Development and validation of a robust prognostic and predictive signature for colorectal cancer (CRC) patients

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4036-4036
Author(s):  
A. M. Glas ◽  
P. Roepman ◽  
R. Salazar ◽  
G. Capella ◽  
V. Moreno ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Colon Cancer ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Adjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Gene Signature ◽  
Low Risk ◽  
Stage Ii ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Independent Cohort

4036 Background: Between 25 and 35% of stage II CRC patients will experience a recurrence of their disease and may benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy. Official guidelines give suggestions but no clear recommendation for best risk stratification. Here we describe the development a robust signature that predicts disease relapse and can assist in treatment decisions. Methods: Fresh frozen tumor tissues from 180 patients with stage I, II and III colorectal cancer undergoing surgery were analyzed using high density Agilent 44K oligonucleotide arrays. Median FU was 70.2 months; 85% of patients did not receive adjuvant chemotherapy. Unsupervised hierarchical clustering based on full-genome gene expression measurement indicated the existence of 3 main colon molecular subclasses. Survival analysis of the 3 classes showed that subtype C (n= 27) had a poor outcome and subtype A (n= 48) good outcome. Only the intermediate group B (n=104) was used to develop a signature by using a cross validation procedure to score all genes for their association with 5-yr distant metastasis free survival (DMFS) and subsequently applied to all samples (n=180). The obtained gene signature was further validated on an independent cohort of 178 stage II + III colon samples. Results: A set of 38 prognosis related gene probes showed robust DMFS association in over 50% of all iterations in the Training Set of 180 samples. The gene signature was validated on an independent cohort of 178 samples from stage II + III colon cancer patients. The profile classified 61% of the validation samples as low-risk and 39% as high-risk. The low- and high-risk samples showed a significant difference in DMFS with a HR of 3.19 (P= 8.5e-4). Five-year DMFS rates were 89% (95%CI 83–95) for low-risk and 62% (95%CI 50–77) for high-risk samples. Moreover, the profile showed a significant performance within stage II (P=0.0058) and III (P=0.036) only samples. The performance of the profile was significant for both untreated (P=0.0082) and treated patients (P=0.016) suggesting that its power is independent of treatment benefits. Conclusions: ColoPrint is able to predict the prognosis of stage II and III colon cancer patients and facilitates the identification of patients who would benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy. [Table: see text]

Genomic classifiers (ColoPrint/MSI-Print) predict outcome and chemotherapy benefit in stage II and III colon cancer patients.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 378-378 ◽  
Author(s):  
Scott Kopetz ◽  
Zhi-Qin Jiang ◽  
Michael J. Overman ◽  
Christa Dreezen ◽  
Sun Tian ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colon Cancer ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Adjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Additional Treatment ◽  
Low Risk ◽  
Stage Ii ◽  
High Risk Patients ◽  
Risk Patients

378 Background: Although the benefit of chemotherapy in stage II and III colon cancer patients is significant, many patients might not need adjuvant chemotherapy because they have a good prognosis even without additional treatment. ColoPrint is a gene expression classifier that distinguish patients with low or high risk of disease relapse. It was developed using whole genome expression data and has been validated in public datasets, independent European patient cohorts and technical studies (Salazar 2011 JCO, Maak 2012 Ann Surg). Methods: In this study, the commercial ColoPrint test was validated in stage II (n=96) and III patients (n=95) treated at the MD Anderson Cancer Center from 2003 to 2009. Frozen tissue specimen, clinical parameters, MSI-status and follow-up data (median follow-up 64 months) were available. The 64-gene MSI-signature developed to identify patients with deficient mismatch repair system (Tian 2012 J Path) was evaluated for its accuracy to identify MSI patients and also for prognosis. Results: In this cohort, ColoPrint classified 56% of stage II and III patients as being at low risk. The 3-year Relapse-Free-Survival (RFS) was 90.6% for Low Risk and 78.4% for High Risk patients with a HR of 2.33 (p=0.025). In uni-and multivariate analysis ColoPrint and stage were the only significant factors to predict outcome. The MSI-signature classified 47 patients (24.6%) as MSI-H and most MSI-H patients were ColoPrint low risk (81%). Patients who were ColoPrint low risk and MSI-H by signature had the best outcome with a 3-year RFS of 95% while patients with ColoPrint high risk had a worse outcome independently of the MSI-status. Low risk ColoPrint patients had a good outcome independent of stage or chemotherapy treatment (90.1% 3-year RFS for treated patients, 91.4% for untreated patients) while ColoPrint high risk patients treated with adjuvant chemotherapy had 3-year RFS of 84%, compared to 70.1% 3-year RFS in untreated patients (p=0.026). Conclusions: The combination of ColoPrint and MSI-Print improves the prognostic accuracy in stage II and stage III patients and may help the identification of patients at higher risk who are more likely to benefit from additional treatment

