A randomized, double-blinded, phase II study of paclitaxel/carboplatin (PC) plus CT-322 versus PC plus bevacizumab (Bev) as first-line treatment for advanced nonsquamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 7584-7584 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eugene Henry Paschold ◽  
Julien Mazieres ◽  
Hervé Lena ◽  
Giorgio Cruciani ◽  
Glen Laird ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Response Rate ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Randomized Study ◽  
Disease Stage ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
First Line ◽  
Bleeding Events ◽  
Ecog Performance Status ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
First Line Treatment

7584 Background: CT- 322 is a pegylated protein engineered from the tenth type III human fibronectin domain thatspecifically blocks VEGFR-2 signaling by all known ligands. This international randomized study assessed the efficacy and safety of PC + CT-322 compared to PC + Bev as first-line treatment for advanced non-squamous NSCLC. Methods: In addition to paclitaxel 200 mg/m2and carboplatin AUC 6 given on day 1 of a 21 day cycle(maximum 6 cycles), subjects, stratified by ECOG performance status, disease stage, and site, were randomized 1:1 to receive either CT-322 2 mg/kg on days 1, 8, and 15 (arm A) or Bev 15 mg/kg on day 1 and placebo on days 8 and 15 (arm B). CT -322 and Bev/placebo were continued as maintenance until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal of consent. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS); secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), response rate, and safety. Results: 255 subjects were randomized to arm A (n=127) or arm B (n=128). Baseline characteristics were wellbalanced. After a median follow- up of 13.8 months, 9 subjects on arm A and 24 on arm B remained on study treatment. The median treatment duration was 19 weeks in arm A and 26.3 weeks on arm B. The median PFS in arm A was 5.6 months compared to 6.8 months in arm B (HR 1.51, 1 -sided p=0.997). In all prespecified subgroups, PFS was favored in arm B. The response rate was 25.2% in arm A compared to 32.8% in arm B. Median OS was 12.5 months in arm A compared to 15.2 months in arm B. The most common grade ≥ 3 adverse events (Arm A vs B) were neutropenia (47.2% vs 49.2%), thrombocytopenia (11.8% vs 6.3%), and fatigue (10.2% in both arms). Grade ≥ 3 hypertension was more frequently reported in arm A (8.7% vs 3.1%). Grade ≥ 3 venous thrombosis (5.5% vs 6.3%), proteinuria (1.6% vs 2.3%), and bleeding events (0.8% vs 1.6%) were similar. Conclusions: PC + CT-322 failed to improve PFS, OS, or response rate compared to PC + Bev. However, thesafety profile in the PC + CT-322 arm was consistent with the anti-angiogenic mechanism of action, suggesting that CT-322 has biological activity as an inhibitor of VEGFR-2.

Randomized phase III study of irinotecan and 5-FU/FA with or without cetuximab in the first-line treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC): The CRYSTAL trial

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4000-4000 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. Van Cutsem ◽  
M. Nowacki ◽  
I. Lang ◽  
S. Cascinu ◽  
I. Shchepotin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Response Rate ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
First Line ◽  
Ecog Performance Status ◽  
Skin Reactions ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B ◽  
First Line Treatment

