Results of the ECOG E1900 Trial in Younger Adults with AML Using an Event Free Survival Endpoint Are Concordant with Results Based on Overall Survival: Potential for a Surrogate Endpoint to Facilitate Rapid Approval of Therapies in AML

Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 2599-2599 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marlise R. Luskin ◽  
Ju-Whei Lee ◽  
Hugo F. Fernandez ◽  
Hillard M. Lazarus ◽  
Jacob M. Rowe ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Treatment Failure ◽  
Induction Treatment ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Event Free Survival ◽  
Npm1 Mutation ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Background: Novel therapies are required to improve the outcome of patients with AML. New agents are asked to demonstrate an overall survival (OS) benefit before qualifying for FDA approval. The long duration of clinical trials required in order to achieve this endpoint hampers quick evaluation of candidate therapies, including novel agents. Identification of reliable surrogate endpoints for OS in AML is needed. Here we compare the results of therapy for patients with untreated AML ages 16-60 years on the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group 1900 trial (E1900) of induction chemotherapy followed by consolidation and autologous transplant in order to evaluate the validity of an event free survival (EFS) endpoint as a surrogate for OS. Methods:OS was measured from randomization for induction therapy to death from any cause (censored at last contact). EFS was measured from randomization to induction treatment failure, relapse after compete response (CR), or death in remission (censored at last contact). Hazard ratios (HR) were computed using Cox proportional hazards models. The association between EFS and OS was evaluated using the Kendall tau-a rank correlation for censored data. Results:There were657 patients enrolled of which 426 patients relapsed or had induction treatment failure before death or date of last contact. Median EFS and OS were 8.0 months (95% CI, 6.3 to 9.7 months) and 23.6 months (95% CI, 16.9 to 23.6 months), respectively. With a median follow-up of 80.1 months, there is a statistically significant correlation between EFS and OS (Kendall tau-a = 0.467, 95% confidence interval (CI) = (0.425, 0.510), p<0.001). This correlation was similarly significant at a median follow-up of 25.2 months (Kendall tau-a = 0.361, 95% CI (0.323, 0.400), p <0.001) when the E1900 trial was originally reported (Fernandez et al. NEJM 2009). Key findings reported based on the original OS endpoint are similar when analyzed with an EFS endpoint (Table 1). High-dose daunorubicin (90 mg/m2) (DNR 90) confers both an EFS and OS benefit in patients aged < 50 years and patients with intermediate cytogenetic risk, and does not confer an EFS or OS benefit in older patients and patients with unfavorable cytogenetic risk, on univariate analysis. Divergent results are only seen in the small subset of favorable cytogenetic risk patients, where DNR 90 conferred an OS benefit (p=0.027) without an EFS benefit (p=0.32). Both EFS and OS endpoints consistently reflect the impact of mutation status on survival. The presence of a FLT3-ITD or DNMT3A mutation has a negative impact on both EFS and OS while an IDH2 mutation has a favorable impact on EFS and OS. The presence of a NPM1 mutation confers a favorable impact on EFS and OS in patients who received DNR 90 and did not impact EFS or OS in patients receiving standard-dose daunorubicin (45 mg/m2) (DNR 45). The presence of an IDH1 mutation does not impact EFS or OS. Conclusions:The results of E1900 demonstrating superiority of DNR 90 in AML induction in patients up to age 60 are concordant when using an EFS or OS endpoint. This is true for the group as a whole as well as for subgroups for which targeted agents are in development (FLT3/IDH2 inhibitors). Further investigation of whether EFS is a reliable surrogate for OS is warranted in AML. If confirmed, its use as a primary endpoint could be adopted by regulatory agencies in order to allow more rapid completion of clinical trials in AML and bring new therapies to AML patients in a timely fashion. Table 1. Results of E1900 based on an EFS endpoint versus an OS endpoint. Subgroup N OS HR (DNR 90/DNR 45) & 95% CI Wald P EFS HR (DNR 90/DNR 45) & 95% CI Wald P DNR 45 DNR 90 Age < 50 yrs ³ 50 yrs 188 142 172 155 0.66 (0.50, 0.85) 0.81 (0.62, 1.06) 0.002 0.118 0.64 (0.50, 0.82) 0.86 (0.67, 1.10) 0.0004 0.23 Cytogenetic Favorable Intermediate Unfavorable 38 141 59 51 127 63 0.51 (0.28, 0.93) 0.68 (0.50, 0.92) 0.79 (0.54, 1.16) 0.027 0.012 0.225 0.76 (0.44, 1.31) 0.63 (0.47, 0.83) 0.72 (0.49, 1.05) 0.32 0.001 0.09 Subgroup N OS HR (MUT/WT) & 95% CI Wald P EFS HR (MUT/WT) & 95% CI Wald P FLT3-ITD WT MUT 456 147 1.62 (1.31, 2.01) <.0001 1.48 (1.21, 1.82) 0.0002 DNMT3A WT MUT 371 119 1.30 (1.03, 1.65) 0.03 1.23 (0.98, 1.54) 0.07 IDH1 WT MUT 465 36 0.88 (0.59, 1.33) 0.55 0.91 (0.62, 1.34) 0.64 IDH2 WT MUT 451 50 0.63 (0.43, 0.93) 0.02 0.68 (0.48, 0.97) 0.03 NPM1 DNR 45 DNR 90 245 257 0.84 (0.61, 1.16) 0.60 (0.41, 0.89) 0.30 0.01 0.90 (0.66, 1.22) 0.59 (0.41, 0.84) 0.49 0.004 Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Randomized trial of high-dose chemotherapy with autologous haematopoietic stem cell support vs. standard-dose chemotherapy in breast cancer patients with 10 or more positive lymph nodes: Overall survival after 6 years of follow up

