O6-benzylguanine (BG) and temozolomide (TMZ) therapy of glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) with infusion of autologous lentiviral transduced P140KMGMT+ hematopoietic progenitors to protect hematopoiesis:  A phase I study.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS1616-TPS1616
Author(s):  
Andrew E. Sloan ◽  
Jane Reese ◽  
Lisa R. Rogers ◽  
Simon S. Lo ◽  
Charles John Nock ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Phase I Study ◽  
Dna Methyltransferase ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Bone Marrow Toxicity ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Methylguanine Dna Methyltransferase ◽  
Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma

TPS1616 Background: The administration of radiation therapy (RT) and concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide (TMZ) for the treatment of newly-diagnosed glioblastoma (GBM) is associated with modestly prolonged survival. However, the benefit of concurrent therapy is restricted to a subgroup of patients whose tumor exhibits methylation of the promoter for methylguanine-DNA-methyltransferase (MGMT). Promoter methylation silences the expression of DNA alkyltransferase (AGT), the product of the MGMT gene which functions to repair alkylated DNA. Unfortunately, the majority of GBMs have non-methylated MGMT promoters and do not appear to benefit from adding TMZ to radiotherapy. Two potential strategies for targeting MGMT-induced chemoprotection in gliomas include depletion of tumor MGMT, and dose escalation of TMZ accomplished by minimizing TMZ-induced bone marrow toxicity. In this study, we propose to combine the irreversible MGMT inhibitor O6-benzylguanine (BG) with infusion of autologous hematopoetic stem cells (HSCs) transduced with lentiviral P140K-MGMT, an MGMT mutant which is highly resistant to inactivation by BG, with the intent to reduce or prevent the myelosuppressive effects of TMZ. The primary objective is to assess the safety and feasibility of combining these two strategies in patients with newly-diagnosed GBM. Methods: This is a three cohort, Phase I study for patients with newly resected supratentorial GBM. There will be at least four evaluable patients per cohort. Cohort 1 will receive standard RT and concomitant TMZ prior to infusion of autologous lentiviral P140K-MGMT transduced HSCs, followed by adjuvant TMZ. Cohort 2 will receive an induction dose of TMZ+BG followed by infusion of autologous LV-P140K-MGMT HSCs prior to concomitant RT +TMZ and adjuvant TMZ. Cohort 3 will include intra-patient dose escalation of TMZ in patients who exhibit detectable levels of P140K-MGMT marked cells in vivo, using the design (i.e. cohort 1 or 2) proven to be safest and most effective. The study is open and has accrued the first patient.

A phase I study of MGMT-P140K transfected hematopoetic progenitor cells (HPC) combined with TMZ/O6BG dose escalation for newly diagnosed, MGMT unmethylated glioblastoma: Tolerance and evidence of survival benefit.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 2062-2062
Author(s):  
Andrew E. Sloan ◽  
Lisa Roger ◽  
Chris Murphy ◽  
Jane Reese ◽  
Hillard M. Lazarus ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bone Marrow ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Dna Methyltransferase ◽  
Tumor Response ◽  
Insertion Site ◽  
Hematologic Toxicity ◽  
Bone Marrow Toxicity ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Mgmt Gene

2062 Background: GBM is the most common malignant brain tumor with a median survival of 15 months despite surgery and radio-chemotherapy. The most important mechanism of TMZ resistance is the O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) gene which repairs temozolamide-induced DNA methylation. The MGMT inhibitor O6-benzylguanine (BG) demonstrated efficacy in depleting MGMT and maximizing tumor response in early phase clinical trials. However, MGMT expression is also low in hematopoietic cells, so this approach led to unacceptable bone marrow toxicity and thus has been abandoned. We hypothesized that chemoprotection of hematopoietic HPC with an MGMT mutant (MGMT-P140K) characterized by normal methyltransferase activity, coupled with low affinity for BG would maximize anti-tumor response while enabling patients to tolerate TMZ & BG dose escalation with minimal toxicity. A phase I trial was performed to test this hypothesis. Methods: 10 adults with newly diagnosed MGMT unmethylated, IDH-1 WT, GBM underwent standard surgery and radiation, followed by transplantation with autologous CD34+ HPC engineered to express MGMT-P140K using a lentiviral vector. We tested tolerance and efficacy of three different paradigms for conditioning bone marrow and re-infusion of HPC. To assess chemo-protection, patients’ blood counts and transgene marking were monitored during and after treatment, as was toxicity, response, and progression-free and overall survival. Results: Treatment was moderately toxic with 3/10 patients suffering grade 3-4 hematologic toxicity; no high grade non-hematologic toxicity was observed . Viral transduction rates ranged from 3-75% and were clearly improved in Arm III utilizing BCNU conditioning and intra-patient dose escalation of TMZ/O6GB. In patients tolerating 3 cycles or more, P140K-MGMT gene markings in peripheral blood and bone marrow cells increased 3-26-fold with only mild (Grade 2-3) mylosuppression consistent with chemo-protection as hypothesized. Median PFS and OS was 22 and 31 months respectfully, and three patients in Arm III are healthy and progression free at 36-39 months. OS exceeded RPA predicted survival by 3.3-fold suggesting clinical benefit. Viral insertion site analysis demonstrate lack of clonal dominance. Conclusions: P140K-MGMT transfected HPC enables TMZ/ BG dose escalation with acceptable toxicity and increased survival in a small cohort of selected patients. A phase II study is ongoing. Clinical trial information: NCT01269424.