4000 Background: Cetuximab in combination with irinotecan-based regimens has proven activity in previously-treated patients (pts) with mCRC. The present trial investigated the effectiveness of cetuximab in combination with standard FOLFIRI compared with FOLFIRI alone in the first-line treatment of pts with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-expressing mCRC. Methods: Pts were randomized 1:1 to receive either cetuximab (400 mg/m2 initial dose then 250 mg/m2/week [w]) plus FOLFIRI q 2 w (irinotecan 180 mg/m2, FA 400 mg/m2, 5-FU bolus 400 mg/m2, 5-FU infusion 2,400 mg/m2 over 46 hours) (Group A) or FOLFIRI alone (Group B). The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS), with secondary endpoints of overall survival (OS), response rate (RR), disease control rate and safety. 633 events were required to statistically differentiate PFS between groups with 80% power. Results: Between August 2004 and October 2005, 1,217 pts were randomized, 608 to Group A and 609 to Group B (60% male, median age 61 [19–84], ECOG performance status: 0=54%; 1=43.5%; 2=3.5%). Median PFS was significantly longer for Group A compared to Group B (8,9 months [8 - 9,5] for Group A vs. 8 months [7.6 - 9] for Group B, p=0.036). Response Rate was also significantly increased by cetuximab (46.9% vs. 38.7%, p=0.005). Treatment was generally well tolerated with neutropenia (26.7% Group A, 23.3% Group B), diarrhea (15.2% and 10.5% respectively) and skin reactions (18.7% and 0.2% respectively) being the most common grade 3/4 adverse events. Conclusions: Cetuximab in combination with FOLFIRI significantly increases response rate and significantly prolongs PFS in the first-line treatment of pts with mCRC, reducing the relative risk of progression by approximately 15%. Treatment-related side effects of cetuximab in combination with FOLFIRI were as expected, with diarrhea being moderately and skin reactions significantly more frequent as compared to FOLFIRI alone. [Table: see text]

Secondary resection in a general mCRC population with cetuximab-based first-line treatment: Interim analysis of the German noninterventional study ERBITAG.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e14532-e14532
Author(s):  
Ulf P Neumann ◽  
Thomas Goehler ◽  
Gernot Reich ◽  
Michael Schwerdtfeger ◽  
Patrick Stuebs ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Interim Analysis ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
R0 Resection ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
Resection Rate ◽  
First Line ◽  
Ecog Performance Status ◽  
Noninterventional Study ◽  
First Line Treatment

e14532 Background: Resection of liver and/or lung metastases (LM) are a potentially curative option for patients with mCRC. Cetuximab in combination with irinotecan- or oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy has shown to increase the resection rate of primarily unresectable LM in mCRC patients. After approval of cetuximab in Germany for first-line treatment of pts with unresectable mCRC, this noninterventional study was initiated to evaluate safety and efficacy of cetuximab in combination with various first-line chemotherapy regimens in patients with unresectable mCRC. Methods: We conducted an interim analysis of the first 124 fully documented pts to evaluate the response rate (RR) and resection rate of LM. Enrolment was restricted to pts with mCRC with proven KRAS wildtype mutation status without prior systemic treatment in the metastatic stage. Predefined endpoints were amongst others RR, LM resection rate, TTF, PFS, OS, and safety. Results: From May 2010 to May 2012 360 eligible pts were enrolled at 109 sites (75% office-based physicians), documentation for 124 was finalised (data cut-off for this analysis 03 May 2012) and evaluated. The median age was 68 [range 34-84] years, ECOG performance status was 0, 1, 2 in 29%, 60%, and 9% of pts, respectively, in 2% of pts ECOG performance status was missing. Resection rate was 18.5% (n=23) performed at 18 sites with 16.9% R0 resections (n=21). 42% of pts (n=52) had liver-limited disease (LLD). Resection rate in pts with LLD was 34.6% (n=18) with a 30.6% R0-resection rate (n=16). Median treatment duration from start of cetuximab-based therapy to resection of LM was 3.7 months [0.7-12.0]. Objective response rate was 46.8% (CR 4.8%, PR 41.9%) and 59.6% (CR 5.8%, PR 53.8%) for pts with LLD. Conclusions: In a clinical practice setting cetuximab-based first-line treatment of an unselected population with KRAS wildtype mCRC resulted in an R0-resection rate of 16.9% overall, and 30.6% for LLD pts. These data compare fairly well with data from clinical trials: CRYSTAL, OPUS, and CELIM.

