Interferon alfa-induced autoimmunity and serum S100 levels as predictive and prognostic biomarkers in high-risk melanoma in the ECOG-intergroup phase II trial E2696

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 8506-8506 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. J. Stuckert ◽  
A. A. Tarhini ◽  
S. Lee ◽  
C. Sander ◽  
J. M. Kirkwood
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Serum Protein ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Phase Ii Trial ◽  
Interferon Alfa ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Time Points ◽  
High Risk Melanoma ◽  
Risk Melanoma ◽  
S 100

8506 Background: Uncontrolled evidence demonstrates that adjuvant high-dose interferon alfa-2b (HDI) benefit in high-risk melanoma patients is predicted by autoimmunity induction, and the prognosis of melanoma has been correlated with levels of S-100 protein. We have evaluated these two serological markers in the context of a completed phase II study E2696. Methods: Patients with resectable AJCC stage IIB, III, and IV melanoma were randomly assigned to receive GM2-KLH/QS-1 (GMK vaccine) plus concurrent HDI (Arm A) or GMK plus sequential HDI (Arm B), or GMK without HDI (Arm C). Sera from 103 patients were banked at baseline and 3 additional time points, and have been tested for serum protein S100, and anti-nuclear, anti-thyroid peroxidase, anti-thyroglobulin, anti-mitochondrial, and total anti-cardiolipin autoantibodies (AA) using ELISA. Results: At a median follow-up of 96.5 mo (range: 17–109), the median relapse-free survival (RFS) was 28.3 mo, 95% CI (18.4, 43.6) (64 /103 patients relapsed). Median survival has not been reached (54/103 alive). AA were induced in 17 subjects (25%; n=69) receiving HDI and GMK versus 2 (6%; n=34) receiving GMK alone (2p-value=0.031). In HDI arms induced AA were detected = 12 weeks after therapy initiation. RFS was improved among HDI recipients with AA, but with the limited numbers in this phase II trial this trend does not achieve significance. In the multivariate (Cox regression model) analysis, adjusting for treatment (HDI vs. no HDI) and baseline S-100 value for later time points, S-100 level ≥0.08 microg/l was an independent prognostic factor for RFS at baseline (HR=1.96; p=0.0273), week 4–6 (HR=1.72; p=0.073), wk 12–14 (HR=1.81; p=0.048) and wk 52 (HR=4.3; p<0.001). The hazard ratio (HR) for OS was 1.86 at wk 12–14 (p=0.061), and 5.7 at wk 52 (p<.001). In the model using wk 52 S-100 value (at completion of HDI), the HR adjusted for treatment was 7.1 p=0.009. Conclusions: Autoimmunity is a predictive biomarker of RFS with HDI in the E2696 trial compared to GMK. Serum protein S-100 level ≥0.08 microg/l is an independent prognostic marker for RFS and OS most significant at baseline and 1 year of followup. Current studies will evaluate these markers in the larger phase III trial E1694 with 880 subjects. [Table: see text]

High-Dose Interferon Alfa-2b Does Not Diminish Antibody Response to GM2 Vaccination in Patients With Resected Melanoma: Results of the Multicenter Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Phase II Trial E2696

2001 ◽  
Vol 19 (5) ◽  
pp. 1430-1436 ◽  
Author(s):  
John M. Kirkwood ◽  
Joseph Ibrahim ◽  
David H. Lawson ◽  
Michael B. Atkins ◽  
Sanjiv S. Agarwala ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Interferon Alfa ◽  
Immunoglobulin M ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
High Dose ◽  
High Risk Melanoma ◽  
Risk Melanoma ◽  
High Dose Interferon ◽  
Very High

