Non-metastatic Ewing's family tumors: High-dose chemotherapy with stem cell rescue in poor responder patients. Preliminary results of the Italian/Scandinavian ISG/SSG III protocol

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 10014-10014 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Ferrari ◽  
T. Alvegard ◽  
R. Luksch ◽  
A. Tienghi ◽  
K. S. Hall ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cell ◽  
Poor Response ◽  
High Dose Chemotherapy ◽  
Induction Treatment ◽  
Poor Responders ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Event Free Survival ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Stem Cell Rescue

10014 Background: Poor response to induction chemotherapy negatively affects prognosis for Ewing's sarcoma (ES) patients. To improve outcome, high-dose chemotherapy (HDCT) with stem cell rescue was added to conventional chemotherapy in patients poor responders after induction treatment. Methods: Non-metastatic ES patients aged <= 40 years were eligible. All patients received VAC (vincristin 2 mg-doxorubicin 80 mg/m2-cyclofosfamide 1,200 mg/m2) weeks 0 and 6, IVAc (ifosfamide 9g/m2-vincristin 2 mg-actinomycin 2 mg) week 3 and IE (ifosfamide 9g/m2-etoposide 450 mg/m2) week 9 as induction therapy. Poor response was histologically defined as persistence of microfoci of viable tumor cells and radiologically as persistence of soft tissue mass. As maintenance treatment good responders (GR) received three cycles of VAC-IVAc-IE. Poor responders (PR) received VAC (weeks 13,19), IE (week 22), CE (mobilizing cycle, cyclophoshamide 4g/m2, etoposide 600 mg/m2, week 16) and HDCT with BuMel (busulfan 4 mg/kg × 4 days orally and melphalan 140 mg/m2 with stem cell support week 25). Results: Starting from 1999, 296 patients were enrolled with a median age of 15 years (3–40). 54 % of the tumors were located to the extremities and 46% in the axial skeleton. 274 patients underwent local treatment: surgery in 222 (81%) patients (with post operative Rxt in 70), RxT alone in 52 (19%). 10 patients progressed during treatment. No toxic deaths were recorded. Response evalutation was available for 262 patients: 135 (52%) were PR. 116 of them completed protocol treatment and 19 did not receive HDCT (5 poor harvest, 5 medical contraindication, 9 refusal).With a median follow-up of 37 months (1–89) 5-year overall and event-free survival were 74 % and 65.5% respectively. 5-year event-free survival was 71% (95% CI 62–81%) for GR, 68% (95% CI 58–78%) for PR treated with HDCT and 35% (95% CI 10–60%) for PR who did not receive HDCT. Conclusions: The preliminary survival data show for PR similar outcome as for GR. The treatment including HDCT is feasible with no toxic death recorded. Longer follow-up will confirm its efficacy. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Randomized trial of high-dose chemotherapy with autologous haematopoietic stem cell support vs. standard-dose chemotherapy in breast cancer patients with 10 or more positive lymph nodes: Overall survival after 6 years of follow up

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 672-672 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. R. Zander ◽  
N. Kroeger ◽  
C. Schmoor ◽  
W. Krueger ◽  
V. Moebus ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
Standard Dose ◽  
Interactive Effect ◽  
High Dose Chemotherapy ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Event Free Survival ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Grade Iii

