Phase I study of CYT997, a novel cytotoxic and vascular disrupting agent, given as a 24-hour intravenous infusion to patients with advanced solid tumours

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 14115-14115 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Lickliter ◽  
G. Smith ◽  
M. Burge ◽  
A. Coulthard ◽  
D. Wyld ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Dose Level ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Central Venous Access ◽  
Tumour Response ◽  
Venous Access ◽  
Microtubule Assembly ◽  
Vascular Disrupting Agent ◽  
Dose Levels ◽  
Vascular Disrupting

14115 Background: CYT997 is a novel tubulin-binding small molecule which inhibits microtubule assembly and also demonstrates potent vascular-disrupting activity in preclinical tumour models. Methods: CYT997 was administered by continuous infusion over 24 hours every 3 weeks to patients with advanced cancer. Dose escalation proceeded by a standard phase I design (3 patients per dose level) for the first 18 patients; subsequently, an accelerated titration design (1 patient per dose level) was utilized. Intrapatient dose escalation was permitted. Pharmacokinetic (PK) analyses were performed in the first cycle. Tumour response was determined every second cycle using RECIST criteria. Pharmacodynamic effects on the tumour vasculature were assessed with dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI). Results: 22 patients (M/F: 11/11; median age 57.5, range 28–75) were enrolled with tumour types including melanoma (4), renal cell (4), colorectal (2), non-small cell lung (2) and adenoid cystic (2) carcinomas, mesothelioma (2) and others (6). A total of 66 cycles of CYT997 were administered (median 2/patient, range 1–6) over 10 dose levels (7, 14, 23, 35, 49, 65, 86, 114, 152 and 202 mg/m2). No dose-limiting toxicity was observed. Because of grade-2 injection site reactions in 2 patients (one each at dose levels 3 and 4), all subsequent patients received CYT997 via a central venous access device. Other toxicities included grade-2 renal toxicity at dose- level 8 in one patient with abnormal baseline renal function and grade-1 QTc prolongation in one patient at dose-level 10. No myelosuppression, gastrointestinal toxicity or clinically-significant cardiac toxicity were observed. PK data revealed dose-related increases in Cmax and AUC values. Six patients had stable disease after 4 cycles of CYT997. Conclusions: CYT997 was well tolerated at the doses studied and accrual to the 269 mg/m2 dose level will now proceed. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

scholarly journals A Safety Study of the Addition of Omacetaxine to the Standard-of-Care Induction Regimen of Cytarabine and Idarubicin in Newly-Diagnosed AML Patients

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 5218-5218
Author(s):  
Sonia Christian ◽  
Kelley E. Kozma ◽  
Stephanie Barath ◽  
Ardaman Shergill ◽  
Damiano Rondelli ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Dose Level ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
De Novo ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Hematologic Toxicity ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Induction Regimen ◽  
Dose Levels

