Phase I study of stereotactic body radiotherapy following radical prostatectomy.

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS158-TPS158 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leslie Ballas ◽  
Monish Aron ◽  
Shamim Jhimlee ◽  
Igor Shuryak ◽  
Tanya B. Dorff ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Toxicity ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Dose Level ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy ◽  
Phase I Study ◽  
Dose Fractionation ◽  
Level 3 ◽  
Dose Levels

TPS158 Background: Although multiple Phase I/II studies demonstrate safety and low rates of toxicity following stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) to the intact prostate, there are limited data on hypofractionation and SBRT after prostatectomy. This Phase I study was performed to evaluate acute toxicity associated with dose escalation from 3.6 Gy per fraction to 7.1 Gy per fraction to the prostate bed in the post-prostatectomy treatment of prostate cancer. We hypothesize that the toxicity of escalating the dose per fraction to the prostate fossa in the post-operative setting will be well tolerated; and we expect toxicity to be comparable to normal fractionation schedules. Methods: This study (NCT02446366) was designed to look at acute toxicity, defined as toxicity that occurred within the first 10 weeks of RT, of different dose fractionation schemes in the post-prostatectomy setting. The doses chosen for dose escalation on this study are based on an equivalent biological effective dose to a previously published hypofractionated post-prostatectomy study that showed no increase in acute bowel or bladder toxicity. The dose levels are as follows: Level 1 -3.6 Gy x 15 fractions; Level 2- 4.7 Gy x 10 fractions; Level 3 - 7.1 Gy x 5 fractions. Eligibility for participation on the trial was for patients who had pT3N0 disease regardless of margin status in the post-prostatectomy setting, pT2N0 patients with positive margin or with a negative surgical margin and a rising post-operative PSA. Patients could be on concurrent ADT and enroll on this study. Dose was escalated according to a 6+6 schema. For purposes of deciding whether to escalate to a new dose level, expand a dose level or de-escalate from a dose level, we used toxicities and adverse events that occur during the 1st 10 weeks after completion of radiotherapy. Six patients were enrolled on each new dose level with a total of 12 patients required at the maximum tolerated dose. Dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was defined as grade 3 or worse fatigue, gastrointestinal (GI) or genitourinary (GU) toxicity by Common Terminology Criteria of Adverse Events (version 4.03). Dose levels 1 and 2 have been completed without any DLT. Dose level 3 has enrolled 9/12 patients without any DLT. Clinical trial information: NCT02446366.

A dose-escalating phase I study of biweekly docetaxel in older men with hormone refractory prostate cancer (HRPC)

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e16117-e16117
Author(s):  
J. McDevitt ◽  
R. Hauser ◽  
J. Simon ◽  
L. Balducci
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Dose Level ◽  
Phase I Study ◽  
Assessment Tool ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Self Report ◽  
Weekly Dose ◽  
Level 3 ◽  
Level 1 ◽  
Dose Levels

e16117 Background: Docetaxel has been shown to be effective and is used in the treatment of HRPC. This phase I study is designed to investigate the maximum tolerated dose, tolerability and activity of docetaxel administered on a biweekly schedule in older patients with HRPC. This study will also explore the feasibility of a self-report geriatric assessment tool in this population. Methods: HRPC patients with progression of metastatic disease during hormonal therapy received docetaxel q 2 wks at dose levels of 40 (level 0), 45 (level 1), 50 (level 2), or 55 mg/m2 (level 3). The trial is a conventional phase I 3+3 dose-escalation design. Treatment was continued until progression, refused further treatment, or unacceptable toxicity. Patients were given the Vulnerable Elders Survey (VES-13) for completion every 4 weeks. Results: 16 patients were enrolled in the study. All are evaluable for toxicity, 10 for response. Pts had a median (range) age 76 (72–87). Median doses administered was 6 (range 3–19). The maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was not reached in the study. No dose limiting side effects were reported for any of the dosing levels in the 8 week assessment period. Five patients had a ≥50% decline in serum PSA on two consecutive measurements taken at least 2 weeks apart. Of the 10 patients with measureable disease, 2 patients (one at dose level 0 and one at dose level 3) achieved a complete response, 2 patients (one at dose level 1 and one at dose 2) achieved a partial response, and 3 patients had stable disease (one each at dose levels 1, 2, and 3). At the time of entry onto the study, 4 patients required narcotic analgesics for bone pain; after treatment, 1 (25%) discontinued their pain medications. The completion rate of the Vulnerable Elders Survey (VES-13) was 94.6%. Conclusions: Biweekly docetaxel can be safely administered in older metastatic HRPC patients and showed activity. For phase II evaluation, a bi-weekly dose of 55 mg/m2 appears to be suitable. The administration of the VES-13 was feasible in this population. [Table: see text]

