Risk of death from prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy or brachytherapy in men with low- or intermediate-risk disease.

2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (7_suppl) ◽  
pp. 198-198
Author(s):  
N. D. Arvold ◽  
M. Chen ◽  
J. W. Moul ◽  
B. J. Moran ◽  
D. E. Dosoretz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Radical Prostatectomy ◽  
Gleason Score ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
Low Risk ◽  
Study Cohort ◽  
Intermediate Risk ◽  
Risk Of Death ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Significant Difference

198 Background: Radical prostatectomy (RP) and brachytherapy (BT) are widely utilized treatments for favorable-risk prostate cancer (PC). We estimated the risk of PC-specific mortality (PCSM) following RP or BT in men with low- or intermediate-risk PC using prospectively collected data. Methods: The study cohort comprised 5,760 men with low-risk PC (prostate-specific antigen [PSA] level ≤ 10 ng/mL, clinical category T1c or 2a, and Gleason score ≤ 6), and 3,079 men with intermediate-risk PC (PSA level 10-20 ng/mL, clinical T2b or T2c, or Gleason score 7). Competing risks multivariable regression was performed to assess risk of PCSM after RP or BT, adjusting for age, treatment year, cardiovascular comorbidity, and known PC prognostic factors. Results: There was no significant difference in the risk of PCSM among men with low-risk PC (11 vs. 6 deaths: adjusted hazard ratio [AHR], 1.62; 95% CI, 0.59–4.45; P = 0.35) who received BT compared to RP. However among men with intermediate-risk PC, despite significantly shorter median follow-up for men undergoing BT as compared to RP (4.1 vs. 7.2 years, P < 0.001), there was a trend toward an increased risk of PCSM (18 vs. 9 deaths: AHR, 2.30; 95% CI, 0.95–5.58; P = 0.07) for men treated with BT. Conclusions: The risk of PCSM among men with low-risk PC was not significantly different following RP or BT, however there may be a reduced risk of PCSM after RP as compared to BT in men with intermediate-risk PC. [Table: see text] No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Gleason score upgrade among 10,282 men who underwent surgery as initial treatment in 2010: A population-based study.

2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 72-72
Author(s):  
Hong Zhang ◽  
Edward M. Messing ◽  
Hamza Ahmed ◽  
Yuhchyau Chen
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Active Surveillance ◽  
Gleason Score ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
Low Risk ◽  
Categorical Variables ◽  
Intermediate Risk ◽  
Time Of Surgery ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Risk Prostate Cancer

72 Background: Active surveillance is now accepted initial management for men who have localized prostate cancer with low risk of disease progression. Many criteria have been used for patient identification, including Gleason score (GS) obtained from prostate biopsy. Because of concerns of sampling error, some have recommended repeated biopsy before committing to active surveillance. However, there is limited information about the risk of missing high grade disease using the current standard biopsy approach. This study seeks to compare GS difference from biopsy and surgery to provide an estimated rate of GS upgrade. Methods: The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program was used to identify men with American Joint Committee on Cancer stage T1-2cN0M0 prostate cancer diagnosed between January 2010 and December 2010. Patients who underwent prostatectomy were selected for further analysis. Based on prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels and GS, cases were divided into low (PSA <=10 and GS <=6) and intermediate (10<PSA<=20 or GS=7) risk groups. The rates of GS upgrade were reported for each group. Chi-square tests were used to assess differences in categorical variables (e.g. age and race) between groups of GS upgrade and no change/downgrade. Results: A total of 10,282 men were evaluated, with 9.2% (n=942) having low-risk disease, and 90.8% (n=9340) having intermediate-risk disease. Among men with low-risk prostate cancer, 22.3% (n=210) had GS upgrade and 0.8% (n=8) had GS 8 disease. Among men with intermediate risk disease, 26.2% (n=2446) had GS upgrade and 2.3% (n=214) had GS 8 disease. There was no statistically significant difference in either age or race distribution among men who had GS upgrade versus no change or downgrade at the time of surgery. Conclusions: A substantial number of low- and intermediate-risk prostate cancer patients had GS upgrade at the time of surgery, but few had upgraded to GS 8 high risk disease. These observations suggest that repeat biopsy prior to active surveillance may not be necessary.

Greatest percent involved core length and the risk of death from prostate cancer in men with highest Gleason score 7 or higher.

