The prognostic importance of miRNA-21 in stage II colon cancer: A population-based study.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3513-3513
Author(s):  
Sanne Kjaer-Frifeldt ◽  
Torben Hansen ◽  
Boye Schnack Nielsen ◽  
Stine Joergensen ◽  
Jan Lindebjerg ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colon Cancer ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Adjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Population Based ◽  
Stage Ii ◽  
Stromal Compartment ◽  
Cox Regression Analysis ◽  
Prognostic Importance ◽  
Stage Ii Colon Cancer

3513 Background: Adjuvant chemotherapy for stage II colon cancer patients is still controversial and the debate on which patients should be considered as high risk patients is still ongoing. The decision is based on clinical and pathological markers of risk, which are inadequately informative in most of the patients, and better methods are highly needed. The aim of the present study was to investigate the possible prognostic importance of miRNA-21, quantified by in situ hybridization (ISH), in a unique, large population-based cohort of patients treated for stage II colon cancer patients. Methods: The study included all patients diagnosed with stage II colon cancer in Denmark in the year 2003 (711 patients), representing a full population of five million people. Patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy were excluded (N=15). One paraffin-embedded tissue block was obtained from each patient. A 6μm-thick section was processed for formazan-based chromogenic miR-21 ISH analysis and counter stained with nuclear red. The blue miR-21 ISH signal was assessed by image analysis to obtain two quantitative expression estimates: the total blue area (TB) and the ratio of TB with the nuclear density (TBR). Results: The miRNA-21 signal was predominantly observed in fibroblast-like cells located in the stromal compartment of the tumors. Patients expressing high levels of miRNA-21 (high mean TBR) had significantly inferior cancer specific survival (CSS): HR = 1.26 (95% CI; 1.15-1.60), p <0.001. In the COX regression analysis (including; gender, T-category, malignancy grade, localization, tumor perforation, tumor fixation, number of lymph nodes and MSI status), mean TBR was found to be an independent predictive marker of poor CSS, HR = 1.41 (95%CI; 1.19-1.67, p< 0.001). The same applied to TB. Conclusions: The present study shows that increasing miRNA-21 expression level is significantly correlated to decreasing CSS. Analyses of miRNA-21 should be considered as a potential adjunct in the selection of high risk stage II patients.

Use of germ-line variants in the WNT/β-CATENIN pathway to predict tumor recurrence in adjuvant colon cancer.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e14034-e14034
Author(s):  
Peter M.D. Wilson ◽  
David Páez ◽  
Armin Gerger ◽  
Wu Zhang ◽  
Dongyun Yang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colon Cancer ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Tumor Recurrence ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Germ Line ◽  
Stage Ii ◽  
Cox Regression Analysis ◽  
Direct Dna Sequencing ◽  
Stage Ii Colon Cancer

e14034 Background: The Wnt/β-catenin signaling plays a central role in the development and progression of most colon cancers. Germline variants in Wnt/β-catenin pathway genes may result in altered gene function and/or activity, thereby causing inter-individual differences in relation to tumor recurrence capacity and chemoresistance. We investigated germline polymorphisms in a comprehensive panel of Wnt/β-catenin pathway genes to predict time to tumor recurrence (TTR) in patients with stage III and high-risk stage II colon cancer. Methods: A total of 234 patients treated with 5-fluorouracil-based chemotherapy at the University of Southern California were included in this study. Whole blood samples were analyzed for putative functional germline polymorphisms in SFRP3, SFRP4, DKK2, DKK3, Axin2, APC, TCF7L2, WNT5B, CXXC4 genes by PCR-RFLP or direct DNA-sequencing. We also included NOTCH2 and GLI1 variants which belong to the Notch and Hedgehog pathways respectively. Results: The minor allele of WNT5B rs2010851 T>G was significantly associated with a shorter TTR (4.9vs10.7 years; HR: 2.48; 95%CI, (0.96, 6.38); p=0.044) in high-risk stage II colon cancer patients. This result remained significant in the multivariate Cox regression analysis. Conclusions: Despite the importance of Wnt/β-catenin pathway in the development of cancer, only the WNT5B germline variant rs2010851 was significantly identified as a stage-dependent prognostic marker for colon cancer patients after 5-fluorouracil-based adjuvant therapy.