scholarly journals CTNI-49. PHASE I STUDY OF MGMT-P140K TRANSFECTED HEMATOPOETIC PROGENITOR CELLS COMBINED WITH TMZ/O6BG DOSE ESCALATION FOR NEWLY DIAGNOSED, UNMETHYLATED GLIOBLASTOMA: TOLERANCE AND EVIDENCE OF SURVIVAL BENEFIT

2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. ii53-ii53
Author(s):  
Andrew E Sloan ◽  
Hua Fung ◽  
Jane Reese ◽  
Lisa Rgers ◽  
Christopher Murphy ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bone Marrow ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Dna Methyltransferase ◽  
Lentiviral Vector ◽  
Insertion Site ◽  
Hematologic Toxicity ◽  
Bone Marrow Toxicity ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Mgmt Gene

Abstract INTRODUCTION GBM has median survival of 12 months despite current SOC therapy. The most important mechanism of TMZ resistance is the O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) gene. The MGMT inhibitor O6-benzylguanine (BG) demonstrated efficacy in depleting MGMT but approach led to unacceptable bone marrow toxicity and has thus been abandoned. We hypothesized that chemoprotection of hematopoietic HPC with an MGMT mutant (MGMT-P140K) characterized by normal methyltransferase activity, coupled with low affinity for BG would maximize anti-tumor response while enabling patients to tolerate TMZ & BG dose escalation with minimal toxicity. A phase I trial was performed to test this hypothesis. METHODS 10 adults with newly diagnosed MGMT unmethylated, IDH-1 WT, GBM underwent standard surgery and radiation, followed by transplantation with autologous CD34+ HPC transfected with MGMT-P140K using a lentiviral vector. We tested tolerance and efficacy of three different paradigms for conditioning bone marrow and re-infusion of HPC. RESULTS Treatment was moderately toxic with 3/10 patients suffering grade 3–4 hematologic toxicity; no high grade non-hematologic toxicity was observed. Viral transduction rates ranged from 3–75% and were clearly improved in Arm III utilizing BCNU conditioning and intra-patient dose escalation of TMZ/O6GB. In patients tolerating 3 cycles or more, P140K-MGMT gene markings in peripheral blood and bone marrow cells increased 3-26-fold with only mild (Grade 2–3) myelosuppression consistent with chemo-protection as hypothesized. Median PFS and OS was 24 and 33 months respectfully, and three patients in Arm III were progression free at 36 months with one progression free at 48 months. OS exceeded RPA & Nomogram predicted survival by 3.6-fold, suggesting clinical benefit. Viral insertion site analysis demonstrate no clonal dominance. CONCLUSIONS P140K-MGMT transfected HPC enables TMZ/ BG dose escalation with acceptable toxicity and increased survival in a small cohort of selected patients. A U-01 funded phase II study is ongoing at UH and NIH.

scholarly journals NIMG-37. DELAYED PSEUDOPROGRESSION IN TWO PATIENTS UNDERGOING TTFIELDS TREATMENT FOR NEWLY DIAGNOSED GLIOBLASTOMA

2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. ii155-ii156
Author(s):  
Allison Lowman ◽  
Sarah Hurrell ◽  
Samuel Bobholz ◽  
Jennifer Connelly ◽  
Elizabeth Cochran ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Methyltransferase ◽  
Radiographic Progression ◽  
Methylation Status ◽  
Underlying Mechanism ◽  
Recurrent Glioblastoma ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Methylguanine Dna Methyltransferase ◽  
Specific Effects ◽  
Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma ◽  
Associated Risk Factors

