scholarly journals Are the Most Distressing Concerns of Patients With Inoperable Lung Cancer Adequately Assessed? A Mixed-Methods Analysis

2010 ◽  
Vol 28 (11) ◽  
pp. 1942-1949 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carol Tishelman ◽  
Malin Lövgren ◽  
Eva Broberger ◽  
Katarina Hamberg ◽  
Mirjam A.G. Sprangers
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Psychosocial Problems ◽  
Symptom Assessment ◽  
First Year ◽  
Life Questionnaire ◽  
Distress Screening ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Symptom Assessment Scale

Purpose Standardized questionnaires for patient-reported outcomes are generally composed of specified predetermined items, although other areas may also cause patients distress. We therefore studied reports of what was most distressing for 343 patients with inoperable lung cancer (LC) at six time points during the first year postdiagnosis and how these concerns were assessed by three quality-of-life and symptom questionnaires. Patients and Methods Qualitative analysis of patients' responses to the question “What do you find most distressing at present?” generated 20 categories, with 17 under the dimensions of “bodily distress,” “life situation with LC,” and “iatrogenic distress.” Descriptive and inferential statistical analyses were conducted. Results The majority of statements reported as most distressing related to somatic and psychosocial problems, with 26% of patients reporting an overarching form of distress instead of specific problems at some time point. Twenty-seven percent reported some facet of their contact with the health care system as causing them most distress. While 55% to 59% of concerns reported as most distressing were clearly assessed by the European Organisation for Research and Treatment for Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core-30 and Lung Cancer Module instruments, the Memorial Symptom Assessment Scale, and the modified Distress Screening Tool, iatrogenic distress is not specifically targeted by any of the three instruments examined. Conclusion Using this approach, several distressing issues were found to be commonly reported by this patient group but were not assessed by standardized questionnaires. This highlights the need to carefully consider choice of instrument in relation to study objectives and characteristics of the sample investigated and to consider complementary means of assessment in clinical practice.

Implementation of the VA Symptom Assessment Scale (VSAS): Five-year experience.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e23120-e23120
Author(s):  
Daphne Ruth Friedman ◽  
Vikas Patil ◽  
Kelli Marie Rasmussen ◽  
Brian C Sauer ◽  
Michael J. Kelley ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Symptom Assessment ◽  
Assessment Scale ◽  
Veterans Health ◽  
Health Administration ◽  
Clinical Tool ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Symptom Assessment Scale

e23120 Background: Cancer patients experience symptoms which may precede diagnosis, occur during therapy, and persist into survivorship. Symptom assessments and patient reported outcomes have been shown to improve quality of life and extend survival in cancer patients. The Veterans Administration Symptom Assessment Scale (VSAS) is a clinical tool to document cancer-related symptoms. Here, we report VSAS adoption in five Veterans Health Administration (VHA) hematology-oncology sites during a five-year period. Methods: Data was collected from the Corporate Data Warehouse (CDW): VSAS data, date of birth, gender, race, ethnicity, vital status, year of cancer diagnosis, ICD-O-3, VHA facility, and clinic stop codes. Descriptive analyses of patient demographics, disease characteristics, and VSAS utilization was performed. VSAS is comprised of 13 symptoms, rated on a 0 to 10 scale. A VSAS visit was defined as the date the VSAS was administered to a patient. Results: From January 2013 through June 2018, there were 41,917 instances of VSAS administered to 9,409 unique patients at five VHA facilities: 8,512 (90.5%) were male; 5,241 (56%) were non-Hispanic White, 3,743 (40%) were Black, and 297 (3%) were other racial categories or not available. The median age at the first VSAS visit was 67 years. In patients whose oncologic diagnosis was recorded by a cancer registrar (4,536), the most common diagnoses were prostate cancer, lung cancer (all histologies), colon cancer, and multiple myeloma. The number of VSAS administrations increased annually, from 866 in 2013 to 12,775 in 2017, which may be attributed to increased adoption of VSAS across and within VHA facilities. Individual patients completed the VSAS 1-57 times (median 2). At the five VHA facilities utilizing VSAS in 2017, VSAS was administered at 56% of hematology-oncology clinic visits. Conclusions: VSAS is a tool to measure and document patient symptom burden, and has been successfully adopted in the last five years at select VHA facilities. Expanded use of VSAS throughout the VHA is an important step in improving the quality of life and extending survival of veterans with cancer and blood disorders.