scholarly journals Identification of Risk Factors for Recurrence in High-Risk Stage II Colon Cancer

10.9738/cc131 ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 98 (2) ◽  
pp. 114-121 ◽  
Author(s):  
Satoshi Hatano ◽  
Hideyuki Ishida ◽  
Keiichiro Ishibashi ◽  
Kensuke Kumamoto ◽  
Norihiro Haga ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Colon Cancer ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Adjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards ◽  
Stage Ii ◽  
Risk Factors For Recurrence ◽  
Stage Ii Colon Cancer

Abstract To identify risk factors for recurrence in patients with stage II colon cancer, Cox proportional hazards regression analysis was performed in 194 patients with stage II colon cancer who underwent curative surgery between April 1997 and December 2008. Thirteen clinical and pathologic factors, including use of fluoropyrimidine-based adjuvant chemotherapy in 113 of the patients (58.2%), were assessed. By multivariate analysis, only obstruction, perforation, and T4-level invasion were identified as independent risk factors affecting disease-free survival (DFS) (P &lt; 0.01). The 5-year DFS rate was 70.6% in patients with one or more risk factors (n = 68) and 96.0% in patients with no risk factors (n = 126) (P &lt; 0.01). These results suggest that obstruction, perforation, and T4-level invasion are suitable candidates for prediction of tumor recurrence in patients with stage II colon cancer. The oxaliplatin-based adjuvant chemotherapy, which has been reported to be effective in stage III colon cancer patients, may improve the prognosis in high-risk stage II colon cancer patients.

Association of modern era adjuvant chemotherapy with improved survival in patients with stage II colon cancer.

2015 ◽  
Vol 33 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 671-671
Author(s):  
Leigh Casadaban ◽  
Dana Villenes ◽  
Garth Rauscher ◽  
Mebea Aklilu ◽  
Ajay V. Maker
Keyword(s):  
Colon Cancer ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Adjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Adjuvant Therapy ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Stage Ii ◽  
Chemotherapy Group ◽  
Multi Agent ◽  
Stage Ii Colon Cancer

671 Background: Patients are often selected for adjuvant therapy after resection of stage II colon cancer based on the presence of poor risk factors. However, the survival advantage of chemotherapy in this population is unclear and there remains variation in clinical practice. Methods: The National Cancer Data Base was analyzed for colon cancer patients treated 1998-2006. The primary outcome was OS between patients who did or did not receive adjuvant chemotherapy. Additional stratification variables included high-risk disease features, age, multi-agent chemotherapy, and diagnosis after 2004 when oxaliplatin was approved for adjuvant therapy. Demographic and disease information was compared using the Pearson Chi-squared test and binary logistic regression, effect size with Cramer's V/Phi for categorical variables, and survival data with Cox regression. Propensity score weighting was utilized to account for the possibility of selection bias. Results: Of 1,078,091 patients with colorectal cancer, 153,110 stage II colon cancer patients met inclusion criteria. Mean age was 72, 46% were male, 84% stage IIA (AJCC 6thed.), 9% stage IIB, and 20% received adjuvant chemotherapy. Predictors of receiving treatment included age<65, male gender, community treatment facility, geographical location, non-Medicare insurance, education level, and diagnosis before 2004. All patient sub-groups analyzed experienced improved OS with adjuvant chemotherapy regardless of the number of high-risk features, age, multi-agent chemotherapy, or adjustment for covariates. Median OS was 13.2 years in the chemotherapy group and 7.0 years in the no-chemotherapy group (p< 0.001). Median and 5-year OS was improved in both high and low-risk patients who received chemotherapy compared to those who did not with a median follow-up >5 years. Conclusions: This large-scale study with long-term follow-up demonstrated that adjuvant chemotherapy was associated with a clinically relevant improvement in OS regardless of treatment regimen, patient age, or high-risk features in patients with resected stage II colon cancer. The results of this retrospective analysis warrant further investigation in prospective trials.