672 Background: Investigation of high dose chemotherapy (HD-CT) supported by autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation compared with standard dose chemotherapy (SD-CT) as adjuvant treatment in patients with primary breast cancer and 10 or more axillary lymph nodes. Methods: Between November 1993 and September 2000 307 patients were randomized to receive the following cycles of Epirubicin (90 mg/m2), Cyclophosphamide (600 mg/m2) intervenously (every 21 days) either HD-CT of Cyclophosphamide (1500 mg/m2), Thiotepa (150 mg/m2) and Mitoxantrone (10 mg/m2) intervenously for 4 consecutive days followed by stem cell transplantation or standard dose chemotherapy SDCT in 3 cycles of Cyclophosphamide (500 mg/m2), Methotrexate (40 mg/m2) and Fluoruracil (600 mg/m2) intervenously on days 1 and 8 every 28 days. The primary end points were event-free survival and overall survival. Results: After a median follow-up of 6.1 years 166 events with respect to event-free survival (SD-CT: 91, HD-CT: 75) and 123 with respect to overall survival (SD-CT: 66 and HD-CT: 57) have been observed. The hazard ratio of HD-CT versus SD-CT is estimated as 0,80, p = 0,15. The hazard ratio for overall survival for high dose chemotherapy versus standard dose chemotherapy is estimated as 0,84, p = 0,33. Analysing the effect of treatment on event-free survival premenopausal patients, patients with tumor grade III and ER-positive patients had a better outcome with HD-CT with an interactive effect of 2.5 and 1.4. The significance was only shown in grade III patients in favour of HD-CT, (p = 0,049). The interactive effect of HD-CT with prognostic factors did not reach significance for overall survival. Conclusion: Even with a follow-up of 6.1 years there was only a trend in favour of high dose chemotherapy with respect to overall survival but without a statistical significance. A proper meta-analysis needs to be undertaken for an evaluation of subgroups of patients which might benefit from this treatment approach. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Phase I/II study incorporating intravenous hydroxyurea into high-dose chemotherapy for patients with primary refractory or relapsed and refractory intermediate-grade and high-grade malignant lymphoma.

1995 ◽  
Vol 13 (5) ◽  
pp. 1089-1095 ◽  
Author(s):  
W P Vaughan ◽  
E Kris ◽  
J Vose ◽  
P J Bierman ◽  
P Gwilt ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Continuous Infusion ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
High Dose Chemotherapy ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Stem Cell Rescue

PURPOSE A phase I/II study was performed to evaluate the incorporation of hydroxyurea (HU) into high-dose chemotherapy of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL). PATIENTS AND METHODS Thirty-eight patients with primary refractory and refractory relapsed NHL were treated with carmustine (BCNU) (300 mg/m2 on day -8), cyclophosphamide (Cy) (2.5 g/m2/d on days -8 and -7), etoposide (E) (150 mg/m2 every 12 hours on days -6, -5, and -4), and HU (BCHE) with autologous hematopoietic stem-cell rescue. Twenty-one patients received HU in a dose escalation of 2 to 12 g/m2 intravenously (IV) by 72-hour continuous infusion. When the IV formulation was not available, 17 patients were given 18 g/m2 of HU orally in divided doses every 6 hours over the same 72-hour period. RESULTS The dose-limiting toxicity of 72-hour continuous infusion HU in this regimen was mucositis. Endotracheal intubation was necessary to protect the airway in two thirds of patients treated at 12 g/m2. Six patients (oral BCHE, five of 17; IV BCHE, one of 21) died with nonresponding or progressive disease and, at least in part, from the complications of the high-dose chemotherapy. Seventeen patients (45%) achieved complete remission (CR). More patients treated with IV BCHE achieved CR than patients treated with oral BCHE (12 of 21 v five of 17; P < .1, chi 2 test). Nine patients (two of 17 oral BCHE and seven of 21 IV BCHE) remain disease-free as of January 31, 1994, with a minimum follow-up time of 3 years. The lower mortality and higher response rate with IV BCHE translated into a significantly superior probability of progression-free survival (PFS) (33% at 4 year v 12% for oral BCHE; P = .048, log-rank test). CONCLUSION High-dose BCHE is effective treatment for primary refractory and refractory relapsed NHL. Continuous IV HU appears to be less toxic and more effective than intermittent oral HU in this regimen.

Combination of Bortezomib and Dexamethasone (VD) or Bortezomib, Adriamycine and Dexamethasone (PAD) Followed by High Dose Therapy and Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplantation in First-Line Treatment of T(4;14) Multiple Myeloma : a Prospective Study of the MAG Group.

Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (22) ◽  
pp. 3408-3408
Author(s):  
Lionel Karlin ◽  
David Ghez ◽  
Marie-Olivia Chandesris ◽  
Sylvain Choquet ◽  
Margaret Macro ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
Partial Response ◽  
Peripheral Blood Stem Cell ◽  
Induction Treatment ◽  
High Dose ◽  
High Dose Therapy ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Blood Stem Cell Transplantation

Abstract Abstract 3408 Poster Board III-296 The t(4;14)(p16.3;q32), leading to the ectopic expression of two potential oncogenes, the Multiple Myeloma Set Gene (MMSET) and the Fibroblast Growth Factor 3 (FGFR3), is found in 15% of patients with multiple myeloma (MM) and is associated with a very poor prognosis. We previously shown in patients under 65 years of age that High Dose Therapy followed by Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplantation (HDT-PBSCT) provides a high response rate (RR) but a very short median relapse-free survival of only 11 months. In addition, relapses are often aggressive and chemoresistant. Thus, more effective regimen is urgently needed. We prospectively studied 23 t(4;14) MM patients treated with 3 or 4 cycles of a combination of Bortezomib and Dexamethasone (VD) (n=4) or of Bortezomib, Adriamycine and Dexamethasone (PAD) (n=19) as induction treatment before HDT-PBSCT (Melphalan 200 mg/m2). T(4;14) was detected using real time quantitative PCR searching for IGH/MMSET and FGFR3 transcripts. RR, event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) were evaluated. Median age at diagnosis was 51 years (range, 33-64). Isotype was IgA in 12 (52%) patients. All patients had stage II or III MM. An elevated serum β2m level (>3.5 mg/L) was found in 14 (61%) patients, and a low haemoglobin (Hb) level (<10 g/dL) in 10. Four presented with renal failure and 5 with hypercalcemia. Three (16%) of 19 patients had a t(4;14) without expression of FGFR3. After induction treatment with VD or PAD, PBSC were successfully harvested with granulocyte-colony stimulating factor only (n=15) or following a cycle of high-dose cyclophosphamide (n= 7). RR after induction treatment was complete response (CR) in 6 (26%) patients, very good partial response (VGPR) in 9 (39%), partial response (PR) in 3. Five patients had refractory or progressive disease (PD), including 1 who died before stem cell mobilization. RR after HDT was CR in 11 (48%), VGPR in 4 (17%) and PR in 4 (overall RR of 82%). Three had PD. With a median follow-up of 18 months (range, 3-32), 9 (39%) patients are alive without relapse, including 4 with a 19, 27, 30 and 32 months follow-up respectively. Twelve (52%) patients relapsed. Two patients died in the first month post HDT from PD. We found a median EFS and OS from initiation of therapy of 14.7 and 30.9 months respectively. EFS was not influenced by Hb and/or serum β2m level. However, we found a significantly longer OS in patients with low β2m (median non reached) as compared to patients with high β2m (median=23.1 months, p=0.04). These preliminary results illustrate the heterogeneity of this disease and indicate that some t(4;14) MM patients seem to benefit from bortezomib containing regimen as induction treatment before HDT in term of EFS and OS. A larger series with a longer median time of follow up will be presented. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

NCOG-36. LONG-TERM SURVIVAL AND COGNITIVE FUNCTION FOLLOW UP OF PRIMARY CNS LYMPHOMA TREATED WITH R-MVP FOLLOWED BY HIGH DOSE CHEMOTHERAPY WITH AUTOLOGOUS STEM CELL TRANSPLANT CONSOLIDATION

2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (Supplement_6) ◽  
pp. vi159-vi160
Author(s):  
Kate Therkelsen ◽  
Christian Grommes
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cell ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
High Dose Chemotherapy ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Consolidation Therapy ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
Stem Cell Rescue ◽  
Long Term Follow Up

Abstract BACKGROUND Primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) is a rare central nervous system malignancy, and long-term follow up studies are uncommon. First line therapy is based on high-dose methotrexate and different consolidation therapy options. This is a long-term follow up study of PCNSL patients enrolled in a prospective trial using R-MPV chemotherapy regimen followed by high dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell rescue to determine long-term survival and cognitive effects. METHODS From June 2005 to September 2011, 32 newly diagnosed immunocompentent PCNSL were enrolled. Patients received 5-7 doses of rituximab (500mg/m2), methotrexate (3.5 gm/m2), procarbazine (100mg/m2), and vincristine (1.4mg/m2) (R-MVP). Consolidation therapy consisted of high dose chemotherapy (HDC) with thiotepa (250 mg/m2), busulfan (3.2 mg/kg), and cyclophosphamide (60 mg/kg), followed by autologous stem cell rescue (ASCT) in those with partial or complete response to R-MVP. Long-term follow-up status including disease status, cognitive status (KPS, NANO score), and leukoencephalopathy (modified Fazkas Scale) were collected. RESULTS 26 of 36 underwent HDC and ACST. Of those, 3 died due to treatment related effects; 2 died of disease progression within two years after ASCT. After a median follow-up of 10.5 years, none of the remaining 21 patients progressed. At the time of last follow up, the median KPS was 90, compared to 80 at time of ASCT. The median NANO score and leukoencephalopathy score post ASCT and at follow-up did not change. Of note, 2 of 4 patients with a partial or complete response to R-MVP that elected not to proceed with HDC-ASCT consolidation, experienced progression at a mean of 52 months. CONCLUSION Long-term follow up demonstrates that treatment was tolerated well with stable leukoencephalopathy on MRI and good performance status. Disease recurrence 2 years after HDC with ASCT consolidation was not observed.