Validation of a genomic classifier (ColoPrint) for predicting outcome in the T3-MSS subgroup of stage II colon cancer patients.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3510-3510 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ramon Salazar ◽  
Josep Tabernero ◽  
Victor Moreno ◽  
Ulrich Nitsche ◽  
Thomas Bachleitner-Hofmann ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colon Cancer ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Adjuvant Therapy ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Lower Risk ◽  
Low Risk ◽  
Stage Ii ◽  
Disease Relapse ◽  
Risk Of Disease

3510 Background: Adjuvant therapy for stage II patients is recommended for patients with high risk features, especially with T4 tumors. Adjuvant therapy is not indicated for patients with MSI-H status who are considered of being at low risk of disease relapse. However, this leaves the majority of patients with an undetermined risk. ColoPrint is an 18-gene expression classifier that identifies early-stage colon cancer patients at higher risk of disease relapse. Methods: ColoPrint was developed using whole genome expression data and was validated in public datasets (n=322) and independent patient cohorts from 5 European hospitals. Tissue specimen, clinical parameters, MSI-status and follow-up data (median follow-up 70 months) for patients were available and the ColoPrint index was determined using validated diagnostic arrays. Uni-and multivariate analysis was performed on the pooled stage II patient set (n=320) and the subset of patients who were T3/ MSS (n=227). Results: In the analysis of all stage II patients, ColoPrint classified two-third of stage II patients as being at lower risk. The 3-year Relapse-Free-Survial (RFS) RFS was 91% for Low Risk and 74% for patients at higher risk with a HR of 2.9 (p=0.001). Clinicopathological parameters from the ASCO recommendations (T4, perforation, <12 LN assessed, and/ or high grade) or NCCN guidelines (ASCO factors plus angio-lymphatic invasion) did not predict a differential outcome for high risk patients (p< 0.20). In the subgroup of patients with T3 and MSS phenotype, ColoPrint classified 61% of patients at lower risk with a 3-year RFS of 91% (86-96%) and 39% of patients at higher risk with a 3-year RFS of 73% (63-83%) (p=0.002). No clinical parameter was significantly prognostic in this subgroup. Conclusions: ColoPrint combined with established clinicopathological factors and MSI, significantly improves prognostic accuracy, thereby facilitating the identification of patients at higher risk who might be considered for additional treatment.

Clinical impact of diverting ileostomy on the dose intensity of adjuvant chemotherapy for colorectal cancer.