2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 164-164
Author(s):  
Matthew David Cheney ◽  
Ming-Hui Chen ◽  
Danjie Zhang ◽  
John Gary Phillips ◽  
Marian J. Loffredo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Gleason Score ◽  
Study Cohort ◽  
Intermediate Risk ◽  
Risk Of Death ◽  
Biopsy Core ◽  
Core Length ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Specific Mortality

164 Background: Men with highest Gleason Score (GS) ≥ 7 and a lower GS (Combo GS) have a decreased risk of prostate cancer (PC) specific mortality (PCSM) following radiation therapy (RT) or RT and androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). Whether this risk is modulated based on the greatest percent involved core length (GPC) is unknown and investigated in the current study. Methods: The study cohort consisted of 333 men with GS ≥ 7 PC consecutively treated between 12/1989 and 7/2000 using RT (n = 268; 80%) or RT and 6 months of ADT (n = 65; 20%). Biopsy core and tumor lengths were used to calculate the GPC. Competing risks regression assessed whether increasing GPC was associated with an increased risk of PCSM in men with or without ComboGS adjusting for prognostic factors, age, and treatment. Results: After a median follow-up of 5.36 years (IQR: 3.22-7.61 years) 92 (28%) men died, 28 (30%) from PC. Increasing GPC was significantly associated with an increased risk of PCSM (AHR: 1.02; 95%CI: 1.00, 1.03; p=0.02) (Table). Men with GPC ≥ 50% vs. < 50% had significantly higher estimates of PCSM when ComboGS was present (p< 0.001) vs. absent (p=0.55). Of the 127 men with ComboGS and GPC < 50%, 83% were treated with RT alone and 2 PC deaths were observed; none in men with GS 7 and favorable intermediate-risk PC. Conclusions: Men treated with RT for ComboGS, GPC < 50%, GS 7 and favorable intermediate-risk PC may not require ADT to reduce the risk of PCSM. [Table: see text]

Oncological outcomes of surgery in very high risk pT3b prostate cancer

2011 ◽  
Vol 18 (3) ◽  
pp. 113-119
Author(s):  
Daimantas MILONAS ◽  
Giedrė SMAILYTĖ ◽  
Darius TRUMBECKAS ◽  
Mindaugas JIEVALTAS
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Radical Prostatectomy ◽  
Gleason Score ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
Oncologic Outcomes ◽  
Cancer Specific Survival ◽  
Risk Of Death ◽  
Surgery Outcome

Background. The aim of the study was to present the oncologic outcomes and to determine the prognostic factors of overall (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) as well as disease-progression-free survival (DPFS) after surgery for pT3b prostate cancer. Materials and methods. In 2002–2007, a pT3b stage after radical prostatectomy was detected in 56 patients. Patients were divided into groups according to the prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level (20 ng/ml), lymph nodes status (N0 vs. Nx vs. N1) and the Gleason score (6–7 vs. 8–10). The Kaplan–Meier analysis was used to calculate OS, CSS and DPFS. The Cox regression was used to identify the predictive factors of survival. Results. Five-year OS, CSS and DPFS rates were 75.1%, 79.6% and 79.3%, respectively. The survival was significantly different when comparing the Gleason 6–7 and 8–10 groups. The 5-year OS, CSS and DPFS were 91.2% vs. 48.6%, 97.1% vs. 51.1% and 93.8 vs. 51.1%, respectively. There was no difference in survival among the groups with a different PSA level. The OS and CSS but not DPFS were significantly different when comparing the N0 and N1 groups. The 5-year OS and CSS was 84.4% vs. 37.5% and 87.3% vs. 47.6%, respectively. The specimen Gleason score was a significant predictor of OS and CSS. The risk of death increased up to 4-fold when a Gleason score 8–10 was present at the final pathology. Conclusions. Radical prostatectomy may offer acceptable CSS, DPFS and OS rates in pT3b PCa. However, outcomes in patients with N1 and specimen Gleason ≥8 were significantly worse, suggesting the need of multimodality treatment in such cases. Keywords: prostate cancer, locally advanced, surgery, outcome

