Final results of the EORTC Intergroup randomized phase III study 40983 [EPOC] evaluating the benefit of peri-operative FOLFOX4 chemotherapy for patients with potentially resectable colorectal cancer liver metastases

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. LBA5-LBA5 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. Nordlinger ◽  
H. Sorbye ◽  
L. Collette ◽  
B. Glimelius ◽  
G. J. Poston ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Liver Metastases ◽  
Dose Intensity ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Median Number ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastases ◽  
Significance Level ◽  
Phase Iii Study

LBA5 Background: The 5-year survival after resection of colorectal cancer liver metastases is 30% but recurrence is common. This study evaluates the benefit of combining peri-operative chemotherapy and surgery for patients with initially resectable liver only metastases from colorectal cancer (LM). Methods: Between September 2000 and July 2004, 364 pts with up to 4 LM were randomized between peri-operative FOLFOX4 (oxaliplatin 85mg/m2 and LV5FU2), 6 cycles before and 6 cycles after surgery, (CT), and surgery alone (S). The primary endpoint was progression free survival (PFS) with the goal to increase median PFS by 40% (HR=0.71). Safety was a secondary endpoint (already reported at ASCO 2005). PFS results are reported at the 2-sided 0.0434 significance level (adjusting for one interim analysis). Results: Baseline characteristics were similar in both arms. Eleven of 182 pts were ineligible in each arm, mostly for more advanced disease. In the CT arm, a median of 6 pre-op cycles were delivered and 151 patients were resected. 115 pts (63%) received post-op CT, with a median number of 6 cycles and a relative dose intensity of 79% to 86%. In the S arm, 152 pts were resected. Due to the nature of the trial, evaluation of resectability (relevant for eligibility) was based on pre-op imaging, but 31/182 pts (CT arm) and 30/182 pt (S arm) could not undergo resection. There were 2 (S arm) and 1 (CT arm) deaths after surgery. At a median follow-up of 3.9 years, 254 PFS events were reported (240 in eligible pts) and the results are as shown in the table . Conclusions: Peri-operative FOLFOX4 chemotherapy improved PFS over surgery alone in patients whose metastases were actually resected. The benefit was slightly diluted when also pts considered resectable on imaging but eventually not resected were taken into account. FOLFOX4 given peri-operatively is safe and does not prevent the pts from undergoing surgery. [Table: see text] [Table: see text]

Topotecan plus carboplatin versus standard therapy with paclitaxel plus carboplatin (PC) or gemcitabin plus carboplatin (GC) or carboplatin plus pegylated doxorubicin (PLDC): A randomized phase III trial of the NOGGO-AGO-Germany-AGO Austria and GEICO-GCIG intergroup study (HECTOR).

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 5031-5031 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jalid Sehouli ◽  
Werner Meier ◽  
Pauline Wimberger ◽  
Radoslav Chekerov ◽  
Antje Belau ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Standard Therapy ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Median Number ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Phase Iii Trial ◽  
Platinum Sensitive ◽  
Best Response ◽  
Phase Iii Study ◽  
Number Of Cycles

5031 Background: We present the efficacy data from a phase III study of topotecan (T) plus carboplatin (C) versus standard therapy with paclitaxel plus carboplatin (PC) or gemcitabine plus carboplatin (GC) or carboplatin plus pegylated doxorubicin (PLDC). Methods: From 02/07 to 12/09, 590 pts were screened and 550 pts were randomized to either T (0.75mg/m²/d1-3/q21d) + C (AUC 5/d1/q21d) or to standard therapy with CP or GC or PLDC based on patient preference. Progression free survival at 1 year was defined as primary endpoint. Results: Median number of cycles was 6 (range 0-9) in both arms. Most patients preferred GC (78%) in the standard therapy arm.. Best Response (CR+PR) was 73.1% (95%CI) and 75.1% (95%CI) for the CA. Median follow-up was 18 (0-52) months for TC and 20 (0-48) months for standard therapy. TC failed to show any advantage regarding 1-yr.-PFS or OAS. Conclusions: The combination of topotecan plus carboplatin failed to improve PFS or OAS in platinum sensitive relapsed ovarian cancer. In addition, carboplatin plus gemcitabine was well tolerated with lower rates of severe and long-lasting (neuropathy) toxicities compared to paclitaxel-carboplatin. [Table: see text]