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 867-867
Author(s):  
Shusuke Yagi ◽  
Eiji Shinozaki ◽  
Keisho Chin ◽  
Mitsukuni Suenaga ◽  
Daisuke Takahari ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Colon Cancer ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Adjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Dose Intensity ◽  
Clinical Impact ◽  
Stage Ii ◽  
Stage Iii ◽  
Diverting Ileostomy ◽  
Grade 3

867 Background: CAPOX as adjuvant chemotherapy is a standard care option for stage III and high risk stage II colorectal cancer(CRC). And then chemotherapy induced diarrhea (CID) is known as one of the dose-limiting toxicities for CAPOX. Although diverting ileostomy is useful for preventing serious complications of high risk anastomosis, it is well recognized that high ileostomy output is hard to manage. Furthermore, the effect of diverting ileostomy on CID of adjuvant chemotherapy is unclear. In this study, we addressed the clinical impact of diverting ileostomy on the dose intensity of adjuvant chemotherapy for CRC. Methods: Patients who diagnosed with stage III colon cancer and stage II or III rectal cancer after curative surgery and received CAPOX as adjuvant chemotherapy during 2011- 2014 were reviewed retrospectively. We investigated the relationship between diverting ileostomy and dose intensity, toxicities and disease-free survival (DFS). Results: 112 patients (median age 60 years, 52% male, 69% colon cancer, 63% stage III, median follow-up 47 months) were enrolled in this study. Of 112 patients, 100 patients were received chemotherapy without ileostomy (non-ileostomy group: NIG) and 12 patients were received chemotherapy with ileostomy (ileostomy group: IG). 112 Patients received 870 chemotherapy cycles. All treatment related grade 3/4 adverse events were documented in 39% of patients in NIG and 33% of patients in IG (P = 0.77). Grade 3/4 of CID occurred in 8% of patients in NIG and 8% of patients in IG (P = 1). Grade 3/4 of neutropenia were recognized in 21% of patients in NIG and 17% of patients in IG (P = 1). Average relative dose intensity (RDI) in NIG were 75.7% and 85.8% for capecitabine and oxaliplatin, respectively. Average RDI of capecitabine and oxaliplatin in IG were 76.1% and 82.7%, respectively. Significant difference of RDI of capecitabine and oxaliplatin were not shown in comparison between NIG and IG (P = 0.93, P = 0.63). The 3-year DFS rate was 85.0% in NIG and 75.0% in IG. The HR for DFS for NIG compared to IG was 1.709 (95% CI, 0.49 to 5.95; P = 0.40). Conclusions: The presence of diverting ileostomy does not affect RDI of CAPOX as adjuvant chemotherapy.

scholarly journals Effect of adjuvant chemotherapy on stage II colon cancer: Analysis of Korean national data.

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 798-798
Author(s):  
Minki KIM ◽  
Daeyoun Won ◽  
Seong Taek Oh ◽  
In Kyu Lee
Keyword(s):  
Colon Cancer ◽  
Adjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Quality Assessment ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Risk Group ◽  
Low Risk ◽  
Stage Ii ◽  
Current Status ◽  
National Quality ◽  
Stage Ii Colon Cancer

798 Background: Debates exist regarding the effectiveness of adjuvant chemotherapy for stage II colon cancer. This study aimed to investigate the current status of adjuvant chemotherapy and its impact on survival for Korean stage II colon cancer patients by analyzing the National Quality Assessment data. Methods: A total of 7880 patients who underwent curative resection for stage II colon adenocarcinoma between Jan 2011 and Dec 2014 in Korea were selected randomly as evaluation subjects for the quality assessment. The factors that influenced overall survival were identified. The high-risk group was defined as having at least one of the following: perforation/obstruction, lymph node harvest less than 12, lymphovascular/perineural invasion, positive resection margin, poor differentiation, or pathologic T4 stage. Results: The median follow-up period was 38 (1-63) months. Chemotherapy was a favorable prognostic factor for either the high- (HR 0.50 [0.40-0.62], p < 0.001) or low-risk group (HR 0.74 [0.61-0.89], p = 0.002) in multivariate analysis. This was also the case in patients over 70 years of age. The hazard ratio was significantly increased as the number of involved risk factors was increased in patients who didn’t receive chemotherapy. However, there was no survival difference between low-risk group patients and patients who only had 1 risk factor among patients who received adjuvant chemotherapy (HR 1.19 [0.93-1.52], p = 0.165). Adding oxaliplatin showed no difference in survival (HR 1.36 [0.91-2.03], p = 0.132). Conclusions: Adjuvant chemotherapy can be recommended for stage II colon cancer patients, but the addition of oxaliplatin to the regimen must be selective.

