Prognostic factor Ki67 for breast cancer patients in each subgroup.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 565-565
Author(s):  
Naoki Niikura ◽  
Shinobu Masuda ◽  
Mizuho Terada ◽  
Mayako Terao ◽  
Nobue Kumaki ◽  
...  

565 Background: Immunohistochemical (IHC) Ki67 has described it as a prognostic and predictive marker for breast cancer. The St. Gallen Consensus Meeting determined that Ki67 labeling index is chiefly important for distinguishing between “Luminal A” and “Luminal B (HER2 negative)” subtypes and is a predictive marker for chemotherapeutic efficacy. However, the high and low cutoff points remain controversial. Our objective is to compare survival in patients with low, intermediate, and high Ki67 levels in each subgroup. Methods: We retrospectively identified all the patients in the Tokai University breast cancer database for whom IHC Ki67 data were available between January 1, 2000, and December 31, 2010. Ki67 was defined as low if <10% Ki67 was detected, as Intermediate if 10–20% Ki67 was detected, and as high if >20% Ki67 was detected. To assess Ki67 levels and survival outcomes, survival curves were calculated using the Kaplan–Meier method and compared using the log-rank test. Results: We identified 1331 primary breast cancer patients without metastasis, of whom 686 received neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy. Patients with high Ki67 had poorer relapse-free survival (RFS) than patients with intermediate (p = 0.009) and low Ki67 (p < 0.001). Patients with intermediate Ki67 had poorer RFS than patients with low Ki67 (p < 0.001). In ER-positive cases (n = 1059), patients with high and intermediate Ki67 had poorer RFS than patients with low Ki67 (p < 0.001 and p = 0.002, respectively). In HER2-positive and ER-negative cases (n = 103), patients with high Ki67 had poorer RFS than patients with low Ki67 (p = 0.002). In triple-negative cases (n = 164), patients with high Ki67 tended to have poorer RFS than patients with low Ki67 (p = 0.064). Conclusions: Our data demonstrated that low, intermediate, and high Ki67 levels may be used to differentiate prognosis in ER-positive cancer patients as well as HER2-positive and triple-negative cancer patients.

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hong Dongsheng ◽  
Zhang YanFang ◽  
Ye Ziqi ◽  
Chen Jing ◽  
Lu Xiaoyang

Abstract Background: Breast cancer is the most commonly malignant cancers in women, and BIRC5 has been found to be overexpressed in a variety of human tumors. Its expression is associated with the prognosis of many cancers. However, whether BIRC5 mRNA could be used as an independent prognostic factor for breast cancer remains inconsistent in previous studies.Methods: Altered BIRC5 expression in normal tissue relative to various tumor tissue and in breast cancer patients with different molecular subtypes, clinical outcomes and chemotherapy responses were examined using the Oncomine, GOBO and Kaplan-Meier plotter datasets.Results: We found that many breast cancers had increased BIRC5 mRNA expression, and GOBO analysis showed that triple-negative cell lines displayed highest BIRC5 mRNA expression levels in the breast cancer cell line panel. Moreover, BIRC5 high mRNA expression was significantly associated with longer relapse-free survival (RFS) in all breast cancer patients. In particular, sub analysis revealed that high mRNA expression of BIRC5 was significantly associated with better survival in ER positive (HR = 2.05, p = 1e-16), but not in ER negative breast cancer (HR = 1.24, p = 0.1), furthermore, the results also demonstrated that BIRC5 high expression was significantly associated with longer RFS in luminal A (HR = 1.51, p = 3.1e-06) and luminal B (HR = 1.28, p = 0.026).Conclusions: In conclusion, BIRC5 is involved in the development and progression of breast cancer and may be a suitable prognostic marker for human breast cancer.


Breast Care ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. 248-252 ◽  
Author(s):  
Muhammet A. Kaplan ◽  
Ulku Y. Arslan ◽  
Abdurrahman Işıkdogan ◽  
Faysal Dane ◽  
Berna Oksuzoglu ◽  
...  

