Changes in survival from metastatic breast cancer during the last twenty-years: A population based study in Northern Italy

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1125-1125 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. Cortesi ◽  
C. Cirilli ◽  
I. Rashid ◽  
E. Artioli ◽  
M. Federico

1125 Background: A significant improvement in overall survival was observed in the last two decades in patients with breast cancer due to early diagnosis and more effective therapies. However, a significant improvement in metastatic setting has been questioned. Our population based study was aimed to investigate the outcome of metastatic breast cancer from 1988 to 2005. Methods: Women with stage IV de novo or relapsed breast cancer diagnosed between 1988 and 2005 were identified by the Modena Cancer Registry (MCR). For all patients overall survival (OS) was measured from the date of first distant metastases to the date of death from any cause or last follow-up and compared across groups for four periods of similar duration time: 1988–1993 (A), 1994–1997(B), 1998–2001(C), 2002–2005(D). Results: Among 8,654 patients with breast cancer identified by the MCR, 409 had an initial metastatic disease (4.8%) and 693 (8.4%) had a distant recurrence. Median age at onset was 66 versus 59 years in de novo vs relapsed disease (p = 0.001). Significant differences for postmenopausal age (80% vs 71%) and for positive estrogen receptors (72% vs 63%) were registered in de novo and relapsed disease, respectively (p = 0.001). After a 27 months median follow-up for initial metastatic disease, the five-year OS was 12%, 14%, 9%, and 13% in the A, B, C, and D periods, respectively, (p = 0.5). Conversely, in relapsed breast cancer, after a 29 months median follow-up, a significant survival improvement was observed between the first and the other three periods, being the 5 year-survival rate after recurrence 10%, 22%, 30%, and 25%, respectively (p = 0.001). A survival improvement was seen in the last ten years for relapsed breast cancer using aromatase inhibitors (p < 0.0001) while for initial metastatic disease the same treatment provided a better outcome only in the last 4 years (p < 0.0001). Conclusions: Data from our study show that the outcome of initial metastatic breast cancer is still discouraging, despite the availability of several new drugs in recent years. A limited improvement was observed in relapsed breast cancer with the aromatase inhibitors introduction. In any case, the finish line is still far away, and robust investments in basic and translational research are still absolutely necessary. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

2017 ◽  
Vol 22 (4) ◽  
pp. 386-393 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ines Vaz‐Luis ◽  
Nancy U. Lin ◽  
Nancy L. Keating ◽  
William T. Barry ◽  
Eric P. Winer ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. e000413
Author(s):  
Kasper Adelborg ◽  
Dóra Körmendiné Farkas ◽  
Jens Sundbøll ◽  
Lidia Schapira ◽  
Suzanne Tamang ◽  
...  

ObjectiveWe examined the risk of primary gastrointestinal cancers in women with breast cancer and compared this risk with that of the general population.DesignUsing population-based Danish registries, we conducted a cohort study of women with incident non-metastatic breast cancer (1990–2017). We computed cumulative cancer incidences and standardised incidence ratios (SIRs).ResultsAmong 84 972 patients with breast cancer, we observed 2340 gastrointestinal cancers. After 20 years of follow-up, the cumulative incidence of gastrointestinal cancers was 4%, driven mainly by colon cancers. Only risk of stomach cancer was continually increased beyond 1 year following breast cancer. The SIR for colon cancer was neutral during 2–5 years of follow-up and approximately 1.2-fold increased thereafter. For cancer of the oesophagus, the SIR was increased only during 6–10 years. There was a weak association with pancreas cancer beyond 10 years. Between 1990–2006 and 2007–2017, the 1–10 years SIR estimate decreased and reached unity for upper gastrointestinal cancers (oesophagus, stomach, and small intestine). For lower gastrointestinal cancers (colon, rectum, and anal canal), the SIR estimate was increased only after 2007. No temporal effects were observed for the remaining gastrointestinal cancers. Treatment effects were negligible.ConclusionBreast cancer survivors were at increased risk of oesophagus and stomach cancer, but only before 2007. The risk of colon cancer was increased, but only after 2007.


Author(s):  
Toshiaki Iwase ◽  
Tushaar Vishal Shrimanker ◽  
Ruben Rodriguez-Bautista ◽  
Onur Sahin ◽  
Anjali James ◽  
...  

The purpose of this study was to determine the change in overall survival (OS) for patients with de novo metastatic breast cancer (dnMBC) over time. We conducted a retrospective cohort study with 1981 patients with dnMBC diagnosed between January 1995 and December 2017 at The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center. OS was measured from the date of diagnosis of dnMBC. OS was compared between patients diagnosed during different time periods: 5-year periods and periods defined according to when key agents were approved for clinical use. The median OS was 3.4 years. The 5- and 10-year OS rates improved over time across both types of time periods. A subgroup analysis showed that OS improved significantly over time for the estrogen-receptor-positive/HER2-positive (ER+/HER2+) subtype, and exhibited a tendency toward improvement over time for the ER-negative (ER-)/HER2+ subtype. Median OS was significantly longer in patients with non-inflammatory breast cancer (P = .02) and in patients with ER+ disease, progesterone-receptor-positive disease, HER2+ disease, lower nuclear grade, locoregional therapy, and metastasis to a single organ (all P &amp;lt;.0001). These findings showed that OS at 5 and 10 years after diagnosis in patients with dnMBC improved over time. The significant improvements in OS over time for the ER+/HER2+ subtype and the tendency toward improvement for ER-/HER2+ subtype suggest the contribution of HER2-targeted therapy to survival.


2020 ◽  
Vol 10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Deyue Liu ◽  
Jiayi Wu ◽  
Caijin Lin ◽  
Lisa Andriani ◽  
Shuning Ding ◽  
...  

BackgroundMetastatic breast cancer (MBC) is a highly heterogeneous disease and bone is one of the most common metastatic sites. This retrospective study was conducted to investigate the clinical features, prognostic factors and benefits of surgery of breast cancer patients with initial bone metastases.MethodsFrom 2010 to 2015, 6,860 breast cancer patients diagnosed with initial bone metastasis were analyzed from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Univariate and Multivariable analysis were used to identify prognostic factors. A nomogram was performed based on the factors selected from cox regression result. Survival curves were plotted according to different subtypes, metastatic burdens and risk groups differentiated by nomogram.ResultsHormone receptor (HR) positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) positive patients showed the best outcome compared to other subtypes. Patients of younger age (&lt;60 years old), white race, lower grade, lower T stage (&lt;=T2), not combining visceral metastasis tended to have better outcome. About 37% (2,249) patients received surgery of primary tumor. Patients of all subtypes could benefit from surgery. Patients of bone-only metastases (BOM), bone and liver metastases, bone and lung metastases also showed superior survival time if surgery was performed. However, patients of bone and brain metastasis could not benefit from surgery (p = 0.05). The C-index of nomogram was 0.66. Cutoff values of nomogram point were identified as 87 and 157 points, which divided all patients into low-, intermediate- and high-risk groups. Patients of all groups showed better overall survival when receiving surgery.ConclusionOur study has provided population-based prognostic analysis in patients with initial bone metastatic breast cancer and constructed a predicting nomogram with good accuracy. The finding of potential benefit of surgery to overall survival will cast some lights on the treatment tactics of this group of patients.


2018 ◽  
Vol Volume 10 ◽  
pp. 287-295 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhenchong Xiong ◽  
Guangzheng Deng ◽  
Xinjian Huang ◽  
Xing Li ◽  
Xinhua Xie ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document