Abstract Background: Omacetaxine mepesuccinate (OM) is a semi-synthetic form of Homoharringtonine (HH), a cephalotaxine alkaloid. OM induces cell apoptosis by inhibiting peptide bond formation during mRNA translation, with rapid loss of short-lived proteins, such as MCL-1, c-MYC, and Cyclin D1 (Lu, J Hematol Oncol. 2014, 7: 2). Notably, cytarabine synergizes with HH in causing apoptosis of leukemia cells in vitro. A phase III RCT in China of 620 patients with de novo AML demonstrated superior CR and 3-yr survival rates upon addition of HH to a standard 2-drug AML induction therapy ('7 + 3'; Jin, Lancet Oncol. 2013, 14:599). Thus, we hypothesized that OM, at an appropriate dose, would similarly enhance the efficacy of a 7 + 3 regimen. OM is FDA-approved for the treatment of TKI-resistant CML. The MTD of 1.25 mg/m2/d SQ for 14 days every 28 days, as determined in a phase I/II CML trial of OM (Quintás-Cardama, Cancer 2007, 109: 248), served as a basis for the dose escalation used in this study. Methods: The primary endpoint of this phase I safety trial was to determine the optimally safe and active dose (OD) of OM when added to a standard 7 + 3 induction regimen, cytarabine and idarubicin. OM was administered SQ q12h d1-7 with cytarabine (100mg/m2 CIV) d1-7 and idarubicin (12mg/m2 IV) d1-3. Four dose levels were tested, starting with OM 0.625 mg/m2 q12h (further dose levels: 1.25, 2.0, 3.0, and 4.2 mg/m2 q12h). All newly diagnosed, untreated de novo or secondary AML patients, aged 18-70y with ECOG PS of 0-3 were eligible for this study. Secondary endpoints included overall response rate (ORR) and overall and event free survival (OS, EFS). Hematologic toxicity (HT) was defined as incomplete hematologic recovery; ANC < 1.0 x 109/L or platelet count < 100 x 109/L present at d49, with the bone marrow documented to be free of leukemic infiltration. Dose escalation was based on the EffTox design (Biometrics 2004, 60:684), a Bayesian adaptive design which considers the trade-off between efficacy and toxicity in determining the OD for Phase II trials. Results: Twenty-two patients, median age 58 (range 25-69) years were enrolled from June 2015 to June 2018. 12 patients (54.5%) had adverse cytogenetics, 6 (27%) intermediate risk, 3 (13.7%) favorable risk and 1 patient's cytogenetic risk was unknown (fibrotic BM). Eight patients demonstrated disease evolution from myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). Altogether 16 of the 22 patients (73%) were deemed high risk based on cytogenetics or MDS-AML evolution. The EffTox design was implemented until cohort 4 (3 mg/m2 q12h), where 2 of 3 patients experienced a grade 5 non-hematologic toxicity (NHT), resulting in a dose-limiting toxicity (DLT). Since no DLTs were observed in cohort 3, an additional 5 patients were thus enrolled at this dose level to ensure safety. The OD was determined to be the dose level used in cohort 3: OM 2 mg/m2. No HTs were observed in 21 of 22 patients, (one patient not evaluable). The most common non-hematologic treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) of any grade were fever (68%), nausea (64%), vomiting (55%), hyperglycemia (41%), diarrhea (41%), mucositis (36%), headache (36%), sinus tachycardia (32%), rash/dermatitis (32%), and abdominal pain (32%). The most prevalent non-hematologic grade 3/4 TEAEs were febrile neutropenia (23%), hypoxia (18%), hyperglycemia (18%), and dyspnea (18%). ORR (CR and CRi) was 45.5%. Median OS was 605 days and EFS was 100 days. Conclusion: In this population with predominantly high-risk AML, the combination of OM with a standard 7 + 3 regimen demonstrates a manageable safety profile with acceptable efficacy. As ~ 25% of patients achieving CR with '7 + 3' do so after a second induction (based on meta-analysis of 6 trials, n = 1980, see Cancer 2010, 116: 5012), the ORR here is comparable to those receiving a single standard of care induction. The results in this high-risk group are therefore promising and warrant further investigation in a phase II trial. At present, we are assessing leukemic blast MCL protein expression in stored pre-treatment samples to determine if this predicts OM efficacy. NCT02440568. Teva has performed a Medical Accuracy Review of this abstract. Figure. Figure. Disclosures Khan: Teva: Speakers Bureau. Patel:Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria.

Clinical Activity of a Novel Multiple Tyrosine Kinase and Aurora Kinase Inhibitor, ENMD-2076, Against Multiple Myeloma: Interim Phase I Trial Results

Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (21) ◽  
pp. 1957-1957 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sherif Farag ◽  
Shuhong Zhang ◽  
Attaya Suvannasankha ◽  
Jing Liang ◽  
Robyn O'Bryant ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Dose Level ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Phase I Clinical Trial ◽  
M Protein ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Significant Activity ◽  
Dose Levels ◽  
Asymptomatic Elevation

Abstract Abstract 1957 Background: Despite recent improvements, MM remains incurable, indicating the need for continued investigation of novel agents. ENMD-2076 is a novel, orally active molecule that has been shown to have significant activity against Aurora and multiple receptor tyrosine kinases. Recently, we demonstrated that ENMD-2076 has significant pre-clinical in vitro and in vivo activity against MM cell lines and primary myeloma cells (Wang et al., Br J Haematol, 2010). Furthermore, ENMD-2076 inhibited critical pathways for MM cell survival and proliferation, including PI3K/AKT pathway with downregulation of survivin and XIAP, and Aurora A and B kinases, inducing G2/M cell cycle arrest, angiogenesis, and the FGFR3 pathway. We present the interim results of a phase I clinical trial of ENMD-2076 in patients with relapsed and refractory MM. Methods: An open label, single agent, dose-escalation dose safety and tolerability trial of ENMD-2076 is currently conducted in heavily pre-treated, relapsed and refractory MM patients who have previously failed standard therapy. Using a 3+3 design, dose escalation with ENMD-2076 is currently being studied at the doses: 150, 225, 325, 400 mg PO daily in 28 day cycles. Patients receive 28-day cycles according to safety and tolerability and absence of progression. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamic studies, including effect on phosphorylated histone 3 (pH3) in purified bone marrow MM cells, effect on the PI3K pathway in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC), and circulating endothelial cell precursors are being investigated. Results: Currently, dose-escalation for the first three dose levels has been completed. Nine patients of median age 54 (range, 48–76) years were treated. There were 5 males and 4 females. The median number of prior regimens was 3 (range, 2–5), with 8 patients having failed high-dose melphalan and autologous stem cell transplantation. The most commonly observed toxicities included grades 1–2 anorexia (n=2), nausea (n=2), diarrhea (n=3), fatigue (n=3), asymptomatic elevation of amylase (n=3) and lipase (n=1), leucopenia (n=1), and heavy proteinuria (n=1). Grades 3 toxicities included hypertension (n=1), asymptomatic elevation of lipase (n=2), and thrombocytopenia (n=1). No dose-limiting toxicity was observed with all toxicities resolving promptly upon interruption or discontinuation of dosing. All patients treated on dose level 1 had progression of disease on treatment, 1 patient in dose level 2 had stabilization of disease, and 2 patients on dose level 3 had stable disease although with 21% and 19% reduction in serum M-protein after the first cycle. Significant increases in pH3 in MM cells were observed in 4 of 5 patients tested in dose levels 2 and 3. p-STAT3 and pGSK-beta were downregulated in PBMC in one patient, who also had a 19% reduction in M-protein. Conclusion: In the ongoing phase I clinical trial, ENMD-2076 appears safe and well –tolerated at the doses tested to date. Additional schedules are under investigation based on tolerability and correlative analyses. ENMD-2076 may hold promise as a treatment for MM and further study is warranted. Disclosures: Farag: EntreMed, Inc: Research Funding. Bray:EntreMed, Inc.: Employment. Sidor:EntreMed, Inc: Employment.

