Oral adjuvant chemotherapy using uracil-tegafur (UFT) with leucovorin (LV) after resection of colorectal cancer liver metastases: Long-term survival results of the phase III UFT/LV study.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 672-672 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kiyoshi Hasegawa ◽  
Akio Saiura ◽  
Tadatoshi Takayama ◽  
Shinichi Miyagawa ◽  
Junji Yamamoto ◽  
...  

672 Background: Surgical resection has been accepted as the standard therapy for colorectal cancer liver metastases (CRLM), however, high recurrence incidence even after curative resection remains a severe problem. The 1st analysis of the UFT/LV trial showed that oral UFT/LV for 6 months significantly prolonged relapse-free survival (RFS) after resection for CRLM (Kobayashi A et al. ASCO 2014, Hasegawa K et al. PlosOne 2016 E-pub). To further evaluate the impact of the UFT/LV therapy on overall survival (OS), we performed the 2nd analysis under longer follow-up period, as have been scheduled by the protocol. Methods: Patients undergoing curative resection of CRLM were randomly assigned to either UFT/LV or surgery alone (control) group. In the UFT/LV group, 5 cycles of adjuvant UFT/LV (UFT 300mg/m2 and LV 75 mg/day for 28 days followed by 7 days rest in one cycle) were administered. Results: Between 2004 and 2010, a total of 180 patients were enrolled to this trial, among whom 3 patients were ineligible for analysis. Median follow-up of the 2nd analysis was 6 years. The 5y-OS rate in the UFT/LV group was 65.3%, which was slightly better than the control group (62.2%) without statistical significance. The hazard ratio for death in the UFT/LV relative to the control was 0.86 (95% confidence interval: 0.54-1.38, P = 0.54). The OS curves of the 2 groups were identical within 4 years after resection, however, the OS curve of the UFT/LV group seemed to go higher than the control group. The 5y-RFS rate in the UFT/LV group was 36.2%, which was significantly better than that in the control group (32.3%), as have been shown by the 1st analysis. Conclusions: The results of the 2nd analysis suggested that oral UFT/LV adjuvant chemotherapy might be also useful to prolong OS, as have been confirmed for RFS. This regimen can be recommended as an alternative choice after hepatic resection for CRLM. Clinical trial information: C000000013.

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. LBA5-LBA5 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. Nordlinger ◽  
H. Sorbye ◽  
L. Collette ◽  
B. Glimelius ◽  
G. J. Poston ◽  
...  

LBA5 Background: The 5-year survival after resection of colorectal cancer liver metastases is 30% but recurrence is common. This study evaluates the benefit of combining peri-operative chemotherapy and surgery for patients with initially resectable liver only metastases from colorectal cancer (LM). Methods: Between September 2000 and July 2004, 364 pts with up to 4 LM were randomized between peri-operative FOLFOX4 (oxaliplatin 85mg/m2 and LV5FU2), 6 cycles before and 6 cycles after surgery, (CT), and surgery alone (S). The primary endpoint was progression free survival (PFS) with the goal to increase median PFS by 40% (HR=0.71). Safety was a secondary endpoint (already reported at ASCO 2005). PFS results are reported at the 2-sided 0.0434 significance level (adjusting for one interim analysis). Results: Baseline characteristics were similar in both arms. Eleven of 182 pts were ineligible in each arm, mostly for more advanced disease. In the CT arm, a median of 6 pre-op cycles were delivered and 151 patients were resected. 115 pts (63%) received post-op CT, with a median number of 6 cycles and a relative dose intensity of 79% to 86%. In the S arm, 152 pts were resected. Due to the nature of the trial, evaluation of resectability (relevant for eligibility) was based on pre-op imaging, but 31/182 pts (CT arm) and 30/182 pt (S arm) could not undergo resection. There were 2 (S arm) and 1 (CT arm) deaths after surgery. At a median follow-up of 3.9 years, 254 PFS events were reported (240 in eligible pts) and the results are as shown in the table . Conclusions: Peri-operative FOLFOX4 chemotherapy improved PFS over surgery alone in patients whose metastases were actually resected. The benefit was slightly diluted when also pts considered resectable on imaging but eventually not resected were taken into account. FOLFOX4 given peri-operatively is safe and does not prevent the pts from undergoing surgery. [Table: see text] [Table: see text]