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 672-672 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. R. Zander ◽  
N. Kroeger ◽  
C. Schmoor ◽  
W. Krueger ◽  
V. Moebus ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
Standard Dose ◽  
Interactive Effect ◽  
High Dose Chemotherapy ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Event Free Survival ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Grade Iii

672 Background: Investigation of high dose chemotherapy (HD-CT) supported by autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation compared with standard dose chemotherapy (SD-CT) as adjuvant treatment in patients with primary breast cancer and 10 or more axillary lymph nodes. Methods: Between November 1993 and September 2000 307 patients were randomized to receive the following cycles of Epirubicin (90 mg/m2), Cyclophosphamide (600 mg/m2) intervenously (every 21 days) either HD-CT of Cyclophosphamide (1500 mg/m2), Thiotepa (150 mg/m2) and Mitoxantrone (10 mg/m2) intervenously for 4 consecutive days followed by stem cell transplantation or standard dose chemotherapy SDCT in 3 cycles of Cyclophosphamide (500 mg/m2), Methotrexate (40 mg/m2) and Fluoruracil (600 mg/m2) intervenously on days 1 and 8 every 28 days. The primary end points were event-free survival and overall survival. Results: After a median follow-up of 6.1 years 166 events with respect to event-free survival (SD-CT: 91, HD-CT: 75) and 123 with respect to overall survival (SD-CT: 66 and HD-CT: 57) have been observed. The hazard ratio of HD-CT versus SD-CT is estimated as 0,80, p = 0,15. The hazard ratio for overall survival for high dose chemotherapy versus standard dose chemotherapy is estimated as 0,84, p = 0,33. Analysing the effect of treatment on event-free survival premenopausal patients, patients with tumor grade III and ER-positive patients had a better outcome with HD-CT with an interactive effect of 2.5 and 1.4. The significance was only shown in grade III patients in favour of HD-CT, (p = 0,049). The interactive effect of HD-CT with prognostic factors did not reach significance for overall survival. Conclusion: Even with a follow-up of 6.1 years there was only a trend in favour of high dose chemotherapy with respect to overall survival but without a statistical significance. A proper meta-analysis needs to be undertaken for an evaluation of subgroups of patients which might benefit from this treatment approach. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Timing of Second Autologous Transplantations in Multiple Myeloma: Results of a Multicenter Sequential Randomized Clinical Trial.