Pharmacodynamic-guided, modified continuous reassessment method (mCRM)-based, dose finding study of rapamycin in adult patients with solid tumors

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3020-3020 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Jimeno ◽  
P. Kulesza ◽  
G. Cusatis ◽  
A. Howard ◽  
Y. Khan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Dose Level ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Dose Finding ◽  
Phase I Trials ◽  
Dose Selection ◽  
Normal Tissues ◽  
Tumor Biopsies ◽  
Dose Levels

3020 Background: Pharmacodynamic (PD) studies, using either surrogate or tumor tissues, are frequently incorporated in Phase I trials. However, it has been less common to base dose selection, the primary endpoint in Phase I trials, in PD effects. We conducted a PD-based dose selection study with rapamycin (Rap). Methods: We used the modified continuous reassessment method (mCRM), a computer-based dose escalation algorithm, and adapted the logit function from its classic toxicity-based input data to a PD-based input. We coupled this design to a Phase I trial of Rap with 2 parts: a dose estimation phase where PD endpoints are measured in normal tissues and a confirmation phase where tumor tissue is assessed. Patients (pts) had solid tumors refractory to standard therapy. Rap was given starting at 2 mg/day continuously in 3-pt cohorts. The PD endpoint was pP70S6K in skin and tumor. Biopsies were done on days 0 and 28 of cycle 1, and a PD effect was defined as ≥ 80% inhibition from baseline. The first 2 dose levels (2 and 3 mgs) were evaluated before implementing the mCRM. The data was then fed to the computer that based on the PD effect calculated the next dose level. The mCRM was set so escalation continued until a dose level elicited a PD effect and the mCRM assigned the same dose to 8 consecutive pts, at which point the effect of that dose will be confirmed in tumor biopsies. Other correlates were PET-CT and pharmacokinetics. Results: Ten pts were enrolled at doses of 2 mg (n = 4), 3 mg (n = 3) and 6 mg (n = 3). Toxicity was anemia (4 G1, 1 G2), leucopenia (1 G1, 2 G2), low ANC (2 G2), hyperglycemia (2 G1, 1 G2), hyperlipidemia (4 G1), and mucositis (1 G1, 1 G2). PD responses were seen in 2 and 1 pt at 2 and 3 mg dose levels. Input of data to the mCRM selected a dose of 6 mg for the third cohort, where PD effect was seen in 1 pt, and thus a fourth dose around 9 mg will be tested. No responses by RECIST occurred, but 2 pts had a response by PET. The PK was consistent with prior data (t1/2 24.6 ± 10.2 h, CL 31.4 ± 12.0 L/h, vol of distribution 235 ± 65 L), and exposure increased with dose. Steady-state concentration were in the 5–20 nM range. Conclusions: mCRM-based dose escalation based on real-time PD assessment is feasible and permits the exploitation of PD effects for dose selection in a rational manner. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Phase I evaluation of orally-administered CYT997, a novel cytotoxic vascular-disrupting agent, in patients with advanced cancer

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3568-3568
Author(s):  
A. Francesconi ◽  
D. Kotasek ◽  
M. Burge ◽  
G. Smith ◽  
J. Lickliter
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Oral Absorption ◽  
Disease Stabilisation ◽  
Preliminary Evidence ◽  
Microtubule Assembly ◽  
Vascular Disrupting Agent ◽  
Dce Mri ◽  
Mri Scans ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Vascular Disrupting

