Gemcitabine as a Single Agent in the Treatment of Relapsed or Refractory Aggressive Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma

1999 ◽  
Vol 17 (12) ◽  
pp. 3786-3792 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Fosså ◽  
A. Santoro ◽  
W. Hiddemann ◽  
L. Truemper ◽  
N. Niederle ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Partial Response ◽  
Confidence Interval ◽  
Karnofsky Performance Status ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
World Health ◽  
Hematologic Toxicity ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Health Organization ◽  
Hodgkin's Lymphomas

PURPOSE: A multicenter phase II trial was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of gemcitabine in patients with relapsed or refractory aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphomas (NHL). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-one patients with B-cell intermediate or high-grade NHL (Working Formulation) were enrolled onto the study. The median age was 61 years, with a Karnofsky performance status of ≤ 80% in 65% of patients. Forty-eight percent had stage III or IV (Ann Arbor Classification) at study entry. Pretreatment consisted of one, two, or three chemotherapeutic regimens in nine, 11, and 11 patients, respectively. Gemcitabine 1,250 mg/m2 was administered intravenously over 30 minutes on days 1, 8, and 15 of a 28-day schedule. RESULTS: Thirty patients were assessable for efficacy, and 31 were assessable for toxicity. No complete responses were observed, but six patients showed a partial response, 11 stable disease, and 13 progressive disease. The overall response rate was 20% (95% confidence interval, 8% to 39%) for assessable patients and 19% (95% confidence interval, 8% to 34%) for the intent-to-treat analysis. The median duration of partial response was 6 months (range, 3.7 to 15+ months). Nonhematologic World Health Organization grade 3 toxicity included hepatic toxicity in four patients and infection in two. Hematologic toxicity was observed as grade 3 anemia in three patients, grade 3 leukopenia in two patients, grade 3/4 neutropenia in two patients, and grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia in six patients. CONCLUSION: The present schedule of gemcitabine displays modest efficacy and mild toxicity in pretreated aggressive NHL.

scholarly journals Etoposide in acute nonlymphocytic leukemia. Australian Leukemia Study Group

Blood ◽  
1990 ◽  
Vol 75 (1) ◽  
pp. 27-32 ◽  
Author(s):  
JF Bishop ◽  
RM Lowenthal ◽  
D Joshua ◽  
JP Matthews ◽  
D Todd ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Older Patients ◽  
World Health ◽  
Hematologic Toxicity ◽  
Acute Nonlymphocytic Leukemia ◽  
Consolidation Therapy ◽  
Who Grade ◽  
Remission Duration ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Additional Clinical Benefit ◽  
Health Organization

Abstract Previously untreated patients with acute nonlymphocytic leukemia (ANLL) aged 15 to 70 years were randomized to either cytosine arabinoside 100 mg/m2/d continuous intravenous (IV) infusion days 1 through 7, daunorubicin 50 mg/m2/d IV days 1 through 3 (7–3), or the same drugs intensified with etoposide 75 mg/m2/d IV days 1 through 7 (7–3–7) as induction therapy. Patients achieving complete remission (CR) received two courses of consolidation therapy (5–2 or 5–2–5) followed by maintenance therapy. Of 264 eligible patients, CR occurred in 56% of 7– 3 and 59% of 7–3–7 patients; 7–3–7 significantly improved remission duration (P = .01). The median remission duration was 12 months for 7–3 and 18 months for 7–3–7. Survival was similar when the two arms were compared overall. Subset analysis performed to identify patients with the most benefit showed that etoposide significantly prolonged remission duration in younger patients (less than 55 years) with a median of 12 months for 7–3 and 27 months for 7–3–7 (P = .01). Survival appeared to be prolonged with 7–3–7 in patients aged less than 55 years, with a median of 9 months for 7–3 as compared with 17 months for 7–3–7 (P = .03). In older patients (aged greater than or equal to 55 years), 7–3–7 was more toxic, with significantly more severe [World Health Organization (WHO) grade 3 or 4] stomatitis (P = .02) and no additional clinical benefit. Hematologic toxicity for induction courses was similar, with granulocytopenia less than 0.5 x 10(9)/L for a median of 16 days per course for 7–3 and 15 days for 7–3–7. Hematologic toxicity was more severe for 5–2–5 consolidation courses (P = .003). Induction and consolidation therapy intensified with etoposide resulted in significantly improved remission duration but not survival.