Patient-reported outcomes and quality of life in advanced ALK+ non-small-cell lung cancer trial of brigatinib (ALTA)

2019 ◽  
Vol 15 (24) ◽  
pp. 2841-2855 ◽  
Author(s):  
William R Lenderking ◽  
Huamao Lin ◽  
Rebecca M Speck ◽  
Yanyan Zhu ◽  
Hui Huang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Small Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Patient Reported Outcomes ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Life Questionnaire ◽  
Small Cell Lung ◽  
Patient Reported

Aim: Patient-reported outcomes (PRO) can support clinically relevant primary end points. Materials & methods: The ALTA trial, an open-label, Phase II, randomized dose-comparison study, evaluated the safety and efficacy of brigatinib in ALK+ non-small-cell lung cancer. PRO data collection included the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core-30 (QLQ-C30). A linear mixed model for repeated measures was used to analyze change from baseline in the Global Health Status/Quality of Life subscale (GHS/QOL), with a change of greater than or equal to ten points deemed meaningful. Results: Improvement in mean GHS/QOL scores was statistically significant in the majority of treatment cycles; <10% of patients experienced a meaningful worsening of their GHS/QOL and symptom scores. Conclusion: PRO-measured benefits are consistent with objective response benefits associated with brigatinib.

scholarly journals Poor preoperative quality of life predicts prolonged hospital stay after VATS lobectomy for lung cancer

2020 ◽  
Vol 59 (1) ◽  
pp. 116-121
Author(s):  
Cecilia Pompili ◽  
Finn McLennan Battleday ◽  
Wei Ling Chia ◽  
Nilanjan Chaudhuri ◽  
Emmanuel Kefaloyannis ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Life Questionnaire ◽  
Prolonged Hospital Stay ◽  
Vats Lobectomy ◽  
European Organization ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Prolonged Hospital

Abstract OBJECTIVES The aim of this study was to assess whether quality of life (QoL) scales are associated with postoperative length of stay (LoS) following video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) lobectomy for lung cancer. METHODS This is a single-centre retrospective analysis on 250 consecutive patients submitted to VATS lobectomies (233) or segmentectomies (17) over a period of 3 years. QoL was assessed in all patients by the self-administration of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-C30 questionnaire. The individual QoL scales were tested for possible association with LoS along with other objective baseline and surgical parameters using univariable and multivariable analyses. RESULTS Thirty-day cardiopulmonary and mortality rates were 22% and 2.4%. The median LoS was 4 days [interquartile range (IQR) 3–7]. Fifty-one (20%) patients remained in hospital longer than 7 days after surgery (upper quartile). General health [global health score (GHS)] (P = 0.019), physical function (P = 0.014) and role functioning (P = 0.016) scales were significantly worse in patients with prolonged stay. They were highly correlated between each other and tested separately in different logistic regression analyses. The best model resulted the one containing GHS (P = 0.032) along with age, low force expiratory volume in 1 s and carbon monoxide lung diffusion capacity and history of cerebrovascular disease. Fifty-nine patients had GHS &lt;58 (lower interquartile value). Thirty-one percent of them experienced prolonged hospital stay (vs 17% of those with higher GHS, P = 0.027). CONCLUSIONS Preoperative patient-reported QoL was associated with prolonged postoperative hospital stay. Baseline QoL status should be taken into consideration to implement psychosocial supportive programmes in the context of enhanced recovery after surgery.

scholarly journals Patient-Reported Symptoms and Impact of Treatment With Osimertinib Versus Chemotherapy in Advanced Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer: The AURA3 Trial

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (18) ◽  
pp. 1853-1860 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chee Khoon Lee ◽  
Silvia Novello ◽  
Anna Rydén ◽  
Helen Mann ◽  
Tony Mok
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Health Status ◽  
Global Health ◽  
Global Health Status ◽  
Life Questionnaire ◽  
Small Cell Lung ◽  
Quality Of Life Questionnaire ◽  
Patient Reported