PURPOSE: High-dose interferon alfa-2b (IFNα2b) is the only established adjuvant therapy of resectable high-risk melanoma. GM2-KLH/QS-21 (GMK) is a chemically defined vaccine that is one of the best developed of a range of vaccine candidates for melanoma. A single-institution phase III trial conducted at Memorial Hospital served as the impetus for an intergroup adjuvant E1694/S9512/C509801 trial, which recently completed enrollment of 880 patients. To build on the apparent benefit of IFNα2b in resectable high-risk American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) stage IIB or III melanoma, this phase II study was designed to evaluate the combination of GMK and IFNα2b. The E2696 trial was undertaken to evaluate the toxicity and other effects of the established adjuvant high-dose IFNα2b regimen in relation to immune responses to GMK and to evaluate the potential clinical and immunologic effects of the combined therapies. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This trial enrolled 107 patients with resectable high- or very high–risk melanoma (AJCC stages IIB, III, and IV). RESULTS: The results demonstrate that IFNα2b does not significantly inhibit immunoglobulin M or G serologic responses to the vaccine and that the combination of high-dose IFNα2b and GMK is well tolerated in this patient population. CONCLUSION: Cox analysis of the results of the combination with IFNα2b show improvement in the relapse-free survival of patients with very high–risk melanoma (including those with resectable M1 disease).

Quality-of-Life–Adjusted Survival Analysis of High-Dose Adjuvant Interferon Alfa-2b for High-Risk Melanoma Patients Using Intergroup Clinical Trial Data

2002 ◽  
Vol 20 (5) ◽  
pp. 1311-1318 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kerry L. Kilbridge ◽  
Bernard F. Cole ◽  
John M. Kirkwood ◽  
Frank G. Haluska ◽  
Michael A. Atkins ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Interferon Alfa ◽  
Trial Data ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
High Dose ◽  
High Risk Melanoma ◽  
Risk Melanoma ◽  
Adjuvant Interferon

PURPOSE: High-dose adjuvant interferon alfa-2b (IFNα2b) for high-risk melanoma is a 1-year regimen that improves relapse-free and overall survival but has significant toxicity. A quality-of-life–adjusted survival (QAS) analysis analysis of two cooperative group phase III trials, E1684 and E1690/S9111/C9190, was performed, incorporating patient values (utilities) for the toxicity of IFNα2b treatment and melanoma recurrence. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Quality-Adjusted Time Without Symptoms or Toxicity methodology was used with melanoma patient utilities and trial data to estimate the effect of IFNα2b on QAS. The increase or decrease in QAS that patients could expect from treatment was estimated based on their utilities. Eleven utility predictor questions were tested to identify patients with utilities that result in decreased QAS. RESULTS: Using E1684 data, IFNα2b would result in an increase in QAS for all sets of patient utilities. This benefit was significant (P < .05) for 16% of patients. Using E1690/S9111/C9190 data, 77% of patients would experience a benefit in QAS from IFNα2b and 23% would experience a decrease in QAS; neither of these effects was statistically significant. Using utility predictors and the E1690/S9111/C9190 analysis, a decision rule was formulated that helps identify patients in whom IFNα2b may detract from QAS. CONCLUSION: Most patients experienced improvement in QAS in both trials, but this benefit was statistically significant in only 16% of patients in E1684. Change in QAS depends more on the utility for IFNα2b toxicity than on the utility for melanoma recurrence. Cancer patients probably have higher utilities for IFNα2b toxicity than members of the general population and will tend to favor IFNα2b treatment as a result.

Duration of High-Dose Interferon Alfa-2b Regimen for Resected High-Risk Melanoma

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (25) ◽  
pp. e82-e83 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sanjiv S. Agarwala ◽  
Robert J. Gray ◽  
Michael K.K. Wong
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Interferon Alfa ◽  
High Dose ◽  
High Risk Melanoma ◽  
Risk Melanoma ◽  
High Dose Interferon

Imatinib 800 mg: Preliminary Results of a Phase II Trial of the GIMEMA CML Working Party in Intermediate Sokal Risk Patients and Status-of-the-Art of an Ongoing Multinational, Prospective Randomized Trial of Imatinib Standard Dose (400 mg Daily) vs High Dose (800 mg Daily) in High Sokal Risk Patients.