A Multicenter Comparison of Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation Followed by Reduced-Intensity Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation with Tandem Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation in Multiple Myeloma.

Blood ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 110 (11) ◽  
pp. 940-940 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chang-Ki Min ◽  
Hwak Kim ◽  
Kihyun Kim ◽  
Jae-Yong Kwak ◽  
Seung Tae Lee ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cell ◽  
Stem Cell Transplantation ◽  
Cell Transplantation ◽  
Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation ◽  
Conditioning Regimen ◽  
Induction Treatment ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Event Free Survival ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Related Mortality

Abstract Background: Autologous stem-cell transplantation (ASCT) after high-dose chemotherapy is regarded as the standard therapeutic approach for multiple myeloma (MM) even if virtually all patients ultimately relapse following this procedure. Recently, tandem ASCT significantly improved overall survival (OS) and event-free survival (EFS) compared with single ASCT. Another strategy is to use reduced-intensity allogeneic stem cell transplantation (RISCT) earlier in the course of disease in chemosensitive patients. In the current study, we retrospectively analyzed the outcomes after a planned tandem ASCT or RISCT in the patients who previously underwent ASCT. Patients and methods: One-hundred twenty-six patients who received a high dose (140 to 200 mg/m2) of melphalan as the conditioning regimen of the first ASCT were analyzed. Ninety-six patients (median age, 50.5 years) received a second ASCT, whereas 30 patients (median age, 46.5 years) underwent a RISCT (related in 28 patients and unrelated in 2 patients). The median interval between the first and second transplant was 131 days in tandem ASCT group and 157.5 days in RISCT group. The conditioning regimen for the tandem ASCT and RISCT consisted of high-dose melphalan ± total body irradiation (TBI) and fludarabine + melphalan or TBI, respectively. The two groups were evenly matched with regard to other disease characteristics. Results: After a median follow-up of 664 days (range, 143–2904) from the first ASCT, the median event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) in all 126 patients were 878 days and 1838 days, respectively. The median EFS in the second ASCT vs. RISCT group were 844 days (95% CI, 714–973) and 1342 days (95% CI, 813–1870), respectively (P=0.262). The median OS in the tandem ASCT vs. RISCT group were 2160 days (95% CI, 1847–2832) and 1575 days (95% CI, 1202–1947), respectively (P=0.132). Disease-related mortality was not significantly different between the second ASCT vs. RISCT groups (73.3% vs. 60.0%, P=0.325) as well as treatment-related mortality between the 2 groups (26.7% vs. 40%, P=0.358). On multivariate analysis, an achieving a good response (≥ VGPR) after the induction treatment predicted a better EFS compared to a poor response (≤ PR) (RR; 0.245, P=0.01). A good response after first ASCT or the second transplant was associated with a better EFS by univariate analysis but not by multivariate analysis (RR; 0.927, P=0.830 or RR; 0.772, P=0.453, respectively). Conclusion: In this retrospective analysis, ASCT followed by RISCT was not superior to the tandem ASCT, either EFS or OS. Disease-related deaths were not different between the 2 groups. Patients whose disease is sensitive to induction chemotherapy and who obtain a good response after the induction treatment benefited the most from this tandem transplant therapy.

