What has changed in the management of breast cancer in the past 25 years at the Istanbul University Hospital?

2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (27_suppl) ◽  
pp. 184-184 ◽  
Author(s):  
F. Aydogan ◽  
E. Gazioglu ◽  
E. Canbay ◽  
I. Aydin ◽  
T. Aydogan ◽  
...  

184 Background: There have been important changes in diagnosis and treatment of the breast cancer during the last century. Diagnosing the cancer in early stages brought the new approaches such as breast conserving surgery instead of mastectomy and sentinel lymph node biopsy instead of direct axillary disection. In this study our purpose is to compare the operations which were performed in 1983 and 2008 on breast cancer patients of our clinic and to search the differences in their ages and tumor characteristics. Methods: In each group the files of 100 patients, who were operated in 1983 and 2008, were compared with each other including the variabilities such as size of the tumor, age of the patient and operation technique. Results: There were 100 patients in both of the groups. Six of the patients (6%), who were operated on in 1983, were found to be between the ages of 20-39 and this percentage was found to be much higher as 19% (19 patients) in 2008. In 1983, there wasn't any patient at stage 0 and the number of patients at stage 1 was 15 (15%), in 2008 the number of stage 0 patient was 9 (9%) and stage 1 patient was 25 (25%). Breast conserving surgery rate was found to be 9% in 1983 and 41% in 2008. Conclusions: According to the data of this study, breast cancer is now being seen at younger ages when compared to 25 years ago. Currently the patients have diagnosis at earlier stages and the breast conserving surgery is much more prevalent. Earlier-stage diagnosis can be explained by widespread use of screening mamographies and increasing consciousness of the patients.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1127-1127
Author(s):  
Rakesh Surapaneni ◽  
Jolanta Jozefara ◽  
Karen Hendershott ◽  
Krystal Hunter ◽  
Elyce Cardonick

1127 Background: There is limited literature on breast surgery during pregnancy. We present prospective registry data on 88 breast cancer patients who underwent breast cancer surgery during pregnancy. Methods: The Cancer and Pregnancy Registry is a voluntary international registry that prospectively collects the clinical course, treatment, and disease outcome of women diagnosed with cancer during pregnancy and the perinatal and neonatal outcomes of their children. Results: We identified 88 patients who were diagnosed with breast cancer and had surgery while pregnant. 59 patients (67%) underwent Mastectomy while29 patients (32%) underwent breast conserving surgery (BCS). Out of 43 patients who underwent BCS as their first surgery 13 patients (30.23%) required subsequent mastectomy during pregnancy. 15 patients (34.88%) from the BCS group and 4 patients (8.69%) from the Mastectomy group had positive margins. There was no significant difference between patients who underwent mastectomy vs BCS based on Age (34.67 vs 34.72 P: 0.97), gestational age at surgery (14.05 vs 16.06 P: 0.23) or ER positivity (47.5% vs 46.4% P: 0.93). 2 patients had neo-adjuvant chemotherapy. 17 patients (19.31%) had sentinel lymph node biopsy. 37 patients (42%) had a pregnancy complication. There was no difference in the rate of complication based on mastectomy vs BCS(45.8% vs 34.5% P: 0.31). There was only 1 patient (from mastectomy group) that delivered within 2 weeks of surgery. Of the 17 patients (19.3%) with spontaneous preterm delivery, there was no difference between Mastectomy and BCS group (22% vs 13.2% P: 0.41). Of the 25 patients (28.4%) with birth complications, there was no significant difference between mastectomy vs BCS (30.5% vs 24.1% P: 0.53). There was also no difference in mean birth weight between the groups (2598 grams vs 2672.3 grams P: 0.57). Conclusions: The data supports the safety of breast cancer surgery during pregnancy. In addition, there were no identified adverse effects in patients who underwent BCS as opposed to mastectomy. Of note, only 19% of patients underwent sentinel node biopsy which is considered the standard of care in early breast cancer patients regardless of pregnancy status.


2020 ◽  
pp. 155335062094298
Author(s):  
Yinghui Liang ◽  
Shuangta Xu

Background. Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) has been an alternative to axillary lymph node dissection as a standard procedure for breast cancer patients with clinically negative lymph nodes. Endoscopic technique has been developed for over 20 years but remains to be mastered by a slice of surgeons. Suction and squeezing in the liposuction endoscopic procedures may increase risk of local recurrence and metastasis. In this study, we present our method of SLNB procedure through the periareolar incision which improves the shape of the breast-conserving surgery. Patients and Procedures. Twenty-eight breast cancer patients with clinically negative lymph nodes received this procedure. Methylene blue dye and technetium-99m sulfur colloid were used to be the tracker of sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs). Periareolar incision was the main surgical technique. The STORZ HD endoscopic system and some special instruments were used during the operation. Results. SLNs can be accurately located and biopsied under an endoscope without additional incisions. The SLNs detection rate, sensitivity, and false-negative rate are 88%, 80%, and 11.1%, respectively. And, the complications such as paresthesia and upper limb lymphedema are similar compared with traditional breast-conserving surgery (10.7% vs 9.8% and 7.1% vs 7.8%). Conclusion. Endoscopic technique can be used to accurately assess the status of SLNs in patients with breast cancer. Nonliposuction endoscopic breast-conserving surgery is one of the safe and alternative surgical procedures for early breast cancer.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document