Blood ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 106 (11) ◽  
pp. 1098-1098
Author(s):  
Gianantonio Rosti ◽  
Giovanni Martinelli ◽  
Fausto Castagnetti ◽  
Nicoletta Testoni ◽  
Giorgina Specchia ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Randomized Trial ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Phase Ii Trial ◽  
Standard Dose ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Molecular Response ◽  
Risk Patients

Abstract The conventional treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) in early chronic phase (ECP) is imatinib 400 mg daily. The estimated rates of major (MCgR) and complete cytogenetic response (CCgR) at 42 months are 91% and 84%, respectively (IRIS Trial - F Guilhot, ASH 2004), with a survival free from accelerated and blastic phase of 84%. The rates of CCgR are significantly different according to Sokal score, being 91%, 84% and 69% for low, intermediate and high risk categories. Phase I and II trials of imatinib have clearly shown a dose-response effect; more importantly, a single center phase II trial of imatinib 800 mg in ECP showed significantly better results vs standard dose, in terms of CCgR (90% vs 74%) and of complete molecular response (28% vs 7% at 18 months) [H. Kantarjian et al, Blood 103 (8), 2004]. The GIMEMA (Gruppo Italiano Malattie Ematologiche dell’Adulto) CML WP is conducting a phase II trial of imatinib 800 mg in intermediate Sokal risk in ECP (trial CML/021). Overall, 89 pts (mean age 53 yrs) have been enrolled. Fourty-four patients completed 6 months of treatment: the complete hematological response rate is 100%; the MCgR and CCgR are 90% and 81%, respectively. The 6 months CCgR rate of this trial parallels the IRIS trial one in intermediate risk cases (84%), with a much shorter treatment period. The major molecular response rate at 6 months (RTQ-PCR as ratio BCR-ABL/ABL) is 56% (cut-off ≤ 0.12%) or 41% (cut-off ≤0.05%). The compliance to the treatment improved time by time, being 47% the patients receiving ≥ 80% of the scheduled dose between months 1–3 and 60% between months 4 - 6. A second project, exploring imatinib high dose, is reserved to high risk cases: a multinational working group, within the frame of Leukemianet CML WP, is conducting a phase III randomized trial (1:1) of imatinib 400 mg vs 800 mg in high Sokal risk in ECP. By July 31, 2005, 80 patients have been enrolled: GIMEMA CML WP (44 pts), Nordic Countries - Sweden, Denmark, Norway and Finland (25 pts), Turkey (10 pts) and Israel (1 pt).

Phase III trial of high-dose interferon alpha-2b versus cisplatin, vinblastine, DTIC plus IL-2 and interferon in patients with high-risk melanoma (SWOG S0008): An intergroup study of CALGB, COG, ECOG, and SWOG.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 8504-8504 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lawrence E. Flaherty ◽  
James Moon ◽  
Michael B. Atkins ◽  
Ralph Tuthill ◽  
John A. Thompson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Stage Iv ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Stage Iii ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Phase Iii Trial ◽  
High Risk Melanoma ◽  
Risk Melanoma ◽  
High Dose Interferon

8504 Background: High-dose interferon for one year (HDI) is the FDA approved adjuvant therapy for patients (pts) with high-risk melanoma (HRM). Efforts to modify IFN dose or schedule have not improved efficacy. A meta-analysis demonstrated that biochemotherapy (BCT) produced superior response rates compared with chemotherapy in pts with stage IV melanoma (Wheatley et al J Clin Oncol 25:5426, 2007). We sought to determine whether a short course of BCT would be more effective than HDI as adjuvant treatment in pts with HRM. Methods: S-0008 (an Intergroup Phase III trial) enrolled pts who were high risk (Stage III A-N2a thru Stage III C N3) and randomized them to receive either HDI or BCT consisting of dacarbazine 800 mg/m2 day 1, cisplatin 20 mg/m2/ days 1-4, vinblastine 1.2 mg/m2 days 1-4, IL-2 9 MIU/m2/day continuous IV days 1-4, IFN 5 MU/m2/day sc days 1-4, 8,10,12, and G-CSF 5 ug/kg/day sc days 7-16. BCT cycles were given every 21 days x 3 cycles (9 weeks total). Pts were stratified for number of involved nodes (1-3 v ≥4), micro v macro metastasis, and ulceration of the primary. Co-primary endpoints were relapse free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) using a one-sided log rank test at p= 0.05. Results: 432 pts were enrolled between 8/2000 and 11/2007: 30 were ineligible or withdrew consent. Grade 3 and 4 adverse events occurred in 57% and 7% respectively of HDI pts and 36% and 40% of BCT pts. At a median f/up of 6 yrs, BCT improved RFS (p = 0.02, HR 0.77 [90% CI: 0.62 – 0.96]) with median RFS for BCT of 4.0 yrs (90% CI:1.9 – 5.9) v 1.9 yrs (90% CI: 1.4 – 2.5) and 5 yr RFS of 47% v 39%. Median OS was not different between the two arms (p = 0.49 HR 1.0 [90% CI: 0.78 – 1.27]) with median OS not yet reached for BCT v 8.4 yrs (90% CI: 4.5 – 9.3) for HDI and 5 yr survival 56% for both arms. Conclusions: In HRM pts, BCT provides a statistically significant improvement in RFS compared to HDI, but no discernable difference in OS and more grade IV toxicity. BCT represents a shorter, alternative treatment for pts with HRM, and a potential control arm and basis for future combinations in the adjuvant setting.