Nordic MCL3 Study: Zevalin Combined with High-Dose Chemotherapy Followed by Autologous Stem Cell Support As Late Intensification for Mantle Cell Lymphoma (MCL) Patients < 66 Years Not in CR After Induction Chemoimmunotherapy: No Benefit of Zevalin

Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 747-747 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kolstad Arne ◽  
Anna Laurell ◽  
Mats Jerkeman ◽  
Kirsten Grønbæk ◽  
Erkki Elonen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bone Marrow ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
High Dose Chemotherapy ◽  
Induction Treatment ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Time To Progression ◽  
Mantle Cell ◽  
Cell Harvest ◽  
Negative Predictor

Abstract Abstract 747 The outcome of mantle cell lympoma (MCL) has improved in recent years. The Nordic Lymphoma Group has since 1996 completed three consecutive phase II trials for front-line treatment of MCL patients < 66 years of age. The first trial (MCL1) showed that quality of response prior to transplant was the most important factor for outcome. Hence, in the second trial (MCL2) induction therapy was intensified by adding cycles of high-dose Ara-C and rituximab to the regimen. Despite significant improvement in overall and progression-free survival, patients who did not achieve CR pretransplant had a shorter time to progression. Therefore, the main objective of the MCL3 study was to improve the time to progression in patients who achieved only CRu or PR pretransplant by adding Zevalin to the high-dose regimen as a late intensification. Results of the – otherwise largely identical - MCL2 trial serve as the historic control. Methods: Newly diagnosed stage II-IV MCL patients < 66 years received induction immunochemotherapy with alternating cycles of R- (rituximab) maxi-CHOP and R-Ara-C to a total of 6 cycles. Evaluation of pretransplant response with CT scans and bone marrow was performed after 5 cycles. PET/CT pretransplant was recommended, but would not influence treatment. Responding patients by NCI criteria underwent in-vivo purged stem cell harvest after the 6th cycle (Ara-C + 2 doses of rituximab). Patients in CRu or PR received a standard dose Zevalin (0.4 mCi/kg) one week prior to high-dose therapy with BEAM or BEAC while CR patients received the high-dose chemotherapy without Zevalin. Follow-up included CT-scans, bone marrow and blood sampling for at least 5 years, including PCR for minimal residual disease or molecular relapse. Patients in solely molecular relapse received preemptive therapy with 4 weekly doses of rituximab, as in the MCL2 study. Results: 161 consecutive patients were included from 2005–2009, with characteristics similar to that of the MCL2 trial with a median age of 57 years (28–65), a male predominance and the majority in stage IV with bone marrow involvement. Only 12 out of 161 patients (7 %) did not receive a transplant, 6 due to stem cell harvest failure, 2 due to toxicity and 4 due to no response to induction treatment. Before transplant 50% were in CR, 17% in CRu, and 30% in PR. Only four out of 161 patients (2 %) did not respond to induction treatment. After a median follow-up of 3.2 years the projected 5-year overall and event free survival, and time to progression were 71, 55 and 65% respectively and the MCL2 and MCL3 curves were superimposable. Of the 69 candidates to Zevalin in CRu/PR according to protocol, 65 (94%) actually received this treatment. There was no significant difference in time to progression for patients in CRu and PR pretransplant between MCL2 and MCL3, indicating no effect of late intensification with Zevalin in MCL3 in this patient group. Interestingly, a positive pretransplant PET scan proved to be a strong negative predictor for outcome. Lack of benefit from addition of Zevalin to the high-dose regimen was shown for both PET-positive and PET-negative patients. In a multivariate analysis of the impact of clinical response, PET positivity and zevalin treatment, only PET positivity pretransplant had independent significance (p=0.0003 HR=3.412 (95% confidence limits 1.744 – 6.673). The treatment-related mortality was 3 %. Side-effects were similar to that previously reported for MCL2, and we did not find that Zevalin added any toxicity. Of the 3 patients who developed secondary MDS/AML posttransplant, two had received Zevalin and one had not. Conclusion: The MCL3 data confirm the good results and tolerability of the Nordic regimen. However, the late intensification with Zevalin, albeit non-toxic, did not prolong the time to progression for patients in only CRu or PR pretransplant. A positive PET prior to transplant was shown to be a strong negative predictor for outcome. The concept of late intensification may be too late in poor responders. In consequence, up-front intensification with increasing use of high-dose AraC for MIPI high-risk patients is used in the subsequent, now ongoing Nordic-British MCL5 study. Disclosures: Arne: Bayer Schering Pharma: Research Funding. Geisler:Roche, Schering: Consultancy, Research Funding.

