Expression of steroids and HER2-neu receptors in breast tumors associated with BRCA1 gene mutations

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e22223-e22223
Author(s):  
N. A. Zarubina ◽  
V. D. Petrova ◽  
T. V. Sinkina ◽  
S. A. Terekhova ◽  
A. F. Lazarev ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Estrogen Receptor ◽  
Progesterone Receptor ◽  
Bilateral Breast Cancer ◽  
Gene Mutations ◽  
Brca1 Gene ◽  
Breast Tumors ◽  
Breast Cancers ◽  
Breast Carcinomas ◽  
Estrogen Receptor Negative

e22223 Background: Hereditary breast carcinomas that are attributable to BRCA1 mutations have their own morphological and immunohistochemical characteristics. This study was aimed to analyze the level of expression of steroids (estrogen and progesterone) and HER2-neu receptors in BRCA1 associated breast cancer. Methods: DNA patterns from 264 patients with hereditary breast cancers (breast cancer diagnosed at the age under 40; bilateral breast cancer; combination of breast and ovarian cancers; 2 and more breast cancers in blood relatives). All the patients were residents of the Altai Territory. BRCA1 gene mutations were registered in 34 patients (12.9%): 5382insC gene mutation - in 28 patients; 300A/C - in 2 patients; 4153del - in 3 patients; 185del - in 1 patient. The frequency of the BRCA1 5382insC allele mutation was 7.3; 300A/C - 0.52; 4153del - 0.26; 185del - 0.83. Immunohistochemical characteristics of BRCA1-associated breast tumors tissue from these patients were investigated. Results: 32 BRCA1-associated breast carcinomas were estrogen receptor- negative; 1 - week positive (H-score 50–100); 1 - moderate positive (H- score 100–200). 33 BRCA1-associated breast carcinomas were progesterone receptor- negative; 1 - positive (H-score 200 and more). HER2-negative were 31 BRCA1-associated breast carcinomas; 2 were week positive (HER2-neu +); 1 - was moderate positive (HER2-neu ++). Conclusion: BRCA1-associated beast carcinomas have been found to be more frequently estrogen receptor-, progesterone receptor-, and HER2- negative. These data show that hereditary breast cancer associated with BRCA1 gene mutations poses poor prognosis. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

scholarly journals Stratification of Estrogen Receptor-Negative Breast Cancer Patients by Integrating the Somatic Mutations and Transcriptomic Data

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jie Hou ◽  
Xiufen Ye ◽  
Yixing Wang ◽  
Chuanlong Li
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Estrogen Receptor ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Gene List ◽  
Significant Proportion ◽  
Gene Mutations ◽  
Breast Cancers ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
Gene Coexpression ◽  
Estrogen Receptor Negative

Patients with estrogen receptor-negative breast cancer generally have a worse prognosis than estrogen receptor-positive patients. Nevertheless, a significant proportion of the estrogen receptor-negative cases have favorable outcomes. Identifying patients with a good prognosis, however, remains difficult, as recent studies are quite limited. The identification of molecular biomarkers is needed to better stratify patients. The significantly mutated genes may be potentially used as biomarkers to identify the subtype and to predict outcomes. To identify the biomarkers of receptor-negative breast cancer among the significantly mutated genes, we developed a workflow to screen significantly mutated genes associated with the estrogen receptor in breast cancer by a gene coexpression module. The similarity matrix was calculated with distance correlation to obtain gene modules through a weighted gene coexpression network analysis. The modules highly associated with the estrogen receptor, called important modules, were enriched for breast cancer-related pathways or disease. To screen significantly mutated genes, a new gene list was obtained through the overlap of the important module genes and the significantly mutated genes. The genes on this list can be used as biomarkers to predict survival of estrogen receptor-negative breast cancer patients. Furthermore, we selected six hub significantly mutated genes in the gene list which were also able to separate these patients. Our method provides a new and alternative method for integrating somatic gene mutations and expression data for patient stratification of estrogen receptor-negative breast cancers.