A phase III randomized study of adjuvant ipilimumab (3 or 10 mg/kg) versus high-dose interferon alfa-2b for resected high-risk melanoma (U.S. Intergroup E1609): Preliminary safety and efficacy of the ipilimumab arms.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 9500-9500 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ahmad A. Tarhini ◽  
Sandra J. Lee ◽  
F. Stephen Hodi ◽  
Uma N. M. Rao ◽  
Gary I Cohen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Adjuvant Therapy ◽  
Interferon Alfa ◽  
Regulatory Approval ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Safety And Efficacy ◽  
High Risk Melanoma ◽  
Relative Safety ◽  
Risk Melanoma ◽  
High Dose Interferon

9500 Background: In the U.S., 3 regimens have regulatory approval as adjuvant therapy for high-risk melanoma, including high-dose interferon-alfa (HDI) and ipilimumab 10 mg/kg (ipi10). Ipilimumab 3 mg/kg (ipi3) has regulatory approval for metastatic inoperable melanoma. The toxicity of ipi is dose- dependent, and following the recent approval of adjuvant ipi10, it has become urgent to evaluate the relative safety and efficacy of adjuvant ipi at the 2 dose levels that have been tested in E1609. Methods: E1609 randomized patients (pts) with resected high-risk melanoma (stratified by stages IIIB, IIIC, M1a, M1b) to ipi10 or ipi3 versus HDI. Co-primary endpoints were RFS and OS. The current analysis investigates the relative safety and preliminary, non-comparative RFS of the ipi arms as of 3/2/17. Results: E1609 was activated on 5/25/11 and completed adult pt accrual on 8/15/14. Accrual to ipi10 was suspended due to toxicity between 9/23-11/16/2013. Final adult pt accrual was 1670 including 511 ipi10, 636 HDI and 523 ipi3 pts. Treatment related adverse events (AEs) were reported among 503 ipi10 and 516 ipi3 pts. Worst degree (Gr 3+) AEs were experienced by 57% ipi10 and 36.4% ipi3 pts and were mostly immune related (Table 1). AEs led to discontinuation of treatment in 271 (53.8 %) of 503 ipi10 and in 180 (35.2 %) of 512 ipi3 pts during the initial 4 dose induction phase. Gr5 AEs considered at least possibly related were 8 with ipi10 and 2 with ipi3. At a median follow-up of 3.1 years, an unplanned RFS analysis of ipi3 and ipi10 on concurrently randomized pts showed no difference between the 2 arms. Three-year RFS rate was 54% (95% CI: 49, 60) with ipi10 and 56% (50, 61) with ipi3. Conclusions: Adjuvant therapy of pts with high-risk melanoma is associated with significantly more toxicity at ipi10 compared to ipi3. An unplanned RFS analysis of concurrently randomized pts on the 2 ipi arms showed no difference in RFS. Clinical trial information: NCT01274338. [Table: see text]

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document