Purpose: The aim of the study was to investigate the association between the molecular subtypes and patterns of relapse in breast cancer patients who had undergone curative surgery. Methods: We retrospectively evaluated 1,350 breast cancer patients with relapses after curative surgery between 1998 and 2012 from referral centers in Turkey. Patients were divided into 4 biological subtypes according to immunohistochemistry and grade: triple negative, HER2 overexpressing, luminal A and luminal B. Results: The percentages of patients with luminal A, luminal B, HER2-overexpressing, and triple-negative breast cancer were 32.9% (n = 444), 34.9% (n = 471), 12.0% (n = 162), and 20.2% (n = 273), respectively. The distribution of metastases differed among the subgroups: bone (66.2% and 53.9% in luminal A and B vs. 38.9% in HER2-overexpressing and 45.1% in triple negative, p < 0.001), liver (40.1% in HER2-overexpressing vs. 24.5% in luminal A, 33.5% in luminal B, and 27.5% in triple negative, p < 0.001), lung (41.4% in triple negative and 35.2% in HER2-overexpressing vs. 30.2% and 30.6% in luminal A and B, p = 0.008) and brain (25.3% in HER2-overexpressing and 23.1% in triple negative vs. 10.1% and 15.1% in luminal A and B, p < 0.001). Conclusions: Organ-specific metastasis may depend on the molecular subtype of breast cancer. Tailored strategies against distant metastasis concerning the molecular subtypes in breast cancer should be considered.


2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 28-37
Author(s):  
Muhammad Furqan ◽  
Pimpin Utama Pohan

Background: Breast cancer symptoms are often not felt clearly by patients, as a result many patients who come in an advanced stage. This will affect the prognosis and cure rate of the patient. There are several factors that influence the prognosis of breast cancer, including histopathological grade, and classic immunohistochemical markers such as estrogen receptors, progesterone receptors, and HER2. In addition, breast cancer can be 4 main molecular subtypes, namely Luminal A, Luminal B, HER2-Overexpression, and Triple Negative / Basal-Like. Objectives: This study aims to determine the relationship between histopathological grade with the molecular subtypes of breast cancer patients in Haji Adam Malik General Hospital in 2016-2018. Methods: This is analytical cross-sectional research using a consecutive-sampling technique. Data were obtained secondary from the medical records of breast cancer patients at Haji Adam Malik General Hospital in 2016-2018 and then analyzed with the chi-square test. From 1005 cases of breast cancer during the 2016-2018 period, 131 samples were taken in this study. Results: Of the 131 samples, the highest histopathological grade was grade 2 with 53 people  (40.5%), followed by 41 people (31.3%) with grade 3, and 37 people (28.2%) with grade 1. The most molecular subtypes were Luminal A with 38 people (29%), followed by 33 people (25.2%) with Luminal B, 31 people (23.7%) with HER-2 Overexpression, and 29 people (22.1%) with Triple Negative / Basal-like. From the analysis of the chi-square test obtained p value of 0.045. Conclusion: There is a relationship between histopathological grade with molecular subtypes of breast cancer patients. Keywords: breast cancer, histopathological grade, immunohistochemistry, molecular subtypes     Latar Belakang: Gejala-gejala kanker payudara sering tidak dirasakan dengan jelas oleh pasien, akibatnya banyak pasien yang datang dalam keadaan stadium lanjut. Hal ini akan mempengaruhi prognosis dan tingkat kesembuhan pasien. Terdapat beberapa faktor yang mempengaruhi prognosis dari kanker payudara, antara lain grading histopatologi, dan marker imunohistokimia klasik seperti reseptor estrogen, reseptor progesteron, dan HER2. Selain itu, kanker payudara dapat diklasifikasikan menjadi 4 subtipe molekuler utama, yaitu Luminal A, Luminal B, HER2-Overexpression, dan Triple Negative/Basal-Like. Tujuan: Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui hubungan antara grading histopatologi dengan subtipe molekuler pasien kanker payudara di RSUP Haji Adam Malik Tahun 2016-2018. Metode: Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian analitik menggunakan desain cross-sectional dengan teknik pengambilan sampel consecutive-sampling. Data diperoleh secara sekunder dari rekam medis pasien kanker payudara di RSUP Haji Adam Malik pada tahun 2016-2018 dan kemudian dianalisis dengan uji chi-square. Dari 1005 kasus kanker payudara selama periode 2016-2018, diambil sampel pada penelitian ini sebanyak 131 buah rekam medis. Hasil: Dari 131 sampel, grading histopatologi terbanyak terdapat pada grade 2 dengan 53 orang (40,5%) , diikuti 41 orang (31,3%) dengan grade 3, dan 37 orang (28,2%) dengan grade 1. Subtipe molekuler terbanyak yaitu Luminal A dengan 38 orang (29%), diikuti 33 orang (25,2%) dengan Luminal B, 31 orang (23,7%) dengan HER-2 Overexpression, dan 29 orang (22,1%) dengan Triple Negative/Basal-like. Dari hasil uji chi-square diperoleh nilai p sebesar 0,045. Kesimpulan: Terdapat hubungan antara grading histopatologi dengan subtipe molekuler pasien kanker payudara. Kata kunci: grading histopatologi, imunohistokimia, kanker payudara, subtipe molekuler