Results of the ECOG E1900 Trial in Younger Adults with AML Using an Event Free Survival Endpoint Are Concordant with Results Based on Overall Survival: Potential for a Surrogate Endpoint to Facilitate Rapid Approval of Therapies in AML

Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 2599-2599 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marlise R. Luskin ◽  
Ju-Whei Lee ◽  
Hugo F. Fernandez ◽  
Hillard M. Lazarus ◽  
Jacob M. Rowe ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Treatment Failure ◽  
Induction Treatment ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Event Free Survival ◽  
Npm1 Mutation ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Background: Novel therapies are required to improve the outcome of patients with AML. New agents are asked to demonstrate an overall survival (OS) benefit before qualifying for FDA approval. The long duration of clinical trials required in order to achieve this endpoint hampers quick evaluation of candidate therapies, including novel agents. Identification of reliable surrogate endpoints for OS in AML is needed. Here we compare the results of therapy for patients with untreated AML ages 16-60 years on the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group 1900 trial (E1900) of induction chemotherapy followed by consolidation and autologous transplant in order to evaluate the validity of an event free survival (EFS) endpoint as a surrogate for OS. Methods:OS was measured from randomization for induction therapy to death from any cause (censored at last contact). EFS was measured from randomization to induction treatment failure, relapse after compete response (CR), or death in remission (censored at last contact). Hazard ratios (HR) were computed using Cox proportional hazards models. The association between EFS and OS was evaluated using the Kendall tau-a rank correlation for censored data. Results:There were657 patients enrolled of which 426 patients relapsed or had induction treatment failure before death or date of last contact. Median EFS and OS were 8.0 months (95% CI, 6.3 to 9.7 months) and 23.6 months (95% CI, 16.9 to 23.6 months), respectively. With a median follow-up of 80.1 months, there is a statistically significant correlation between EFS and OS (Kendall tau-a = 0.467, 95% confidence interval (CI) = (0.425, 0.510), p<0.001). This correlation was similarly significant at a median follow-up of 25.2 months (Kendall tau-a = 0.361, 95% CI (0.323, 0.400), p <0.001) when the E1900 trial was originally reported (Fernandez et al. NEJM 2009). Key findings reported based on the original OS endpoint are similar when analyzed with an EFS endpoint (Table 1). High-dose daunorubicin (90 mg/m2) (DNR 90) confers both an EFS and OS benefit in patients aged < 50 years and patients with intermediate cytogenetic risk, and does not confer an EFS or OS benefit in older patients and patients with unfavorable cytogenetic risk, on univariate analysis. Divergent results are only seen in the small subset of favorable cytogenetic risk patients, where DNR 90 conferred an OS benefit (p=0.027) without an EFS benefit (p=0.32). Both EFS and OS endpoints consistently reflect the impact of mutation status on survival. The presence of a FLT3-ITD or DNMT3A mutation has a negative impact on both EFS and OS while an IDH2 mutation has a favorable impact on EFS and OS. The presence of a NPM1 mutation confers a favorable impact on EFS and OS in patients who received DNR 90 and did not impact EFS or OS in patients receiving standard-dose daunorubicin (45 mg/m2) (DNR 45). The presence of an IDH1 mutation does not impact EFS or OS. Conclusions:The results of E1900 demonstrating superiority of DNR 90 in AML induction in patients up to age 60 are concordant when using an EFS or OS endpoint. This is true for the group as a whole as well as for subgroups for which targeted agents are in development (FLT3/IDH2 inhibitors). Further investigation of whether EFS is a reliable surrogate for OS is warranted in AML. If confirmed, its use as a primary endpoint could be adopted by regulatory agencies in order to allow more rapid completion of clinical trials in AML and bring new therapies to AML patients in a timely fashion. Table 1. Results of E1900 based on an EFS endpoint versus an OS endpoint. Subgroup N OS HR (DNR 90/DNR 45) & 95% CI Wald P EFS HR (DNR 90/DNR 45) & 95% CI Wald P DNR 45 DNR 90 Age < 50 yrs ³ 50 yrs 188 142 172 155 0.66 (0.50, 0.85) 0.81 (0.62, 1.06) 0.002 0.118 0.64 (0.50, 0.82) 0.86 (0.67, 1.10) 0.0004 0.23 Cytogenetic Favorable Intermediate Unfavorable 38 141 59 51 127 63 0.51 (0.28, 0.93) 0.68 (0.50, 0.92) 0.79 (0.54, 1.16) 0.027 0.012 0.225 0.76 (0.44, 1.31) 0.63 (0.47, 0.83) 0.72 (0.49, 1.05) 0.32 0.001 0.09 Subgroup N OS HR (MUT/WT) & 95% CI Wald P EFS HR (MUT/WT) & 95% CI Wald P FLT3-ITD WT MUT 456 147 1.62 (1.31, 2.01) <.0001 1.48 (1.21, 1.82) 0.0002 DNMT3A WT MUT 371 119 1.30 (1.03, 1.65) 0.03 1.23 (0.98, 1.54) 0.07 IDH1 WT MUT 465 36 0.88 (0.59, 1.33) 0.55 0.91 (0.62, 1.34) 0.64 IDH2 WT MUT 451 50 0.63 (0.43, 0.93) 0.02 0.68 (0.48, 0.97) 0.03 NPM1 DNR 45 DNR 90 245 257 0.84 (0.61, 1.16) 0.60 (0.41, 0.89) 0.30 0.01 0.90 (0.66, 1.22) 0.59 (0.41, 0.84) 0.49 0.004 Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