Blood ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 108 (11) ◽  
pp. 59-59 ◽  
Author(s):  
Abderrahman Abdelkefi ◽  
Saloua Ladeb ◽  
Tarek Ben Othman ◽  
Lamia Torjman ◽  
Amel Lakhal ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Randomized Trial ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Optimal Timing ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Consolidation Therapy ◽  
Event Free Survival ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Log Rank Test

Abstract Background: Autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is now considered standard therapy in young patients (<65 years) with multiple myeloma (MM). The Intergroupe Francophone du Myelome conducted a randomized trial of the treatment of MM with high-dose chemotherapy followed by either one or two successive ASCTs. The probabilities of event-free-survival and overall survival were doubled with a double transplant. However, no randomized trial has compared tandem transplant up-front with a strategy including planned second ASCT at relapse or progression. Therefore, we performed a multicenter, sequential, randomized trial designed to assess the optimal timing of a second ASCT. Methods: From May 2003 to April 2006, 140 patients with symptomatic MM (de novo) and less than 60 years of age, were randomly assigned to receive either tandem transplantation up-front (within 6 months of the first transplantation) [Arm A, n=69] or one ASCT followed by a consolidation therapy with thalidomide (day +90, 100 mg/per day during 5 months) [Arm B, n=71]. Patients included in the arm B received a second transplant in case of disease progression on consolidation therapy, or in case of relapse in responders. Clinical characteristics of each group were similar. In both arms of the study, ASCT was preceded by first-line therapy with thalidomide-dexamethasone and subsequent collection of peripheral blood stem cells with high-dose cyclophosphamide (4 g/m2) and G-CSF. Data were analyzed on an intent-to-treat basis. Results: With a median follow-up of 23 months (range: 6–34), the 2-year overall survival was 55% in the arm A and 75% in the arm B. Survival curves were not different (P=0.28, log-rank test). The 2-year event-free survival was 41% in the arm A and 60% in the arm B (P=0.4, log-rank-test). In the arm B, relapse-free survival of ≥ 16 months following the first transplantation was an important predictor of overall survival (p< 0.001). Conclusion: Data from the present study suggest that up-front single ASCT followed by a consolidation therapy with thalidomide and a second ASCT after relapse or progression is a safe and effective global strategy to treat MM patients. Longer follow-up is needed before definite conclusions can be given concerning the optimal timing of second autologous transplantations in patients with MM.

Ten Year Follow up Analysis of the OSHO Phase III Trial (AML 96) Comparing Different Application Modes of AraC in Patients below 60 Years with Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML): No Impact of AraCApplication Mode on Remission Rate, Toxicity, Disease-Free Survival or Overall Survival

Blood ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 112 (11) ◽  
pp. 2966-2966
Author(s):  
Cornelia Becker ◽  
Rainer Krahl ◽  
Antje Schulze ◽  
Georg Maschmeyer ◽  
Christian Junghanß ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Prognostic Factors ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Event Free Survival ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Significant Difference