Oral adjuvant chemotherapy using uracil-tegafur (UFT) with leucovorin (LV) after resection of colorectal cancer liver metastases: Long-term survival results of the phase III UFT/LV study.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 672-672 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kiyoshi Hasegawa ◽  
Akio Saiura ◽  
Tadatoshi Takayama ◽  
Shinichi Miyagawa ◽  
Junji Yamamoto ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Adjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Liver Metastases ◽  
Curative Resection ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastases ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Better Than

672 Background: Surgical resection has been accepted as the standard therapy for colorectal cancer liver metastases (CRLM), however, high recurrence incidence even after curative resection remains a severe problem. The 1st analysis of the UFT/LV trial showed that oral UFT/LV for 6 months significantly prolonged relapse-free survival (RFS) after resection for CRLM (Kobayashi A et al. ASCO 2014, Hasegawa K et al. PlosOne 2016 E-pub). To further evaluate the impact of the UFT/LV therapy on overall survival (OS), we performed the 2nd analysis under longer follow-up period, as have been scheduled by the protocol. Methods: Patients undergoing curative resection of CRLM were randomly assigned to either UFT/LV or surgery alone (control) group. In the UFT/LV group, 5 cycles of adjuvant UFT/LV (UFT 300mg/m2 and LV 75 mg/day for 28 days followed by 7 days rest in one cycle) were administered. Results: Between 2004 and 2010, a total of 180 patients were enrolled to this trial, among whom 3 patients were ineligible for analysis. Median follow-up of the 2nd analysis was 6 years. The 5y-OS rate in the UFT/LV group was 65.3%, which was slightly better than the control group (62.2%) without statistical significance. The hazard ratio for death in the UFT/LV relative to the control was 0.86 (95% confidence interval: 0.54-1.38, P = 0.54). The OS curves of the 2 groups were identical within 4 years after resection, however, the OS curve of the UFT/LV group seemed to go higher than the control group. The 5y-RFS rate in the UFT/LV group was 36.2%, which was significantly better than that in the control group (32.3%), as have been shown by the 1st analysis. Conclusions: The results of the 2nd analysis suggested that oral UFT/LV adjuvant chemotherapy might be also useful to prolong OS, as have been confirmed for RFS. This regimen can be recommended as an alternative choice after hepatic resection for CRLM. Clinical trial information: C000000013.

scholarly journals Long Term Real-World Outcomes of Trifluridine/Tipiracil in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer—A Single UK Centre Experience

2021 ◽  
Vol 28 (3) ◽  
pp. 2260-2269
Author(s):  
Daniel Tong ◽  
Lei Wang ◽  
Jeewaka Mendis ◽  
Sharadah Essapen
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Real World ◽  
Systemic Treatment ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Median Number ◽  
Current Data ◽  
Real World Data

In the UK, Trifluridine-tipiracil (Lonsurf) is used to treat metastatic colorectal cancer in the third-line setting, after prior exposure to fluoropyrimidine-based regimes. Current data on the real-world use of Lonsurf lack long-term follow-up data. A retrospective evaluation of patients receiving Lonsurf at our Cancer Centre in 2016–2017 was performed, all with a minimum of two-year follow-up. Fifty-six patients were included in the review. The median number of cycles of Lonsurf administered was 3. Median follow-up was 6.0 months, with all patients deceased at the time of analysis. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 3.2 months, and overall survival (OS) was 5.8 months. The median interval from Lonsurf discontinuation to death was two months, but seven patients received further systemic treatment and median OS gained was 12 months. Lonsurf offered a slightly better PFS but inferior OS to that of the RECOURSE trial, with PFS similar to real-world data previously presented. Interestingly, 12.5% had a PFS > 9 months, and this cohort had primarily left-sided and RAS wild-type disease. A subset received further systemic treatment on Lonsurf discontinuation with good additional OS benefit. Lonsurf may alter the course of disease for a subset of patients, and further treatment on progression can be considered in carefully selected patients.