3568 Background: CYT997 is a novel, small-molecule vascular disrupting agent which binds tubulin and inhibits microtubule assembly. The compound demonstrates potent antitumour and vascular-disrupting activity in preclinical models. A phase I study of CYT997 given by intravenous infusion showed favourable safety and tolerability, pharmacokinetics and preliminary evidence of pharmacodynamic activity. Unlike most other VDAs, CYT997 is orally available and a phase I dose-ranging study with oral capsule dosing is underway. Methods: CYT997 was administered orally every 2 weeks to patients with advanced solid tumours. Doses were escalated using an accelerated phase I design to cohort 6 and thereafter with a standard 3+3 design. Pharmacodynamic effects on tumour vasculature were assessed with DCE-MRI scans, circulating endothelial cell (CEC) assays and von Willebrand factor (vWF) plasma levels. Results: 21 patients (M/F: 16/5; median age 63, range 48–77) have been treated on study. A total of 56 cycles of CYT997 have been administered (median 2/patient, range 1–7) over 8 dose levels (15 - 164 mg/m2). Doses up to 118 mg/m2 were well tolerated. However, dose-limiting toxicities were observed at 164 mg/m2, consisting of grade 3 hypoxia in one patient and grade 3–4 asthenia in two patients. The grade 3 hypoxia was reversible. PK profiles revealed favourable oral absorption which was generally dose-linear. DCE-MRI assessments indicating significant changes in tumour Ktrans values consistent with vascular disruption were observed in 6 of 10 currently evaluated patients. No objective tumour responses were seen; however, disease stabilisation for six weeks or greater was observed in 13 patients. vWf and CEC analysis is currently ongoing. Conclusions: Orally-administered CYT997 is well tolerated at doses associated with vascular targeting activity. Moreover, its good oral bioavailability suggests the potential for novel administration schedules, including metronomic dosing. [Table: see text]

Phase I Study of the Oral Histone Deacetylase Inhibitor SB939 In Patients with Advanced Hematologic Malignancies

Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (21) ◽  
pp. 3292-3292 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guillermo Garcia-Manero ◽  
Charles Chuah ◽  
George Wilding ◽  
Julie Chang ◽  
Srdan Verstovsek ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Dose Level ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Human Tumor ◽  
B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Hematologic Malignancies ◽  
Median Number ◽  
Dose Escalation Study ◽  
Neutropenic Sepsis ◽  
Dose Levels

Abstract Abstract 3292 Background: SB939 is a novel orally bioavailable inhibitor of class 1, 2 and 4 histone deacetylases. In human tumor cell lines SB939 inhibits proliferation and promotes apoptosis at an IC50 of 0.1 – 1.3mM. Antitumor activity has been demonstrated in xenograft models of AML (MV4-11) and B-cell lymphoma (Ramos), as well as solid tumors. A phase I, open label, dose escalation study in patients with advanced hematologic malignancies was conducted to assess the safety, maximum tolerated dose (MTD), pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and preliminary efficacy of SB939. Methods: SB939 was administered orally every other day 3 times a week for 3 consecutive weeks, in a 4-week cycle. Cohorts of patient were treated with escalating doses of SB939 starting from 10 mg. The MTD was defined as the lowest dose level with less than 2 DLTs. The recommended Phase 2 dose level was defined as one dose level below the MTD. PK and PD (Acetylated Histone 3 in PBMCs) samples were collected in the first cycle. Results: A total of 44 patients were enrolled. 23 patients during dose escalation at dose levels of 10 mg (n=1), 20 mg (n=1), 40 mg (n=6), 60 mg (n=3), 80 mg (n=3), 100 mg (n=3) and 120 mg (n=6). An additional 21 patients were enrolled as part of a cohort expansion at 100 mg. The median age was 70 yr (range 37–84 yr), 57% were male, 61% were caucasian and 27% asian. Median number of prior therapies was 2 (range 0–9), 16 % had a prior transplant. 89% had ECOG performance score of 0–1. The median number of doses received was 17. DLTs included prolonged QTc at 40 mg and neutropenic sepsis at 120 mg. The MTD as defined was not reached; 120 mg was declared as MTD due to the requirement for dose reduction after multiple cycles of treatment. 100 mg was determined to be the recommended Phase II dose. 24 patients, MDS (n=11), AML (n=12), and lymphoma (n=1) were treated at the 100 mg dose level. SB939 was generally well tolerated. Grade 1–2 events included nausea (45%), fatigue (44%), diarrhea (36%), anorexia (34%) and vomiting (30%). Grade 3–4 adverse events included thrombocytopenia (39%), anemia (23%), pneumonia (23%), febrile neutropenia (20%), fatigue (16%), hypokalemia (11%), and neutropenic sepsis (11%). Samples for pharmacokinetics were drawn prior to dosing and 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 24 ± 2 and 30 ± 2 hours after dosing on days 1 and 15 of Cycle 1. Levels of SB939 in plasma were determined using a validated LC-MS/MS method and Non-Compartmental Analysis used WinNonlin, version 5.2 (Pharsight). SB939 was rapidly absorbed with mean Tmax ranging between 0.5–1.3 h; the mean elimination half-life ranged between 6–17 hrs. The Cmax and AUC (0-∞) increased dose-proportionally in the range of doses tested. There was no accumulation of SB939 on day 15 following repeated dosing. Concentrations above IC50 of SB939 for HDAC 1, 2, and 4 were reached at all doses and increased acetylation of H3 was observed in PBMCs across all dose levels. 1 PR (80 mg) and 1 CR (120 mg) were observed in 2 patients with AML with durations of 362 and 206 days respectively. Stable disease for more than 2 cycles was seen in 7 patients, 3 with IPSS intermediate or high risk MDS (duration 72–134 d) and 4 with AML (duration 56–354 d). Conclusions: SB939 demonstrated excellent PK properties and target inhibition and was generally very well tolerated. Toxicities were mild to moderate and similar to some but not all toxicities seen with other HDAC inhibitors. The MTD as defined for this regimen of SB939 in patients with hematologic malignancies was not reached and 100mg is the recommended dose, indicating a favorable therapeutic index. Response data particularly in higher risk MDS and AML encourage further exploration of the therapeutic benefit of SB939 in combination with other anti-cancer therapies. Disclosures: Ethirajulu: S*BIO: Employment. Zhu:S*BIO: Employment.