Phase I study of sirolimus plus gemcitabine in patients with advanced solid tumors: A Spanish Group for Research on Sarcomas (GEIS) study.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3096-3096
Author(s):  
Juan Martin Liberal ◽  
Marta Gil ◽  
Laura Jimenez ◽  
Maria Ochoa de Olza ◽  
Carmen Munoz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Dose Level ◽  
Phase I Study ◽  
Mtor Pathway ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Level 3 ◽  
Skin Biopsies ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Dose Levels

3096 Background: In preclinical studies, combination of sirolimus with gemcitabine enhances apoptosis in vitro and increases anti-tumor efficacy in vivo. Methods: Patients with advanced solid tumors, age 18-70 years, no prior mTOR inhibitor or gemcitabine, ECOG PS 0-1, and adequate hematological, renal and hepatic function, were enrolled in this phase I study to assess safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK), and to identify the dose limiting toxicity (DLT), maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and recommended dose (RD) of the combination of sirolimus and gemcitabine. A 3+3 dose escalation design with cohorts of 3-6 patients was used. Sirolimus was given po continuously. Gemcitabine was given iv 10mg/m2/minute on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks. Dose levels 1, 2 and 3 corresponded to sirolimus 2, 2 and 5mg/24h plus gemcitabine 800, 1000 and 1000mg/m2 respectively. After observing DLTs at higher dose level and poorer mTOR signaling inhibition at lower doses, a new cohort of sirolimus 5mg/24h plus gemcitabine 800 mg/m2 was added. Skin biopsies pre and post treatment were performed to assess the inhibition of mTOR pathway. Results: 19 patients were enrolled: median age 51 years (36-70); gender 12M, 7F. Median number of cycles was 4. Patients were treated at 4 dose levels, the MTD was reached at level 3 and the RD was: sirolimus 5mg/24h and gemcitabine 800mg/m2. 3 DLTs were observed, 1 at dose level 2 and 2 at dose level 3: transaminitis grade 3, thrombocytopenia grade 3 and thrombocytopenia grade 4. Other toxicities grade 1-2 included anemia, neutropenia, asthenia, mucositis and high cholesterol levels. 2 patients achieved partial response (1 uterine cervix cancer and 1 colon cancer). Immunohistochemistry of pS6 in skin biopsies showed significative inhibition of mTOR pathway at RD. PK parameters estimated were in agreement with those previously reported in the literature. No influence of sirolimus administration on gemcitabine clearance was found. Conclusions: Combination of sirolimus and gemcitabine is feasible and safe, allowing administration of active doses of both agents and achieving mTOR signaling inhibition. A phase II study to assess the activity of this combination in sarcomas is ongoing.

A phase I study of 1-methyl-D-tryptophan in combination with docetaxel in metastatic solid tumors.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS2620-TPS2620 ◽  
Author(s):  
Erica Jackson ◽  
Susan E. Minton ◽  
Roohi Ismail-Khan ◽  
Heather Han ◽  
Anthony Neuger ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Dose Level ◽  
Phase I Study ◽  
Overall Response Rate ◽  
Tumor Antigens ◽  
Indoleamine 2 ◽  
Solid Malignancy ◽  
Level 3 ◽  
Dose Levels ◽  
Unacceptable Toxicity

