039 Background: Ixabepilone is the first analog in a new class of antineoplastic agents, the epothilones, which stabilizes microtubules and induces apoptosis. Ixabepilone has shown clinical activity in a broad range of tumors. Methods: This Phase I trial was designed to establish the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), efficacy, safety, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of ixabepilone when administered as a 1-hour infusion every 3 weeks to patients with advanced solid tumors or lymphoma. Eligible patients were aged ≥18 years with histologically/cytologically confirmed non-hematologic cancer, or a pathologic diagnosis of relapsed/primary refractory non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (NHL) or relapsed/primary refractory mantle cell lymphoma, with ≤CTC Grade 1 neuropathy. Ixabepilone doses ranged from 7.5–65 mg/m2. Response was assessed every 6 weeks using RECIST. DLT was defined as Grade 4 neutropenia and/or febrile neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, ≥Grade 3 nausea/vomiting and non-hematologic toxicity, or treatment delay of >2 weeks due to delayed recovery. Results: Of 61 patients (median age 58, range 18–81), 75% had solid tumors; 25% had lymphoma. 98% and 67% of patients had received one or ≥ two prior chemotherapy regimens, respectively. The MTD of ixabepilone as a 1-hour infusion every 3 weeks was established as 50 mg/m2. The most common DLTs were neutropenia, myalgia, arthralgia and stomatitis/pharyngitis. A total of eight patients (13%) achieved a durable objective response. Complete responses were achieved in two patients with primary peritoneal cancer and NHL. A partial response was seen in six patients. The most common Grade 3/4 treatment-related adverse events (only observed at doses ≥40 mg/m2) were sensory neuropathy (13%), fatigue (13%), myalgia (10%), arthralgia (7%), nausea (5%), febrile neutropenia (5%) and neutropenia (5%). Recovery to baseline or ≤Grade 1 neuropathy occurred in some patients. Conclusions: The recommended dose of ixabepilone for the initiation of Phase II studies based on this study is 50 mg/m2 over 1 hour every 3 weeks. Ixabepilone demonstrates promising safety in patients with solid tumors or lymphoma who have failed standard therapy. Encouraging activity was reported in several tumor types. [Table: see text]

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document