Abstract Clinical trials on different cytarabine doses for treatment of AML provide evidence of a dose response effect, but also for increase toxicity after high dose AraC (HDAC). Pharmacokinetic measurements of cytarabine-triphosphate (AraC-CTP), which is the most relevant cytotoxic metabolite of AraC, have revealed its formation in leukemic cells to be saturated with infusion rates above 250 mg/m2/h, this being significantly lower than used in HDAC schedules. Methods: Based on a pharmacological model and encouraging results of a phase II study we conducted a prospective randomized multicenter clinical trial comparing the effects of two different application modes of AraC in patients up to 60 years with untreated newly diagnosed AML. Patients were randomized to receive AraC at two different infusion rates (IR) during induction and consolidation treatment: arm A/experimental: 1 × 2 g/m2/d AraC over 8 hours (IR 250 mg/m2/h) arm B/standard: 2 × 1 g/m2/d AraC over 3 hours (IR 333 mg/m2/h). Induction and first consolidation consisted of AraC (days 1, 3, 5, 7) in combination with an anthracycline (Idarubicine 12 mg/m2 or Mitoxantrone 10 mg/m2, days 1–3). The final dosage points (AraC day 7 and anthracycline day 3) were excluded from the second consolidation. The third consolidation consisted of either allogeneic or autologous stem cell transplantation or of chemotherapy identical to second consolidation. Results: From 02/97 to 04/02 419 patients were enrolled in the study. The present analysis is based on 361 eligible and evaluable patients with a median follow up of 7 years. CR was reached in 249/361 (69%; 95%CI: 65%–74%) patients. No statistically significant differences were detected between arms A and B with regard to CR-rate (69% vs 69%) or early death rate (11% vs 8%). Hematological recovery of median white blood cell count (WBC) &gt; 109/l and median platelets (plt) &gt; 50 × 109/l revealed no difference between arms A and B after induction (WBC day 22 vs 22, p=0,68; plt day 25 vs 26, p=0,41) and consolidation (WBC day 28 vs 27, p=0,07; plt day 42 vs 40, p= 0,58). The event free survival (EFS) after 5 years is 0,25 ± 0,03 % for all patients with an overall survival of 0,31 ± 0,03 % after 5 years. For the purposes of analysis, the 83 transplant patients (23 allogeneic MRD, 14 allogeneic MUD and 46 autologous) were censored at time of transplant. No statistically significant difference between arms A and B in regard to EFS (0,25 ± 0,04 vs 0,25 ± 0,04, p=0,99), relapse incidence (0,63 ± 0,06 vs 0,60 ± 0,06, p=0,89), overall survival (0,32 ± 0,04 vs 0,30 ± 0,04, p=0,44) and therapy associated mortality (0,18 ± 0,04 vs 0,17 ± 0,03, p=0,95) were detectable after adjustment of prognostic factors. An analysis of risk factors by multivariate cox regression model confirmed cytogenetics at diagnosis to be the most important risk factor for CR rate (p&lt;10−6) and for EFS (p&lt;10−6). Other significant prognostic factors for EFS evaluated in the multivariate analysis were de novo vs secondary AML (p=0,0001), WBC (continuous) (p=0,001), LDH (&gt;1–4 × vs other ULN) (p=0,008) and FAB classification (FAB M0,6,7 vs FAB M1,2,4,5) (p=0,0005). EFS after 5 years shows a significant correlation to cytogenetics (p&lt;10−6) with 0,71±0,1, 0,27±0,05, 0,20±0,06 and 0,03±0,03 for favorable, normal, other and unfavorable cytogenetic karyotype, respectively. Conclusion: We conclude that the application of AraC at the presumptive saturating infusion rate of 250 mg/m2/h results in comparable remission rates, toxicity, event free survival and overall survival as compared to the standard IR with 333 mg/m2/h.

Standard chemotherapy with interferon compared with CHOP followed by high-dose therapy with autologous stem cell transplantation in untreated patients with advanced follicular lymphoma: the GELF-94 randomized study from the Groupe d'Etude des Lymphomes de l'Adulte (GELA)

Blood ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 108 (8) ◽  
pp. 2540-2544 ◽  
Author(s):  
Catherine Sebban ◽  
Nicolas Mounier ◽  
Nicole Brousse ◽  
Coralie Belanger ◽  
Pauline Brice ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
Follicular Lymphoma ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Event Free Survival ◽  
High Dose Therapy ◽  
Standard Chemotherapy ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Dose Therapy

AbstractThe purpose of this study is to compare our standard chemotherapy regimen (CHVP [cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, teniposide, and prednisone]) plus interferon with 4 courses of CHOP (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone) followed by high-dose therapy with autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) in treatment-naive patients with advanced follicular lymphoma. Four hundred one patients were included from July 1994 to March 2001: 209 received 12 cycles of CHVP plus interferon α for 18 months (CHVP-I arm) and 192 received 4 cycles of CHOP followed by high-dose therapy (HDT) with total body irradiation and ASCT (CHOP-HDT arm). Overall response rates were similar in both groups (79% and 78% after induction chemotherapy, respectively). One hundred thirty-one of the 150 patients eligible for HDT underwent transplantation (87%). Intent-to-treat analysis after a median follow-up of 7.5 years showed that there was no difference between the 2 arms for overall survival (P = .53) or event-free survival (P = .11). Patients with a complete response at the end of the induction therapy had a statistically longer event-free survival and overall survival (P = .02 and < .001, respectively). After long-term follow-up, our study showed that there was no statistically significant benefit in favor of first-line high-dose therapy in patients with follicular lymphoma. High-dose therapy should be reserved for relapsing patients.