Purpose Capturing patient-reported outcome data is important for evaluating the overall clinical benefits of new cancer therapeutics. We assessed self-reported symptoms of advanced non–small-cell lung cancer in patients treated with osimertinib or chemotherapy in the AURA3 phase III trial. Patients and Methods Patients completed the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer 13-item Quality of Life Questionnaire-Lung Cancer Module (EORTC QLQ-LC13) questionnaire on disease-specific symptoms and the EORTC 30-item Core Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLC-C30) on general cancer symptoms, functioning, global health status/quality of life. We assessed differences between treatments in time to deterioration of individual symptoms and odds of improvement (a deterioration or improvement was defined as a change in score from baseline of ≥ 10). Hazard ratios (HRs) were calculated using a log-rank test stratified by ethnicity; odds ratios (ORs) were assessed using logistic regression adjusted for ethnicity. Results At baseline, the questionnaires were completed by 82% to 88% of patients, and 30% to 70% had individual key symptoms. Time to deterioration was longer with osimertinib than with chemotherapy for cough (HR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.53 to 1.05), chest pain (HR, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.37 to 0.73), and dyspnea (HR, 0.42; 95% CI, 0.31 to 0.58). The proportion of symptomatic patients with improvement in global health status/quality of life was higher with osimertinib (80 [37%] of 215) than with chemotherapy (23 [22%] of 105; OR, 2.11; 95% CI, 1.24 to 3.67; P = .007). Proportions were also higher for appetite loss (OR, 2.50; 95% CI, 1.31 to 4.84) and fatigue (OR, 1.96; 95% CI, 1.20 to 3.22). Conclusion Time to deterioration of key symptoms was longer with osimertinib than with chemotherapy, and a higher proportion of patients had improvement in global health status/quality of life, demonstrating improved patient outcomes with osimertinib.

scholarly journals Quality of life of patients with lung cancer: A scoping review

2019 ◽  
Vol 22 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Rafael Turano Mota ◽  
Helder Márcio Ferreira Júnior ◽  
Fabiane Silva Pereira ◽  
Maria Aparecida Vieira ◽  
Simone de Melo Costa
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Scoping Review ◽  
Prospective Studies ◽  
Current Knowledge ◽  
Care Quality ◽  
Life Questionnaire ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
European Organization

Abstract Objective: To characterize scientific publications on the quality of life of people with lung cancer in order to explore current knowledge of the subject, with emphasis on assessment instruments and methodological aspects. Method: A scoping type literature review was performed. Articles were sought in the databases of the Virtual Health Library, in an integrative manner, with the descriptors: Quality of life and Lung Neoplasms, with no date of publication or language restrictions (n=138). The selection of articles was based on inclusion and exclusion criteria defined in the study proposal. Results: We included 18 publications published between 2006 and 2017, the majority (n = 10) of which had a cross-sectional design. Eight different instruments were used to evaluate the quality of life of patients with lung cancer, four of which were specific for people with cancer. There was a prevalence of the use of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Care Quality of Life Questionnaire - EORTC QLQ-C30 (n=8). Prospective studies (n=8) assessed quality of life before and after chemotherapy, physical therapy or pulmonary resection. The studies adopted different methodologies and provided conflicting results of quality of life. Cross-sectional studies with comparatively healthy subjects found an inferior quality of life for people with lung cancer. Conclusion: The scoping review contributed to the identification of the multiple evaluated instruments, both generic and specific. It found a lack of homogeneity in the methodological approaches of the studies. Further prospective studies with a specific instrument and methodological standardization to evaluate the quality of life of people with lung cancer are recommended.

Does a Patient-Held Quality-of-Life Diary Benefit Patients With Inoperable Lung Cancer?