Secondary resection in a general mCRC population with cetuximab-based first-line treatment: Interim analysis of the German noninterventional study ERBITAG.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 590-590 ◽  
Author(s):  
Friedrich Overkamp ◽  
Thomas Goehler ◽  
Gernot Reich ◽  
Michael Schwerdtfeger ◽  
Patrick Stuebs ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Interim Analysis ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
R0 Resection ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
Resection Rate ◽  
First Line ◽  
Ecog Performance Status ◽  
Noninterventional Study ◽  
First Line Treatment

590 Background: Resection of liver and/or lung metastases (LM) are a potentially curative option for patients with mCRC. Cetuximab in combination with irinotecan- or oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy has shown to increase the resection rate of primarily unresectable LM in mCRC patients. After approval of cetuximab in Germany for first-line treatment of pts with unresectable mCRC, this noninterventional study was initiated to evaluate safety and efficacy of cetuximab in combination with various first-line chemotherapy regimens in patients with unresectable mCRC. Methods: We conducted an interim analysis of the first 124 fully documented pts to evaluate the response rate (RR) and resection rate of LM. Enrolment was restricted to pts with mCRC with proven KRAS wildtype mutation status without prior systemic treatment in the metastatic stage. Predefined endpoints were amongst others RR, LM resection rate, TTF, PFS, OS, and safety. Results: From May 2010 to May 2012 360 eligible pts were enrolled at 109 sites (75% office-based physicians), documentation for 124 was finalised (data cut-off for this analysis 03 May 2012) and evaluated. The median age was 68 [range 34-84] years, ECOG performance status was 0, 1, 2 in 29%, 60%, and 9% of pts, respectively, in 2% of pts ECOG performance status was missing. Resection rate was 18.5% (n=23) performed at 18 sites with 16.9% R0 resections (n=21). 42% of pts (n=52) had liver-limited disease (LLD). Resection rate in pts with LLD was 34.6% (n=18) with a 30.6% R0-resection rate (n=16). Median treatment duration from start of cetuximab-based therapy to resection of LM was 3.7 months [0.7-12.0]. Objective response rate was 46.8% (CR 4.8%, PR 41.9%) and 59.6% (CR 5.8%, PR 53.8%) for pts with LLD. Conclusions: In a clinical practice setting cetuximab-based first-line treatment of an unselected population with KRAS wildtype mCRC resulted in an R0-resection rate of 16.9% overall, and 30.6% for LLD pts. These data compare fairly well with data from clinical trials: CRYSTAL, OPUS, and CELIM.

Phase II study of infusional 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, and irinotecan (FOLFIRI) plus bevacizumab as first-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4089-4089 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Kopetz ◽  
K. Y. Glover ◽  
C. Eng ◽  
R. A. Wolff ◽  
D. Z. Chang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase Ii ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
First Line ◽  
Intention To Treat ◽  
Hand Foot Syndrome ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
First Line Treatment

4089 Background: When compared to bolus 5-fluorouracil (F), leucovorin (L), and irinotecan (I) regimens such as IFL, the infusional F, L, I regimen (FOLFIRI) resulted in a improved toxicity profile with a response rate (RR) of 35% and median progression free survival (PFS) of 6.7 months. When combined with bevacizumab (B) as first-line treatment, IFL demonstrated improved activity with a RR of 45% and a median PFS of 10.6 months. Combining FOLFIRI and B may further improve the efficacy. Methods: We designed a single-arm, phase II trial of FOLFIRI+B with B (5mg/kg), I (180mg/m2), bolus of F (400mg/m2) and L (400mg/m2) with a 46-hour infusion of F (2400mg/m2) every 2 weeks. The primary endpoint was PFS. Chemotherapy naïve mCRC patients (pts) with a performance status of 0–2 received B alone on Day -14, starting FOLFIRI+B on Day 1. Proteomic and radiographic correlative studies were completed and will be reported separately. Results: N=41 pts, median age 56 y/o (range 26–78), M:F = 16:25, 5 pts with prior adjuvant therapy, were enrolled from 1/2005 to 1/2007. A total of 502 cycles have been administered (median = 12). The median PFS is 12.6 months. Response rate by intention-to-treat analysis was 62% (24 pts), with 33% stable disease (13 pts). Responses occurred after a median of 4 months of therapy. Fifteen pts remain on treatment; 26 pts are off study: 7 for progressive disease, 2 withdrew consent, 7 for toxicity and 2 for surgery unrelated to cancer. Eight pts were removed from the study for metastasectomies. Grade 3 or 4 toxicities included 17 occurrences of grade = 3 neutropenia, including 1 grade 4 febrile neutropenia, 4 grade 4 pulmonary emboli, 2 grade 3 hand-foot syndrome, and 1 grade 3 diarrhea. One pt included in the analysis developed a possible microperforation, manifested by peritonitis, after B alone and never received FOLFIRI. Conclusion: FOLFIRI+B is well-tolerated and efficacious, with an impressive PFS that compares favorably to historical controls. This regimen is an excellent choice as a first-line treatment for mCRC. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Cetuximab plus 5-FU/FA/oxaliplatin (FOLFOX-4) versus FOLFOX-4 in the first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC): OPUS, a randomized phase II study