Non-metastatic Ewing's family tumors: High-dose chemotherapy with stem cell rescue in poor responder patients. Preliminary results of the Italian/Scandinavian ISG/SSG III protocol

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 10014-10014 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Ferrari ◽  
T. Alvegard ◽  
R. Luksch ◽  
A. Tienghi ◽  
K. S. Hall ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cell ◽  
Poor Response ◽  
High Dose Chemotherapy ◽  
Induction Treatment ◽  
Poor Responders ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Event Free Survival ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Stem Cell Rescue

10014 Background: Poor response to induction chemotherapy negatively affects prognosis for Ewing's sarcoma (ES) patients. To improve outcome, high-dose chemotherapy (HDCT) with stem cell rescue was added to conventional chemotherapy in patients poor responders after induction treatment. Methods: Non-metastatic ES patients aged <= 40 years were eligible. All patients received VAC (vincristin 2 mg-doxorubicin 80 mg/m2-cyclofosfamide 1,200 mg/m2) weeks 0 and 6, IVAc (ifosfamide 9g/m2-vincristin 2 mg-actinomycin 2 mg) week 3 and IE (ifosfamide 9g/m2-etoposide 450 mg/m2) week 9 as induction therapy. Poor response was histologically defined as persistence of microfoci of viable tumor cells and radiologically as persistence of soft tissue mass. As maintenance treatment good responders (GR) received three cycles of VAC-IVAc-IE. Poor responders (PR) received VAC (weeks 13,19), IE (week 22), CE (mobilizing cycle, cyclophoshamide 4g/m2, etoposide 600 mg/m2, week 16) and HDCT with BuMel (busulfan 4 mg/kg × 4 days orally and melphalan 140 mg/m2 with stem cell support week 25). Results: Starting from 1999, 296 patients were enrolled with a median age of 15 years (3–40). 54 % of the tumors were located to the extremities and 46% in the axial skeleton. 274 patients underwent local treatment: surgery in 222 (81%) patients (with post operative Rxt in 70), RxT alone in 52 (19%). 10 patients progressed during treatment. No toxic deaths were recorded. Response evalutation was available for 262 patients: 135 (52%) were PR. 116 of them completed protocol treatment and 19 did not receive HDCT (5 poor harvest, 5 medical contraindication, 9 refusal).With a median follow-up of 37 months (1–89) 5-year overall and event-free survival were 74 % and 65.5% respectively. 5-year event-free survival was 71% (95% CI 62–81%) for GR, 68% (95% CI 58–78%) for PR treated with HDCT and 35% (95% CI 10–60%) for PR who did not receive HDCT. Conclusions: The preliminary survival data show for PR similar outcome as for GR. The treatment including HDCT is feasible with no toxic death recorded. Longer follow-up will confirm its efficacy. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Nordic Mantle Cell Lymphoma (MCL) Project: Prolonged Follow-Up of 86 Patients Treated with BEAM/BEAC + PBSCT Confirms That Addition of High-Dose Ara-C and Rituximab to CHOP Induction + In-Vivo Purging with Rituximab Increases Clinical and Molecular Response Rates, PCR-Neg. Grafts, Failure-Free, Relapse-Free and Overall Survival.