Advancing age and the risk of adverse pathology at radical prostatectomy in men with biopsy Gleason score 6 prostate cancer.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. 289-289
Author(s):  
Daniel Kim ◽  
Ming-Hui Chen ◽  
Hartwig Huland ◽  
Markus Graefen ◽  
Derya Tilki ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Radical Prostatectomy ◽  
Gleason Score ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
Cancer Center ◽  
Study Cohort ◽  
Pathologic Features ◽  
Younger Men ◽  
Biopsy Gleason Score ◽  
The Impact

289 Background: We evaluated the impact of age > 65 years versus younger on the odds of finding adverse pathologic features (pT3/T4 and/or R1 and/or Gleason score 8, 9, 10) at radical prostatectomy (RP) among men with biopsy Gleason score 6 prostate cancer (PC). Methods: The study cohort comprised 3191 men with biopsy Gleason score 6 PC treated with a RP between February 28, 1992 and February 15, 2016 at the Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center. Multivariable logistic regression was used to evaluate the impact of age > 65 years versus younger on the adjusted odds ratio (AOR) of finding adverse pathology at RP adjusting for pre-RP prostate specific antigen (PSA), clinical tumor category, year of diagnosis, percent positive biopsies (PPB), and PSA density (PSAd). Results: Men age > 65 years as compared to younger had significantly lower median PPB (16.67% vs 20.0%; p = 0.01) and PSAd (0.13 ng/mL vs 0.15 ng/mL; p < 0.0001). Yet, while both increasing PPB (AOR 1.018, 95% CI 1.013, 1.023; p- < 0.0001) and PSAd (AOR 4.28, 95% CI 1.66, 11.01; p = 0.003) were significantly associated with an increased odds of finding adverse pathology at RP, men age > 65 years versus younger had a higher odds of adverse pathology at RP (AOR 1.28, 95% CI 1.002, 1.62; p = 0.048). Conclusions: Despite a more favorable median PPB and PSAd, men with biopsy Gleason score 6 PC and who are age > 65 years compared to younger men are at higher risk for having adverse pathology at RP and may benefit from a multiparametric MRI and targeted biopsy before proceeding with active surveillance. If higher grade/stage disease is discovered and treatment indicated then this information could guide both the use and duration of supplemental androgen deprivation therapy in men considering radiation therapy.

scholarly journals Influence of Biopsy Gleason Score on the Risk of Lymph Node Invasion in Patients With Intermediate-Risk Prostate Cancer Undergoing Radical Prostatectomy

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mike Wenzel ◽  
Felix Preisser ◽  
Benedikt Hoeh ◽  
Maria N. Welte ◽  
Clara Humke ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Lymph Node ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Radical Prostatectomy ◽  
Gleason Score ◽  
International Society ◽  
Low Risk ◽  
Intermediate Risk ◽  
Risk Prostate Cancer ◽  
Biopsy Gleason Score

Objective: To analyze the influence of biopsy Gleason score on the risk for lymph node invasion (LNI) during pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy (RP) for intermediate-risk prostate cancer (PCa).Materials and Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 684 patients, who underwent RP between 2014 and June 2020 due to PCa. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression, as well as binary regression tree models were used to assess the risk of positive LNI and evaluate the need of PLND in men with intermediate-risk PCa.Results: Of the 672 eligible patients with RP, 80 (11.9%) men harbored low-risk, 32 (4.8%) intermediate-risk with international society of urologic pathologists grade (ISUP) 1 (IR-ISUP1), 215 (32.0%) intermediate-risk with ISUP 2 (IR-ISUP2), 99 (14.7%) intermediate-risk with ISUP 3 (IR-ISUP3), and 246 (36.6%) high-risk PCa. Proportions of LNI were 0, 3.1, 3.7, 5.1, and 24.0% for low-risk, IR-ISUP1, IR-ISUP 2, IR-ISUP-3, and high-risk PCa, respectively (p &lt; 0.001). In multivariable analyses, after adjustment for patient and surgical characteristics, IR-ISUP1 [hazard ratio (HR) 0.10, p = 0.03], IR-ISUP2 (HR 0.09, p &lt; 0.001), and IR-ISUP3 (HR 0.18, p &lt; 0.001) were independent predictors for lower risk of LNI, compared with men with high-risk PCa disease.Conclusions: The international society of urologic pathologists grade significantly influence the risk of LNI in patients with intermediate- risk PCa. The risk of LNI only exceeds 5% in men with IR-ISUP3 PCa. In consequence, the need for PLND in selected patients with IR-ISUP 1 or IR-ISUP2 PCa should be critically discussed.