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (1) ◽  
pp. 70-77 ◽  
Author(s):  
Moyra E. Mills ◽  
Liam J. Murray ◽  
Brian T. Johnston ◽  
Chris Cardwell ◽  
Michael Donnelly
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Palliative Care ◽  
Health Care Professionals ◽  
Standard Care ◽  
Care Quality ◽  
Care Group ◽  
Consistent Difference ◽  
Life Questionnaire

Purpose To examine the effect of weekly completion of a patient-held quality-of-life (QOL) diary in routine oncology practice for palliative care patients. Patients and Methods In a pragmatic randomized controlled trial, 115 patients with inoperable lung cancer were randomly assigned to receive either standard care or a structured QOL diary (European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire C30 and the related lung cancer module LC13) that they completed at home each week for 16 weeks. Patients were encouraged to share the QOL information with health professionals involved in their care. Changes in QOL over time (measured by the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy–Lung questionnaire and the Palliative Care Quality of Life Index), discussion of patient problems, and satisfaction with communication and general care were assessed at baseline and at 2 and 4 months after baseline. Results Analysis of QOL indicated a small but consistent difference between patients in the diary group and the standard care group. The diary group had a poorer QOL in many domains. Two different QOL summary scores (total and overall QOL) indicated a statistically significant between-group difference. No effects were found in relation to satisfaction with care, communication, or the discussion of patient problems. Conclusion The regular completion of a QOL questionnaire without appropriate feedback to health care professionals and without the provision of appropriate support may have a negative impact on inoperable lung cancer patients. Further research should focus on identifying features such as feedback loops that are required for the successful and meaningful use of QOL questionnaires in routine patient care.

scholarly journals Magnesium level correlation with clinical status and quality of life in women with hormone related conditions and pregnancy based on real world data

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Svetlana Orlova ◽  
Galina Dikke ◽  
Gisele Pickering ◽  
Eliso Djobava ◽  
Sofya Konchits ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Clinical Status ◽  
High Response Rate ◽  
World Health ◽  
Life Questionnaire ◽  
Real World Data ◽  
World Health Organization Quality ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Health Organization

AbstractThis study was aimed to assess the effectiveness of magnesium (Mg)-vitamin B 6 replenishment and its correlation with clinical status in pregnant women (PW), and quality of life in women with hormone-related conditions (HRCW) and hypomagnesemia (HME). Data collected in four observational studies were pooled and analysed. All women received Mg supplementation for 4 weeks. The proportion of women with normalized Mg level, and the correlation between serum Mg dynamics and number of symptoms/complaints (PW) or changes in World Health Organization quality of life questionnaire scores (WHOQOL; HRCW) were evaluated. 869 PW and 957 HRCW were included in the study. Normalization of serum Mg level to ≥ 0.66 mmol/L occurred in 92.1% of PW and 78.4% of HRCW, and to ≥ 0.8 mmol/L in 73.8% and 58.9%, respectively. Mg normalization was accompanied by a median decrease of 1 symptom and 1 complaint in PW. Serum Mg level increase by 0.1 mmol/L was associated to significant changes in the WHOQOL scores in HRCW. Treatment of HME with the Mg for approximately 4 weeks provided a high response rate of Mg serum level, was associated with an improvement in symptom severity and complaints in PW, and WHOQOL score in HRCW. A 0.8 mmol/L cut-off appeared to be more relevant in terms of patient-reported outcomes.

scholarly journals Health Behavior Patterns Among First-Year and Non-First Year College Students Attending a North Carolina Historically Black University

2019 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Dixie Dennis ◽  
Terence Hicks
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
College Students ◽  
North Carolina ◽  
Health Behavior ◽  
Behavior Patterns ◽  
First Year ◽  
Life Questionnaire ◽  
First Year College ◽  
First Year College Students

The major purpose of this study was to conduct a baseline investigation of self-rated health behavior and quality of life among first-year and non-first-year college students. The authors used a quality of life questionnaire that was designed to gauge college students' health status, lifestyle, mental health, and living conditions. Results from this study were indicated that there were significan differences among health behavior patterns between first-year and non-first-year college students. Most importantly, this study provides compelling information regarding the physical and psychological health behaviors among a mostly African American student population who attended a historical Black university in North Carolina. Implications for university student personnel, counselors, and faculty are discussed.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document