Blood ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 104 (11) ◽  
pp. 8-8
Author(s):  
Christian H. Geisler ◽  
Erkki Elonen ◽  
Arne Kolstad ◽  
Anna Laurell ◽  
Niels S. Andersen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cells ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Maintenance Treatment ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Induction Treatment ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Molecular Response ◽  
Free Survival

Abstract Methods: In the Nordic Lymphoma Group MCL Project newly diagnosed stage II-IV MCL patients < 66 years receive induction treatment and peripheral-blood stem-cell (PBSC) harvest, followed by BEAM/BEAC with PBSC support. In the MCL1 Protocol, the induction was maxi-CHOP x 3 (CTX 1200 mg/m2, doxorubicin 75 mg/m2, VCR 2mg D1, prednisolone 100 mg D1-5). Stem-cells were mobilised by maxi-CHOP + G-CSF. Because of the high failure rate in MCL1 (Figure 1) the MCL2 protocol was activated adding 2 series of high-dose Ara-C (3g/m2 BID D1-2) and 2 standard doses of rituximab (R) (375 mg/m2) to the induction program. Stem cells were mobilised by Ara-C + G-CSF + rituximab D1 + D9 for in-vivo purging. In both protocols patient-specific molecular markers were sought established before treatment start, and stem-cells and follow-up blood and bone-marrow samples assessed for MCL by PCR or flow cytometry. Results: Table 1 Compared Results of the Nordic Lymphoma Group MCL1 and MCL2 Protocols NORDIC MCL PROTOCOL # MCL1 (1997–2000) MCL2 (2000-) P value Supported by the Nordic Cancer Union No. of Pts included/eval. for response 42/42 120/88 Response pretransplant 31/42 86/88 0.002 CR/resp pretransplant 11/31 51/86 0.04 No. transplanted 27 86 Eval. for response posttransplant 27 82 CR/Response posttransplant 25/27 76/82 NS Molecular response posttransplant 5/13 38/42 0.0003 PCR-neg. stem-cell products (of tested) 2/16 22/25 0.00005 3-year failure-free survival (104 pts eval.) 24% 68% 0.0001 3-year relapse-free survival (RFS) 45% 76% 0.04 3-year molecular RFS survival ND 67% 3-year overall survival 60% 85% 0.02 Posttransplant maintenance treatment: In MCL2, patients in clinical stable response but molecular relapse are offered R 4 std. doses. So far, isolated molecular relapse occurred in 11 pts. of whom 10 received R: Four became PCR neg., one did not respond and later relapsed, five are not yet evaluable. Conclusion: By comparing MCL1 results with preliminary results of the still ongoing MCL2 study we conclude that the addition of HD Ara-C and R to the induction treatment significantly increases the • clinical response rate pretransplant • molecular response rate • No. of tumor-cell free grafts • failure-free, relapse-free and overall survival Rituximab maintenance treatment can induce 2nd molecular remission, the clinical significance hereof still unknown. Figure Figure

High-Resolution Genomic Profiles Identify Novel Genes and/or Chromosomal Regions with Prognostic and Oncogenic Significance in Myeloma Patients.

Blood ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 110 (11) ◽  
pp. 657-657
Author(s):  
Herve Avet Loiseau ◽  
Nikhil C. Munshi ◽  
Cheng Li ◽  
Florence Magrangeas ◽  
Wilfried Gouraud ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Chromosomal Abnormalities ◽  
Global Analysis ◽  
Copy Number Variations ◽  
Response To Therapy ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Prognostic Impact ◽  
Event Free Survival ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Despite major improvements in the treatment of myeloma over the last decade, disease course is variable due to genetic heterogeneity. Even though cytogenetics is a difficult art in myeloma, chromosomal abnormalities are present in 100% of the patients. In order to define the spectrum of unbalanced chromosomal abnormalities in myeloma, we studied a cohort of 200 patients ≤ 65 years of age, homogeneously treated with high dose chemotherapy in the IFM 99 trials, using the Affymetrix 500K SNP arrays. Bone marrow was obtained at diagnosis, and plasma cells were sorted using anti-CD138-coated magnetic beads. In all cases, a plasma cell suspension with a purity > 90% was obtained, and DNA was extracted using standard methods. After labeling, DNA was hybridized on the two Nsp and Sty chips, containing 260,000 SNP each. As expected, copy number variations were observed in all the cases. The most frequently involved chromosomes were chromosomes 13, 16, 1, 8 and 6. We then performed a prognostic analysis to correlate survival and chromosomal abnormalities. Many previously unreported chromosomal regions were identified; for example, 89 deleted chromosomal regions as well as 53 regions present in > 2.5 copies were associated with a survival < 3 years. Among the deleted regions with prognostic impact, the most frequent were 1p, 12p, and 4q. The most frequently gained regions associated with overall survival were 1q, 8q, and chromosomes 7 and 21. A similar analysis was performed for association with event free survival (EFS). Losses at 11q, 4q, and 12p were highly predictive of a short EFS, whereas gains of chromosome 15 predicted a longer EFS. Global analysis revealed a marked heterogeneity in the gains observed in hyperdiploid karyotypes, explaining the inconsistency in the literature regarding the prognostic value of hyperdiploidy. A more detailed analysis identified more than 80 genes presenting a double deletion, suggesting their role as putative tumor suppressor genes. This study represents the largest cohort of patients analyzed with such high-density arrays, enabling the description of a highly confident landscape of chromosomal abnormalities in myeloma. Moreover, since all the 200 patients were treated with a similar high-dose regimen, it allows powerful statistical analysis of the impact of chromosomal gains and losses on response to therapy, event free survival and overall survival. Finally, since all the patients were also annotated for other prognostic parameters such as t(4;14) or beta2-microglobulin, a multivariate prognostic model will be presented.