2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e15015-e15015
Author(s):  
Hiroki Hashida ◽  
Hironaga Satake ◽  
Hiroaki Tanioka ◽  
Yasuhiro Miyake ◽  
Shinichi Yoshioka ◽  
...  

e15015 Background: Hepatic resection is one of the treatment strategies for resectable colorectal cancer liver metastases (CLM). The role of neoadjuvant and adjuvant chemotherapy in the management of initially resectable CLM is still unclear. Adjuvant chemotherapy consisting of capecitabine plus oxaliplatin (CapeOx) appears to be equivalent to FOLFOX in patients with stage III colon cancer. Furthermore, some studies suggest that adjuvant chemotherapy for three months after curative resection for stage II/III colorectal cancer has equivalent efficacy to adjuvant chemotherapy for 6 months. We initiated a multi-institutional, single-arm, open label, phase II trial to confirm the feasibility of adjuvant CapeOx for three months for post curative resection of CLM. Methods: Patients received one course of capecitabine followed by four courses of CapeOx for a total five courses (15 weeks) as adjuvant chemotherapy after curative resection of CLM. CapeOx consisted of a 2-hour intravenous infusion of oxaliplatin 130 mg/m2 on day 1 plus oral capecitabine 1,000 mg/m2 twice daily for 2 weeks in a 3-week cycle. The primary endpoint was completion rate of adjuvant chemotherapy. We set a threshold completion rate of protocol treatment of 45% and an expected completion rate of 70%. Given a one-sided α of 0.1 and statistical power of 80%, a minimum of 25 patients was required. Results: From May 2013 to November 2015, Twenty-eight patients were enrolled from six institutions: median age 69.5y, 54% male, 78.5% left-sided primary. Of the patients, 15 were synchronous metastases and 13 were metachronous. The locations of the metastases were unilobar in 20 patients and bilobar in 8. The mean number of lesions resected was two (range, 1 to 4). The mean size of largest tumor was 31 mm (range, 2 to 112 mm). Among the 28 patients, 20 (71.4 %: 95% CI, 53.6 to 89.3%) completed the protocol treatment. The most common grade 3 or 4 toxicities were neutropenia (29%). No treatment related death was observed. Conclusions: Adjuvant CapeOx for three months for post curative resection of CLM was feasible. Clinical trial information: UMIN000011164.


2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 866-866 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hironaga Satake ◽  
Hiroki Hashida ◽  
Hiroaki Tanioka ◽  
Yasuhiro Miyake ◽  
Shinichi Yoshioka ◽  
...  