Oral Formulation of Rigosertib (ON 01910.Na) in Patients with Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS) – Phase I Study Results,

Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (21) ◽  
pp. 3797-3797
Author(s):  
Rami S. Komrokji ◽  
Alan F. List ◽  
Francois Wilhelm ◽  
Jeffrey E. Lancet ◽  
Azra Raza
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Dose Level ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Oral Formulation ◽  
Refractory Anemia ◽  
Absolute Bioavailability ◽  
History Of ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Dose Levels

Abstract Abstract 3797 Background: Rigosertib (ON 01910.Na) is a multi-kinase inhibitor that selectively induces mitotic arrest leading to apoptosis in cancer cells and myeloblasts, while non-toxic to normal cells. Biological activity of the intravenous formulation has been demonstrated in myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS), including an ongoing randomized clinical trial in patients with refractory anemia and excess blasts failing azanucleosides. We report the preliminary results of a safety and efficacy study of a novel oral formulation of rigosertib. Methods: The trial is a 3 part phase I dose escalation study. The first part addressed bioavailability and tolerability of single oral dosing administered on a weekly basis for 5 weeks, the second included dose escalation, the third represented a dose expansion of the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) with absolute biavailability and food/fasting bioavailability studies. Eligibility included any International prognostic Scoring System (IPSS) MDS risk group with at least one cytopenia, failure to respond to at least one prior standard treatment, good performance status (ECOG≤ 2), adequate kidney and liver functions. Key exclusions included hypoplastic MDS (< 10% cellularity), ascites, history of seizures, uncontrolled hypertension, and history of HIV. Dose limiting toxicity (DLT) was defined as grade 3 or greater non-hematological drug related toxicity or delay in blood count recovery for more than 30 days in the absence of response. Rigosertib dose was escalated based on a defined escalation dose schema (70, 140, 280, 560, and 700 mg). The drug was administered orally twice a day for 14 days of a 21 day cycle. Results: Between January 2010 and July 2011, 33 MDS patients were enrolled in an ongoing phase I dose escalating study. Pharmacokinetic dose proportionality was established in the 70–700 mg single dose range in the first 3 patients, and pharmacodynamically active concentrations were reached. A subsequent escalation phase enrolled 15 patients who were treated with 70 to 700 mg doses of rigosertib capsules bid for 2 weeks of a 3 week cycle (70mg: N=3; 140 mg: N=2; 280mg: N=2; 560: N=2; 700mg: N=6). The formulation was well tolerated. One patient experienced DLT at the 700mg dose level during the first 3-week cycle (dysuria and shortness of breath). Another patient at this dose level had grade 3 dysuria during cycle 2. The RP2D was identified as 560 mg bid and 18 patients were enrolled in the expansion cohort (part 3). Up to 12 patients in this cohort are undergoing full pharmacokinetic evaluation (absolute bioavailability vs. the IV formulation and food effect). Encouraging signs of activity have been observed, including two marrow CR responses at the 140 and 560 mg dose levels; erythroid response (reduction of at least 4 units of RBC transfusions over 56 days) in four Low/Int-1 risk transfusion dependent MDS patients (3 at 560mg and 1 at 700 mg dose levels). Full PK results as well as clinical activity and tolerability at the RP2D dose level will be presented. Conclusion: Oral rigosertib is bioavailable and well tolerated. The RP2D was 560 mg bid for 2 weeks of a 3 week with a DLT of dysuria. Early encouraging responses are being confirmed in the expansion phase of the study. Disclosures: Komrokji: Onconova Therapeutics: Research Funding. List:Onconova Therapeutics: Research Funding. Wilhelm:Onconova Therapeutics: Employment, Equity Ownership. Lancet:Onconova Therapeutics: Research Funding. Raza:Onconova Therapeutics: Research Funding.