2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 583-583
Author(s):  
George Stathopoulos ◽  
Nikolaos Malamos ◽  
Christos Markopoulos ◽  
Athanasios Polychronis ◽  
Sotirios Rigatos ◽  
...  

583 Background: The Ki-67 antigen was identified the involvement in early steps of polymerase I-dependent ribosomal RNA synthesis. Although it seems that the protein has an important function in cell division, its exact role is still obscure and there is little published work on its overall function. The aim of the present study is to evaluate the contribution of Ki-67 level in respect of tumor recurrence in molecular classified groups of breast cancer patients. Methods: Breast cancer tumor samples were examined for histological confirmation and for estrogen and progesterone receptors, c-erb-B2 expression, proliferation with Grade and Ki-67. Ki-67 was divided in percentage levels, up to 20 and higher than 20%. Immunohistochemistry and Fluorescence in situ hybridization is described for the results of ER, PR, c-erb-B2, Ki-67 biomarkers. Formaldehyde – fixed breast samples were paraffin wax embedded and processed for paraffin sections. The primary antibodies used were: The monoclinal antibody ID5 (M7047, Dakocytomation, Carpinteria, CA) for the detection of ER, the monoclonal anti-PR antibody 636 was used. For the detection of Ki-67 we used monoclonal mouse anti-human Ki-67 MIB-1. The patients molecular classification was Luminal A, Luminal B, Her-2 subtype and basal cell (triple negative). Results: 847 breast cancer patients were recruited. 291 were group as Luminal A, 228 as Luminal B, 221 Her-2 subtype and 107 triple negative. Follow-up was from 3 years to 15 years since diagnosis. It was found that in Luminal A patients, none had Ki-67 higher than 20% and the recurrence was in 10.65%. In Luminal B, the Ki-67 was higher than 20% in 61% of the patients and recurrence 23.68%. In Her-2 subtype >20% Ki-67 was 78.94%, recurrence 17.19%. In triple negative > 20% Ki-67 was in 68.75% and recurrence in 29.90% of the patients. Conclusions: The data presented here indicate that Ki-67 level may be considered as one of valuable biomarkers in breast cancer patients process and recurrence.


2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e11559-e11559
Author(s):  
Muhammet Ali Kaplan ◽  
Ülkü Yalçintas Arslan ◽  
Abdurrahman Isikdogan ◽  
Berna Oksuzoglu ◽  
Mevlude Inanc ◽  
...  