Phase III Trial of Infusional Fluorouracil, Leucovorin, Oxaliplatin, and Irinotecan (FOLFOXIRI) Compared With Infusional Fluorouracil, Leucovorin, and Irinotecan (FOLFIRI) As First-Line Treatment for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: The Gruppo Oncologico Nord Ovest

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (13) ◽  
pp. 1670-1676 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alfredo Falcone ◽  
Sergio Ricci ◽  
Isa Brunetti ◽  
Elisabetta Pfanner ◽  
Giacomo Allegrini ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Peripheral Neurotoxicity ◽  
Phase Iii Trial ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Secondary Resection ◽  
Phase Iii Study ◽  
Grade 3

Purpose The Gruppo Oncologico Nord Ovest (GONO) conducted a phase III study comparing fluorouracil, leucovorin, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan (FOLFOXIRI [irinotecan 165 mg/m2 day 1, oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2 day 1, leucovorin 200 mg/m2 day 1, fluorouracil 3,200 mg/m2 48-hour continuous infusion starting on day 1, every 2 weeks]) with infusional fluorouracil, leucovorin, and irinotecan (FOLFIRI). Methods Selection criteria included unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer, age 18 to 75 years, and no prior chemotherapy for advanced disease. The primary end point was response rate (RR). Results A total of 244 patients were randomly assigned. An increase of grade 2 to 3 peripheral neurotoxicity (0% v 19%; P < .001), and grade 3 to 4 neutropenia (28% v 50%; P < .001) were observed in the FOLFOXIRI arm. The incidence of febrile neutropenia (3% v 5%) and grade 3 to 4 diarrhea (12% v 20%) were not significantly different. Responses, as assessed by investigators, were, for FOLFIRI and FOLFOXIRI, respectively, complete, 6% and 8%; and partial, 35% and 58%, (RR, 41% v 66%; P = .0002). RR confirmed by an external panel was 34% versus 60% (P < .0001). The R0 secondary resection rate of metastases was greater in the FOLFOXIRI arm (6% v 15%; P = .033, among all 244 patients; and 12% v 36%; P = .017 among patients with liver metastases only). Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were both significantly improved in the FOLFOXIRI arm (median PFS, 6.9 v 9.8 months; hazard ratio [HR], 0.63; P = .0006; median OS, 16.7 v 22.6 months; HR, 0.70; P = .032). Conclusion The FOLFOXIRI regimen improves RR, PFS, and OS compared with FOLFIRI, with an increased, but manageable, toxicity in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer with favorable prognostic characteristics. Further studies of FOLFOXIRI in combination with targeted agents and in the neoadjuvant setting are warranted.

scholarly journals Final Results of the IELSG-19 Randomized Trial of Mucosa-Associated Lymphoid Tissue Lymphoma: Improved Event-Free and Progression-Free Survival With Rituximab Plus Chlorambucil Versus Either Chlorambucil or Rituximab Monotherapy

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (17) ◽  
pp. 1905-1912 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emanuele Zucca ◽  
Annarita Conconi ◽  
Giovanni Martinelli ◽  
Reda Bouabdallah ◽  
Alessandra Tucci ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Randomized Trial ◽  
Lymphoid Tissue ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Final Sample ◽  
Phase Iii Study ◽  
To Receive