TPS2620 Background: The indoleamine 2, 3 dioxygenase pathway (IDO) can create immune suppression and unresponsiveness to tumor antigens in tumor-bearing hosts. 1-methyl-D-tryptophan (1-MT), an oral inhibitor of the IDO pathway, showed favorable toxicity profile and biologic activity in prior studies. Remarkably, in prior animal models (MMTV-neu mice), 1-MT in combination with chemotherapy produced 30% greater tumor regressions. Based on this data, a phase I trial was initiated to study the synergism of 1-MT with docetaxel. The primary goal of this trial is to determine the MTD and toxicity for the combination of docetaxel and oral 1-MT. A secondary endpoint will be to determine the PK data and the overall response rate. Methods: This phase I study utilizes a 3+3 design comprised of five dose levels. Dose levels 1-4 will evaluate docetaxel 60mg/m2 IV d1 q3wks plus 1-MT at 300mg, 600mg, 1000mg, and 2000mg PO BID d1-21 respectively. Dose level 5 is docetaxel 75mg/m2 IV d1 q3wks + 1-MT 2000mg PO BID d1-21. Eligibility for this study includes patients with measurable metastatic solid malignancy, no prior docetaxel for metastatic disease, age ≥18, life expectancy >4 months, and adequate organ/marrow function. Patients will be excluded if they meet any of the following criteria: chemotherapy within the past 3 weeks, untreated brain metastases, active autoimmune disease, or GI disease causing malabsorption. In addition, any patients who have received prior immunotherapy such as ipilimumab are excluded. Treatment will continue until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or patient/physician discretion. Accrual to dose level 3 is complete and dose level 4 accrual is underway. The PK of 1-MT and docetaxel will also be characterized, using an HPLC assay. PK measurements for 1-MT are drawn on C1D1 after a single dose of 1-MT is given and then on C1D8 after the morning dose of 1-MT is given. (Drawn at 0,1,2,4,8,12,24, and 48 hours) Because IDO is hypothesized to cause regulatory T cell expansion, circulating Tregs will be quantified utilizing flow cytometry for CD4+CD25+ FoxP3+ cells. (NCT01191216)

scholarly journals A Safety Study of the Addition of Omacetaxine to the Standard-of-Care Induction Regimen of Cytarabine and Idarubicin in Newly-Diagnosed AML Patients

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 5218-5218
Author(s):  
Sonia Christian ◽  
Kelley E. Kozma ◽  
Stephanie Barath ◽  
Ardaman Shergill ◽  
Damiano Rondelli ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Dose Level ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
De Novo ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Hematologic Toxicity ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Induction Regimen ◽  
Dose Levels

Abstract Background: Omacetaxine mepesuccinate (OM) is a semi-synthetic form of Homoharringtonine (HH), a cephalotaxine alkaloid. OM induces cell apoptosis by inhibiting peptide bond formation during mRNA translation, with rapid loss of short-lived proteins, such as MCL-1, c-MYC, and Cyclin D1 (Lu, J Hematol Oncol. 2014, 7: 2). Notably, cytarabine synergizes with HH in causing apoptosis of leukemia cells in vitro. A phase III RCT in China of 620 patients with de novo AML demonstrated superior CR and 3-yr survival rates upon addition of HH to a standard 2-drug AML induction therapy ('7 + 3'; Jin, Lancet Oncol. 2013, 14:599). Thus, we hypothesized that OM, at an appropriate dose, would similarly enhance the efficacy of a 7 + 3 regimen. OM is FDA-approved for the treatment of TKI-resistant CML. The MTD of 1.25 mg/m2/d SQ for 14 days every 28 days, as determined in a phase I/II CML trial of OM (Quintás-Cardama, Cancer 2007, 109: 248), served as a basis for the dose escalation used in this study. Methods: The primary endpoint of this phase I safety trial was to determine the optimally safe and active dose (OD) of OM when added to a standard 7 + 3 induction regimen, cytarabine and idarubicin. OM was administered SQ q12h d1-7 with cytarabine (100mg/m2 CIV) d1-7 and idarubicin (12mg/m2 IV) d1-3. Four dose levels were tested, starting with OM 0.625 mg/m2 q12h (further dose levels: 1.25, 2.0, 3.0, and 4.2 mg/m2 q12h). All newly diagnosed, untreated de novo or secondary AML patients, aged 18-70y with ECOG PS of 0-3 were eligible for this study. Secondary endpoints included overall response rate (ORR) and overall and event free survival (OS, EFS). Hematologic toxicity (HT) was defined as incomplete hematologic recovery; ANC < 1.0 x 109/L or platelet count < 100 x 109/L present at d49, with the bone marrow documented to be free of leukemic infiltration. Dose escalation was based on the EffTox design (Biometrics 2004, 60:684), a Bayesian adaptive design which considers the trade-off between efficacy and toxicity in determining the OD for Phase II trials. Results: Twenty-two patients, median age 58 (range 25-69) years were enrolled from June 2015 to June 2018. 12 patients (54.5%) had adverse cytogenetics, 6 (27%) intermediate risk, 3 (13.7%) favorable risk and 1 patient's cytogenetic risk was unknown (fibrotic BM). Eight patients demonstrated disease evolution from myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). Altogether 16 of the 22 patients (73%) were deemed high risk based on cytogenetics or MDS-AML evolution. The EffTox design was implemented until cohort 4 (3 mg/m2 q12h), where 2 of 3 patients experienced a grade 5 non-hematologic toxicity (NHT), resulting in a dose-limiting toxicity (DLT). Since no DLTs were observed in cohort 3, an additional 5 patients were thus enrolled at this dose level to ensure safety. The OD was determined to be the dose level used in cohort 3: OM 2 mg/m2. No HTs were observed in 21 of 22 patients, (one patient not evaluable). The most common non-hematologic treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) of any grade were fever (68%), nausea (64%), vomiting (55%), hyperglycemia (41%), diarrhea (41%), mucositis (36%), headache (36%), sinus tachycardia (32%), rash/dermatitis (32%), and abdominal pain (32%). The most prevalent non-hematologic grade 3/4 TEAEs were febrile neutropenia (23%), hypoxia (18%), hyperglycemia (18%), and dyspnea (18%). ORR (CR and CRi) was 45.5%. Median OS was 605 days and EFS was 100 days. Conclusion: In this population with predominantly high-risk AML, the combination of OM with a standard 7 + 3 regimen demonstrates a manageable safety profile with acceptable efficacy. As ~ 25% of patients achieving CR with '7 + 3' do so after a second induction (based on meta-analysis of 6 trials, n = 1980, see Cancer 2010, 116: 5012), the ORR here is comparable to those receiving a single standard of care induction. The results in this high-risk group are therefore promising and warrant further investigation in a phase II trial. At present, we are assessing leukemic blast MCL protein expression in stored pre-treatment samples to determine if this predicts OM efficacy. NCT02440568. Teva has performed a Medical Accuracy Review of this abstract. Figure. Figure. Disclosures Khan: Teva: Speakers Bureau. Patel:Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria.