e11559 Background: Relapse is one of the most important risk factors in overall survival, and distant recurrence is related to a complex biologic interaction of seed and soil factors. The aim of the study was to investigate the association between the molecular subtypes and patterns of relapse in patients with curative surgery performed breast cancer. Methods: We retrospectively evaluated clinical data from 1126 breast cancer patients with relapses after their curative surgery between 1998 and 2012 from referral centers of Turkey. Study population was divided into four biological subtypes according to their hormone receptor status and HER2 expression.Patients were divided into four biological subtypes according to IHC: triple negative (ER negative, PR negative, and HER2 negative), HER2 overexpressing (ER negative, PR negative, and HER2 positive), luminal B (ER and/or PR positive, HER2 positive), and luminal A (ER and/or PR positive, HER2 negative). Results: The proportion of patients with luminal A, Luminal B, HER2-overexpressing, and triple negative breast cancer was 42.0% (n=473), 23.0% (n=259), 13.3% (n=150), and 21,7% (n=244), respectively. Median time to relapse was 26.6 months. 22.5% of the patients (n=253) had multiple relapse sites. The incidence of first distant recurrence site was significantly different among the subtypes. Liver (31.8% vs. 22.4%, p=0.008), bone (42.2% vs 37.0%, p<0.001), and lung metastases (30.9% vs. 22.2%, p=0.019) were increased in HER2 overexpressing, luminal A and triple negative group as first relapse site compared with other groups, respectively. Brain metastasis was increased in HER2 overexpressing and triple negative groups (17.7%), compared with Luminal A and B groups (8.0%, p<0.001). Conclusions: Organ-specific metastasis may depend on the molecular subtype of breast cancer. Tailored strategies against distant metastasis concerning the molecular subtypes in breast cancer may be considered.


2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (8) ◽  
pp. 1168-1176 ◽  
Author(s):  
Judith Hugh ◽  
John Hanson ◽  
Maggie Chon U. Cheang ◽  
Torsten O. Nielsen ◽  
Charles M. Perou ◽  
...  

PurposeTo investigate the prognostic and predictive significance of subtyping node-positive early breast cancer by immunohistochemistry in a clinical trial of a docetaxel-containing regimen.MethodsPathologic data from a central laboratory were available for 1,350 patients (91%) from the BCIRG 001 trial of docetaxel, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide (TAC) versus fluorouracil, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide (FAC) for operable node-positive breast cancer. Patients were classified by tumor characteristics as (1) triple negative (estrogen receptor [ER]–negative, progesterone receptor [PR]–negative, HER2/neu [HER2]–negative), (2) HER2 (HER2-positive, ER-negative, PR-negative), (3) luminal B (ER-positive and/or PR-positive and either HER2-positive and/or Ki67high), and (4) luminal A (ER-positive and/or PR-positive and not HER2-positive or Ki67high), and assessed for prognostic significance and response to adjuvant chemotherapy.ResultsPatients were subdivided into triple negative (14.5%), HER2 (8.5%), luminal B (61.1%), and luminal A (15.9%). Three-year disease-free survival (DFS) rates (P values with luminal B as referent) were 67% (P < .0001), 68% (P = .0008), 82% (referent luminal B), and 91% (P = .0027), respectively, with hazard ratios of 2.22, 2.12, and 0.46. Improved 3-year DFS with TAC was found in the luminal B group (P = .025) and a combined ER-positive/HER2-negative group treated with tamoxifen (P = .041), with a marginal trend in the triple negatives (P = .051) and HER2 (P = .068) subtypes. No DFS advantage was seen in the luminal A population.ConclusionA simple immunopanel can divide breast cancers into biologic subtypes with strong prognostic effects. TAC significantly complements endocrine therapy in patients with luminal B subtype and, in the absence of targeted therapy, is effective in the triple-negative population.


2021 ◽  
Vol 107 (1_suppl) ◽  
pp. 12-12
Author(s):  
D Aissaoui ◽  
M Bohli ◽  
R Ben Amor ◽  
J Yahyaoui ◽  
A Hamdoun ◽  
...  