Male Versus Female Breast Cancers

2003 ◽  
Vol 127 (1) ◽  
pp. 36-41 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. Muir ◽  
R. Kanthan ◽  
S. C. Kanthan
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Estrogen Receptor ◽  
Progesterone Receptor ◽  
Male Breast Cancer ◽  
Male Breast ◽  
High Grade ◽  
Breast Cancers ◽  
Receptor Status ◽  
Female Breast ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Context.—The rate of male breast cancer is a small fraction of that observed in females, thus severely limiting our understanding of the pathogenesis of this condition. It remains unclear whether the biological behavior and tumor progression associated with male breast cancer parallel that of the female form. Objectives.—To evaluate the immunohistochemical profile of male breast carcinomas and to compare this profile with that of stage-matched female breast cancers. Design.—Seventy-five cases of primary male breast cancer were identified using the records of the Saskatchewan Cancer Foundation over a period of 26 years (1970–1996). Fifty-nine of these cases had formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue blocks available for the purposes of this study. All cases were reviewed and a standardized modified Bloom-Richardson grading criterion was applied. Estrogen receptor status, progesterone receptor status, c-Erb-B2 expression, p53 expression, and Bcl-2 expression were evaluated by immunohistochemistry. Results from 240 consecutive cases of stage-matched female breast cancers analyzed in the same laboratory were used as a standard set for comparison. Results.—Male breast cancers tended to be high grade (85% grade 3) in comparison with the female breast cancers (50% grade 3). In descriptive analysis across all stages of disease, male carcinomas were more frequently estrogen receptor positive (81% vs 69%) than their female counterparts. Despite their high grade, they were less likely to overexpress p53 (9% vs 28%) and Erb-B2 (5% vs 17%) than the female counterparts. There was no significant difference in either progesterone receptor (63% vs 56%) or Bcl-2 (79% vs 76%) overexpression. Stratified analysis by stage-matched controls showed no statistically significant differences among the men and women with stage I disease. However, in stage II–matched samples, statistically significant differences were observed between the 2 groups. The male cancers were more likely to overexpress estrogen receptor (81.6% vs 64.4%, P = .04), progesterone receptor (71.1% vs 47.5%, P = .01), and Bcl-2 (78.9% vs 69.4%, P = .20). They also showed statistically significant lower expression of p53 (7.9% vs 36.3%, P = .001) and Erb-B2 (5.3% vs 23.8% P = .01). Conclusion.—Male breast cancers display distinct immunophenotypic differences from those occurring in women, implying a different pathogenesis in the evolution and progression of this disease. Such differences may play key roles in therapeutic management, warranting different treatment strategies in comparison to female breast cancers.

Predominance of RAD21 and ERBB2 amplification and progesterone receptor positivity in tumors of the right breast support breast cancer lateralization.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e12557-e12557
Author(s):  
Zachary Spigelman ◽  
Jo-Ellen Murphy
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Progesterone Receptor ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Breast Tumors ◽  
Left Breast ◽  
Breast Cancers ◽  
Her2 Expression ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
The Right ◽  
Chi Square Analysis

e12557 Background: Biologic lateralization broadly impacts breast cancer. Malignancies originating in the left breast compared to the right breast tend to be more frequent, larger and of poorer prognosis. Left breast tumors respond differently to HER2-neu signaling and have lateralized Ki67 expression. In a prior study a right-left asymmetry in the neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (NLR) of breast cancers was identified (ASCO 2018, e13094). As a follow-up, retrospective analysis of results from comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) of right and left side breast cancer specimens was performed to determine a potential genomic etiology for the observed NLR lateralization. Methods: Tumors from 43 consecutive breast cancer patients underwent analysis for all classes of genomic alterations by hybrid capture-based CGP (Foundation Medicine). The CGP results from the 25 left- and 18 right-sided breast cancer samples were analyzed along with the histologic grade and status of estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and HER2 expression. Results: In this cohort of advanced breast cancer patients (stage 3-4), no statistically significant differences in lateralization were identified based on patient age, tumor stage, or frequency of ER or Her2 expression (Table). A predominance of PR positivity (p=0.14 chi square analysis) and amplifications in the ERBB2 (p=0.37) and RAD21 (p=0.08) genes were detected in right side tumors. Conclusions: Together with the prior study, trends in asymmetry based on genomic, pathologic, and immunohistologic differences have been detected in breast cancers, including an increased incidence of ERBB2 and RAD21 amplification in right-side breast tumors in this cohort. The predominance of lower PR positivity in the left breast tumors may be due to preferential hypermethylation, consistent with reports that it mediates biologic lateralization changes, downregulates PR expression, and alters amplification rates. Epigenetic methylation, may contribute to asymmetric breast cancer biology and have implications for therapeutic strategy. Further study is warranted.[Table: see text]