Phase I Study of a Weekly Schedule of Irinotecan, High-Dose Leucovorin, and Infusional Fluorouracil as First-Line Chemotherapy in Patients With Advanced Colorectal Cancer

1999 ◽  
Vol 17 (3) ◽  
pp. 907-907 ◽  
Author(s):  
Udo Vanhoefer ◽  
Andreas Harstrick ◽  
Claus-Henning Köhne ◽  
Wolf Achterrath ◽  
Youcef M. Rustum ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Dose Level ◽  
Phase I Study ◽  
Advanced Colorectal Cancer ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Weekly Schedule ◽  
First Line ◽  
Dose Levels ◽  
Line Chemotherapy

PURPOSE: To determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) of a weekly schedule of irinotecan (CPT-11), leucovorin (LV), and a 24-hour infusion of fluorouracil (5-FU24h) as first-line chemotherapy in advanced colorectal cancer and to assess preliminary data on the antitumor activity. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-six patients with measurable metastatic colorectal cancer were entered onto this phase I study. In the first six dose levels, fixed doses of CPT-11 (80 mg/m2) and LV (500 mg/m2) in combination with escalated doses of 5-FU24h ranging from 1.8 to 2.6 g/m2 were administered on a weekly-times-four (dose levels 1 to 4) or weekly-times-six (dose levels 5 to 6) schedule. The dose of CPT-11 was then increased to 100 mg/m2 (dose level 7). RESULTS: Seventy-nine cycles of 5-FU24h/LV with CPT-11 were administered in an outpatient setting. No dose-limiting toxicities were observed during the first cycle at dose levels 1 to 6, but diarrhea of grade 4 (National Cancer Institute common toxicity criteria) was observed in three patients after multiple treatment cycles. Other nonhematologic and hematologic side effects, specifically alopecia and neutropenia, did not exceed grade 2. With the escalation of CPT-11 to 100 mg/m2 (dose level 7), diarrhea of grade 3 or higher was observed in four of six patients during the first cycle; thus, the MTD was achieved. Sixteen of 25 response-assessable patients (64%; 95% confidence interval, 45% to 83%) achieved an objective response. CONCLUSION: The recommended doses for further studies are CPT-11 80 mg/m2, LV 500 mg/m2, and 5-FU24h 2.6 g/m2 given on a weekly-times-six schedule followed by a 1-week rest period. The addition of CPT-11 to 5-FU24h/LV seems to improve the therapeutic efficacy in terms of tumor response with manageable toxicity.