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4035-4035 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Bokemeyer ◽  
I. Bondarenko ◽  
A. Makhson ◽  
J. T. Hartmann ◽  
J. Aparicio ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
First Line ◽  
Ecog Performance Status ◽  
Curative Intent ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Ecog Ps ◽  
First Line Treatment

4035 Background: FOLFOX-4 is a standard first-line treatment for patients (pts) with mCRC. The IgG1 monoclonal antibody cetuximab has proven activity in combination with cytotoxic chemotherapy. Excellent response rates (RRs) have been reported with first-line cetuximab and FOLFOX-4. This randomized, controlled study was conducted to compare RRs of FOLFOX-4 + cetuximab vs FOLFOX-4. Methods: Pts with previously untreated epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-expressing mCRC not resectable with curative intent were eligible. They were randomized 1:1, stratified by ECOG performance status (PS) (0–1 vs 2), to either Group A (cetuximab 400 mg/m2 initial dose then 250 mg/m2/week plus FOLFOX-4 every 2 weeks [oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2 day (d) 1; FA 200 mg/m2 d1, 2; 5-FU 400 mg/m2 bolus + 600 mg/m2 infusion over 22 h, d1, 2]) or Group B (FOLFOX-4 only). The primary objective was the best confirmed RR assessed by independent review; secondary objectives were progression- free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), the R0 resection rate after metastatic surgery of curative intent and safety. Results: Between July 2005 and March 2006, 337 pts were randomized and treated in more than 70 centers in Europe. 181 (53.7%) pts were male; the median age of all pts was 61.0 years [24–82]; 305 (90.5%) pts had an ECOG PS of 0 or 1, and 32 (9.5%) of 2. The best overall confirmed RR was 45.6% in A and 35.7% in B. For pts with ECOG PS 0–1, RR was 49.0% in A and 36.8% in B (Odds Ratio 1.648, 95%CI [1.043- 2.604]). PFS and OS results are not yet available. The most common grade 3/4 adverse events were neutropenia (27.6% in A; 31.5% in B), diarrhea (7.1 and 6.0%), leucopenia (7.1 and 5.4%) and rash (9.4%, in A only). Conclusions: The addition of cetuximab increased the RR of FOLFOX-4 in first-line treatment of mCRC. Grade 3/4 adverse events, with the exception of skin rash, were not significantly more frequent in the cetuximab arm. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Phase II trial of combined chemotherapy with irinotecan, S-1, and bevacizumab (IRIS/Bev) in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC): Final analysis—Hokkaido Gastrointestinal Cancer Study Group (HGCSG) trial.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 460-460
Author(s):  
Satoshi Yuki ◽  
Yoshito Komatsu ◽  
Hiraku Fukushima ◽  
Takahide Sasaki ◽  
Toraji Amano ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Primary Endpoint ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Rest Period ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
First Line ◽  
Ecog Performance Status ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
First Line Treatment