Purpose There is no consensus on the optimal systemic treatment of patients with extranodal marginal zone lymphoma of mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue. The IELSG-19 phase III study, to our knowledge, was the first such study to address the question of first-line treatment in a randomized trial. Patients and Methods Eligible patients were initially randomly assigned (1:1 ratio) to receive either chlorambucil monotherapy (6 mg/m2/d orally on weeks 1 to 6, 9 to 10, 13 to 14, 17 to 18, and 21 to 22) or a combination of chlorambucil (same schedule as above) and rituximab (375 mg/m2 intravenously on day 1 of weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 9, 13, 17, and 21). After the planned enrollment of 252 patients, the protocol was amended to continue with a three-arm design (1:1:6 ratio), with a new arm that included rituximab alone (same schedule as the combination arm) and with a final sample size of 454 patients. The main end point was event-free survival (EFS). Analysis of chlorambucil versus the combination arm was performed and reported separately before any analysis of the third arm. Results At a median follow-up of 7.4 years, addition of rituximab to chlorambucil led to significantly better EFS (hazard ratio, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.38 to 0.77). EFS at 5 years was 51% (95% CI, 42 to 60) with chlorambucil alone, 50% (95% CI, 42 to 59) with rituximab alone, and 68% (95% CI, 60 to 76) with the combination ( P = .0009). Progression-free survival was also significantly better with the combination ( P = .0119). Five-year overall survival was approximately 90% in each arm. All treatments were well tolerated. No unexpected toxicities were recorded. Conclusion Rituximab in combination with chlorambucil demonstrated superior efficacy in mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue lymphoma; however, improvements in EFS and progression-free survival did not translate into longer overall survival.

scholarly journals Conversion Chemotherapy With a Modified FLOX Regimen for Borderline or Unresectable Liver Metastases From Colorectal Cancer: An Alternative for Limited-Resources Settings

2019 ◽  
pp. 1-6
Author(s):  
Renata Colombo Bonadio ◽  
Paulo Henrique Amor Divino ◽  
Jorge Santiago Madero Obando ◽  
Karolina Cayres Alvino Lima ◽  
Débora Zachello Recchimuzzi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Liver Metastases ◽  
Median Overall Survival ◽  
Low Cost ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Hazard Ratio ◽  
R0 Resection ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Unresectable Liver Metastases

PURPOSE Conversion chemotherapy is often used for borderline or unresectable (B/U) liver metastases from colorectal cancer (CRC) with the aim of achieving resectability. Although intensive and costly regimens are often used, the best regimen in this scenario remains unclear. We aimed to evaluate the outcomes of patients with B/U liver metastases from CRC treated with conversion chemotherapy with the modified fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin (mFLOX) regimen followed by metastasectomy. METHODS We performed a single-center retrospective analysis of patients with B/U liver metastases from CRC treated with chemotherapy with the mFLOX regimen followed by surgery. B/U disease was defined as at least one of the following: more than four lesions, involvement of hepatic artery or portal vein, or involvement of biliary structure. RESULTS Fifty-four consecutive patients who met our criteria for B/U liver metastases were evaluated. Thirty-five patients (64%) had more than four liver lesions, 16 (29%) had key vascular structure involvement, and 16 (29%) had biliary involvement. After chemotherapy, all patients had surgery and 42 (77%) had R0 resection. After a median follow-up of 37.2 months, median progression-free survival (PFS) was 16.9 months and median overall survival (OS) was 68.3 months. R1-R2 resections were associated with worse PFS and OS compared with R0 resection (PFS: hazard ratio, 2.65; P = .007; OS: hazard ratio, 2.90; P = .014). CONCLUSION Treatment of B/U liver metastases from CRC with conversion chemotherapy using mFLOX regimen followed by surgical resection was associated with a high R0 resection rate and favorable survival outcomes. On the basis of our results, we consider mFLOX a low-cost option for conversion chemotherapy among other options that have been proposed.