A phase 1 study of daily oral perifosine (P) with every 3-week paclitaxel (T)

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 13134-13134 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. F. Goggins ◽  
J. J. Nemunaitis ◽  
R. Shiffman ◽  
R. Birch ◽  
D. H. Berdeaux ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dose Level ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
State Level ◽  
Hematologic Toxicity ◽  
Ecog Performance Status ◽  
Full Dose ◽  
Phase Ii Studies ◽  
Grade 3

13134 Background: Perifosine is a novel alkylphospholipid that has been shown to affect multiple signal transduction pathways including Akt, MAPK and JNK (Kondapaka, Mol. Canc. Ther 2: 1093–1103. 2003). Treatment with a taxane initially activates Akt, and persistent activation increases resistance to the drug (Vanderweele, Mol. Canc. Ther. 3: 1605–13, 2004). Methods: Twelve patients (pts) were enrolled on this study. T was given at a dose of 175 mg/m2 on day 8 (after 7 days of perifosine) of a 21 day cycle; this was to obtain a steady state level of P at the tumor before exposure to T. The intent of the protocol was to determine if full dose P could be delivered with 50 mg of perifosine given orally 1, 2 or 3 times a day on days 1–14 of each cycle. Results: Disease sites included lung 3, thyroid 3, breast 1, esophagus 1 and other 4, Median age was 66 (range 45 - 83); 6 pts were male and median ECOG performance status was 1 (range 0–2). All pts had received prior chemotherapy (median 2 regimens); 3 had prior treatment with a taxane. Three pts were entered at each dose level and the cohort expanded to 6 pts if 2 or more pts experienced a grade 3/4 non-hematologic toxicity (DLT) during cycle 1. A dose level was toxic if 4 or more pts experienced a DLT during cycle 1. A total of 30 cycles and a median of 2 cycles (range 1–11) per patient were delivered. There were no grade 3/4 hematologic toxicities. Full dose T was given in all treatment cycles. P dose reductions were required in 6% of cycles (50 mg - 7%, 100 mg - 0%, 150 mg - 7%). One patient missed one dose due to nausea and one pt was stopped due to diarrhea. The grade 3 toxicities for each cohort are given in the table below. The elevated glucose value was 321. Nine pts were evaluable for response; two pts with thyroid cancer had stable disease by the RECIST criteria for 9 and 10+ months. Conclusions: In this study the usual single agent doses of P (150 mg daily) & T (175 mg/m2 q 3 weeks) were given together without increasing the toxicities that would be expected from using each drug alone. Phase II studies are warranted to define activity of the combination. [Table: see text] [Table: see text]

Phase II trial of oral gimatecan in adults with recurrent glioblastoma

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 2009-2009
Author(s):  
J. Hu ◽  
P. Y. Wen ◽  
L. E. Abrey ◽  
C. Fadul ◽  
J. Drappatz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase Ii ◽  
Phase Ii Trial ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Recurrent Glioblastoma ◽  
Hematologic Toxicity ◽  
Radiographic Response ◽  
Daily Dose ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Experienced Grade

2009 Background: Gimatecan is a highly lipophilic oral camptothecin analogue with impressive preclinical activity in glioma models. Methods: We conducted a multicenter two-stage phase II trial to evaluate the efficacy of gimatecan in adults with recurrent glioblastoma. Eligibility criteria included ≤1 prior treatment for recurrent disease, age ≥18, ECOG performance status 0 or 1, and normal organ function. Patients taking enzyme-inducing anti-seizure medications were excluded. Gimatecan 1.22 mg/m2 was given orally once daily for 5 consecutive days during each 28-day cycle. Radiographic response was evaluated by MRI after every second cycle. The primary endpoint of the study was 6 months PFS. A Simon's 2-stage design was used in which 19 patients were evaluated in the first stage, with an additional 36 patients accrued if > 4 patients in stage 1 achieved 6 month PFS. Results: A total of 29 patients were enrolled in the study, with median age of 58 years (range, 25–77 years); 58.6% female; all of whom had received prior surgery, radiation therapy, and at least one regimen of chemotherapy. The daily dose was reduced to 1.0 mg/m2 after four of the first 10 patients experienced grade 4 hematologic toxicity. One patient was removed from trial due to toxicity (grade 3 leukopenia and thrombocytopenia). Treatment delay occurred in 11 patients (38%) and dose reduction was necessary in eight patients (28%). Treatment-related grade 3/4 toxicities included thrombocytopenia (17.2%), leukopenia (17.2%), and neutropenia (10.3%). Only 1/19 patients treated with 1.0 mg/m2/day experienced grade 3/4 hematologic toxicity. The 18% reduction in the daily dose resulted in a 19% decrease in the concentration of total gimatecan in plasma prior to administration of the fifth daily dose (56 ± 23 vs. 45 ± 20 ng/mL) and a 33% decrease in the AUC for dose 5 (8.0±4.8 vs. 5.3±4.2 ng*h/mL). Only one patient had a partial radiographic response by the modified Macdonald criteria and stable disease was the best response in 13 patients. All other patients had progressive disease after two cycles of therapy. Only three patients (12%) were progression-free at 6 months. Median time to progression was 12.0 weeks (95% CI: 7.0, 17.0). Conclusions: Treatment with single-agent gimatecan 1.0 mg/m2/day for 5 days, repeated every 28-days showed minimal efficacy. [Table: see text]