Abstract CT263: Post-surgical liquid biopsy-guided treatment of stage III and high-risk stage II colon cancer patients: The PEGASUS trial

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elena Elez ◽  
Filippo Pietrantonio ◽  
Andrea Sartore-Bianchi ◽  
Clara Montagut ◽  
Andres Cervantes ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colon Cancer ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Liquid Biopsy ◽  
Stage Ii ◽  
Stage Iii ◽  
Stage Ii Colon Cancer

Identifying High-Risk Stage II Colon Cancer Patients: A Three-MicroRNA-Based Score as a Prognostic Biomarker

2016 ◽  
Vol 15 (4) ◽  
pp. e175-e182 ◽  
Author(s):  
Oriol Caritg ◽  
Alfons Navarro ◽  
Isabel Moreno ◽  
Francisco Martínez-Rodenas ◽  
Anna Cordeiro ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colon Cancer ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Prognostic Biomarker ◽  
Stage Ii ◽  
Stage Ii Colon Cancer

Development and validation of a robust prognostic and predictive signature for colorectal cancer (CRC) patients

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4036-4036
Author(s):  
A. M. Glas ◽  
P. Roepman ◽  
R. Salazar ◽  
G. Capella ◽  
V. Moreno ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Colon Cancer ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Adjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Gene Signature ◽  
Low Risk ◽  
Stage Ii ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Independent Cohort

4036 Background: Between 25 and 35% of stage II CRC patients will experience a recurrence of their disease and may benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy. Official guidelines give suggestions but no clear recommendation for best risk stratification. Here we describe the development a robust signature that predicts disease relapse and can assist in treatment decisions. Methods: Fresh frozen tumor tissues from 180 patients with stage I, II and III colorectal cancer undergoing surgery were analyzed using high density Agilent 44K oligonucleotide arrays. Median FU was 70.2 months; 85% of patients did not receive adjuvant chemotherapy. Unsupervised hierarchical clustering based on full-genome gene expression measurement indicated the existence of 3 main colon molecular subclasses. Survival analysis of the 3 classes showed that subtype C (n= 27) had a poor outcome and subtype A (n= 48) good outcome. Only the intermediate group B (n=104) was used to develop a signature by using a cross validation procedure to score all genes for their association with 5-yr distant metastasis free survival (DMFS) and subsequently applied to all samples (n=180). The obtained gene signature was further validated on an independent cohort of 178 stage II + III colon samples. Results: A set of 38 prognosis related gene probes showed robust DMFS association in over 50% of all iterations in the Training Set of 180 samples. The gene signature was validated on an independent cohort of 178 samples from stage II + III colon cancer patients. The profile classified 61% of the validation samples as low-risk and 39% as high-risk. The low- and high-risk samples showed a significant difference in DMFS with a HR of 3.19 (P= 8.5e-4). Five-year DMFS rates were 89% (95%CI 83–95) for low-risk and 62% (95%CI 50–77) for high-risk samples. Moreover, the profile showed a significant performance within stage II (P=0.0058) and III (P=0.036) only samples. The performance of the profile was significant for both untreated (P=0.0082) and treated patients (P=0.016) suggesting that its power is independent of treatment benefits. Conclusions: ColoPrint is able to predict the prognosis of stage II and III colon cancer patients and facilitates the identification of patients who would benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy. [Table: see text]

Genomic classifiers (ColoPrint/MSI-Print) predict outcome and chemotherapy benefit in stage II and III colon cancer patients.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 378-378 ◽  
Author(s):  
Scott Kopetz ◽  
Zhi-Qin Jiang ◽  
Michael J. Overman ◽  
Christa Dreezen ◽  
Sun Tian ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colon Cancer ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Adjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Additional Treatment ◽  
Low Risk ◽  
Stage Ii ◽  
High Risk Patients ◽  
Risk Patients