460 Background: The FIRIS study (Muro K et al. Lancet Oncol 2010;11:853–860) previously demonstrated the non-inferiority of Irinotecan plus S-1 (IRIS) to FOLFIRI for mCRC, with progression-free survival (PFS) as the primary endpoint. We previously reported that IRIS plus bevacizumab (IRIS/Bev) is very effective as first-line treatment (Komatsu Y et al. Acta Oncol. 2012 May 4). We now report the final results of this study. Methods: Eligible patients had to have mCRC with a confirmed diagnosis of adenocarcinoma, an age of >20 years, ECOG performance status (PS) of 0-1, and no history of prior chemotherapy. S-1 (40-60 mg depending on patients body surface area) was given orally, twice daily for 2 consecutive weeks, and 100 mg/m2irinotecan and 5 mg/kg bevacizumab was given intravenously on day 1 and 15, followed by 2-week rest period, within a 4-week cycle. The primary endpoint was safety. The secondary endpoints included overall response (OR), PFS, and overall survival (OS). Results: A total of 53 patients were enrolled from October 2007 through March 2009. The results were reported for 52 patients with evaluable lesions. The clinical characteristics of the patients were as follows. The median age was 63.5 years (range, 48 to 82). The male:female ratio was 3:2. The most common grade 3 or 4 adverse events were neutropenia (27%) and diarrhea (17%). Grade 3 or 4 hypertension (21%) was attributed to bevacizumab, but there were no life-threatening adverse events, such as gastrointestinal perforation. On an intention-to-treat basis, OR was 63.5% [95% confidence interval (CI) 50.4-76.5%], and the disease control rate was 94.2%. With a median follow-up time of 51.7 months, median PFS was 17.0 months (95%C.I. 14.2-19.8 months) and median survival time was 39.6 months (95%C.I. 34.2-45.0 months). Conclusions: IRIS/Bev is a remarkably active and generally well-tolerated first-line treatment for patients with mCRC. Randomized control trial comparing this regimen with oxaliplatin containing regimen(XELOX or mFOLFOX6 plus bevacizumab: TRICOLORE study) is already started. Clinical trial information: NCT00569790.

Update results from ALTER-C-001: Efficacy and safety of anlotinib plus XELOX regimen as first-line treatment followed by maintenance monotherapy of anlotinib for patients with mCRC-A single-arm, multicenter, phase Ⅱ clinical trial.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e15550-e15550
Author(s):  
Jin Yan ◽  
Yunwei Han ◽  
Li Zhang ◽  
Yongdong Jin ◽  
Hao Sun
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
First Line ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Ecog Performance Status ◽  
Multicenter Phase ◽  
First Line Treatment

e15550 Background: The combination of anti-VEGF or anti-EGFR targeted drugs with chemotherapy is the standard first-line therapy for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), and the followed maintenance treatment is an optional approach to balance the efficacy and toxicity. However, studies regarding the maintenance strategies based on antiangiogenic TKIs are limited currently. Anlotinib, a novel oral multi-target TKI which can inhibit both tumor angiogenesis and tumor cell proliferation simultaneously, substantially prolonged the PFS with manageable toxicity for refractory mCRC in the phase III ALTER0703 clinical trial. Here we report an update on the effectiveness and safety of anlotinib plus XELOX as first-line treatment followed by anlotinib monotherapy for mCRC. Methods: In this open label, single-arm, multicenter phase II clinical trial, 53 mCRC patients without prior systemic treated, aged 18-75 and an ECOG performance status of 0 or 1 were planned to recruit. Eligible patients received capecitabine (1000 mg/m2, po, d1-14, q3w) and oxaliplatin (130 mg/m2, iv, d1, q3w) plus anlotinib (10mg, po, d1̃14, q3w) treatment for 6 cycles. After 6 cycles of inducing therapy, patients would receive anlotinib (12mg, po, d1̃14, q3w) as maintenance therapy until disease progression or intolerable adverse events (AEs). The primary endpoint was PFS; Secondary endpoints included ORR, DCR, DOR and safety. Results: By the data analysis cutoff date of January 22, 2021, a total of 18 patients were enrolled, of which 12 patients were available for efficacy assessment. In best overall response assessment, there were 50.0% PR (6/12), 33.3% SD (4/12) and 16.7% PD (2/12). The ORR was 50.0% (95% CI, 21.1-78.9%) and DCR was 83.3% (95% CI, 51.5-97.9%). The longest duration of treatment was 8.8 months and the response was still ongoing. The median PFS was not reached. The most common treatment related adverse events (TRAEs) of any grade (≥20%) were leukopenia, hypertension, neutropenia, diarrhea, fatigue, hypertriglyceridemia. Grade 3/4 TRAEs included hypertension (22.2%), hypertriglyceridemia (11.1%), lipase elevated (11.1%) and neutropenia (5.6%). No grade 5 AEs occurred. Conclusions: The update results suggested that anlotinib combined with XELOX as first line regimen followed by anlotinib monotherapy showed promising anti-tumor activity and manageable safety for patients with mCRC. And the conclusions needed to be confirmed in trials continued subsequently. Clinical trial information: ChiCTR1900028417.