The risk of death from prostate cancer in men with Gleason Score 3+4 prostate cancer treated using brachytherapy with or without a short course of androgen deprivation therapy.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. 330-330
Author(s):  
David Dewei Yang ◽  
Ming-Hui Chen ◽  
Michelle H. Braccioforte ◽  
Brian Joseph Moran ◽  
Anthony Victor D'Amico
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Androgen Deprivation Therapy ◽  
Gleason Score ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
Androgen Deprivation ◽  
Risk Of Death ◽  
Short Course ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Adenocarcinoma Of The Prostate ◽  
Biopsy Gleason Score

330 Background: We evaluated whether the intermediate-risk factors of percentage of positive biopsies (PPB), clinical tumor category, and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level, in addition to age, were associated with the risk of prostate cancer-specific mortality (PCSM) among men with Gleason 3+4 prostate cancer treated with brachytherapy (BT) alone or BT and a short course of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). Methods: We conducted a prospective cohort study of 1920 consecutively treated men with Gleason 3+4 adenocarcinoma of the prostate who received BT or BT and a median of 4 months of ADT between 10/14/1997 and 5/28/2013. Separate multivariable Fine and Gray competing risks regression models among men treated with BT or BT and ADT were used to assess whether PPB, cT2b-T2c, and PSA of 10.1-20.0 ng/ml, in addition to age greater than the median of 70 years, were associated with the risk of PCSM after adjustment for comorbidity. Results: After a median follow-up of 7.8 years (interquartile range 5.2-10.4 years), 284 men (14.8%) had died, including 31 (10.9% of deaths) from PC of which 18 (58.1%) and 13 (41.9%) occurred in men treated with BT or BT and ADT, respectively. For men treated with BT alone, increasing PPB, PSA of 10.1-20.0 vs 4.0-10.0 ng/mL, and age >70 vs ≤70 years were significantly associated with an increased risk of PCSM (adjusted hazard ratio [AHR] 1.015 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.000-1.031, P=0.048; AHR 5.55, 95% CI 2.01-15.29, P<0.001; and AHR 3.66, 95% CI 1.16-11.56, P=0.03, respectively). The respective results for men treated with BT and ADT were AHR 1.009, 95% CI 0.987-1.031, P=0.44; AHR 4.17, 95% CI 1.29-13.50, P=0.02; and AHR 3.74, 95% CI 0.87-16.05, P=0.08. The clinical tumor category was not significantly associated with the risk of PCSM. Conclusions: Among men with biopsy Gleason score 3+4 PC, both age >70 years and PSA of 10.1-20.0 ng/ml were significantly associated with an increased risk of PCSM following BT, and adding 4 months of ADT may not be sufficient to mitigate this risk. Advanced imaging and targeted biopsy of suspicious areas should be considered to personalize treatment in order to minimize the risk of PCSM in these men.

scholarly journals The role of PSA density to predict a pathological tumour upgrade between needle biopsy and radical prostatectomy for low risk clinical prostate cancer in the modified Gleason system era

2013 ◽  
Vol 7 (11-12) ◽  
pp. 722 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stavros Sfoungaristos ◽  
Ioannis Katafigiotis ◽  
Petros Perimenis
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Radical Prostatectomy ◽  
Gleason Score ◽  
Strong Predictor ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
Low Risk ◽  
Surgical Margins ◽  
Positive Surgical Margins ◽  
Psa Density

Objectives: We evaluate the role of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) density to predict Gleason score upgrade between prostate biopsy material and radical prostatectomy specimen examination in patients with low-risk prostate cancer.Methods: Between January 2007 and November 2011, 133 low-risk patients underwent a radical prostatectomy. Using the modified Gleason criteria, tumour grade of the surgical specimens was examined and compared to the biopsy results.Results: A tumour upgrade was noticed in 57 (42.9%) patients. Organ-confined disease was found in 110 (82.7%) patients, while extracapsular disease and seminal vesicles invasion was found in 19 (14.3%) and 4 (3.0%) patients, respectively. Positive surgical margins were reported in 23 (17.3%) patients. A statistical significant correlation between the preoperative PSA density value and postoperative upgrade was found (p = 0.001) and this observation had a predictive value (p = 0.002); this is in contrast to the other studied parameters which failed to reach significance, including PSA, percentage of cancer in biopsy and number of biopsy cores. Tumour upgrade was also highly associated with extracapsularcancer extension (p = 0.017) and the presence of positive surgical margins (p = 0.017).Conclusions: PSA density represents a strong predictor for Gleason score upgrade after radical prostatectomy in patients with clinical low-risk disease. Since tumour upgrade increases the potential for postoperative pathological adverse findings and prognosis, PSA density should be considered when treating and consulting patients with low-risk prostate cancer.