Front-Line Treatment of Advanced Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer With Docetaxel and Gemcitabine: A Multicenter Phase II Trial

1999 ◽  
Vol 17 (3) ◽  
pp. 914-914 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vassilis Georgoulias ◽  
Charalambos Kouroussis ◽  
Nikos Androulakis ◽  
Stelios Kakolyris ◽  
Meletios-Athanasios Dimopoulos ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Small Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Stage Iv ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
World Health ◽  
Small Cell Lung ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Health Organization

PURPOSE: To evaluate the tolerance and efficacy of the combination of docetaxel and gemcitabine in patients with advanced non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fifty-one chemotherapy-naive patients with NSCLC were treated with gemcitabine 900 mg/m2 intravenously on days 1 and 8 and docetaxel 100 mg/m2 intravenously on day 8 with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (150 μg/m2, subcutaneously) support from day 9 to day 15. Treatment was repeated every 3 weeks. RESULTS: The patients' median age was 64 years. The World Health Organization performance status was 0 to 1 in 39 patients and 2 in 12 patients. Fifteen patients (29%) had stage IIIB disease, and 36 (71%) had stage IV; histology was mainly squamous cell carcinoma (59%). A partial response was achieved in 19 patients (37.5%; 95% confidence interval, 24% to 50%); stable disease and progressive disease were each observed in 16 patients (31.4%). The median duration of response and the time to tumor progression were 5 and 6 months, respectively. The median survival was 13 months, and the actuarial 1-year survival was 50.7%. Grade 4 anemia and thrombocytopenia were rare (2%). Four patients (8%) developed grade 3 or 4 neutropenia, and all were complicated with fever; there was no treatment-related death. Grade 3 or 4 diarrhea occurred in three patients (6%), grade 2 or 3 neurotoxicity in four patients (8%), grade 2 or 3 asthenia in 10 patients (20%), and grade 2 or 3 edema in 10 patients (20%). CONCLUSION: The combination of docetaxel/gemcitabine is well tolerated, can be used for outpatients, and is active for the treatment of advanced NSCLC. This treatment merits further comparison with other cisplatin- or carboplatin-based combinations.

Phase II study of single-agent gemcitabine in previously untreated patients with metastatic urothelial cancer.

1997 ◽  
Vol 15 (11) ◽  
pp. 3394-3398 ◽  
Author(s):  
W M Stadler ◽  
T Kuzel ◽  
B Roth ◽  
D Raghavan ◽  
F A Dorr
Keyword(s):  
Karnofsky Performance Status ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Cell Cancer ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Transitional Cell ◽  
Significant Activity ◽  
Survival Times ◽  
Metastatic Urothelial Cancer ◽  
Transitional Cell Cancer ◽  
Grade 3

PURPOSE To determine the activity of single-agent gemcitabine in previously untreated patients with metastatic transitional cell cancer. METHODS Forty patients with measurable disease and a Karnofsky performance status > or = 60% were enrolled at five institutions between March 1994 and October 1995. Treatment consisted of gemcitabine (1,200 mg/m2) administered weekly times three on a 4-week cycle. One patient was ineligible for response evaluation because pathology review showed a metastatic melanoma. Responses were confirmed by all investigators and an independent radiologist and were maintained for at least 4 weeks. RESULTS There were four complete and seven partial responses, for an overall response rate of 28%. Responses were seen at all sites, including liver. Median progression-free and overall survival times were 20 and 54 weeks, respectively. Toxicity was mild, with only two grade 4 toxicities. Twenty-five percent of patients experienced grade 3 neutropenia or thrombocytopenia that was rapidly reversible. CONCLUSION Gemcitabine exhibits significant activity in metastatic transitional cell cancer with minimal toxicity, but survival remains short. Trials of gemcitabine in combination with other active agents are thus suggested.