Pemetrexed (MTA) and carboplatin (CBDCA) in the treatment of advanced pleural mesothelioma (MPM)

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 7093-7093 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. Castagneto ◽  
M. Mencoboni ◽  
D. Degiovanni ◽  
A. Muzio ◽  
L. Giaretto ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Response Rate ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Phase Ii Study ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Entire Group ◽  
Hematologic Toxicity ◽  
First Line ◽  
Ecog Performance Status ◽  
Grade 3

7093 Background: Aim of this study was to evaluate the activity and toxicity of MTA and CBDCA combination as first line chemotherapy in advanced MPM. Methods: Chemonaive patients (pts) with histologically proven, an ECOG performance status (PS) 0–2, and measurable advanced MPM were considered. The schedule of administration was: pemetrexed 500 mg/m2 in combination with CBDA AUC 5, once every 21 days for 8 cycles. Results: From July 2003 to March 2005 76 pts (54 male and 22 female) have been treated with this combination chemotherapy. Median age was 62.7 years (range 40–70); median PS 0 (range 0–3); epithelial histologic findings were in 57 (75%), mixed in 13 (17.1%), sarcomatous in 3 (3.9%), and unspecified in 3 (3.9%) pts. A total of 537 cycles was administered (median 7, range 1 to 13). Grade 3 hematologic toxicity according to WHO criteria was seen in 43 (56.6%) pts (neutropenia in 30, thrombocytopenia in 8, and anemia in 5); grade 4 hematologic toxicity in 5 (6.6%) pts. The most common nonhematologic events were grade 3 nausea/vomiting in 10 (13.1%), and fever in 4 (5.3%) pts. 74 pts were evaluable for clinical response. There were 16 (21.%) partial responses (PR) and 3 (3.9%) complete responses (CR), for an overall response rate of 23.9%. 29 (38.2%) pts reported stable disease (SD). The overall survival was considered from date of diagnosis to date of death from any cause or to date of last follow-up. The median survival time for the entire group was estimated at 23 months. Conclusions: The results of this phase II study indicate that, at this dose and schedule, the combination of CBDCA and MTA is moderately active and that the profile of toxicity is acceptable in pts with advanced MPM. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Preliminary results from a phase II study of infusional 5-FU, leucovorin, and irinotecan (FOLFIRI) plus bevacizumab as first-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC)

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3579-3579 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Kopetz ◽  
J. L. Abbruzzese ◽  
C. Eng ◽  
R. B. Adinin ◽  
J. Morris ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase Ii ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
First Line ◽  
Curative Surgery ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Preliminary Results ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
First Line Treatment