High-Dose Chemotherapy With Autologous Hematopoietic Stem-Cell Support Compared With Standard-Dose Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer Patients With 10 or More Positive Lymph Nodes: First Results of a Randomized Trial

2004 ◽  
Vol 22 (12) ◽  
pp. 2273-2283 ◽  
Author(s):  
A.R. Zander ◽  
N. Kröger ◽  
C. Schmoor ◽  
W. Krüger ◽  
V. Möbus ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
Standard Dose ◽  
High Dose Chemotherapy ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Event Free Survival ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Stem Cell Support ◽  
Cell Support

Purpose Investigation of high-dose chemotherapy (HD-CT) followed by autologous hematopoietic stem-cell support compared with standard-dose chemotherapy (SD-CT) as adjuvant treatment in patients with primary breast cancer and 10 or more positive axillary lymph nodes. Patients and Methods Between November 1993 and September 2000, 307 patients were randomized to receive (following four cycles of epirubicin 90 mg/m2 and cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m2, intravenously every 21 days) either HD-CT of cyclophosphamide 1,500 mg/m2, thiotepa 150 mg/m2, and mitoxantrone 10 mg/m2, intravenously for 4 consecutive days followed by stem-cell support; or SD-CT in three cycles of cyclophosphamide 500 mg/m2, methotrexate 40 mg/m2, and fluorouracil 600 mg/m2 intravenously on days 1 and 8, every 28 days. The primary end point was event-free survival. Results After a median follow-up of 3.8 years, 144 events with respect to event-free survival have been observed (HD-CT: 63 events; SD-CT: 81 events). The first event of failure (HD-CT v SD-CT) was an isolated locoregional recurrence (nine v 11), a distant failure (52 v 68), and death without recurrence (two v two). The estimated relative risk of HD-CT versus SD-CT was 0.75 (95% CI, 0.54 to 1.06; P = .095). Overall survival showed no difference (HD-CT: 40 deaths; SD-CT: 49 deaths). Conclusion There was a trend in favor of HD-CT with respect to event-free survival, but without statistical significance. Further follow-up and a meta-analysis of all randomized studies will reveal the effect of HD-CT as compared with SD-CT as adjuvant treatment in high-risk primary breast cancer.

Long-Term Follow Up of High-Dose Chemotherapy With Autologous Stem Cell Rescue in Adults With Ewing Tumor

2005 ◽  
Vol 28 (3) ◽  
pp. 301-309 ◽  
Author(s):  
Val??rie Laurence ◽  
Jean-Yves Pierga ◽  
Sophie Barthier ◽  
Antoine Babinet ◽  
Claire Alapetite ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cell ◽  
High Dose Chemotherapy ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Stem Cell Rescue ◽  
Long Term Follow Up ◽  
Autologous Stem Cell Rescue ◽  
Ewing Tumor
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document