866 Background: Hepatic resection is one of the treatment strategies for resectable colorectal cancer liver metastases (CLM). The role of neoadjuvant and adjuvant chemotherapy in the management of initially resectable CLM is still unclear. Adjuvant chemotherapy consisting of capecitabine plus oxaliplatin (CapeOx) appears to be equivalent to FOLFOX in patients with stage III colon cancer. Furthermore, the IDEA collaboration reported that adjuvant chemotherapy with the three months of CapeOx after curative resection for stage III colon cancer has equivalent efficacy to adjuvant chemotherapy for 6 months. We conducted a multi-institutional, single-arm, phase II trial to confirm the feasibility of the three months of adjuvant CapeOx for post curative resection of CLM. Methods: Patients received one course of capecitabine followed by four courses of CapeOx for a total five courses (15 weeks) as adjuvant chemotherapy after curative resection of CLM. Oral capecitabine was given with 1,000 mg/m2 twice daily for 2 weeks in a 3-week cycle, and CapeOx consisted of oral capecitabine plus oxaliplatin 130 mg/m2 on day 1 in a 3-week cycle. The primary endpoint was completion rate of adjuvant chemotherapy. We set a threshold completion rate of protocol treatment of 45% and an expected completion rate of 70%. Given a one-sided α of 0.1 and statistical power of 80%, a minimum of 25 patients was required. Results: From May 2013 to November 2015, Twenty-eight patients were enrolled from six institutions: median age 69.5y, 54% male, 78.5% left-sided primary. Of the patients, 15 were synchronous metastases and 13 were metachronous. The locations of the metastases were unilobar in 20 patients and bilobar in 8. The mean number of lesions resected was two (range, 1 to 4). Among the 28 patients, 20 (71.4%: 95% CI, 53.6 to 89.3%) completed the protocol treatment. The most common grade 3/4 toxicities were neutropenia (29%). No treatment related death was observed. With a median follow-up period of 36 months (range 15-53months), 3 year-relapse free survival was 75.3%. Conclusions: The three months of adjuvant CapeOx is tolerable for post curative resection of CLM. Clinical trial information: 000011164.


2006 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 40-44 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Mielczarek ◽  
A. Chrzanowska ◽  
D. Ścibior ◽  
A. Skwarek ◽  
F. Ashamiss ◽  
...  

The present work is a continuation of studies on arginase as a marker in the diagnosis of colorectal cancer liver metastases (CRCLM). The purpose of the study was the evaluation of the arginase test in comparison with other colorectal cancer tests such as CEA, CA 19-9 and biochemical markers of liver function such as aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and alanine aminotransferase (ALT). The studies were conducted on blood serum from 85 patients with CRCLM obtained one to two days before tumor resection. The control group comprised 140 healthy blood donors and 81 patients with various non-malignant gastrointestinal diseases. Raised arginase activity was observed in serum of 85% of CRCLM patients, whereas elevated levels of CEA and CA 19-9 were found in 63% and 42% of patients, respectively. The combination of CEA or CA 19-9 with the arginase assay improved their sensitivity, but the sensitivity of the combined parameters was not higher than that of the arginase test itself. AST and ALT activities were increased in about 30% of CRCLM patients. The specificity of the arginase test calculated for 221 control subjects was 76%. It can thus be concluded that the determination of serum arginase activity can be helpful in the diagnosis of patients with colorectal cancer liver metastases.


2019 ◽  
Vol 49 (10) ◽  
pp. 985-990 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kenichi Miyamoto ◽  
Atsuo Takashima ◽  
Junki Mizusawa ◽  
Yuya Sato ◽  
Yasuhiro Shimada ◽  
...  

Abstract Adjuvant chemotherapy is the current standard treatment for stage III colorectal cancer after curative resection. However, the prognosis of stage III colorectal cancer is still poor even after curative resection and adjuvant chemotherapy. Several observational studies suggested that the anti-tumor effect of aspirin. Therefore, we planned a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled phase III trial, which commenced in Japan in March 2018, to confirm the superiority of aspirin over placebo added to adjuvant chemotherapy in terms of disease-free survival (DFS) for stage III colorectal cancer patients after curative resection. A total of 880 patients will be accrued from 20 Japanese institutions within 3 years. The primary endpoint is DFS and the secondary endpoints are overall survival, relapse-free survival, relative dose intensity, adverse events, and serious adverse events. This trial has been registered at Japan Registry of Clinical Trials as jRCTs031180009 (https://jrct.niph.go.jp/detail/589).


2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4049-4049 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. Hamaguchi ◽  
K. Shirao ◽  
Y. Moriya ◽  
S. Yoshida ◽  
S. Kodaira ◽  
...  