3579 Background: Irinotecan (I) plus bolus 5-FU (F) and leucovorin (L) comprise the IFL regimen, a very active treatment in mCRC when combined with bevacizumab (B). The response rate (RR) for IFL-B given as first-line treatment is 45%, with a median progression-free survival (PFS) of 10.6 months and a median survival of 20.3 months. The IFL regimen is now considered inferior to infusional 5-FU regimens, such as FOLFIRI, which have less toxicity and improved efficacy. Methods: We designed a 43 patient (pt), single-arm phase II trial of FOLFIRI-B with B (5mg/kg), I (180mg/m2), bolus of F (400mg/m2) and L (400mg/m2) followed by a 46-hour infusion of F (2400mg/m2), with a primary endpoint of progression-free survival (PFS). Chemotherapy naïve mCRC patients (pts) with adequate organ function and performance status 0–2 received B alone on Day minus 14, starting FOLFIRI + B on Day 1. DCE-MRI and laboratory correlates were completed before and after B alone and cycle 1. Once cycle is equivalent to two weeks. Results: 21 pts, median age 59 y/o (range 26–75), M:F = 15:6, 4 with prior F in adjuvant setting, have been enrolled to date. 20 pts are evaluable for response. One pt is too early. A total of 215 cycles have been administered (median 11). Median PFS has not been reached after a median follow-up of 8 months. By intent-to-treat analysis, there were 14 PRs (70%), and 5 (25%) pts with stable disease observed (including 1 unconfirmed PR). PRs were observed from 9 to 35 weeks after the first cycle (median: 18 weeks). 9 pts remain on treatment (1–12 months); 12 pts are off study (3 for progressive disease, 1 withdrew, 4 sent for curative surgery, 2 for toxicity, 2 sent for surgery unrelated to cancer). Toxicity included 10 cases of grade 3 neutropenia, including 1 febrile neutropenia, 4 venous thrombi, and 6 cases of hypertension requiring medication change. One pt included in the analysis developed peritonitis, considered a possible microperforation, after B alone and never received FOLFIRI. No ≥ grade 3 diarrhea was observed. Analysis of correlative studies will be presented at a later date. Conclusion: Our preliminary results indicate that FOLFIRI-B is well tolerated and an excellent choice as a first-line treatment for mCRC. [Table: see text]

Phase II study of bortezomib with cisplatin as first-line treatment of malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM): EORTC 08052.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 7081-7081 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mary O'Brien ◽  
Rabab Mohamed Gaafar ◽  
Sanjaykumar Popat ◽  
Francesco Grossi ◽  
Allan Price ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase Ii ◽  
Phase Ii Study ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Dose Intensity ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
First Line ◽  
Phase Ii Studies ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
First Line Treatment

7081 Background: Cisplatin is one of the most active drugs available in MPM while bortezomib has shown some activity in single agent phase II studies against MPM. This was a prospective phase II study of cisplatin and bortezomib (CB) in the first line treatment of MPM. Methods: Patients with histological proven MPM, with performance status (PS) 0/1, were eligible. The doses were cisplatin 75mg/m2 /3 wks and bortezomib 1.3mg/m2 day 1, 4, 8, 11 every 3 wks. The primary end-point was progression free survival rate at 18 wks (PFSR=18). The 2-stage Simon design (a=0.1; b = 0.05, P0=0.50 and P1=0.675) was used. In the first step of the study 37 eligible patients were planned. If more than 19 patients were alive and free of progression at 18 wks the total sample size was increased to 76 eligible patients. Results: Between 2007 and 2010 82 patients were entered. The median follow-up time is 32.3 months The median age was 55 years (range: 22-77yrs), male/female: 55/27 , PS 0/1: 9/73, Stage T1: 10%; T2: 42%, T3: 25%; T4: 23% and N0: 57%; N1: 4%; N2: 33%; N3: 6%. The median number of cycles received was 4 and 38% received 6 cycles. Cisplatin/ bortezomib dose intensity was 98/ 80%. Toxicity (grade 3/4): neutropenia 10%, thrombocytopenia 11%, anaemia 1%. Grade 3-4 hyponatraemia/ hypokalaemia occurred in 46/ and 17%. Grade 2 tinnitus, grade 3 fatigue occurred in 16%, and 12%, of patients. Motor/sensory/other neurotoxicity was grade 1: 6/28/7%, grade 2: 2/26/2% and grade 3: 1/7/2% respectively. There were 2 toxic deaths at 32 and 74 days due to acute pneumonitis and cardiac arrest. The PFRS-18 (including symptomatic progression) was 53% (80% confidence intervals, CI, 42-64%). The overall survival was 13.5 months (95% CI 10.5-15) with 56% (95% CI 44-66%) alive at 1 year. The PFS was 5.1 months (95% CI 3.3-6.5). Conclusions: On the basis of the PFRS-18, the null hypothesis could not be rejected, although CB gave predictable toxicity and was as active as other reported regimens in MPM.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document