A phase I dose escalation study of selenomethionine (SLM) in combination with fixed dose irinotecan (Iri) in patients with solid tumors

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 2574-2574 ◽  
Author(s):  
Y. Rustum ◽  
L. Pendyala ◽  
P. Creaven ◽  
M. Ross ◽  
W. Brady ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Febrile Neutropenia ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Dose Level ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Fixed Dose ◽  
Dose Escalation Study ◽  
Partial Small Bowel Obstruction ◽  
Xenograft Models ◽  
Phase Ii And Iii ◽  
Dose Levels

2574 Background: SLM reduces Iri toxicity in xenograft models at associated selenium (Se) concentrations (Con) = 15μM. We conducted a phase I clinical trial of a fixed dose Iri with escalating doses of SLM in order to identify the highest safe dose of SLM that achieves and maintains Se Conc > 15μM. Methods: A standard 3–3 escalation was conducted. Iri was given at 125mg/m2/week x 4 weeks every 6 weeks. SLM was started 1 week prior to 1st dose of Iri. A loading BID dose of SLM was given for 1 week, followed by a daily maintenance dose. Selenium trough levels were obtained on days 8 and 29 of the study (days 1 and 22 irinotecan) and once every 6 week-cycle. Seven dose-levels of SLM were investigated (loading/maintenance, in mcg): 3,200/2,800, 3,200/3,200, 4,000/3,200, 4,000/4,000, 4,800/4,800, 5,600/5,600, and 7,200/7,200. Results: 31 patients enrolled on this study: age (median 57, range 21–80), Male/Female 21/10, ECOG 0/1 (15/16), 31 with prior chemotherapy, 12 with prior radiation, 22 colorectal and 9 mixed solids. Dose escalation was successful up to dose level 7 (7,200mcg SLM PO BID × 1 week followed by 7,200mcg SLM PO QD), which was declared the recommended dose. 2 Dose limiting toxicities occurred on study: one DLT of Grade (G) 3 febrile neutropenia, G3 sepsis, G3 dehydration occurred on dose-level 1; one DLT of G3 febrile neutropenia, dehydration occurred on dose-level 7. Both DLT occurred in a setting of partial small bowel obstruction related to peritoneal carcinomatosis. Non-DLT = G3 treatment-related toxicities included: 3 G3 neutropenia (< 1 week) at DL2, 3 & 7; 2 G3 diarrhea lasting < 48 hours on DL5 & 7. A lower incidence of G2+ toxicities was noted in patients with higher Se Conc (86% for Se < 15; 67% for Se 15–20; 57% for Se> 20 μM). Toxicities related to SLM were limited to garlic-like smell to breath, sweat, and urine in few patients. Responses included 7 confirmed stable diseases and 2 confirmed partial responses. A Se Con > 15 μM was achieved at all SLM dose levels of 4,800 mcg and above. Conclusions: Doses of SLM up to 7,200 mcg BID × 7 days followed by 7,200 mcg QD can be administered safely with standard doses of Iri. Formal phase II and III studies are needed to determine if SLM reduces Iri toxicity. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Phase I study of stereotactic body radiotherapy following radical prostatectomy.

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS158-TPS158 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leslie Ballas ◽  
Monish Aron ◽  
Shamim Jhimlee ◽  
Igor Shuryak ◽  
Tanya B. Dorff ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Toxicity ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Dose Level ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy ◽  
Phase I Study ◽  
Dose Fractionation ◽  
Level 3 ◽  
Dose Levels