378 Background: Although the benefit of chemotherapy in stage II and III colon cancer patients is significant, many patients might not need adjuvant chemotherapy because they have a good prognosis even without additional treatment. ColoPrint is a gene expression classifier that distinguish patients with low or high risk of disease relapse. It was developed using whole genome expression data and has been validated in public datasets, independent European patient cohorts and technical studies (Salazar 2011 JCO, Maak 2012 Ann Surg). Methods: In this study, the commercial ColoPrint test was validated in stage II (n=96) and III patients (n=95) treated at the MD Anderson Cancer Center from 2003 to 2009. Frozen tissue specimen, clinical parameters, MSI-status and follow-up data (median follow-up 64 months) were available. The 64-gene MSI-signature developed to identify patients with deficient mismatch repair system (Tian 2012 J Path) was evaluated for its accuracy to identify MSI patients and also for prognosis. Results: In this cohort, ColoPrint classified 56% of stage II and III patients as being at low risk. The 3-year Relapse-Free-Survival (RFS) was 90.6% for Low Risk and 78.4% for High Risk patients with a HR of 2.33 (p=0.025). In uni-and multivariate analysis ColoPrint and stage were the only significant factors to predict outcome. The MSI-signature classified 47 patients (24.6%) as MSI-H and most MSI-H patients were ColoPrint low risk (81%). Patients who were ColoPrint low risk and MSI-H by signature had the best outcome with a 3-year RFS of 95% while patients with ColoPrint high risk had a worse outcome independently of the MSI-status. Low risk ColoPrint patients had a good outcome independent of stage or chemotherapy treatment (90.1% 3-year RFS for treated patients, 91.4% for untreated patients) while ColoPrint high risk patients treated with adjuvant chemotherapy had 3-year RFS of 84%, compared to 70.1% 3-year RFS in untreated patients (p=0.026). Conclusions: The combination of ColoPrint and MSI-Print improves the prognostic accuracy in stage II and stage III patients and may help the identification of patients at higher risk who are more likely to benefit from additional treatment

American Society of Clinical Oncology Recommendations on Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Stage II Colon Cancer

2004 ◽  
Vol 22 (16) ◽  
pp. 3408-3419 ◽  
Author(s):  
Al B. Benson ◽  
Deborah Schrag ◽  
Mark R. Somerfield ◽  
Alfred M. Cohen ◽  
Alvaro T. Figueredo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colon Cancer ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Adjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Clinical Oncology ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Indirect Evidence ◽  
Stage Ii ◽  
Prognostic Features ◽  
American Society ◽  
Stage Ii Colon Cancer

Purpose To address whether all medically fit patients with curatively resected stage II colon cancer should be offered adjuvant chemotherapy as part of routine clinical practice, to identify patients with poor prognosis characteristics, and to describe strategies for oncologists to use to discuss adjuvant chemotherapy in practice. Methods An American Society of Clinical Oncology Panel, in collaboration with the Cancer Care Ontario Practice Guideline Initiative, reviewed pertinent information from the literature through May 2003. Results A literature-based meta-analysis found no evidence of a statistically significant survival benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy for stage II patients. Recommendations The routine use of adjuvant chemotherapy for medically fit patients with stage II colon cancer is not recommended. However, there are populations of patients with stage II disease that could be considered for adjuvant therapy, including patients with inadequately sampled nodes, T4 lesions, perforation, or poorly differentiated histology. Conclusion Direct evidence from randomized controlled trials does not support the routine use of adjuvant chemotherapy for patients with stage II colon cancer. Patients and oncologists who accept the relative benefit in stage III disease as adequate indirect evidence of benefit for stage II disease are justified in considering the use of adjuvant chemotherapy, particularly for those patients with high-risk stage II disease. The ultimate clinical decision should be based on discussions with the patient about the nature of the evidence supporting treatment, the anticipated morbidity of treatment, the presence of high-risk prognostic features on individual prognosis, and patient preferences. Patients with stage II disease should be encouraged to participate in randomized trials.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document