A randomized phase II trial of adjuvant chemotherapy with cisplatin, epirubicin, 5-fluorouracil, gemcitabine (PEFG regimen) or gemcitabine alone after curative resection for pancreatic cancer

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4608-4608
Author(s):  
M. Reni ◽  
S. Cereda ◽  
G. Aprile ◽  
M. C. Tronconi ◽  
C. Milandri ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Endpoint ◽  
Curative Resection ◽  
Karnofsky Performance Status ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
R1 Resection ◽  
Post Surgery ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Intent To Treat ◽  
The Impact

4608 Background: The PEFG regimen yielded a statistically relevant outcome advantage as compared with gemcitabine (G) in patients with advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PA). The current trial assessed the impact upon disease control of PEFG regimen and single agent G after curative resection for PA. At time of trial design, both arms were experimental since the role of adjuvant therapy in PA was debated. Methods: After R0 or R1 resection for PA, patients with stage IB-III disease, aged 18–70 years, Karnofsky performance status (PS) >60 were randomized within 8 weeks from surgery to receive either G 1 g/m2/weekly Q3 every 4 weeks (Arm A), or PEFG (cisplatin and epirubicin at 40 mg/m2 each on day one, gemcitabine at 600 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8 and 5-FU at 200 mg/m2/day on days 1 to 28) every 4 weeks (Arm B). In both treatment arms chemotherapy was administered for 3 months and followed by radiotherapy (54–60 Gy in 27–30 fractions) with concurrent 5-FU 250 mg/m2/day. A CT scan was performed every three months. The primary endpoint was the probability of being disease-free at 1 year (DFS1y) from surgery. The Fleming design was used to calculate the sample size. Assuming P0=35% and P1=55%, α .05 and β.10, the study was to enroll 51 patients per arm. The treatment arm had to be considered of interest with > 23 patients being DFS1y. Results: Between August 2003 and August 2008, 102 patients were enrolled, stratified by center and resection margin and randomized (51 per arm). All patients were eligible. One patient in arm A and 2 in arm B refused the assigned treatment. An intent-to-treat analysis was performed. Patients’ characteristics were (A/B): median age 61/60, median PS 90/90, stage IIA 19/12%; stage IIB 73/81%; stage III 8/7%; grade 3 30/46; R1 36/30; pre- and post-surgery surgery CA19.9 > upper limit of laboratory normal 68/80% and 29/33%, tumor size > 2.9 cm 41/43%. To date, 41 patients per arm are assessable for the primary endpoint: 19 (46%) and 28 (68%) patients were DFS1. Main G3–4 toxicity was: neutropenia in 21/85% and thrombocytopenia in 0/23% of patients. Conclusions: With a mature follow-up for 80% of patients, PEFG reached the primary endpoint of the trial and warrants further study while G not yet. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Treatment of Pancreatic Cancer With Docetaxel and Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor: A Multicenter Phase II Study

1999 ◽  
Vol 17 (6) ◽  
pp. 1779-1779 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nikos Androulakis ◽  
Charalambos Kourousis ◽  
Meletios A. Dimopoulos ◽  
George Samelis ◽  
Stelios Kakolyris ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Advanced Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
World Health ◽  
Granulocyte Colony Stimulating Factor ◽  
Colony Stimulating Factor ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Stimulating Factor

PURPOSE: To determine the efficacy and tolerance of single-agent docetaxel and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-three chemotherapy-naive patients (median age, 65 years) with histologically confirmed pancreatic cancer were treated, after appropriate premedication, with docetaxel (100 mg/m2) and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (150 μg/m2/d subcutaneously days 2 through 10) every 3 weeks. World Health Organization performance status was 0 to 1 in 28 patients (85%) and 2 in 5 patients (15%). Twenty-nine patients had stage III and IV disease. RESULTS: One complete response (3%) and one partial response (3%) were observed for an overall response rate of 6% (95% confidence interval, 2.1% to 14.2%). Nineteen patients (58%) had stable disease and 12 (36%) had progressive disease. The duration of the two objective responses was 10 and 28 weeks, and the median time to tumor progression was 20 weeks. The median overall survival was 36 weeks. The actuarial 1-year survival was 36.4%. The performance status improved in seven of 21 assessable patients (24%) and pain improved in 14 of 21 (67%) assessable patients; five patients (29%) experienced weight gain during treatment. Disease-related asthenia, anorexia, vomiting, and diarrhea improved in 29%, 15%, 67%, and 47% of the assessable patients, respectively. Serum concentrations of CA 19-9 were decreased by more than 50% in seven patients (35%). Grade 3 and 4 neutropenia occurred in four patients (12%) and eight patients (24%), respectively, with two episodes of febrile neutropenia. There were no treatment-related deaths. Grade 3/4 asthenia occurred in three patients. CONCLUSION: Although docetaxel has a marginal objective activity in pancreatic cancer, it seems to have an important effect on tumor growth control, conferring a clinical benefit.