Identifying Patients at Risk for Significant Versus Clinically Insignificant Postoperative Prostate-Specific Antigen Failure

2005 ◽  
Vol 23 (22) ◽  
pp. 4975-4979 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anthony V. D'Amico ◽  
Ming-Hui Chen ◽  
Kimberly A. Roehl ◽  
William J. Catalona
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
At Risk ◽  
Radical Prostatectomy ◽  
Prostate Specific Antigen ◽  
Gleason Score ◽  
Prostate Cancer Screening ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
Study Cohort ◽  
Psa Failure ◽  
Psa Velocity

Purpose We evaluated whether men at risk for significant versus clinically insignificant prostate-specific antigen (PSA) failure after radical prostatectomy could be identified using information available at diagnosis. Patients and Methods A prospective prostate cancer screening study that enrolled, diagnosed, and treated 1,011 men with radical prostatectomy at Barnes-Jewish Hospital (St Louis, MO) from January 1, 1989, to June 1, 2002, for localized prostate cancer formed the study cohort. Preoperative predictors of a postoperative PSA doubling time (DT) of less than 3 months and more than 12 months or no PSA failure were identified using logistic regression. Results A preoperative PSA velocity more than 2.0 ng/mL/yr (P = .001) and biopsy Gleason score 7 (P = .006) or 8 to 10 (P = .003) were significantly associated with having a postoperative PSA DT less than 3 months. A PSA level less than 10 ng/mL (P = .005), a nonpalpable cancer (P = .001) with a Gleason score ≤ 6 (P = .0002), and a preoperative PSA increase that did not exceed 0.5 ng/mL/yr (P = .03) were significantly associated with a postoperative PSA DT of at least 12 months or no PSA failure. Most men with these preoperative characteristics and a postoperative PSA DT of 12 months or more had a persistent postoperative PSA level of at least 0.2 ng/mL that did not exceed 0.25 ng/mL after a median follow-up of 3.6 years. Conclusion A postoperative PSA DT less than 3 months is associated with a preoperative PSA velocity more than 2.0 ng/mL/yr and high-grade disease. Select men with a postoperative PSA DT more than 12 months may not require salvage radiation therapy.

scholarly journals Prostate cancer survival in Trinidad: Is PSA a prognostic factor?

2012 ◽  
Vol 6 (6) ◽  
pp. 249 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kameel Mungrue ◽  
Suresh Moonan ◽  
Maryam Mohammed ◽  
Saara Hyatali
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Gleason Score ◽  
African Ancestry ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
Western Hemisphere ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
Risk Of Death ◽  
Epidemiological Features ◽  
Increased Risk

Background: Prostate cancer is the most common malignancy among men in the western hemisphere, including Trinidad and Tobago. The aim of this study is to describe the epidemiological features of prostate cancer among patients admitted to a tertiary level teaching hospital during 2002 to 2005. We assessed the long term survival of patients with prostate cancer and the epidemiology of the disease.Methods: We reviewed the admissions data for the period 2002-2005. Demographic, clinical and outcomes (survival or death) data were collected and analysed, using SPSS version 16. Statistical analysis included Kaplan-Mier survival analysis, Cox regression models and the log-rank test. A p value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant.Results: Of the 1250 cases reviewed, 242 participants were selected. Patients of African ancestry, older than 60 years and a Gleason score greater than 7 had an increased risk of mortality. Patients with prostate-specific antigen (PSA) ≥100 ng/L had a 3-fold increasedrisk of mortality. Survival rates declined between 2002 and 2005.Conclusion: This is the first study of its kind to demonstrate survival rates among patients with prostate cancer in Trinidad. The following epidemiological features were identified: average age of occurrence of 71 years, ethnic disparity with higher occurrence in African men than all other ethnic groups and a PSA of >100 ng/dL. These features were associated with a 3-fold higher risk of death. A Gleason score of 8 to 10 was also associated with lower survival rates.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document