Introduction: Inflammatory Breast Cancer (IBC) is a rare and very aggressive breast cancer with poor prognosis. The prevalence is different from a country to another. In Tunisia, it is about 5 to 7% of breast cancer. The aim of this study is to describe the epidemiological and histopathological features of patients with inflammatory breast cancer and to evaluate the treatment response according to the molecular subtypes. Methods: This retrospective review identified 31 patients with no metastatic IBC treated in our radiotherapy department between December 2019 and November 2020. IBC was confirmed using the clinical criteria. Baseline clinic-pathological and treatment information was retrieved from medical records. Statistical analysis was performed with IBM SPSS V.20. Results: Median age was 51.3 years [27-68]. 48% of tumors were grade 3. The average tumor size was 36mm [10-90]. The histological type was ductal carcinoma in 97%. Vascular invasion was noted in 24 patients (77%). Thirty patients were classified as stage IIIB and one patient was IIIC. 74% were hormone receptor positive and 45% were HER2 positive. Luminal B was the predominant subtype (52%) followed by Her2 positive (32%), Luminal A (23%), and triple negative (3%) All patients had chemotherapy: neoadjuvant for 26 patients (84%) and adjuvant for 5 patients (16%). Nine patients (29%) had tumor pathological complete response (pCR). Partial response was observed in 18 patients (58%). Lymph node pCR was noted in 16% of cases (n=5). Endocrine therapy and trastuzumab were given to 76% and 45% of patients, respectively. The influence of the molecular subtype was not statistically significant on the response to neoadjuvant treatment. The highest rate of pCR were 43% for Her2positive, then 27%, 21% and 9% for Luminal B, Luminal A and Triple negative, respectively (p=0.2). Conclusion: Our study showed a high percentage of hormone receptor and Her2+ (74% and 45% respectively) in IBC. Luminal B was the most frequent subtype. Anthracycline-based chemotherapy and trastuzumab improved the pCR rate: 44% for Her2positive. Triple negative showed poorer pCR than other breast cancer subtype without a significant difference. A larger study is warranted to confirm our findings.


2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e12570-e12570
Author(s):  
Lalnun Puii ◽  
Lalram Sangi ◽  
Hrishi Varayathu ◽  
Samuel Luke Koramati ◽  
Beulah Elsa Thomas ◽  
...  

e12570 Background: Gene expression profiling for breast cancer has classified ER positive subtype into luminal A and luminal B. Luminal B breast cancer (LBBC) have a higher proliferation and poorer prognosis than luminal A tumors. Ki-67 index is the commonly used proliferation marker in breast cancer; however Ki67 expression can also be used to identify a subset of patients among LB with a favorable prognosis. This study attempts to verify this subset of LBBC patients based on DFS and PFS in non-metastatic and metastatic patients respectively. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 80 IDC breast cancer patients diagnosed in 2013-2016 with complete follow-up till January-2021. We defined LBBC as ER+, PR+ or PR- , HER2+ or HER2- with a Ki67 index >20%. PFS was considered as the endpoint in patients presenting with metastatic disease whereas DFS was used in non-metastatic disease. The cut-off for ki67 was calculated using an X-tile plot (version 3.6.1, Yale University) by dividing Ki67 data into two populations: low and high, with randomized 1:1 “training” and “validation” cohorts. Results: Median age was 51.5 years. 18.7% (n=15) presented with metastasis at the time of diagnosis and their overall median PFS was found to be 25.8 months. The incidence of HER2 positive LBBC was found to be 15% (n=12) and none of them were found to be presented with metastasis. Survival and frequency of various sub groups in our study are enlisted in the given table. We estimated a Ki67 cut-off of 30% in patients with upfront metastatic disease and PFS was found to be higher in <30% compared to a Ki67 index >30% (38.9 months vs 19.7 months, p-0.002). Overall median DFS was not achieved in non-metastatic group (Mean DFS: 64.7 months) where as a statistically significant difference was observed in the survival of HER2 positive (median DFS: 53.5 months, mean DFS: 50.9) than HER2 negative patients (median DFS not achieved, mean: 66.97 months) ( p-0.021). We obtained a Ki67 cut-off of 32% in non- metastatic group and mean DFS was found to be higher in Ki67<32% (69 months) compared to Ki67>32% (61.4 months), however it failed to exhibit a statistically significant relationship ( p-0.373). Conclusions: Our study indicates that a subset of patients exists within metastatic and non-metastatic LBBC with differing prognosis based on Ki67. Larger studies are further required to confirm the findings and therapeutic implications.[Table: see text]


2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 572-572
Author(s):  
Yunan Han ◽  
Shuai Xu ◽  
Graham A. Colditz ◽  
Adetunji T. Toriola