Efficacy and safety profile of gemcitabine in non-small-cell lung cancer: a phase II study.

1994 ◽  
Vol 12 (8) ◽  
pp. 1535-1540 ◽  
Author(s):  
R P Abratt ◽  
W R Bezwoda ◽  
G Falkson ◽  
L Goedhals ◽  
D Hacking ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Small Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
World Health ◽  
Hematologic Toxicity ◽  
Small Cell Lung ◽  
Who Grade ◽  
Grade 3

PURPOSE The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of gemcitabine at higher doses than had been used previously in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). PATIENTS AND METHODS Eighty-four patients (65 men, 19 women; age range, 35 to 75 years; mean age, 59 years) with locally advanced or metastatic pathologically documented NSCLC were enrolled. Patients had bidimensionally measurable disease, as defined by computed tomographic (CT) scan or chest x-ray. A total of 28.6% had previously been surgically treated, while 9.5% had received radiotherapy. Fifty-three patients commenced at a dose of 1,000 mg/m2, and 31 at a dose of 1,250 mg/m2. Patients were to receive two dose escalations of 25%, provided that overall toxicity was no worse than World Health Organization (WHO) grade 1 or WHO grade 0 for platelets. Responding patients were reviewed and validated by a blinded oncology review board (ORB) of experts not involved with the study. Of the original 84 patients enrolled, 76 were assessable. RESULTS The overall response rate was 20% (95% confidence interval [CI], 11.6% to 30.8%). There were two complete responses (3%) and 13 partial responses (17%). Hematologic toxicity was negligible. WHO grade 3 WBC toxicity occurred in 0.9% of doses and WHO grade 4 in 0.1%. WHO grade 3 and 4 thrombocytopenia occurred in 0.1% and 0.1% of all doses, respectively. Nonhematologic toxicity was minor and easily controlled. Common side effects included peripheral edema, asthenia, and transient malaise. CONCLUSION The single-agent efficacy of gemcitabine is equivalent to other agents commonly used to treat NSCLC. Gemcitabine has an unusually mild side effect profile for such an active agent. The nausea and vomiting experienced with gemcitabine are mild and generally well controlled with standard antiemetics; 5-HT3 receptor antagonists are typically not required. The use of gemcitabine does not cause significant alopecia, and hematologic toxicity is modest and unlikely to require hospitalization. Gemcitabine may have a role as monotherapy in patients with inoperable NSCLC.

Results of a randomized phase III trial (MPACT) of weekly nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine versus gemcitabine alone for patients with metastatic adenocarcinoma of the pancreas with PET and CA19-9 correlates.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4005-4005 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel D. Von Hoff ◽  
Thomas J. Ervin ◽  
Francis P. Arena ◽  
E. Gabriela Chiorean ◽  
Jeffrey R. Infante ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Metabolic Response ◽  
Karnofsky Performance Status ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
International Study ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Duration Of Treatment ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Metastatic Sites ◽  
Adenocarcinoma Of The Pancreas