Abstract PURPOSE Tumor treatment fields (TTFields) are approved by the FDA for newly diagnosed as well as recurrent glioblastoma (GBM). TTFields have been shown to extend survival by 4.9 months in newly diagnosed GBM, and a landmark overall survival rate of 13% at 5 years. However, the specific effects remain widely unknown, which has prevented widespread clinical use of this treatment. METHODS This case study examines two glioblastoma patients, IDH-1 wildtype, MGMT unmethylated, that received TTFields (Optune) in addition to maintenance temozolomide (TMZ) following radiation (RT). Both cases were followed using standard MR imaging. Second resections were performed due to radiographic progression of contrast enhancement. RESULTS Although imaging was concerning for tumor progression, pathology showed only treatment effect, ultimately leading to the diagnosis of pseudoprogression. Both patients fell outside the normal expected timeline for chemo-radiation induced pseudoprogression. Based on the pathology, both patients resumed treatment with TMZ/TTFields. One patient expired at 25 months and one is still alive. CONCLUSIONS Pathologic confirmation was essential for guiding further treatment and allowed patients to continue treatment that was effective despite contrary indications on imaging. These findings suggest that pathological confirmation should be strongly considered in patients receiving TMZ/TTFields who develop radiographic progression, potentially with a less invasive biopsy procedure. Future studies should look to characterize the underlying mechanism of interaction between TTFields/TMZ and quantify the prevalence, associated risk factors and whether there is a genotype more susceptible. Both patients reported here had O(6)-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) unmethylated GBM, and while about 60% of glioblastomas are diagnosed likewise, it is possible that MGMT methylation status plays a role in TTFields response. Better characterization of this phenomenon will improve treatment guidance, potentially reducing unnecessary surgeries and the discontinuance of successful therapies.

scholarly journals EPCT-06. A PHASE I STUDY OF MULTI-TARGETED THERAPY IN NEWLY DIAGNOSED OR PROGRESSIVE DIFFUSE INTRINSIC PONTINE GLIOMA

2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (Supplement_3) ◽  
pp. iii304-iii305
Author(s):  
Muhammad Baig ◽  
Jason Johnson ◽  
Sumit Gupta ◽  
Zsila Sadighi ◽  
Wafik Zaky ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Targeted Therapy ◽  
Maintenance Therapy ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Phase I Study ◽  
Diffusion Tensor ◽  
Diffuse Intrinsic Pontine Glioma ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Pontine Glioma ◽  
Dose Limiting Toxicity

Abstract BACKGROUND Diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma (DIPG) constitutes 80% of pediatric brain stem tumors with a median survival of 12 months. The PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway is a key oncogenic driver of this tumor. Targeting the chromatin dysregulation through HDAC inhibition, demonstrated benefit in vivo and vitro studies. We completed the first study as a multi-targeted therapy using SAHA and temsirolimus in pediatric DIPG. METHODS After receiving institutional IRB approval, we enrolled 6 patients on this phase I study using a 3 + 3 statistical design. Patients were divided into stratum 1 and stratum 2, based on newly diagnosed or relapsed DIPG respectively. Stratum I patients received radiation therapy concurrently with vorinostat, followed by maintenance therapy with vorinostat and temsirolimus for 10 cycles (28 day cycle), while in stratum II patients received vorinostat and temsirolimus for 12 cycles. Neuroimaging including diffusion tensor imaging were evaluated where feasible. RESULTS Three patients were enrolled in each of the stratum. One patient in stratum 1 completed therapy, 2 other demonstrated progressive disease (PD) after 4th and 1st cycle of maintenance therapy respectively. In stratum 2 all patients progressed 2 months after the start of therapy. However no dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was noted. The patient in stratum 1 who completed therapy, remained free of PD 21 months after diagnosis with continued improvements in the volume of enhancing and T2 hyperintense disease. CONCLUSION Although no significant benefit was seen as compared to historical controls during this study, no dose limiting toxicity was noticed with this treatment.

scholarly journals Safety and tolerability of asunercept plus standard radiotherapy/temozolomide in Asian patients with newly-diagnosed glioblastoma: a phase I study

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kuo-Chen Wei ◽  
Peng-Wei Hsu ◽  
Hong-Chieh Tsai ◽  
Ya-Jui Lin ◽  
Ko-Ting Chen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Phase I Study ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Multicenter Trial ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Asian Patients ◽  
Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma ◽  
Secondary Endpoints