Analysis of Low Estrogen Receptor (ER+) Breast Carcinomas in a Large Community Breast Cancer Center in Northern California

2021 ◽  
Vol 156 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S26-S27
Author(s):  
G Bulusu ◽  
K Duncan ◽  
A Wheeler
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Estrogen Receptor ◽  
Histological Grade ◽  
Statistical Significance ◽  
Cancer Center ◽  
Pathology Report ◽  
Breast Cancers ◽  
Breast Carcinomas ◽  
Ki 67 ◽  
Er Positive

Abstract Introduction/Objective Estrogen Receptor (ER) expression in breast cancers is a crucial factor for endocrine therapy in patients with tumors expressing ER in ≥1% of tumor cells. The 2019 guidelines published by ASCO/CAP states that breast cancers that have a 1% to 10% of cells staining Estrogen Receptor (ER) positive should be reported as ER Low Positive cases. This study aims to address this subset of low-positive ER tumors and compare the clinical features to other known breast cancer subtypes. Methods/Case Report We conducted a retrospective review of a prospectively maintained breast cancer registry from 2013 to 2021 at Mills-Peninsula Medical Center, a Sutter Health Affiliate. The study reviewed patient charts with respect to the pathology report, operative report, chemotherapy regimen, and clinical outcomes. Statistical analyses were conducted using R Project for Statistical Coding, with The Student’s T-test used to compare continuous variables. Two-sided P values less than 0.05 indicate statistical significance. Results (if a Case Study enter NA) Our study identified 1316 cases of invasive breast carcinomas, of which 29 (2.16%) demonstrated ER Low-Positive expression. We aimed to evaluate the clinical and pathological features, such as histological grade, ER, PR, HER-2, Ki-67%, and patient age for these tumors. We found that ER Low-Positive tumors demonstrated higher mean histological grade morphology (2.5 out of 3, p<0.001) that was similar to that of Triple Negative Breast Cancers (TNBC) (3 of 3, p<0.001) than to High ER-Positive (1.6 of 3, p<0.001) cancers. Further observations, through examining proliferation rates by utilizing the Ki-67 index, indicate comparative trends between the ER Low-Positive cohort and the TNBC cohort. Conclusion The results suggest that the ER Low-Positive carcinomas, despite reported as ER-positive cases, present with similar clinicopathological features to those of ER-negative tumors. Through this study and future research, we would like to emphasize a stricter set of guidelines that can be adopted to reduce variability for reporting biomarkers. This standardization will allow oncologists to provide more appropriate treatment options and improve the quality of patient care.

Breast cancer estrogen and progesterone receptor values: their distribution, degree of concordance, and relation to number of positive axillary nodes.

1983 ◽  
Vol 1 (6) ◽  
pp. 349-358 ◽  
Author(s):  
B Fisher ◽  
D L Wickerham ◽  
A Brown ◽  
C K Redmond
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Estrogen Receptor ◽  
Progesterone Receptor ◽  
The Other ◽  
Breast Cancers ◽  
Patient Age ◽  
National Surgical Adjuvant Breast ◽  
Axillary Nodes ◽  
Bowel Project ◽  
Estrogen And Progesterone Receptor

Increasing evidence indicates the importance of ascertaining the quantitative estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR) content (in femtomoles per milligram cytosol protein) of primary breast cancers. Those values obtained from the tumors of 1,887 patients participating in National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project protocol B-09 have been analyzed to define (1) the distribution of tumor ER or PR according to patient age, (2) the distribution of tumor PR within a specific ER interval, and (3) the concordance of tumor ER and PR levels. The present findings indicate how predictive the knowledge of the amount of one receptor (e.g., ER) may be for estimating the amount of the other (PR), when the latter is unknown.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document