scholarly journals Phase I Study of ATR Inhibitor M6620 in Combination With Topotecan in Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (16) ◽  
pp. 1594-1602 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anish Thomas ◽  
Christophe E. Redon ◽  
Linda Sciuto ◽  
Emerson Padiernos ◽  
Jiuping Ji ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Small Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Dose Level ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Stable Disease ◽  
Phase I Study ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Small Cell Lung ◽  
Platinum Refractory

Purpose Our preclinical work identified depletion of ATR as a top candidate for topoisomerase 1 (TOP1) inhibitor synthetic lethality and showed that ATR inhibition sensitizes tumors to TOP1 inhibitors. We hypothesized that a combination of selective ATR inhibitor M6620 (previously VX-970) and topotecan, a selective TOP1 inhibitor, would be tolerable and active, particularly in tumors with high replicative stress. Patients and Methods This phase I study tested the combination of M6620 and topotecan in 3-week cycles using 3 + 3 dose escalation. The primary end point was the identification of the maximum tolerated dose of the combination. Efficacy and pharmacodynamics were secondary end points. Results Between September 2016 and February 2017, 21 patients enrolled. The combination was well tolerated, which allowed for dose escalation to the highest planned dose level (topotecan 1.25 mg/m2, days 1 to 5; M6620 210 mg/m2, days 2 and 5). One of six patients at this dose level experienced grade 4 thrombocytopenia that required transfusion, a dose-limiting toxicity. Most common treatment-related grade 3 or 4 toxicities were anemia, leukopenia, and neutropenia (19% each); lymphopenia (14%); and thrombocytopenia (10%). Two partial responses (≥ 18 months, ≥ 7 months) and seven stable disease responses ≥ 3 months (median, 9 months; range, 3 to 12 months) were seen. Three of five patients with small-cell lung cancer, all of whom had platinum-refractory disease, had a partial response or prolonged stable disease (10, ≥ 6, and ≥ 7 months). Pharmacodynamic studies showed preliminary evidence of ATR inhibition and enhanced DNA double-stranded breaks in response to the combination. Conclusion To our knowledge, this report is the first of an ATR inhibitor-chemotherapy combination. The maximum dose of topotecan plus M6620 is tolerable. The combination seems particularly active in platinum-refractory small-cell lung cancer, which tends not to respond to topotecan alone. Phase II studies with biomarker evaluation are ongoing.

Clinical Activity of a Novel Multiple Tyrosine Kinase and Aurora Kinase Inhibitor, ENMD-2076, Against Multiple Myeloma: Interim Phase I Trial Results

Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (21) ◽  
pp. 1957-1957 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sherif Farag ◽  
Shuhong Zhang ◽  
Attaya Suvannasankha ◽  
Jing Liang ◽  
Robyn O'Bryant ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Dose Level ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Phase I Clinical Trial ◽  
M Protein ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Significant Activity ◽  
Dose Levels ◽  
Asymptomatic Elevation