Bevacizumab (BEV) plus capecitabine as maintenance therapy after initial treatment with BEV plus XELOX in previously untreated patients (pts) with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC): Mature data from STOP and GO, a phase III, randomized, multicenter study.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3565-3565 ◽  
Author(s):  
Suayib Yalcin ◽  
Ruchan Uslu ◽  
Faysal Dane ◽  
Ugur Yilmaz ◽  
Nurullah Zengin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Maintenance Therapy ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Drop Out ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Significance Level ◽  
First Line Therapy ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Grade 3

3565 Background: Colorectal cancer is one of the most frequent malignancies, second after breast cancer in women and third after lung cancer and prostate cancer in men. The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the progression-free survival (PFS) between two arms: Arm A is a combination of BEV + XELOX; Arm B is a combination of BEV + XELOX for 6 cycles followed by maintenance BEV + capecitabine as first-line therapy in mCRC. Methods: BEV (7.5 mg/kg) + XELOX (capecitabine 1000 mg/m2 bid d1–14 + oxaliplatin 130 mg/m2 d1 q3w) were administered until progression (Arm A) or 6 cycles of BEV + XELOX followed by BEV + capecitabine were administered until progression (Arm B). PFS was the primary endpoint; secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), and safety. A sample size of 118 pts was required to detect with 80% power an increase of 1.5 months in median PFS between two arms with a standard deviation of 3.9 months and significance level of 0.05 (10% drop-out rate). Results: A total of 123 pts were randomized. Demographic characteristics were balanced between the arms. Median treatment period was 7.5 (range 0.5–13.9) and 8.1 (range 0.1–20.7) months in Arms A and B, respectively. There was a statistically significant difference in median PFS between arms, although there was no significant difference in ORR and OS (see table). Tolerability was acceptable in both arms with the following grade 3/4 adverse events (AEs): Arm A 48.4%; Arm B 34.4% (p=0.116). Grade 3/4 diarrhoea occurred in 9.7% vs. 3.3%, weakness in 8.1% vs. 8.2%, hand-foot syndrome in 3.2% vs. 1.6%, and neuropathy in 4.8% vs. 3.3% of pts in Arms A and B, respectively. Conclusions: These findings suggest that maintenance therapy with BEV + capecitabine following induction with 6 cycles of BEV + XELOX may be superior to continuous BEV + XELOX until progression inpts with previously untreated mCRC. [Table: see text]

Hepatic arterial embolization adopting polyvinyl alcohol microspheres preloaded with irinotecan versus systemic chemotherapy for hepatic metastases from colorectal cancer: A phase III clinical research trial of activity and quality of life.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 587-587 ◽  
Author(s):  
Giammaria Fiorentini ◽  
Camillo Aliberti ◽  
Massimo Tilli ◽  
Paolo Coschiera ◽  
Andrea Mambrini ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Hepatic Metastases ◽  
Dose Intensity ◽  
Arterial Embolization ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Late Toxicity ◽  
Radical Resection ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Clinical Research Trial

587 Background: Patients with liver metastases (LM) from colorectal cancer (CRC) have a severe prognosis with the 5-year survival of 25% after radical resection; for not operable metastases the survival is poor. Embolization using polyvinil alcohol microspheres loaded with IRI 200 mgr (D) is a feasible procedure. FOLFIRI (CT) is active for the treatment of CRC. We planned this phase III study to assess survival as primary endpoint to increase median survival (MS) by 40% at 2-y (HR=0.72). QoL, responses, progression-free survival (PFS) and safety are secondary endpoints. Methods: Between December 2006 and December 2008, 74 pts were randomized, 37 patients to D and 37 to CT. Two D patients had early progression and two CT patients refused. 70 cycles of D were administered in 35 pts, with a dose intensity (DI) of 99%, and 292 CT cycles were delivered to 35 pts with a DI of 90%. Results: At a median follow up of 30 months ( 18-42) we reported (D vs CT): MS 48% vs 28%, Response Rate 70% vs 20%, Acute Toxicity 70% vs 20%, Late Toxicity 20% vs 80%, QoL improvement 65% vs 25%, Costs for each pt: 7,000 vs 24,000 euro. Conclusions: D increased the 30-Months MS difference of 20% compared to CT. D improved responses, Performance Status and reduced costs. D reported higher immediate toxicity, mainly fever and abdominal pain, than CT. Late toxicity, mainly haematological, diarrhoea, asthenia and alopecia, was more common in CT. We conclude that D compared to CT increases survival and palliative results in patients with LM from CRC.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document