TPS158 Background: Although multiple Phase I/II studies demonstrate safety and low rates of toxicity following stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) to the intact prostate, there are limited data on hypofractionation and SBRT after prostatectomy. This Phase I study was performed to evaluate acute toxicity associated with dose escalation from 3.6 Gy per fraction to 7.1 Gy per fraction to the prostate bed in the post-prostatectomy treatment of prostate cancer. We hypothesize that the toxicity of escalating the dose per fraction to the prostate fossa in the post-operative setting will be well tolerated; and we expect toxicity to be comparable to normal fractionation schedules. Methods: This study (NCT02446366) was designed to look at acute toxicity, defined as toxicity that occurred within the first 10 weeks of RT, of different dose fractionation schemes in the post-prostatectomy setting. The doses chosen for dose escalation on this study are based on an equivalent biological effective dose to a previously published hypofractionated post-prostatectomy study that showed no increase in acute bowel or bladder toxicity. The dose levels are as follows: Level 1 -3.6 Gy x 15 fractions; Level 2- 4.7 Gy x 10 fractions; Level 3 - 7.1 Gy x 5 fractions. Eligibility for participation on the trial was for patients who had pT3N0 disease regardless of margin status in the post-prostatectomy setting, pT2N0 patients with positive margin or with a negative surgical margin and a rising post-operative PSA. Patients could be on concurrent ADT and enroll on this study. Dose was escalated according to a 6+6 schema. For purposes of deciding whether to escalate to a new dose level, expand a dose level or de-escalate from a dose level, we used toxicities and adverse events that occur during the 1st 10 weeks after completion of radiotherapy. Six patients were enrolled on each new dose level with a total of 12 patients required at the maximum tolerated dose. Dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was defined as grade 3 or worse fatigue, gastrointestinal (GI) or genitourinary (GU) toxicity by Common Terminology Criteria of Adverse Events (version 4.03). Dose levels 1 and 2 have been completed without any DLT. Dose level 3 has enrolled 9/12 patients without any DLT. Clinical trial information: NCT02446366.

Phase I study of topotecan and cisplatin in patients with advanced solid tumors: a cancer and leukemia group B study.

1994 ◽  
Vol 12 (12) ◽  
pp. 2743-2750 ◽  
Author(s):  
A A Miller ◽  
J B Hargis ◽  
R C Lilenbaum ◽  
S Z Fields ◽  
G L Rosner ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Dose Level ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Topoisomerase I ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Phase Ii Trials ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Dose Levels

PURPOSE The objectives of this phase I trial were to determine the dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) of the novel topoisomerase I inhibitor topotecan combined with cisplatin, to define the maximum-tolerated doses (MTDs) of the combination without and with the use of filgrastim, and to define recommended doses for phase II trials. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients with advanced solid tumors were eligible if they had normal bone marrow, renal, and hepatic function and had not previously been treated with platinum compounds. Topotecan was administered intravenously on days 1 through 5 and cisplatin was administered intravenously on day 1 of a 21-day cycle. The topotecan dose was fixed at 1.0 mg/m2/d on the first four dose levels, and cisplatin was escalated in 25-mg/m2 increments from 25 to 100 mg/m2 without filgrastim. After encountering DLT, the dose of cisplatin was decreased by one level and topotecan dose escalation was attempted. After defining the MTD without growth factor, the study proceeded with escalating cisplatin doses to define the MTD with filgrastim 5 micrograms/kg subcutaneously (SC) daily starting on day 6 of treatment. Priming with filgrastim 5 micrograms/kg SC on days -6 to -2 before the first course was explored last. RESULTS Of 38 patients entered, 37 were eligible, 35 assessable for toxicity in the first course, and 28 assessable for response. The principal toxicity was grade 4 neutropenia, which had to last more than 7 days to be considered dose-limiting. No DLT was observed at the starting cisplatin dose of 25 mg/m2 (dose level 1). On level 2 (cisplatin 50 mg/m2, one patient had dose-limiting neutropenia and one patient had grade 3 renal toxicity. On level 3 (cisplatin 75 mg/m2), two patients had dose-limiting neutropenia. Therefore, cisplatin dose escalation was stopped. On dose level 5 (cisplatin 50 mg/m2 and topotecan 1.25 mg/m2/d), one patient had grade 4 neutropenia that lasted more than 7 days and one patient died of neutropenic sepsis. The remaining dose levels used topotecan 1.0 mg/m2/d plus cisplatin 75 mg/m2 (level 6) and 100 mg/m2 (levels 7 and 8) with filgrastim. No DLT was observed on level 6. On level 7, two patients had dose-limiting neutropenia and one patient had grade 3 hyperbilirubinemia. Priming with filgrastim on level 8 demonstrated no obvious advantage over level 7, and one patient had grade 4 thrombocytopenia that lasted more than 7 days. Three patients with non-small-cell lung cancer achieved a partial response and one patient with breast cancer had a complete response. CONCLUSION Topotecan and cisplatin in combination cause more neutropenia than expected from either drug given alone at the same dosage. The recommended phase II doses are topotecan 1.0 mg/m2/d for 5 days in combination with cisplatin 50 mg/m2 on day 1 without filgrastim or cisplatin 75 mg/m2 on day 1 with filgrastim support.

