Pelvic node control in patients with locally advanced uterine cervical cancer treated with concurrent chemoradiotherapy

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 16018-16018
Author(s):  
T. Toita ◽  
Y. Nagai ◽  
W. Tamaki ◽  
K. Ogawa ◽  
S. Gibo ◽  
...  

16018 Background: To evaluate pelvic node control in cervical cancer patients treated with concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) without surgical resection. Methods: Ninety-six patients (stage IB2, 3; IIA, 2; IIB, 49; IIIA, 1; IIIB, 40; IVA, 1) with uterine cervical squamous cell carcinoma treated with CCRT were analyzed. Cervical tumor diameter and pelvic node status were assessed by MRI. The median maximum tumor diameter was 58 mm (range, 36–86 mm). Thirty-four patients had positive pelvic nodes (= 10 mm in shortest diameter). The largest diameter of the positive nodes ranged from 10–50 mm (median, 18 mm). All patients received CDDP (20 mg/m2 for 5 days every 21 days), pelvic external beam RT (PERT), and high-dose-rate intracavitary brachytherapy (HDR-ICBT). The planned RT schedule consisted of PERT with 40 Gy/20 fractions (frs) followed by HDR-ICBT with 18–24 Gy/3–4 frs and PERT with 10 Gy/5 frs using a midline block. Thirty of thirty-four node-positive patients received boost RT (6–10 Gy/3–5 frs) to involved nodes. The dose from HDR-ICBT to the pelvic nodes was estimated at a point 6 cm lateral to the midline at the level of the vaginal fornix. Doses of ERT and HDR-ICBT were simply summed and used for pelvic node dose-response analysis. The median total dose was 60 Gy (range, 52–64 Gy) for positive nodes and 54 Gy (range, 51–55 Gy) for negative nodes. Median follow-up of the surviving 79 patients was 41 months (range, 8–98 months). Results: Four-year overall survival (OAS), pelvic control (PC), and distant metastasis-free (DMF) rates for all 96 patients were 79%, 90%, and 79%, respectively. Four-year OAS, PC, and DMF rates for node-positive/node-negative patients were 60%/89% (P=0.002), 82%/95% (P=0.08), and 66%/86% (P=0.008), respectively. Pelvic nodal recurrence was observed in 4 patients. One patient developed isolated pelvic node recurrence while the other 3 had concurrent recurrences at other sites, including 1 with a cervical tumor and 2 with cervical tumor and distant metastases. Nodal recurrence rates by largest diameter were 1/62 for node-negative patients, 1/14 for nodes 10–14 mm, 0/13 for nodes 15–29 mm, and 2/7 for nodes = 30 mm. Conclusions: Pelvic nodal metastases < 30 mm were well controlled by CCRT without surgical resections using RT dose delivered. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

2020 ◽  
Vol 25 (11) ◽  
pp. 1977-1984
Author(s):  
Takeaki Kusada ◽  
Takafumi Toita ◽  
Takuro Ariga ◽  
Wataru Kudaka ◽  
Hitoshi Maemoto ◽  
...  

Abstract Background This prospective study investigated the feasibility, toxicity, and oncologic outcomes of definitive radiotherapy (RT) consisting of whole pelvic radiotherapy with no central shielding (noCS-WPRT) and CT-based intracavitary brachytherapy (ICBT) in Japanese patients with cervical cancer. Methods Patients with cervical cancer of FIGO stages IB1–IVA were eligible. The treatment protocol consisted of noCS-WPRT of 45 Gy in 25 fractions and CT-based high dose-rate ICBT of 15 or 20 Gy in 3 or 4 fractions prescribed at point A. The prescribed ICBT dose was decreased if the manual dwell time/position optimization failed to meet organs-at-risk constraints. Graphical optimization and additional interstitial needles were not applied. Results We enrolled 40 patients. FIGO stages were IB1: 11, IB2: 13, IIA2: 1, IIB: 11, IIIB: 3, and IVA: 1. Median (range) pretreatment tumor diameter was 47 (14–81) mm. Point A doses were decreased in 19 of 153 ICBT sessions (12%). The median follow-up duration was 33 months. The 2-year rates of pelvic control, local control (LC), and progression-free survival were 83%, 85%, and 75%, respectively. Pre-ICBT tumor diameter, high-risk clinical target volume (HR-CTV), total HR-CTV D90, and overall treatment time (OTT) significantly affected LC. Late adverse events (grade ≥ 3) were observed in 3 patients (2 in the bladder, 1 in the rectum). Conclusions Definitive RT consisting of noCS-WPRT and CT-based ICBT was feasible for Japanese patients with cervical cancer. To further improve LC, additional interstitial needles for patients with a large HR-CTV and shorter OTT should be considered.