572 Background: Breast cancer is the second leading cause of cancer death in U.S. women. On the molecular level, breast cancer is a heterogeneous disease. Heterogeneous expressions of estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) are etiologically and clinically meaningful, as they map to distinct risk factors and different treatment strategies. Although breast cancer mortality has been declining since 1990, little is known about mortality trends according to molecular subtypes at the population level. Methods: We examined the incidence-based mortality rates and trends among women who were diagnosed with invasive breast cancer from 2010 through 2017 using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. We defined incidence-based mortality using a moving 5-year calendar period starting in 2014. We further assessed mortality according to breast cancer molecular subtypes: luminal A (ER and/or PR positive, HER2 negative), luminal B (ER and/or PR positive, HER2 positive), HER2-enriched (HER2 over-expressed or amplified, ER and PR negative) and triple-negative (ER and PR negative, HER2 negative) tumors. We calculated annual percent changes (APC) in incidence-based mortality using joinpoint regression models. Results: Overall, incidence-based mortality for breast cancer significantly decreased by 1.5% annually from 2014 through 2017 (APC, -1.5%; 95% coefficient interval [CI], -2.3% to -0.7%; p<0.001). Incidence-based mortality decreased annually by 2.0% for luminal A breast cancer (APC, -2.0%; 95% CI, -3.7% to -0.3%; p<0.001), 2.1% for luminal B breast cancer (APC, -2.1%; 95% CI, -5.4% to 1.4%; p=0.1), 1.1% for triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) (APC, -1.1%; 95% CI, -2.1% to -0.0%; p<0.001). However, incidence-based mortality for HER2-enriched breast cancer increased 2.3% annually during the study period (APC, 2.3%; 95% CI, -2.4% to 7.2%; p=0.2). Conclusions: Between 2014 and 2017, incidence-based mortality for luminal A, luminal B, and TNBC decreased among U.S. women, with a larger decrease observed for luminal tumors. However, incidence-based mortality for HER2-enriched breast cancer increased. The favorable incidence-based mortality trends for luminal tumors and TNBC are likely due to the continuing improvement in treatments and early detection. The increasing trend of incidence-based mortality for HER2-enriched breast cancer constitutes a priority for cancer control activities and further research.


2020 ◽  
Vol 66 (1) ◽  
pp. 89-94
Author(s):  
T.S. Kalinina ◽  
V.V. Kononchuk ◽  
S.V. Sidorov ◽  
L.F. Gulyaeva

Breast cancer (BC) is the most common cancer among women. It is known that the prolactin receptor (PRLR) may play a role in breast carcinogenesis, but the available data are often contradictory. To get a more complete picture of the relationship between the receptor and mammary gland carcinogenesis, we examined the association between changes in PRLR expression level and tumor subtype (and its main characteristics). To do this, using real-time PCR, we evaluated the level of PRLR mRNA in BC tissue samples and untransformed adjoining tissue samples (89 pairs). Since the androgen receptor (AR) has begun to be seen as a prognostic marker in breast cancer, we also evaluated the association between mRNA levels of AR and PRLR. We found a significant increase in PRLR expression in luminal subtypes; the highest level of PRLR mRNA was detected in luminal A subtype. In HER2-positive ER-, PR-negative BC, the PRLR mRNA level decreases in tumor tissues compared with untransformed tissues. High PRLR expression is also associated with smaller tumor size in luminal B HER2-negative subtype. In ER-, PR-negative tumors, PRLR expression is associated with AR expression: PRLR mRNA level is increased when AR mRNA level is reduced by more than 8 times in triple-negative tumors; in contrast, in HER2-positive subtype it decreases more significantly when AR expression is reduced by more than 3 times. A tendency towards an increase in PRLR expression with an increase in the AR mRNA level was also discovered in luminal subtypes. The level of PRLR expression depends on the age of patients. In luminal A, PRLR expression is higher in patients under 65 years. In contrast, in luminal B HER2-negative and triple-negative BC, reduced PRLR expression was observed in patients under the age of 40 years and under the age of 50 years, respectively. In this group of patients under the age of 40 years with luminal B HER2-negative BC, ER expression was also reduced (0-4 score according to the IHC assay). Thus, PRLR probably plays a different role in the development and progression of BC: in luminal A and luminal B HER2-positive subtypes PRLR may act as an oncogen, and in luminal B HER2-negative and ER-, PR-negative subtypes can play a tumor suppressor role.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document