4049 Background: In the latter 1990s, no consensus was reached as to whether adjuvant chemotherapy was standard treatment for completely resected stage III colorectal cancer in Japan. At that time, we started two randomized controlled trials to clarify the role of adjuvant chemotherapy of stage III colon and rectal cancer in the same time. Methods: Patients with completely resected stage III cancer of the colon or rectum (PS, 0 to 2; age, 20 to 75 years; no other adjuvant therapy) were eligible for these trials. Patients were registered within 6 weeks after surgery and were randomly assigned to receive surgery alone (control group) or surgery followed by treatment with UFT (400 mg/m2/day), given for 5 consecutive days per week for 1 year (UFT group). The target number of patients was 500 for colon cancer and 400 for rectal cancer (hazard ratio = 0.67, one-sided a= 0.05, β= 0.2). The primary endpoint was relapse-free survival (RFS), and the secondary end point was overall survival (OS). Results: Between October 1996 and April 2001, a total of 334 patients with colon cancer and 276 with rectal cancer were enrolled. Four ineligible patients were excluded; data from the remaining 332 patients with colon cancer and 274 with rectal cancer were analyzed. The patients’ characteristics were similar in the groups. Analysis of the results of follow-up until March 2006, at least 5 years after surgery in all patients (median follow-up period, 6.2 years), showed no significant difference in RFS or OS in colon cancer. In rectal cancer, however, RFS and OS were significantly better in the UFT group than in the control group. The only grade 4 toxicity was diarrhea, occurring in 1 patient with colon cancer and 1 patient with rectal cancer. Conclusions: Postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy with UFT is well tolerated and improved RFS and OS in patients with stage III rectal cancer. In colon cancer, the expected benefits were not obtained (hazard ratio = 0.67). [Table: see text] No significant financial relationships to disclose.


HPB ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anna L. Larsson ◽  
Bergthor Björnsson ◽  
Bärbel Jung ◽  
Olof Hallböök ◽  
Karolina Vernmark ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS3643-TPS3643
Author(s):  
Jonathan Fawcett ◽  
Katrin Marie Sjoquist ◽  
Rob Padbury ◽  
Christopher Christophi ◽  
Niall Christopher Tebbutt ◽  
...  

TPS3643 Background: No randomized studies have directly compared the role of peri-operative to adjuvant chemotherapy for resectable liver metastases. Benefit from post operative compared to peri-operative treatment has been suggested in a recent retrospective study of 499 patients with resected colorectal liver metastases which showed improved survival with entirely post-operative chemotherapy. Given this data and that of the small randomised trials demonstrating improved surgical outcomes with adjuvant chemotherapy, the role of entirely post-operative chemotherapy as a means of improving outcomes while reducing the negative effects of pre-operative treatment needs to be examined. Methods: 200 patients randomized 1:1 to 6 months of treatment post-operatively or 3 months of treatment pre-operatively and 3 months post-operatively. Site investigators will nominate chemotherapy schedule (mFOLFOX6, XELOX or FOLFIRI when adjuvant oxaliplatin received previously) prior to randomisation. Primary endpoint: proportion of patients in each arm with surgical complications within 30 days. Secondary endpoints: proportion of patients completing planned chemotherapy, post operative mortality rate (in each group), tolerability and safety of treatment, response rate by RECIST V1.1 and CEA, time to progression, time to treatment failure, overall survival, QoL (EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-LMC21). A planned prospective meta-analysis with MRC (UK) and NSABP C-11 trials will have sufficient power to examine the effect of schedule (peri- or post-operative) on progression free survival (PFS). Eligibility: Patients with histologically proven colorectal cancer with radiologically confirmed, resectable liver metastases without evidence of extra-hepatic disease are eligible. Patients with synchronous metastases who have undergone resection of the primary tumour are eligible but patients requiring combined resection of primary cancer and liver metastatic disease are excluded. Patients with involved hilar nodes or wound implant metastases will not be eligible. Trial Status: Study opened to accrual August 2011.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document