2020 ◽  
Vol 30 (8) ◽  
pp. 1215-1223 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gloria Salvo ◽  
Diego Odetto ◽  
Marie Catherine Saez Perrotta ◽  
Florencia Noll ◽  
Myriam Perrotta ◽  
...  

The major tenets in accurately assessing tumor size in patients with early stage cervical cancer currently include physical examination, imaging studies, and pathologic evaluation. It is estimated that when comparing clinical stage based on physical examination and final pathology, the concordance diminishes as stage increases: 85.4%, 77.4%, 35.3%, and 20.5% for stage IB1, IB2, IIA, and IIB, respectively. Vaginal involvement and larger tumor diameter are considered the main causes of stage inaccuracy. When considering imaging studies, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) provides the highest level of accuracy in the assessment of cervical tumor size. Its accuracy in determining tumor location within the cervix is approximately 91% and in predicting tumor size 93%. MRI imaging is also significantly more accurate in measuring tumor size, delineating cervical tumor boundaries, and local tumor extension when compared with computed tomography (CT) scan. When comparing with pelvic ultrasound, the accuracy of both imaging techniques (MRI and pelvic ultrasound) in the assessment of tumor size in small versus large tumors is comparable. Pertaining to pathology, the depth of invasion should be measured by convention from the nearest surface epithelium, which equates to tumor thickness. In the setting where tumor is found both in the conization and hysterectomy specimen, the horizontal extent should be measured by summing the maximum horizontal measurement in the different specimens and the depth of invasion measured as the maximum depth in either specimen. A new pattern-based classification for endocervical adenocarcinomas recommends the description of patterns of invasion for human papillomavirus (HPV)-related adenocarcinomas as this is associated with differing risks of lymph node involvement.


2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 16056-16056
Author(s):  
Y. Aoki ◽  
Y. Nagai ◽  
T. Toita ◽  
M. Hirakawa ◽  
M. Toma ◽  
...  

16056 Background: The purpose of this study was to report the feasibility and efficacy of concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) for the locally advanced cervical cancer in our institute. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 147 patients (stage Ib: 9, II: 82, III: 80, and IVa: 7) with squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix treated with CCRT. Cisplatin (20mg/m2/day) was administered for 5 days every 3 weeks for a median of three courses (range: 1–5 courses) during radiotherapy (RT). The patients with paraaortic and/or common iliac lymphadenopathy were excluded. RT consisted of pelvic external beam RT (EBRT) with 40Gy/20 fractions followed by high-dose rate brachytherapy (HDR-BT) with 18Gy/3 fractions and pelvic EBRT with 10Gy/5 fractions using a midline block. Late complications were graded by the RTOG/EORTC criteria. Results: The 5-year actuarial overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), and pelvic relapse-free survival were 78.5%, 70.7%, and 78.0%, respectively. The 5-year OS by the disease stage was as follows: stage Ib 100%, II 82.0%, III 62.3%, and IVa 35.7%. Multivariate analysis identified pelvic lymphadenopathy, tumor diameter > 7cm, and pretreatment hemoglobin < 9.0g/dl as an independent prognostic factor for both OS and DFS. Only one patient suffered from grade 3 enterocolitis, but no grade 4 complication developed. Conclusions: Our experience suggests that CCRT using HDR-BT for locally advanced cervical cancer could achieve favorable local control without suffering from severe late complications. No significant financial relationships to disclose.


Brachytherapy ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 13 ◽  
pp. S64-S65 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew R. McKeever ◽  
Lindsay Hwang ◽  
Jennifer Barclay ◽  
Jeffrey Dubas ◽  
Yin Xi ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document