A Phase I Dose-Escalation Trial of Oral Clofarabine for Relapsed/Refractory Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma

Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (21) ◽  
pp. 1775-1775
Author(s):  
Jeremy S Abramson ◽  
Tak Takvorian ◽  
Eric D Jacobsen ◽  
Jennifer R Brown ◽  
Jeffrey A. Barnes ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
B Cell ◽  
Dose Level ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Median Number ◽  
Hematologic Toxicity ◽  
Low Grade ◽  
Non Hodgkin Lymphoma ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Dose Levels

Abstract Abstract 1775 Background: Clofarabine is a second-generation purine analogue currently FDA-approved for intravenous use for relapsed/refractory pediatric ALL. Purine analogues demonstrate significant clinical activity in non-Hodgkin lymphomas (NHL), though clofarabine offers potential pharmacologic advantages over existing agents. Clofarabine is a more efficient substrate for deoxycytidine kinase, more completely inhibits ribonucleotide reductase and DNA polymerase α, and demonstrates improved activity in cells that are non-dividing or have a low proliferation rate. This phase I trial is the first evaluation of an oral formulation of clofarabine in relapsed or refractory non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Patients and Methods: The primary objective was to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and define dose-limiting toxicities (DLT). Efficacy was a secondary objective. Patients (pts) were eligible if they had relapsed or refractory B-cell or T-cell NHL without prior stem cell transplant. All pts were required to have adequate organ function and performance status ≤2 as well as absence of both CNS involvement and HIV infection. No routine infectious prophylaxis was given. Patients were treated at 4 dose levels (1mg, 2mg, 4mg and ultimately 3mg) with oral clofarabine administered once daily on days 1–21 of a 28 day cycle for up to 6 cycles. Three to 6 pts were treated at each dose level in a traditional 3+3 design. Response assessment occurred after cycles 2 and 6. DLT was assessed during cycle 1 and was defined as Grade 4 neutropenia or thrombocytopenia occurring for ≥5 days, any grade 3–4 non-hematologic toxicity, and grade 2 non-hematologic toxicity that did not recover prior to the subsequent cycle of therapy. Results: Twenty-one pts were enrolled on the dose-escalation phase of the study. The median age was 63 years (range 51–85). The median number of prior regimens was 2 (range 1–7). Histologies included follicular lymphomas (FL; 5 pts), small lymphocytic lymphomas (SLL; 5 pts), diffuse large B-cell lymphomas (DLBCL; 4 pts), marginal zone lymphomas (MZL; 4 pts), mantle cell lymphomas (MCL. 2 pts) and lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma (LPL; 1 pt). Median number of cycles administered was 5.5. No DLTs were observed at the 1mg or 2mg dose levels. Three pts were accrued at 4mg with 1 patient experiencing DLT of persistent grade 3 thrombocytopenia and grade 4 neutropenia. No additional DLTs occurred in the cohort, but the majority of pts required late dose reductions due to grade 3–4 hematologic toxicity. The dose was therefore de-escalated to 3mg and 6 additional pts were accrued. No DLTs were observed at the 3mg dose level with a median of 6 cycles administered (range 5–6); 3mg was declared the recommended phase 2 dose. Grade 3–4 hematologic toxicity included neutropenia (7 pts), thrombocytopenia (4 pts), and anemia (2 pts). Grade 1–2 non-hematologic toxicities were uncommon, and included fatigue, diarrhea, cough, and dizziness. There were no grade 3–4 non-hematologic toxicities. Seventeen pts completed one cycle of therapy and were evaluable for response. Radiographic disease reduction was observed in 11 of 17 pts (65%). The overall response rate (ORR) was 35% (6 of 17), all partial responses (PR). Responders included FL (2 pts), MZL (2 pts), SLL and LPL (1 pt ea.). ORR among low grade histologies (FL, MZL, SLL) was 43% in this phase 1 trial. Seven pts had stable disease, including 5 pts with reduction in tumor size that did not reach threshold for PR. Of the 4 pts with progressive disease, 2 had DLBCL, 1 had MCL and 1 had FL with biopsy following relapse identifying ALK-negative anaplastic large T-cell lymphoma. Of the 4 pts not evaluable for response, 1 pt died of progressive DLBCL during cycle 1 on dose level 1 and was replaced, 1 pt was the DLT pt on the 4mg dose level and was removed due to prolonged cytopenias, and 2 pts withdrew consent (1pt at 4mg, 1pt at 3mg), and were replaced. The 3mg dose level has been expanded in a 10-patient dose-expansion cohort limited to low-grade NHL and MCL. Conclusions: Oral clofarabine demonstrates encouraging tolerability and efficacy in relapsed B-cell NHL, particularly in low-grade histologies, warranting further investigation. Disclosures: Abramson: Genzyme: Consultancy. Off Label Use: Clofarabine is not FDA approved for NHL.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document