Prospective, multicenter randomized GITMO/IIL trial comparing intensive (R-HDS) versus conventional (CHOP-R) chemoimmunotherapy in high-risk follicular lymphoma at diagnosis: the superior disease control of R-HDS does not translate into an overall survival advantage

Blood ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 111 (8) ◽  
pp. 4004-4013 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marco Ladetto ◽  
Federica De Marco ◽  
Fabio Benedetti ◽  
Umberto Vitolo ◽  
Caterina Patti ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Follicular Lymphoma ◽  
Disease Control ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Event Free Survival ◽  
Outcome Predictor ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Intention To Treat

Abstract In this randomized multicenter study of 136 patients, 6 courses of CHOP (cyclo-phosphamide/doxorubicin/vincristine/prednisone) followed by rituximab (CHOP-R) were compared with rituximab-supplemented high-dose sequential chemotherapy with autografting (R-HDS) to assess the value of intensified chemo-therapy as a first-line treatment for high-risk follicular lymphoma (FL) after the introduction of monoclonal antibodies. The analysis was intention to treat with event-free survival (EFS) as the primary endpoint. Complete remission (CR) was 62% with CHOP-R and 85% with R-HDS (P < .001). At a median follow-up (MFU) of 51 months, the 4-year EFS was 28% and 61%, respectively (P < .001), with no difference in overall survival (OS). Molecular remission (MR) was achieved in 44% of CHOP-R and 80% of R-HDS patients (P < .001), and was the strongest independent outcome predictor. Patients relapsing after CHOP-R underwent salvage R-HDS in 71% of cases. Salvage R-HDS had an 85% CR rate and a 68% 3-year EFS (MFU, 30 months). We conclude that (1) achieving MR is critical for effective disease control, regardless of which treatment is used; (2) R-HDS ensures superior disease control and molecular outcome than CHOP-R, but no OS improvement; and (3) CHOP-R failures have a good outcome after salvage R-HDS, suggesting that relapsed/refractory FL could be the most appropriate setting for R-HDS–like treatments. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as no. NCT00435955.

Event free survival in adults with relapsed ALL who underwent front-line therapy with CALGB 10403.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e19005-e19005
Author(s):  
Suravi Raychaudhuri ◽  
Ilana Yurkiewicz ◽  
Gabriel N. Mannis ◽  
Bruno C. Medeiros ◽  
Steve E. Coutre ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Cohort Study ◽  
Survival Time ◽  
Retrospective Cohort Study ◽  
Retrospective Cohort ◽  
Event Free Survival ◽  
Front Line ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
First Relapse