Abstract Abstract 1957 Background: Despite recent improvements, MM remains incurable, indicating the need for continued investigation of novel agents. ENMD-2076 is a novel, orally active molecule that has been shown to have significant activity against Aurora and multiple receptor tyrosine kinases. Recently, we demonstrated that ENMD-2076 has significant pre-clinical in vitro and in vivo activity against MM cell lines and primary myeloma cells (Wang et al., Br J Haematol, 2010). Furthermore, ENMD-2076 inhibited critical pathways for MM cell survival and proliferation, including PI3K/AKT pathway with downregulation of survivin and XIAP, and Aurora A and B kinases, inducing G2/M cell cycle arrest, angiogenesis, and the FGFR3 pathway. We present the interim results of a phase I clinical trial of ENMD-2076 in patients with relapsed and refractory MM. Methods: An open label, single agent, dose-escalation dose safety and tolerability trial of ENMD-2076 is currently conducted in heavily pre-treated, relapsed and refractory MM patients who have previously failed standard therapy. Using a 3+3 design, dose escalation with ENMD-2076 is currently being studied at the doses: 150, 225, 325, 400 mg PO daily in 28 day cycles. Patients receive 28-day cycles according to safety and tolerability and absence of progression. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamic studies, including effect on phosphorylated histone 3 (pH3) in purified bone marrow MM cells, effect on the PI3K pathway in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC), and circulating endothelial cell precursors are being investigated. Results: Currently, dose-escalation for the first three dose levels has been completed. Nine patients of median age 54 (range, 48–76) years were treated. There were 5 males and 4 females. The median number of prior regimens was 3 (range, 2–5), with 8 patients having failed high-dose melphalan and autologous stem cell transplantation. The most commonly observed toxicities included grades 1–2 anorexia (n=2), nausea (n=2), diarrhea (n=3), fatigue (n=3), asymptomatic elevation of amylase (n=3) and lipase (n=1), leucopenia (n=1), and heavy proteinuria (n=1). Grades 3 toxicities included hypertension (n=1), asymptomatic elevation of lipase (n=2), and thrombocytopenia (n=1). No dose-limiting toxicity was observed with all toxicities resolving promptly upon interruption or discontinuation of dosing. All patients treated on dose level 1 had progression of disease on treatment, 1 patient in dose level 2 had stabilization of disease, and 2 patients on dose level 3 had stable disease although with 21% and 19% reduction in serum M-protein after the first cycle. Significant increases in pH3 in MM cells were observed in 4 of 5 patients tested in dose levels 2 and 3. p-STAT3 and pGSK-beta were downregulated in PBMC in one patient, who also had a 19% reduction in M-protein. Conclusion: In the ongoing phase I clinical trial, ENMD-2076 appears safe and well –tolerated at the doses tested to date. Additional schedules are under investigation based on tolerability and correlative analyses. ENMD-2076 may hold promise as a treatment for MM and further study is warranted. Disclosures: Farag: EntreMed, Inc: Research Funding. Bray:EntreMed, Inc.: Employment. Sidor:EntreMed, Inc: Employment.

Fludarabine-Based Conditioning for Allogeneic Marrow Transplantation From Unrelated Donors in Severe Aplastic Anemia (SAA): Serious and Unexpected Adverse Events in Pre-Defined Cyclophosphamide (CY) Dose Levels

Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (21) ◽  
pp. 3009-3009
Author(s):  
Jakub Tolar ◽  
H. Joachim Deeg ◽  
Sally Arai ◽  
Mitchell Horwitz ◽  
Joseph H. Antin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Dose Level ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Marrow Transplantation ◽  
Graft Failure ◽  
Marrow Transplant ◽  
The Other ◽  
Unrelated Donor ◽  
Dose Levels

