Colorectal cancer nutritional and quality-of-life parameters predict patients outcomes after radiotherapy: Long-term follow-up from a prospective randomized controlled trial

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 14570-14570
Author(s):  
P. Ravasco ◽  
I. Monteiro Grillo ◽  
M. Camilo

14570 Background: Long term data of our published randomized trial of nutritional therapy in colorectal cancer showed that nutritional counseling optimizes pts prognosis. This study aimed to search whether outcomes were affected by individual nutritional & Quality of Life (QoL) parameters after nutrition intervention and radiotherapy (RT). Methods: Data were obtained from the trial pts’ records: G1 (n=37) on individualized nutritional counseling & education (regular foods), G2 (n=37) ad lib+polymeric protein supplements & G3 (n=37) ad lib intake. After RT, current intake (diet history), nutritional status (PG-SGA) & QoL scores (EORTC) were evaluated; their ability to predict survival, disease outcome [loco regional recurrence (LRR), distant metastases] & late RT toxicity (permanent flatulence, abdominal distension, diarrhea) were analyzed after a median follow-up of 3.7 (2.0–5.8) yrs. Results: Energy/protein intakes had decreased in G3 (p<0.01) & increased in G1>G2, p=0.007; wasting only occurred in G3>G2 (p<0.05); QoL scores worsened in G3>G2 (p<0.05) yet improved in G1, p<0.01. On multivariate analyzis of coded time-dependent variables: poorer diet intake, nutritional wasting & worse QoL scores were associated with decreased survival (p<0.002), LRR (p=0.01), distant metastases (p=0.005) & late RT toxicity, p<0.003. Landmark analysis showed that pts with nutritional intake/status & QoL deterioration, had significantly lower survival (hazard ratio [HR]: 8.25; 95% CI 2.74–26.47; p<0.001), worse disease outcome (HR: 8.15; 95% CI 2.22–25.40; p<0.002) & more severe late RT toxicity (HR: 7.15; 95% CI 2.25–16.11; p<0.004). Conclusions: In colorectal cancer after RT, poor diet intake, wasting & deteriorated QoL look as if significant predictors of survival, treatment response & late RT toxicity; such patients are prone to a more aggressive clinical course. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Maturitas ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 81 (1) ◽  
pp. 139
Author(s):  
Kirsi Mansikkamäki ◽  
Jani Raitanen ◽  
Clas-Håkan Nygård ◽  
Eija Tomás ◽  
Reetta Rutanen ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Troels G. Dolin ◽  
Marta Mikkelsen ◽  
Henrik L. Jakobsen ◽  
Tyge Nordentoft ◽  
Trine S. Pedersen ◽  
...  

Abstract Background The incidence of colorectal cancer (CRC) increases with age. Older patients are a heterogeneous group ranging from fit to frail with various comorbidities. Frail older patients with CRC are at increased risk of negative outcomes and functional decline after cancer surgery compared to younger and fit older patients. Maintenance of independence after treatment is rarely investigated in clinical trials despite older patients value it as high as survival. Comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) is an evaluation of an older persons’ medical, psychosocial, and functional capabilities to develop an overall plan for treatment and follow-up. The beneficial effect of CGA is well documented in the fields of medicine and orthopaedic surgery, but evidence is lacking in cancer surgery. We aim to investigate the effect of CGA on physical performance in older frail patients undergoing surgery for CRC. Methods GEPOC is a single centre randomised controlled trial including older patients (≥65 years) undergoing surgical resection for primary CRC. Frail patients (≤14/17 points using the G8 screening tool) will be randomised 1:1 to geriatric intervention and exercise (n = 50) or standard of care along (n = 50) with their standard surgical procedure. Intervention includes preoperative CGA, perioperative geriatric in-ward review and postoperative follow-up. All patients in the intervention group will participate in a pre- and postoperative resistance exercise programme (twice/week, 2 + 12 weeks). Primary endpoint is change in 30-s chair stand test. Assessment of primary endpoint will be performed by physiotherapists blinded to patient allocation. Secondary endpoints: changes in health related quality of life, physical strength and capacity (handgrip strength, gait speed and 6 min walking test), patient perceived quality of recovery, complications to surgery, body composition (Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and bioelectric impedance), serum biomarkers, readmission, length of stay and survival. Discussion This ongoing trial will provide valuable knowledge on whether preoperative CGA and postoperative geriatric follow-up and intervention including an exercise program can counteract physical decline and improve quality of life in frail CRC patients undergoing surgery. Trial registration Prospectively registered at Clinicaltrials.gov NCT03719573 (October 2018).


2012 ◽  
Vol 60 (S 01) ◽  
Author(s):  
I Kammerer ◽  
M Höhn ◽  
AH Kiessling ◽  
S Becker ◽  
FU Sack

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document