AbstractAsunercept (company code APG101 [Apogenix AG]; company code CAN008 [CANbridge Pharmaceuticals]) is a novel glycosylated fusion protein that has shown promising effectiveness in glioblastoma. This Phase I study was initiated to evaluate the tolerability and safety of asunercept in combination with standard radiotherapy and temozolomide (RT/TMZ) in Asian patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma. This was the Phase I portion of a Phase I/II open label, multicenter trial of asunercept plus standard RT/TMZ. Adults with newly-diagnosed glioblastoma received surgical resection followed by standard RT/TMZ plus asunercept 200 mg/week (Cohort 1) or 400 mg/week (Cohort 2) by 30-min IV infusion. The primary endpoint was the safety and tolerability of asunercept during concurrent asunercept and RT/TMZ; dose-limiting toxicities were observed for each dose. Secondary endpoints included pharmacokinetics (PK) and 6-month progression-free survival (PFS6). All patients (Cohort 1, n = 3; Cohort 2, n = 7) completed ≥ 7 weeks of asunercept treatment. No DLTs were experienced. Only one possibly treatment-related treatment emergent adverse event (TEAE), Grade 1 gingival swelling, was observed. No Grade > 3 TEAEs were reported and no TEAE led to treatment discontinuation. Systemic asunercept exposure increased proportionally with dose and showed low inter-patient variability. The PFS6 rate was 33.3% and 57.1% for patients in Cohort 1 and 2, respectively. Patients in Cohort 2 maintained a PFS rate of 57.1% at Month 12. Adding asunercept to standard RT/TMZ was safe and well tolerated in patients with newly-diagnosed glioblastoma and 400 mg/week resulted in encouraging efficacy.Trial registration NCT02853565, August 3, 2016.

Intraoperative Radiotherapy in Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma (INTRAGO): An Open-Label, Dose-Escalation Phase I/II Trial

Neurosurgery ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 84 (1) ◽  
pp. 41-49 ◽  
Author(s):  
Frank A Giordano ◽  
Stefanie Brehmer ◽  
Bettina Mürle ◽  
Grit Welzel ◽  
Elena Sperk ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Intraoperative Radiotherapy ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Label Dose ◽  
Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma

scholarly journals ATIM-29. NRG BN002: SAFETY DATA FROM A PHASE I STUDY OF IPILIMUMAB (IPI), NIVOLUMAB (NIVO), AND THE COMBINATION FOR NEWLY DIAGNOSED GLIOBLASTOMA (GBM)

2018 ◽  
Vol 20 (suppl_6) ◽  
pp. vi7-vi7
Author(s):  
Mark Gilbert ◽  
Peixin Zhang ◽  
Andrew Sloan ◽  
Kenneth Aldape ◽  
Jing Wu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Phase I Study ◽  
Safety Data ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma

Phase I study of the safety and activity of formulated IL-12 plasmid administered intraperitoneally in combination with neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with newly diagnosed advanced-stage ovarian cancer.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (8_suppl) ◽  
pp. 2-2 ◽  
Author(s):  
Premal H. Thaker ◽  
William Hampton Bradley ◽  
Charles A. Leath ◽  
Camille Catherine Gunderson ◽  
Nicholas Borys ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Peritoneal Cancer ◽  
Interval Debulking Surgery ◽  
Objective Clinical Response ◽  
Dose Levels ◽  
Dose Limiting Toxicity ◽  
Ongoing Phase

2 Background: This study evaluated weekly intraperitoneal (IP) GEN-1, an IL-12 plasmid formulated with polyethyleneglycol-polyethyleneimine-cholesterol lipopolymer, with intravenous (IV) weekly taxane (T) and carboplatinum (C) every 3 weeks in epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube or primary peritoneal cancer (EOC) patients undergoing neoadjuvant therapy (NAC). The primary objective was to evaluate the tolerability and safety of GEN-1 with NAC. Secondary objectives included objective clinical response and pathological response at interval debulking surgery (IDS). Methods: Newly diagnosed EOC patients with no prior therapies were eligible. The trial utilized a 3+3 design with dose escalation in ~30% increments at GEN-1 IP dose levels of 36 mg/m2, 47 mg/m2, 61 mg/m2, and 79 mg/m2 weekly for 8 treatments with concurrent IV T/C. Dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was based on the first 4 doses of GEN-1 administered. Results: 18 patients were enrolled into the study and 12 of those patients received all 8 treatments with no DLTs. 14 patients underwent IDS. Most common related toxicities were Gr 1 nausea, abdominal pain and fatigue. One patient experienced Gr 2 fevers associated with GEN-1 but responded to acetaminophen and fluids. Conclusions: Adding GEN-1 to T/C is safe and appears to be active in EOC patients receiving NAC. Dose limiting toxicity was not reached and further dose escalation and safety and activity is being evaluated in an ongoing phase I/II study. Clinical trial information: NCT02480374. [Table: see text]

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document