scholarly journals Adjuvant chemotherapy use and outcomes of patients with high-risk versus low-risk stage II colon cancer

Cancer ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 121 (4) ◽  
pp. 527-534 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aalok Kumar ◽  
Hagen F. Kennecke ◽  
Daniel J. Renouf ◽  
Howard J. Lim ◽  
Sharlene Gill ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colon Cancer ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Adjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Low Risk ◽  
Stage Ii ◽  
Stage Ii Colon Cancer

scholarly journals Identification of Risk Factors for Recurrence in High-Risk Stage II Colon Cancer

10.9738/cc131 ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 98 (2) ◽  
pp. 114-121 ◽  
Author(s):  
Satoshi Hatano ◽  
Hideyuki Ishida ◽  
Keiichiro Ishibashi ◽  
Kensuke Kumamoto ◽  
Norihiro Haga ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Colon Cancer ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Adjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards ◽  
Stage Ii ◽  
Risk Factors For Recurrence ◽  
Stage Ii Colon Cancer

Abstract To identify risk factors for recurrence in patients with stage II colon cancer, Cox proportional hazards regression analysis was performed in 194 patients with stage II colon cancer who underwent curative surgery between April 1997 and December 2008. Thirteen clinical and pathologic factors, including use of fluoropyrimidine-based adjuvant chemotherapy in 113 of the patients (58.2%), were assessed. By multivariate analysis, only obstruction, perforation, and T4-level invasion were identified as independent risk factors affecting disease-free survival (DFS) (P &lt; 0.01). The 5-year DFS rate was 70.6% in patients with one or more risk factors (n = 68) and 96.0% in patients with no risk factors (n = 126) (P &lt; 0.01). These results suggest that obstruction, perforation, and T4-level invasion are suitable candidates for prediction of tumor recurrence in patients with stage II colon cancer. The oxaliplatin-based adjuvant chemotherapy, which has been reported to be effective in stage III colon cancer patients, may improve the prognosis in high-risk stage II colon cancer patients.

Adjuvant Systemic Therapies in Patients with Colorectal Cancer: An Audit on Clinical Practice in Italy

2005 ◽  
Vol 91 (6) ◽  
pp. 472-476 ◽  
Author(s):  
◽  
Fausto Roila ◽  
Benedetta Ruggeri ◽  
Enzo Ballatori ◽  
Lucio Patoia ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Rectal Cancer ◽  
Colon Cancer ◽  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Adjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Daily Clinical Practice ◽  
Stage Ii ◽  
International Consensus ◽  
Systemic Therapies

Aims and Background Rarely are conclusions from clinical trials summarized in international consensus conferences and promptly transferred to patient care. The adjuvant therapy for colorectal cancer used in daily clinical practice in Italy is described and compared with the recommendations of the 1990 NIH Consensus Conference. Patients and Methods We audited prescriptions of adjuvant systemic therapies for Italian colorectal cancer patients in 82 centers during a fixed one-week period. Results Among 434 patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy there were 139 (42.5%) colon cancer patients with N- and 169 (51.7%) with N+ regional nodal involvement. Treatment at academic centers, a young age, T4 and a low total number of lymph nodes removed at surgery were the factors potentially justifying the decision for adjuvant chemotherapy in stage II colon cancer patients. The most common chemotherapy used was a bolus of 5-fluorouracil/folinic acid for 6 months (75.8%). Adjuvant radiotherapy was not administered to 37 (38.5%) of 96 patients with stage II and III rectal cancer. Conclusions The study shows that a substantial proportion of patients on adjuvant treatment at a certain time point in a large enough sample of Italian centers are stage II (potential over-treatment) and that an under-treatment of stage II and III rectal cancer patients (lack of radiotherapy) occurs too often in daily clinical practice in this country.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document