Abstract Abstract 3009FN2 Objective: To determine toxicity and efficacy of adding fludarabine (FLU) to a regimen of total body irradiation (TBI), anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG) and cyclophosphamide (CY), with de-escalation of the CY dose. The goal is to minimize CY-related toxicities while preserving (or improving) engraftment and survival in patients with SAA receiving an unrelated donor marrow transplant. Patients and Methods: Since May 2006, the Blood and Marrow Transplant Clinical Trials Network (BMT CTN), sponsored by the NHLBI and NCI, has conducted a prospective Phase I/II clinical trial of unrelated donor marrow transplantation in SAA (BMT CTN 0301). Patients with SAA are eligible if they are < 65 years, have adequate organ function, and have an available unrelated marrow donor matched 7 of 8 HLA-A, B, C, DRB1 loci. Patients with Fanconi anemia and other marrow failure syndromes are excluded. All patients receive TBI 200 cGy, ATG (either thymoglobulin: 3 mg/kg IV or ATGAM 30 mg/kg IV daily × 3, days –4 to –2), FLU (30 mg/m2 IV daily × 4, days –5 to –2). The Phase I portion of the trial sequentially tested four CY dose levels: 150 mg/kg (administered days –4 to –2); 100 mg/kg (days –3 to –2); 50 mg/kg (day –2); and, 0 mg/kg, and allowed enrollment of up to six patients at each CY dose level unless toxicity or graft failure boundaries were crossed. In the Phase II portion of the trial, patients enroll onto the optimal CY dose level, which is chosen using adaptive Bayesian criteria to rank desirability of the CY doses. All patients are followed for two years after transplantation. Early stopping guidelines are used to monitor for graft failure and early transplant-related mortality through day 100. Results: Twenty-one patients accrued to the Phase I portion of the trial. CY dose level 0 mg/kg was closed after all three enrolled patients developed secondary graft failure. All received a second allograft. One patient remains alive at 23 months after the first transplantation. The other two died from adult respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) at 114 days after the first transplant and idiopathic pneumonia at 200 days after the first transplant. Review of Phase I results for the other three dose levels suggested CY dose 150 mg/kg as the optimal dose level for Phase II testing. However, after an additional eight patients were treated at this dose, the level was closed to further accrual because of excess toxicity. Seven of the 14 patients receiving 150 mg/kg of CY (and 7 of the last 8 enrolled) died. Causes of death were cardiac/pulmonary/multi-organ failure (n=4), ARDS (n=2), and parainfluenza virus type 3 pneumonia (n=1). Bayesian evaluation of the two remaining dose levels indicates very similar desirability scores and accrual continues at both the CY 100 mg/kg and 50 mg/kg levels. As of July 15, 2011, a total of 61 patients have been enrolled, 17 on the two closed levels, 33 on the 100 mg/kg level and 11 on the 50 mg/kg level. Conclusions: Early analysis of this trial, made necessary by these unexpected severe adverse events, revealed two important findings among patients receiving low-dose TBI, ATG, and FLU at the doses outlined: 1) CY dose 0 mg/kg is associated with higher than expected graft failure; and, 2) CY dose 150 mg/kg is associated with excess transplant-related toxicity. Neither CY dose level should be tested further in the context of the regimen used in this trial. To date, the two intermediate CY dose levels (100 mg/kg and 50 mg/kg) have not crossed the graft failure or fatality stopping boundaries and accrual is in progress. Disclosures: Pulsipher: Genzyme: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Final Results of a Phase I Study of the Fc Engineered CD19 Antibody XmAb®5574 (MOR00208) in Patients with Relapsed or Refractory Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL) or Small Lymphocytic Lymphoma (SLL).

Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 2894-2894 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer A. Woyach ◽  
Farrukh Awan ◽  
Ian W. Flinn ◽  
Rolondo Enoch ◽  
Paul A. Foster ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Febrile Neutropenia ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Phase I ◽  
B Cell ◽  
Dose Level ◽  
Phase I Trial ◽  
Hematologic Toxicity ◽  
B Cell Malignancies ◽  
Dose Levels

Abstract Abstract 2894 Antibody (Ab) therapies such as the CD20 monoclonal abs rituximab and ofatumumab are commonly used in CLL alone and in combination with chemotherapy, however, CD20 density is low on CLL cells, suggesting this may not be the ideal target. CD19, which is ubiquitously expressed on CLL cells and those of other B cell malignancies is a reasonable candidate for ab targeting. XmAb5574 is a novel humanized IgG1 CD19 monoclonal ab with an engineered Fc region to enhance Fc gamma receptor binding affinity. In vitro, this ab demonstrates direct cytotoxicity and antibody dependent cellular phagocytosis similar to rituximab, however, shows enhanced natural killer antibody dependent cellular cytotoxicity compared to other therapeutic abs used in CLL (Awan, FT Blood 2009). We have performed a first in human trial of this ab as a single agent in relapsed or refractory (R/R) CLL, and present the results in this report. This study is a multi-institutional phase I trial of XmAb5574 in patients (pts) with R/R CLL. Eligible pts were those with CLL who had at least 1 prior therapy and required treatment by International Working Group on CLL (IWCLL) 2008 Guidelines (Hallek, M Blood 2008), had Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status <3, had platelets ≥50,000/mm3, and had adequate organ function. Primary endpoints were to determine maximal tolerated dose (MTD), describe toxicity, and characterize pharmacokinetics (PK). A secondary endpoint was to explore efficacy. An accelerated titration design was used in which 1 pt was accrued to the first two dose levels provided there were no dose limiting toxicities (DLT) or ≥ grade 2 adverse events (AE), and then a standard 3×3 design was employed from dose level 3 forward. Dose levels included 0.3, 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 mg/kg with an expansion to a total of 16 pts at the MTD. XmAb5574 was administered as an intravenous infusion on days 1, 4, 8, 15, and 22 of cycle (C) 1, and on days 1, 8, 15, and 22 of C2. Toxicity was assessed using the National Cancer Institute's Common Criteria for Adverse Events v4.0 for non-hematologic toxicity, and IWCLL 2008 guidelines for hematologic toxicity. Disease response assessment by physical exam was performed on C1D28, C2D28, and 4, 8, and 12 weeks after the end of C2. Radiographic assessment was performed C2D28. 27 pts were enrolled to this phase I trial. The median age of all pts was 66 years (range 40–84). The pts were generally high risk: 14 (52%) had high-risk disease by Rai stage, 8 (30%) had del(11q22.3) and 10 (37%) had del(17p13.1) by FISH, and 24 (89%) had IgVH unmutated disease. The median number of prior therapies was 4 (range 1–14). Toxicity with this agent was modest. Dose escalation continued without dose limiting toxicity (DLT) until the highest dose level, in which one patient experienced grade 4 neutropenia associated with febrile neutropenia which required dose discontinuation. 100% of patients experienced any AE, with the majority of AE being grade 1–2. The most common AEs were infusion reactions in 18 patients (67%), all of which were grade 1 or 2. Treatment-related Grade 3 or 4 AEs occurred in 5 pts (19%), and included neutropenia (n=3), thrombocytopenia (n=2), increased aspartate aminotransferase (AST) (n=1), febrile neutropenia (n=1), and tumor lysis syndrome (n=1). All were on the 12 mg/kg dose level except one pt receiving 1mg/kg who experienced neutropenia. Overall response rate by IWCLL 2008 criteria is 11%, all of which have been partial responses (PR). Using IWCLL 1996 response criteria which does not include CT scan assessment of disease resulted in a PR in 13 pts (42%). Only 2 pts had PD at the 8 week evaluation point. Responses occurred at the 6, 9, and 12 mg/kg dose levels. All objective responses were in pts categorized as CLL as opposed to SLL, and no patients with lymph nodes >5cm responded. PK was best modeled by a two-compartment model. Half-life was 14 days, with clearance 5mL/day/kg that was not dose-dependent. Across the dose range, area under the curve increased in a dose-proportional manner, while maximum concentration increased in a less than proportional manner. A steady-state was reached at or before infusion 9. XmAb5574 shows acceptable toxicity and signs of preliminary efficacy in patients with high-risk, heavily pretreated CLL. These results justify movement into phase II study in CLL as well as other B cell malignancies. Modest toxicity, in particular infectious toxicity, will potentially allow combinations with other active agents in CLL. Disclosures: Enoch: Xencor, Inc.: Employment. Foster:Xencor, Inc: Consultancy.

Phase I study of bortezomib and oxaliplatin (BOX) in solid tumors: Improved neurotoxicity (NT) profile with lower bortezomib (B) dose

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 12007-12007
Author(s):  
R. A. Kosloff ◽  
J. Wright ◽  
P. Ivy ◽  
J. Escalon ◽  
B. Norwood ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Phase I Study ◽  
Major Contributor ◽  
Organ Function ◽  
Dose Escalation Study ◽  
Adequate Organ Function ◽  
Dose Levels ◽  
Platinum Agents

12007 Background: B inhibits proteasome function and may be synergistic in causing apoptotic death with platinum agents. We were interested in combining B with OX but concerned with dose limiting (DL) NT based on our prior B phase I study [Hamilton et al., JCO 2005]: therefore this Phase I dose-escalation study (alternating increases of B and OX) focusing on NT was planned. Methods: Patients (pts) with metastatic solid tumors, PS 0–2, platinum or taxane naive, no peripheral neuropathy and adequate organ function, received B (D1, 4, 15, 18) and OX (D1, 15) every 28 days in a dose escalation design (see table ). Baseline and monthly assessments were performed by an independent neurologist. Results: 27 (18 gastrointestinal, 3 melanoma, 3 ovarian, 3 others) were accrued; pt characteristics: 14 male/13 female; median age 55 years (range 35–75); 2 median cycles (range 1–10). NT was not DL because it did not occur within the first cycle. Late and limiting NT was observed in levels 2–5 after 2–9 cycles, but serial neurologic evaluations showed reversible NT. With an amended new dose level to lower B to 1.0 mg/m2 (level 6) to avoid late NT, NT was not observed. Of 22 evaluable pts, there were 3 partial responses (ampullary, GE junction, biliary), 6 stable disease, and 13 disease progression by RECIST criteria. Conclusions: biweekly BOX is tolerable at B 1.0 mg/m2 and OX 85 mg/m2 with no DL NT. Additional observations on late NT are ongoing. This suggests B is a major contributor to NT observed in dose levels 2–5 and may potentiate the effects of OX. [Table: see text] [Table: see text]

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document