Randomized multicenter phase III trial comparing two neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CT-RT) regimens (RT45-Cap versus RT50-Capox) in patients (pts) with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC): Results of the ACCORD 12/0405 PRODIGE 2

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. LBA4007-LBA4007 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Gerard ◽  
D. Azria ◽  
S. Gourgou-Bourgade ◽  
I. Martel-Laffay ◽  
C. Hennequin ◽  
...  

LBA4007 Background: Following the results of randomized trials FFCD 9203 and EORTC 2291, neoadjuvant CT-RT is considered standard treatment for LARC. The ACCORD 12/0405 PRODIGE 2 trial was initiated to optimize this regimen. Methods: Pts with T3 or resectable T4 N0–1-2 M0, rectal adenocarcinoma were randomized to arm A: concurrent RT 45Gy/25f/5 weeks (w) + capecitabine (800mg/m2/bid) or arm B: concurrent RT 50Gy/25f/5w + capecitabine (800mg/m2/bid/5/7days) + oxaliplatine 50mg/m2/w. Resection with Total Mesorectum Excision was scheduled 6 weeks after the end of CT-RT. Adjuvant chemotherapy was optional. 590 patients were needed to show an increase in the pathological complete response (Dworak) rate from 11% (arm A) to 20% (arm B). Circumferential positive rectal margin (CRM R1) was defined as the presence of residual cancer cells within 0 to 1 mm from the perirectal surface. Results: This trial closed in 07/2008 after randomization of 598 pts since 11/2005. Patients characteristics of 586 eligible pts were well balanced: male 66%, median age 61 years, 66% low rectum, 87% T3 stage. Data base was locked in March 2009. Results are reported in Table . Conclusions: The RT 50 capox regimen is compatible with surgery in 98% of cases with no increase in postoperative complication. In the RT 50 arm, there is a trend in favour of a higher rate of pathological complete sterilization and lower rate of positive CRM. These data could contribute to design a new standard preoperative regimen for LARC. 50 Gy/25 F/5 weeks combined with concurrent chemotherapy could be proposed as an efficient schedule. [Table: see text] No significant financial relationships to disclose.

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. LBA4007-LBA4007
Author(s):  
J. Gerard ◽  
D. Azria ◽  
S. Gourgou-Bourgade ◽  
I. Martel-Laffay ◽  
C. Hennequin ◽  
...  

LBA4007 The full, final text of this abstract will be available in Part II of the 2009 ASCO Annual Meeting Proceedings, distributed onsite at the Meeting on May 30, 2009, and as a supplement to the June 20, 2009, issue of the Journal of Clinical Oncology. No significant financial relationships to disclose.


2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS144-TPS144
Author(s):  
Paul Bernard Romesser ◽  
Emma B. Holliday ◽  
Tony Philip ◽  
Rocio Garcia-Carbonero ◽  
Jaume Capdevila ◽  
...  

TPS144 Background: Perioperative radiotherapy and chemotherapy, followed by total mesorectal excision, is the standard of care for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). However, 1/3 of these patients still develop distant metastases, indicating the need for more effective therapies. In addition, strategies that increase pathological complete response rates are needed to enable non-surgical management of LARC. DNA-dependent protein kinase (DNA-PK) regulates a key DNA damage repair pathway for double-strand break repair. Peposertib (M3814), a potent, selective, orally administered DNA-PK inhibitor, has been shown to potentiate the effect of ionizing radiation in a human colon cancer xenograft model and several colon cancer cell lines. Peposertib is being investigated in several different trials across multiple indications. This Phase Ib/II study (NCT03770689) aims to evaluate the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK), and efficacy of the neoadjuvant treatment combination of peposertib, capecitabine, and radiotherapy (RT) in patients with LARC. Methods: Patients aged ≥18 years with histologically confirmed and resectable Stage II/III rectal adenocarcinoma are eligible. Induction chemotherapy is permitted, but residual disease must first be documented by MRI, digital rectal examination and endoscopy. Patients who received other anticancer therapies or those with prior pelvic RT are excluded. At open-label Phase Ib (open), 18–30 patients (n = 3 per cohort) will receive peposertib + capecitabine (orally, 825 mg/m2 twice daily [BID]) + RT (45–50.4 Gy), 5 days/week. Peposertib 50 mg once daily (QD) was the starting dose. Additional dose levels will range between 100─800 mg QD. Dose escalation is determined by the safety monitoring committee and guided by a Bayesian 2-parameter logistic regression model. At Phase II (planned), 150 patients will be randomized (1:1) to receive oral capecitabine (825 mg/m2 BID) + RT (45–50 Gy), with either oral peposertib (recommended phase II dose [RP2D] or placebo, QD for 5 days/week. Primary objectives are to define a maximum tolerated dose and RP2D (Phase Ib), and to evaluate the efficacy of peposertib + capecitabine + RT in terms of pathological/clinical complete response (Phase II). Secondary objectives include assessment of antitumor activity (Phase Ib), quality of life outcomes (Phase II), and PK of peposertib, and the safety and tolerability of the combination therapy (both phases). To date, one patient has received peposertib 50 mg QD, six patients peposertib 100 mg QD, three patients peposertib 150 mg QD, and three patients peposertib 250 mg QD. Clinical trial information: NCT03770689.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document