4005^ Background: nab-paclitaxel (nab-P; 130 nm albumin-bound paclitaxel) has demonstrated both single-agent activity and synergy with gemcitabine (G) in preclinical models of pancreatic cancer (PC). nab-P + G also demonstrated promising efficacy in a phase I/II study in metastatic PC (J Clin Oncol. 2011:4548-4554), warranting a phase III study of nab-P + G vs G for metastatic PC. Methods: 861 patients (pts) with metastatic PC and a Karnofsky performance status (KPS) ≥ 70 were randomized at 151 community and academic centers 1:1 to receive nab-P 125 mg/m2 + G 1000 mg/m2 days 1, 8, and 15 every 4 weeks or G alone 1000 mg/m2weekly for 7 weeks followed by 1 week of rest (cycle 1) and then days 1, 8, and 15 every 4 weeks (cycle ≥ 2). The primary endpoint was OS; secondary endpoints were PFS and ORR by independent review. Results: The median age was 63 years (range 27 - 88). KPS was 100 (16%), 90 (44%), 80 (32%), and 70 (7%). Pts had advanced disease with liver metastases (84%), ≥ 3 metastatic sites (46%), and CA19-9 ≥ 59 × ULN (46%). nab-P + G was superior to G for all efficacy endpoints: median OS was 8.5 vs. 6.7 mo (HR 0.72; 95% CI, 0.617 - 0.835; P = 0.000015); median PFS was 5.5 vs. 3.7 mo (HR 0.69; 95% CI, 0.581 - 0.821; P = 0.000024), and ORR was 23% vs. 7% (P = 1.1 × 10−10) by RECIST v1.0. Metabolic response by PET in 257 patients was 63% for nab-P + G vs 38% for G (P = 0.000051). CA19-9 response (≥ 90% decrease) was 31% for nab-P + G vs. 14% for G (P < 0.0001). Grade ≥ 3 AEs with nab-P + G vs. G included neutropenia (38% vs. 27%), fatigue (17 % vs. 7%), diarrhea (6% vs 1%), and febrile neutropenia (3% vs. 1%). Grade ≥ 3 peripheral neuropathy (PN) occurred in 17% vs. 1% of pts who received nab-P + G vs. G, respectively; for nab-P + G, PN improved to grade ≤ 1 in a median 29 days, and 44% of patients resumed nab-P treatment. The median duration of treatment was 3.9 mo for nab-P + G and 2.8 mo for G. Conclusions: MPACT was a large, international study performed at community and academic centers. nab-P + G was superior to G across all efficacy endpoints, had an acceptable toxicity profile, and is a new standard for the treatment of metastatic PC that could become the backbone for new regimens. Clinical trial information: NCT00844649.

scholarly journals Etoposide in acute nonlymphocytic leukemia. Australian Leukemia Study Group

Blood ◽  
1990 ◽  
Vol 75 (1) ◽  
pp. 27-32 ◽  
Author(s):  
JF Bishop ◽  
RM Lowenthal ◽  
D Joshua ◽  
JP Matthews ◽  
D Todd ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Older Patients ◽  
World Health ◽  
Hematologic Toxicity ◽  
Acute Nonlymphocytic Leukemia ◽  
Consolidation Therapy ◽  
Who Grade ◽  
Remission Duration ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Additional Clinical Benefit ◽  
Health Organization

Previously untreated patients with acute nonlymphocytic leukemia (ANLL) aged 15 to 70 years were randomized to either cytosine arabinoside 100 mg/m2/d continuous intravenous (IV) infusion days 1 through 7, daunorubicin 50 mg/m2/d IV days 1 through 3 (7–3), or the same drugs intensified with etoposide 75 mg/m2/d IV days 1 through 7 (7–3–7) as induction therapy. Patients achieving complete remission (CR) received two courses of consolidation therapy (5–2 or 5–2–5) followed by maintenance therapy. Of 264 eligible patients, CR occurred in 56% of 7– 3 and 59% of 7–3–7 patients; 7–3–7 significantly improved remission duration (P = .01). The median remission duration was 12 months for 7–3 and 18 months for 7–3–7. Survival was similar when the two arms were compared overall. Subset analysis performed to identify patients with the most benefit showed that etoposide significantly prolonged remission duration in younger patients (less than 55 years) with a median of 12 months for 7–3 and 27 months for 7–3–7 (P = .01). Survival appeared to be prolonged with 7–3–7 in patients aged less than 55 years, with a median of 9 months for 7–3 as compared with 17 months for 7–3–7 (P = .03). In older patients (aged greater than or equal to 55 years), 7–3–7 was more toxic, with significantly more severe [World Health Organization (WHO) grade 3 or 4] stomatitis (P = .02) and no additional clinical benefit. Hematologic toxicity for induction courses was similar, with granulocytopenia less than 0.5 x 10(9)/L for a median of 16 days per course for 7–3 and 15 days for 7–3–7. Hematologic toxicity was more severe for 5–2–5 consolidation courses (P = .003). Induction and consolidation therapy intensified with etoposide resulted in significantly improved remission duration but not survival.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document