e19005 Background: CALGB 10403 is a pediatric-inspired ALL regimen that has recently been shown to have improved survival rates in adolescents and young adults with ALL when compared to historical outcomes with traditional adult ALL regimens (Stock et. al, 2019). Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study of ALL patients who received induction CALGB 10403 at Stanford University (both on and off trial), achieved CR1, and subsequently relapsed. Primary outcome of interest was event free survival from time of diagnosis. Events were defined as relapse or death. Secondary outcomes were overall survival and event free survival from first relapse. Patients were censored at time of last clinical follow up. Results: 25 patients met inclusion criteria and received front-line CALGB 10403 from April 2010 to September 2018. At the time of initial diagnosis median age was 30 years (range 18 – 39 years). 68% of patients were male. 48% of patients were overweight and 40% were obese. 76% of patients had precursor B cell ALL while 24% had T cell ALL. 12% had CNS disease at diagnosis. 36% of patients had WBC greater than 30k. 12% of patients had CRLF2 rearrangement. 12% of patients were MRD positive after first induction. 20% of patients received rituximab. Median event free survival time from diagnosis was 20 months (range 3 – 79 months) and median overall survival time was 53 months. Blinatumomab was the most common salvage therapy after 1st relapse, followed by inotuzumab. 15 patients (60%) achieved CR2, of which 4 (27%) were MRD positive after 2nd induction. 15 patients (60%) went to HSCT. Of the patients who achieved CR2, 8 relapsed for a second time. Median event free survival time after first relapse was 23 months. Survival 1 year after relapse was 60%. 11 of the 25 patients were alive at last follow up. Median follow up time of survivors was 6 years. Conclusions: This is a descriptive retrospective cohort study of adult patients in a real world setting who received CALGB 10403 induction and subsequently relapsed. Compared to other studies of relapsed ALL patients who were induced with traditional chemotherapy (Fielding et. al, 2007), survival 1 year after relapse was much higher (60% vs. 22%). As CALGB 10403 becomes an increasingly common induction regimen for AYA and adults with ALL, further outcomes study is required.[Table: see text]

scholarly journals Association of Cardiovascular Risk Factors With Cardiac Events and Survival Outcomes Among Patients With Breast Cancer Enrolled in SWOG Clinical Trials

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (26) ◽  
pp. 2710-2717 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dawn L. Hershman ◽  
Cathee Till ◽  
Sherry Shen ◽  
Jason D. Wright ◽  
Scott D. Ramsey ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Risk Factors ◽  
Cardiovascular Disease ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Survival Outcomes ◽  
Cardiac Events ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Increased Risk

Background Cardiovascular disease is the primary cause of death among patients with breast cancer. However, the association of cardiovascular-disease risk factors (CVD-RFs) with long-term survival and cardiac events is not well studied. Methods We examined SWOG (formerly the Southwest Oncology Group) breast cancer trials from 1999 to 2011. We identified baseline diabetes, hypertension, hypercholesterolemia, and coronary artery disease by linking trial records to Medicare claims. The primary outcome was overall survival. Patients with both baseline and follow-up claims were examined for cardiac events. Cox regression was used to assess the association between CVD-RFs and outcomes. Results We identified 1,460 participants older than 66 years of age from five trials; 842 were eligible for survival outcomes analysis. At baseline, median age was 70 years, and median follow-up was 6 years. Hypertension (73%) and hypercholesterolemia (57%) were the most prevalent conditions; 87% of patients had one or more CVD-RF. There was no association between any of the individual CVD-RFs and overall survival except for hypercholesterolemia, which was associated with improved overall survival (hazard ratio [HR], 0.73; 95% CI, 0.57 to 0.93; P = .01). With each additional CVD-RF, there was an increased risk of death (HR, 1.23; 95% CI, 1.08 to 1.40; P = .002), worse progression-free survival (HR, 1.12; 95% CI, 1.00 to 1.25; P = .05), and marginally worse cancer-free survival (HR, 1.15; 95% CI, 0.99 to 1.34; P = .07). The relationship between baseline CVD-RFs and cardiac events was analyzed in 736 patients. A strong linear association between the number of CVD-RFs and cardiac event was observed (HR per CVD-RF, 1.41; 95% CI, 1.17 to 1.69; P < .001). Conclusion Among participants in clinical trials, each additional baseline CVD-RF was associated with an increased risk of cardiac events and death. Efforts to improve control of modifiable CVD-RFs are needed, especially among those with multiple risk factors.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document